All Forums | NFL Betting

Say it aint so!! People are betting on Peyton and the Colts AGAIN in week 16......

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 13440
Posts: 111
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 146
Posted: #101
and i wasnt speaking to the owner of this thread, more to the other idiots that chimed in along the way with no real thought process-
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2004
Posts: 50586
Posted: #102

Quote Originally Posted by LosAngelesKing:





yet another moronic post from you....when you have a guy like manning, there's always a chance to make cash...wake up

 

 

LosAngelesKing, are you in a foul mood every day of your life or are you just still mad that I spoke poorly of your lousy Lakers?  Every time I see you post - no matter towards whom - you're in a super bitchy frame of mind.  You seem like a real a-hole. 

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2007
Posts: 1446
Posted: #103
KC just went through two blow out wins so I am fading them on this coming up game against the Oakland Raiders.


 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2004
Posts: 50586
Posted: #104

Quote Originally Posted by angrypirate129:

just lookin over this now, and I was on the colts and got paid nice for it. I read one post that said it best- Peyton and Indy vs Oakland, and The Colts are out if they lose, how can you not take the COlts? Stop overthinking shit man, sometimes you can follow those trends,  (NO +2 last night), but you will always need talent on your team to make it work. Oakland was overmatched, pure and simple. And all of your line watching and genius Vegas insight means nothing when it is Peyton vs Oak with a spread of -1. Cmon man, you guys just like to be different than the perceived "public" and "squares",  and probably dont even have money on the game, just on here talking shit. So just shut the fuck up, thank you and have a great day

 

 

This post is a classic example of a gambling simpleton talking shit after a lucky win.  Not impressive, matey.

 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2007
Posts: 13407
Posted: #105
Quote Originally Posted by MrBator:

 

 

This post is a classic example of a gambling simpleton talking shit after a lucky win.  Not impressive, matey.




We know this, Mr. B... I've never understood why you waste your time arguing with these clowns.
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2004
Posts: 38704
Posted: #106

Classic covers thread. 

For the record, I was on the Raiders. 

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 146
Posted: #107
Would rather be lucky than good all day brother, and not a simpleton or clown at all. I know I cant match some of the higher intellects around here, but I do ok. But other people read stuff from the supposed "sharps" and take it as gospel, when we are all doing the same thing- gambling. And sometimes you end up outsmarting yourself. And numbers of posts to covers does not equal intelligence either my friend.

and waasnt a lucky win either- was in the bag early, and the score would have been larger too if Peyton had kept running at the end. Was a good pick. Recent history tells you the Colts win that game-, hating Peyton Manning and over analyzing tells you that Oakland hits
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2004
Posts: 50586
Posted: #108

Quote Originally Posted by angrypirate129:

Would rather be lucky than good all day brother, and not a simpleton or clown at all. I know I cant match some of the higher intellects around here, but I do ok. But other people read stuff from the supposed "sharps" and take it as gospel, when we are all doing the same thing- gambling. And sometimes you end up outsmarting yourself. And numbers of posts to covers does not equal intelligence either my friend.

and waasnt a lucky win either- was in the bag early, and the score would have been larger too if Peyton had kept running at the end. Was a good pick. Recent history tells you the Colts win that game-, hating Peyton Manning and over analyzing tells you that Oakland hits

 

 

Fair enough, angrypirate129, although number of posts means very little to me.

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 146
Posted: #109
yessir, and sorry to fly off the handle, it happens to me sometimes readin through here, and right back at you brother, good luck with  all your plays


 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2002
Posts: 54497
Posted: #110

I still dont see why people think this has anything to do with hating Manning. He is a top 5 all time qb. I think his commercials are funny. He doesnt stab people,get dwis, shoot himslef in the leg or kill dogs.

I like Peyton Manning. However, you cant bet with you heart. Raiders where a home dog in the NFL. Thats not the worst bet you can make. Sure it lost, no big deal. They'lll have more games next week 

 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2010
Posts: 1857
Posted: #111
If you really follow football and know football, then you had to take Manning and the Colts here. Did anyone really, honestly think they would lose to a very mediocre team when all the marbles were on the line.
Call me square, bash me all you want, it really doesn't matter. Sometimes you need to forget all the trends and handicapping BS and just bet based on your knowledge.
Your going to bet on Oakland just because they're a home dog and history dictates thats "the play."
Cmon man!
All Forums | NFL Betting
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.