All Forums | NFL Betting

Say it aint so!! People are betting on Peyton and the Colts AGAIN in week 16......

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 13440
Posts: 111
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2009
Posts: 77
Posted: #76
GL Train 
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2006
Posts: 5587
Posted: #77
Quote Originally Posted by heeeeeh:

How is -3 giving away cash? This line implies that the Colts would be -9 at home, and even I as a colts fan would have to side with +9 with the Raiders. This line should be PK or +1 for Colts.


  The line of -3 does not imply that it would be -9 if it were in Indy. 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2010
Posts: 2524
Posted: #78

SO now again two weeks in a ROW THE COLTS WON AND COVERED 

all kinds of excuses last time THE jags should have covered last time they should of won the game they should of done this !

GIVE IT UP ! COLT hater or Manning hater ?

A Total Blowout 31 - 19 grabage time TD  31 - 26  manning runs the clock down and takes a knee shoving your pick in your face !

Raiders + 3 LMAO 

 

 

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2007
Posts: 3648
Posted: #79
Never understood why people try confusing themselves
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2010
Posts: 56
Posted: #80
Train was on the money on this one I realize it didnt work out but it was the correct play. Vgeas wanted you squares to take indianapolis and you did and this time you won. but in the long run you suck.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2010
Posts: 56
Posted: #81
Vegas rules and you guys will learn next week when you loose your asses
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2010
Posts: 2524
Posted: #82

Quote Originally Posted by LasVegas_Boss:

Train was on the money on this one I realize it didnt work out but it was the correct play. Vgeas wanted you squares to take indianapolis and you did and this time you won. but in the long run you suck.

ON THE MONEY THEY GOT slaugthered ?

Last week also the Jags got ears handed to them TWO LOSSES IN a ROW from this TRAIN WRECK because he is hell bent against ONE team !

and YOU aint NO Las Vegas boss either !

because NO vegas boss has any time to play in a kiddie forum

STOP with THE Vegas wants YOU to DO this and BET this team

VEGas dosent want YOU to DO anything !

THEY set the lines according to what they think public perception will be and boy all they do is pray they dont get hammered

as IN packers - 3 point vs Giants what a JOKE  that spread was

i guess Vegas wanted us to Take Packers  HUH?

Train wrecked again smashed going downhill with no brakes into a Brick wall

 

probably didnt even bet the game just tells others to take radiers hoping to drive line down and  then he goes and BETS other side !

 

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2007
Posts: 3648
Posted: #83
Quote Originally Posted by LasVegas_Boss:

Train was on the money on this one I realize it didnt work out but it was the correct play. Vgeas wanted you squares to take indianapolis and you did and this time you won. but in the long run you suck.


  Another idiot who thinks he is 'sharp'
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2002
Posts: 54497
Posted: #84
Quote Originally Posted by dawniewags:

SO now again two weeks in a ROW THE COLTS WON AND COVERED 

all kinds of excuses last time THE jags should have covered last time they should of won the game they should of done this !

GIVE IT UP ! COLT hater or Manning hater ?

A Total Blowout 31 - 19 grabage time TD  31 - 26  manning runs the clock down and takes a knee shoving your pick in your face !

Raiders + 3 LMAO 

 

 







Haters
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 177
Posted: #85

Quote Originally Posted by LasVegas_Boss:

Train was on the money on this one I realize it didnt work out but it was the correct play. Vgeas wanted you squares to take indianapolis and you did and this time you won. but in the long run you suck.

So you are asuming that because I bet the Colts THIS WEEK, that I've now bet on them all 16 weeks of the season, and will be on them again next week? That's a little silly don't you think? How old are you, you simpleton? Maybe it just makes you feel better to believe this? 

There are professional gamblers (is this what you mean by sharps?) who bet both sides of just about avery game each week. Do you really think there were no professional gamblers betting on the Colts? That's even more silly.

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 177
Posted: #86

Quote Originally Posted by CrazyFrenchman:



  Another idiot who thinks he is 'sharp'

Well with a name like LasVegas_Boss he has to be "sharp", right. Either that or he is one of the legions of grown men here acting on the logic of 12 year old girls.

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2010
Posts: 56
Posted: #87
Quote Originally Posted by dawniewags:

ON THE MONEY THEY GOT slaugthered ?

Last week also the Jags got ears handed to them TWO LOSSES IN a ROW from this TRAIN WRECK because he is hell bent against ONE team !

and YOU aint NO Las Vegas boss either !

because NO vegas boss has any time to play in a kiddie forum

STOP with THE Vegas wants YOU to DO this and BET this team

VEGas dosent want YOU to DO anything !

THEY set the lines according to what they think public perception will be and boy all they do is pray they dont get hammered

as IN packers - 3 point vs Giants what a JOKE  that spread was

i guess Vegas wanted us to Take Packers  HUH?

Train wrecked again smashed going downhill with no brakes into a Brick wall

 

 

 

Another loser from kiddie college taking the colts and losing big then winning a $5 bet and bragging lololol. I buy and sell losers like you. Vegas rules the roost and we win BIG. Just like tonight you squares all took FIU and now vegas gets to go "F U" to you losers. Train wil win most of the time cuz he knows what's what and you keep banging up against a wall. Sorry about your damn luck.

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2010
Posts: 88
Posted: #88

Don't be sorry, it was good luck, we won with Indy... sorry for your luck though. So Vegas said "F U" to us "losers"? I was unaware cities could talk, and btw we won<-- so we are winnersor just as individuals we would be called a winner, not losers, your incorrect. Losers would be a group of people that bet on Oakland. Kind of funny how you unsult yourself though.

Sidenote : I want Vegas to hate my guts.

All in all thanks! I guess?

