The NFL creates storylines out of match-ups. They don't create match-ups out of storylines. Right off the top of my head, a Niners Chiefs rematch is a better storyline than "two black QBs." Any storyline involving a rookie, former Mr. irrelevant, 3rd strong QB taking over and going undefeated to the Super Bowl is a great story. The Kelce story is fine as a side piece but doesn't have legs. The black QB story would probably be used but only for lack of other stories. KC and SF makes for good stories but I think it will be Cinco and Philly.
TIME TO BRING BACK THE OBAMA CAGES!
1
The NFL creates storylines out of match-ups. They don't create match-ups out of storylines. Right off the top of my head, a Niners Chiefs rematch is a better storyline than "two black QBs." Any storyline involving a rookie, former Mr. irrelevant, 3rd strong QB taking over and going undefeated to the Super Bowl is a great story. The Kelce story is fine as a side piece but doesn't have legs. The black QB story would probably be used but only for lack of other stories. KC and SF makes for good stories but I think it will be Cinco and Philly.
Also, you can sell any story with Jalen Hurts given the path of his college career. It makes a great "pick yourself up" story. And they can still do some black QB stuff if they choose.
TIME TO BRING BACK THE OBAMA CAGES!
0
Also, you can sell any story with Jalen Hurts given the path of his college career. It makes a great "pick yourself up" story. And they can still do some black QB stuff if they choose.
The NFL creates storylines out of match-ups. They don't create match-ups out of storylines. Right off the top of my head, a Niners Chiefs rematch is a better storyline than "two black QBs." Any storyline involving a rookie, former Mr. irrelevant, 3rd strong QB taking over and going undefeated to the Super Bowl is a great story. The Kelce story is fine as a side piece but doesn't have legs. The black QB story would probably be used but only for lack of other stories. KC and SF makes for good stories but I think it will be Cinco and Philly.
Bingo. It's quite an easy concept to understand.
And I will say this. All the guys who are handicapping football on "storylines" have all ready lost before kickoff.
You handicap the game on the field. 11 vs 11. Essentially 44 players, plus special teams, kickers and punters, coaches, venue, weather, schemes, injuries etc...
There's a whole lot of ingredients that go into the handicapping buffet, but a storyline ain't one of them. Leave that for the reporters and media. Watch their pieces if you like, or don't.
1
Quote Originally Posted by StumpTownStu:
The NFL creates storylines out of match-ups. They don't create match-ups out of storylines. Right off the top of my head, a Niners Chiefs rematch is a better storyline than "two black QBs." Any storyline involving a rookie, former Mr. irrelevant, 3rd strong QB taking over and going undefeated to the Super Bowl is a great story. The Kelce story is fine as a side piece but doesn't have legs. The black QB story would probably be used but only for lack of other stories. KC and SF makes for good stories but I think it will be Cinco and Philly.
Bingo. It's quite an easy concept to understand.
And I will say this. All the guys who are handicapping football on "storylines" have all ready lost before kickoff.
You handicap the game on the field. 11 vs 11. Essentially 44 players, plus special teams, kickers and punters, coaches, venue, weather, schemes, injuries etc...
There's a whole lot of ingredients that go into the handicapping buffet, but a storyline ain't one of them. Leave that for the reporters and media. Watch their pieces if you like, or don't.
Quote Originally Posted by StumpTownStu: The NFL creates storylines out of match-ups. They don't create match-ups out of storylines. Right off the top of my head, a Niners Chiefs rematch is a better storyline than "two black QBs." Any storyline involving a rookie, former Mr. irrelevant, 3rd strong QB taking over and going undefeated to the Super Bowl is a great story. The Kelce story is fine as a side piece but doesn't have legs. The black QB story would probably be used but only for lack of other stories. KC and SF makes for good stories but I think it will be Cinco and Philly. Bingo. It's quite an easy concept to understand. And I will say this. All the guys who are handicapping football on "storylines" have all ready lost before kickoff. You handicap the game on the field. 11 vs 11. Essentially 44 players, plus special teams, kickers and punters, coaches, venue, weather, schemes, injuries etc... There's a whole lot of ingredients that go into the handicapping buffet, but a storyline ain't one of them. Leave that for the reporters and media. Watch their pieces if you like, or don't.
.... and unfortunately , Zebras too lol
0
Quote Originally Posted by undermysac:
Quote Originally Posted by StumpTownStu: The NFL creates storylines out of match-ups. They don't create match-ups out of storylines. Right off the top of my head, a Niners Chiefs rematch is a better storyline than "two black QBs." Any storyline involving a rookie, former Mr. irrelevant, 3rd strong QB taking over and going undefeated to the Super Bowl is a great story. The Kelce story is fine as a side piece but doesn't have legs. The black QB story would probably be used but only for lack of other stories. KC and SF makes for good stories but I think it will be Cinco and Philly. Bingo. It's quite an easy concept to understand. And I will say this. All the guys who are handicapping football on "storylines" have all ready lost before kickoff. You handicap the game on the field. 11 vs 11. Essentially 44 players, plus special teams, kickers and punters, coaches, venue, weather, schemes, injuries etc... There's a whole lot of ingredients that go into the handicapping buffet, but a storyline ain't one of them. Leave that for the reporters and media. Watch their pieces if you like, or don't.
@MistaMiz316 aka Mr. 50% Who said that? You are saying the NFL wants a "storyline" for the Super Bowl correct? I am asking then why didn't Buffalo win with what would be an amazing story line? Of course you chose to deflect and not answer that. You response was as expected. No answer to the question you were asked. You're not too bright are you Mr. 50%?
They don't want to focus on Damar's health situation. I thought you would be smart enough to figure that out. People like you actually believed the NFL wanted that to be the storyline for the Super Bowl.
1
Quote Originally Posted by wmi799:
@MistaMiz316 aka Mr. 50% Who said that? You are saying the NFL wants a "storyline" for the Super Bowl correct? I am asking then why didn't Buffalo win with what would be an amazing story line? Of course you chose to deflect and not answer that. You response was as expected. No answer to the question you were asked. You're not too bright are you Mr. 50%?
They don't want to focus on Damar's health situation. I thought you would be smart enough to figure that out. People like you actually believed the NFL wanted that to be the storyline for the Super Bowl.
@MistaMiz316 aka Mr. 50% You need to get off the drugs. YOU created this "story line" thread. Not me. YOU claimed Buffalo would win because of the Damar situation. Not me. More deflection from you. Now that you look stupid for saying it, you want to act like you never did Have you not noticed how many in this thread think you are an idiot? I don't cap games on story lines. YOU do
When did I ever claim that Buffalo would win because of the Damar situation? Furthermore, when did I even bring up the Buffalo Bills in this thread? That was you.
You're obviously upset because you didn't do well last night. Here's an NBA pick for you tonight:
Orlando Magic: (+8)
Lastly, sometimes the storylines matter more than the stats.
0
Quote Originally Posted by wmi799:
@MistaMiz316 aka Mr. 50% You need to get off the drugs. YOU created this "story line" thread. Not me. YOU claimed Buffalo would win because of the Damar situation. Not me. More deflection from you. Now that you look stupid for saying it, you want to act like you never did Have you not noticed how many in this thread think you are an idiot? I don't cap games on story lines. YOU do
When did I ever claim that Buffalo would win because of the Damar situation? Furthermore, when did I even bring up the Buffalo Bills in this thread? That was you.
You're obviously upset because you didn't do well last night. Here's an NBA pick for you tonight:
Orlando Magic: (+8)
Lastly, sometimes the storylines matter more than the stats.
I never EVER brought up if I won a bet, or if you won a bet ( or lost a bet) None of this has anything to do with wins or losses. Why are you going there? Deflection. That is why. IF I LOSE and it happens more than I want, I'd never EVER be pissed. It's gambling dumb ass. Losses happen. You should know since you hit under 50%
"Story lines matter" That is the point dumb ass. YOU claimed Bill's would win on "story lines"
No wonder you are jealous of Badlands.
BTW - Magic pick does look good.
Histrionic personality disorder. It's sad
0
@MistaMiz316 aka Mr. 50%
More deflection.
Get off the drugs
I never EVER brought up if I won a bet, or if you won a bet ( or lost a bet) None of this has anything to do with wins or losses. Why are you going there? Deflection. That is why. IF I LOSE and it happens more than I want, I'd never EVER be pissed. It's gambling dumb ass. Losses happen. You should know since you hit under 50%
"Story lines matter" That is the point dumb ass. YOU claimed Bill's would win on "story lines"
@MistaMiz316 aka Mr. 50% More deflection. Get off the drugs I never EVER brought up if I won a bet, or if you won a bet ( or lost a bet) None of this has anything to do with wins or losses. Why are you going there? Deflection. That is why. IF I LOSE and it happens more than I want, I'd never EVER be pissed. It's gambling dumb ass. Losses happen. You should know since you hit under 50% "Story lines matter" That is the point dumb ass. YOU claimed Bill's would win on "story lines" No wonder you are jealous of Badlands. BTW - Magic pick does look good.
I brought up "storylines." I did NOT bring up the Bills. You assumed that because I brought up storylines. You're not the only fan who thought about this. But many fans should've thought carefully and asked, "Does the NFL really want Damar's health to be a major focal point during the Super Bowl?"
You can do all the research you want, but sometimes the storyline will bear out in the end. Look back to the 2016 NBA Finals. Research would've shown a Warriors victory, right? What happened? The storyline happened.
Jealous of the Badlands. LMAO. That says enough about you. Go support your buddy in his threads and enjoy his party-line picks.
0
Quote Originally Posted by wmi799:
@MistaMiz316 aka Mr. 50% More deflection. Get off the drugs I never EVER brought up if I won a bet, or if you won a bet ( or lost a bet) None of this has anything to do with wins or losses. Why are you going there? Deflection. That is why. IF I LOSE and it happens more than I want, I'd never EVER be pissed. It's gambling dumb ass. Losses happen. You should know since you hit under 50% "Story lines matter" That is the point dumb ass. YOU claimed Bill's would win on "story lines" No wonder you are jealous of Badlands. BTW - Magic pick does look good.