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2010
Posts: 88
Posted: #89
Sorry for the typos, I was laughing as I typed. I am sure most of us are smart enough to figure out the coded english message above. I said most. I am sure we all know who won't understand it.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2009
Posts: 439
Posted: #90
I still think Oakland was a solid play.  They were up 7-0 and were within striking distance most of the game.  They were one onside kick recovery away from turning a lot of peoples' world upside down.



***I came here to eat my words as I was a staunch supporter of the Raider play.  (Luckily nobody cares )
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2010
Posts: 1857
Posted: #91
Square, circular or triangular, Colts were the play with Manning in a must-win situation. Of course, if you hate the Colts, if you hate Manning, you can talk yourself into believing anything. Like Vegas cares one way or another how one person bets a game. Vegas does not control the outcome of football games! Give me a break!

CMON MAN!
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2004
Posts: 50586
Posted: #92

Quote Originally Posted by RP333:

Square, circular or triangular, Colts were the play with Manning in a must-win situation.

 

 

No, they weren't.  The Raiders were the play, but the Colts got it done, and Colts backers should be thanking Joseph Addai more than Peyton Manning.

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 122
Posted: #93

Colts roll in the final week with a blowout against the Titans!!!        

-9.5

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2002
Posts: 9392
Posted: #94

Oak was a solid play.  Home teams with above average D, good Running game are always good dog plays.  That is a good situational bet.  Oak has a solid Pass D, and is lousy against the Run.  Indy has a solid Pass attack and weak Run Game.  Good matchups = good situational bet.

Betting a team because "They are in a must-win situation" is not a good situational bet.  That is called a retard, public, square bet. 

Why didn't he win those other 6 games?  Why didnt he cover the 6 games ATS?  Was he not in a must win situation those weeks?

Every game is a "must win" in the NFL.

 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2004
Posts: 50586
Posted: #95
Quote Originally Posted by dyamarik:

Oak was a solid play.  Home teams with above average D, good Running game are always good dog plays.  That is a good situational bet. 

 

 

Not to mention Oakland was a winning home team (5-2 record) getting points in their final home game against a visiting team with a losing road record.  I still can't believe the Colts got away with another one.  Their 8-6-1 ATS record this season is some kind of miracle.

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2009
Posts: 889
Posted: #96
Quote Originally Posted by MrBator:

 

 

Not to mention Oakland was a winning home team (5-2 record) getting points in their final home game against a visiting team with a losing road record.  I still can't believe the Colts got away with another one.  Their 8-6-1 ATS record this season is some kind of miracle.





yet another moronic post from you....when you have a guy like manning, there's always a chance to make cash...wake up
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2010
Posts: 2524
Posted: #97
Quote Originally Posted by LasVegas_Boss:

 

Another loser from kiddie college taking the colts and losing big then winning a $5 bet and bragging lololol. I buy and sell losers like you. Vegas rules the roost and we win BIG. Just like tonight you squares all took FIU and now vegas gets to go "F U" to you losers. Train wil win most of the time cuz he knows what's what and you keep banging up against a wall. Sorry about your damn luck.

YOU own losers like me huh ?

YOU aint no vegas boss 1st off and if your a local WE want YOUR Money all your fucking money !

 

all i know is  i went 7 - 4  which is damn good

64 %

Steelers  - 14 .5   10 units  1

CARDINALS + 7.5  10 units 2

LIONS 10 UNITS3

REDSKINS +7 points at jaguars 10 UNITS 4

Packers - 3  40 units doubled up 5-6

BENGALS  +8 points 10 units ! 7

49ers +2.5 -25  UNITS

TITANS +5 @ chiefs  -15 UNITS

BROWNIES tho only - 3 UNITS 

RAIDERS +3  points  - 10Units

won 90 units  lost 53 units 

PLUS  46 UNITS

pasted from MNF thread

i'm leaning Saints for +120  10 units

 

 thee most important two games of thier season is this one and final game vs Tampa

8 wins and 4 losses  on sides

won two 4 teamer teasers  lost one  2-1 on exotic bets

 

EAT THAT VEGAS BOOS fantasy  name all you jackoffs  with Vegas names in these kidde forums are the biggest losers in the world !

 

I think YOU are same person as Train is by coming in his threads and patting him on the back every time he posts LOSERS !

 

 VEGAS BOSS

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2007
Posts: 4992
Posted: #98
   The Raiders also knew they were out of the playoffs before they stepped on the field. The Colts needed to win, and they won. Janikowski had to kick a couple of bombs to even keep this one close. Either way, this game should not have been a top play for anyone, because arguing for either side had merit.
   People are just mad the fade Peyton Manning theory went 6-8-1 this season. Yes, the Colts are always overvalued because they have Manning, but the bottom line is they won against the spread this season.  Get over it and move on...
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 146
Posted: #99
just lookin over this now, and I was on the colts and got paid nice for it. I read one post that said it best- Peyton and Indy vs Oakland, and The Colts are out if they lose, how can you not take the COlts? Stop overthinking shit man, sometimes you can follow those trends,  (NO +2 last night), but you will always need talent on your team to make it work. Oakland was overmatched, pure and simple. And all of your line watching and genius Vegas insight means nothing when it is Peyton vs Oak with a spread of -1. Cmon man, you guys just like to be different than the perceived "public" and "squares",  and probably dont even have money on the game, just on here talking shit. So just shut the fuck up, thank you and have a great day
 
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2010
Posts: 20468
Posted: #100
Quote Originally Posted by LosAngelesKing:





yet another moronic post from you....when you have a guy like manning, there's always a chance to make cash...wake up



A rookie calling out MrBator?  When will these people ever learn? 
All Forums | NFL Betting
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.