I brought up "storylines." I did NOT bring up the Bills. You assumed that because I brought up storylines. You're not the only fan who thought about this. But many fans should've thought carefully and asked, "Does the NFL really want Damar's health to be a major focal point during the Super Bowl?"
You can do all the research you want, but sometimes the storyline will bear out in the end. Look back to the 2016 NBA Finals. Research would've shown a Warriors victory, right? What happened? The storyline happened.
Jealous of the Badlands. LMAO. That says enough about you. Go support your buddy in his threads and enjoy his party-line picks.
@MistaMiz316 aka Mr. 50% Me calling you out on jealousy. Fact. You bring him up all the time in your threads. Fact . He hits way more than you ever have. All documented Keep betting "story lines" and maybe you will get over the 50% line and catch up with Badlands BOL. As I pointed out. EVERYONE in this thread thinks you are an idiot. Not just me. Later
Badlands, huh? Another poster here gave great research on yesterday's games. Unfortunately for him, your boy Badlands had the same picks. What happened?
Bills -6
Cowboys +4
I bring him up to alert others.
Later, imw799
0
Quote Originally Posted by wmi799:
@MistaMiz316 aka Mr. 50% Me calling you out on jealousy. Fact. You bring him up all the time in your threads. Fact . He hits way more than you ever have. All documented Keep betting "story lines" and maybe you will get over the 50% line and catch up with Badlands BOL. As I pointed out. EVERYONE in this thread thinks you are an idiot. Not just me. Later
Badlands, huh? Another poster here gave great research on yesterday's games. Unfortunately for him, your boy Badlands had the same picks. What happened?
The NFL is all about stories. Here's what they can tell: Andy Reid versus his former team is the obvious storyline, but there's another involving Reid. In 2013, when he took over in Kansas City, he did not retain Nick Sirianni as wide receivers coach. Sirianni is now the head coach in Philadelphia. The Kelce Brothers But here's the biggest story of them all: It will be the first Super Bowl with two black starting quarterbacks. AFC Championship: Chiefs -1NFC Championship: Eagles ML
0
Quote Originally Posted by MistaMiz316:
The NFL is all about stories. Here's what they can tell: Andy Reid versus his former team is the obvious storyline, but there's another involving Reid. In 2013, when he took over in Kansas City, he did not retain Nick Sirianni as wide receivers coach. Sirianni is now the head coach in Philadelphia. The Kelce Brothers But here's the biggest story of them all: It will be the first Super Bowl with two black starting quarterbacks. AFC Championship: Chiefs -1NFC Championship: Eagles ML
Quote Originally Posted by SiuLungBao: so whats the pick Super Bowl LVII: Chiefs vs EaglesMistamiz's Super Bowl pick: Chiefs ML +115 I'll have the write up ready on Tuesday in a new thread.
Thanks for sharing. I look forward to your write up.
0
Quote Originally Posted by MistaMiz316:
Quote Originally Posted by SiuLungBao: so whats the pick Super Bowl LVII: Chiefs vs EaglesMistamiz's Super Bowl pick: Chiefs ML +115 I'll have the write up ready on Tuesday in a new thread.
Thanks for sharing. I look forward to your write up.
If Joey B......Hunter B.......and Joey's Brother (All in THE BIDEN CRIME FAMILY) Can Fix shit and get away with it because of the Corrupt F.B.I. and the CORRUPT Department of UN-Justice, and the pathetic saying, "Nobody is above the Law! ?!?!?!?!?!?
THEN OF COURSE THE NFL (with Joey B's wife sitting with Roger G. in the Booth) CAN RIG THIS CRAP in the favor of what will generate higher viewer ratings .....
CHIEFS vs. EAGLES will get much higher "RATING$$$ Then Cincy / Philly
Joey B's wife Jill (Doctor Jill) Doctor of nothing was right there during the RIGGING !!! WHAT A COUNTRY !! OPEN ALL BORDERS, LET 'EM ALL IN JOEY !!!
This country is F---ucked !!! And going down the drain !!
0
If Joey B......Hunter B.......and Joey's Brother (All in THE BIDEN CRIME FAMILY) Can Fix shit and get away with it because of the Corrupt F.B.I. and the CORRUPT Department of UN-Justice, and the pathetic saying, "Nobody is above the Law! ?!?!?!?!?!?
THEN OF COURSE THE NFL (with Joey B's wife sitting with Roger G. in the Booth) CAN RIG THIS CRAP in the favor of what will generate higher viewer ratings .....
CHIEFS vs. EAGLES will get much higher "RATING$$$ Then Cincy / Philly
Joey B's wife Jill (Doctor Jill) Doctor of nothing was right there during the RIGGING !!! WHAT A COUNTRY !! OPEN ALL BORDERS, LET 'EM ALL IN JOEY !!!
This country is F---ucked !!! And going down the drain !!
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
That is the point dumb ass. YOU claimed Bill's would win on "story lines" 
Hot Forum Topics
