Suuma, any thoughts on GB/TEN OVER 50? Could see that being a high scorer. Might be a nice teaser with Seattle, too. O 43/Sea +15
Thank you for making me money every single week.
I think the Titans are going to pound the rock to keep Rodgers sidelined and the GB receivers don't expire confidence for a big game on the road. Don't see a high scoring game honestly.
BOL this week!
0
Quote Originally Posted by vywillreturn:
Suuma, any thoughts on GB/TEN OVER 50? Could see that being a high scorer. Might be a nice teaser with Seattle, too. O 43/Sea +15
Thank you for making me money every single week.
I think the Titans are going to pound the rock to keep Rodgers sidelined and the GB receivers don't expire confidence for a big game on the road. Don't see a high scoring game honestly.
I gotta know why. DAL is clicking on all cylinders right now. They're gonna turn the chemistry upside down Suuma. But JJ is itching to insert him. My guess: he's waiting as long as possible, so once they make the playoffs, he will yank Dak and cite Romo's experience. Agree ? oR DO YOU THINK HE'LL DO IT WITH THEIR NEXT LOSS?
I have had these discussions a lot this month with many Germans. Why would the chemistry go down when one of the best QBs in the game comes back? Romo is 16-5 over his last 21 starts with the team and was the Dez-catch away from the NFC Championship game. This is basically the same offense he worked with the last two years but now with a beast at running back. With Romo healthy, this offense would be unstoppable until they play the Eagles in week 17 or the Vikes in the playoffs.
Prescott brings hype around this franchise, maybe that's what JJ likes at the moment. But the better QB should play everytime.
0
Quote Originally Posted by DRIBBLE4LIFE:
I gotta know why. DAL is clicking on all cylinders right now. They're gonna turn the chemistry upside down Suuma. But JJ is itching to insert him. My guess: he's waiting as long as possible, so once they make the playoffs, he will yank Dak and cite Romo's experience. Agree ? oR DO YOU THINK HE'LL DO IT WITH THEIR NEXT LOSS?
I have had these discussions a lot this month with many Germans. Why would the chemistry go down when one of the best QBs in the game comes back? Romo is 16-5 over his last 21 starts with the team and was the Dez-catch away from the NFC Championship game. This is basically the same offense he worked with the last two years but now with a beast at running back. With Romo healthy, this offense would be unstoppable until they play the Eagles in week 17 or the Vikes in the playoffs.
Prescott brings hype around this franchise, maybe that's what JJ likes at the moment. But the better QB should play everytime.
Summa, I appreciate your valuable service for all the readers of your posts. I have this question I asked you in another person's thread, but you probably didn't read it.
Last week, you said when Pouncey, Albert, and James start and finish games together, Miami is 8-0 ATS, now 9-0 ATS. Do you think Miami has a chance to win ATS in San Diego this Sunday? Thank you for answering this somewhat square question.
I was leaning the Chargers originally, because of one simple reason: I couldn't see the Fins outscoring the Chargers at California. But now that the Chargers are missing both ILBs again along with Addae, I will stay away from the side and take the Over instead which I just locked in for 1.5u. I expect this game to fly over 55.
0
Quote Originally Posted by CoreyPaus:
Summa, I appreciate your valuable service for all the readers of your posts. I have this question I asked you in another person's thread, but you probably didn't read it.
Last week, you said when Pouncey, Albert, and James start and finish games together, Miami is 8-0 ATS, now 9-0 ATS. Do you think Miami has a chance to win ATS in San Diego this Sunday? Thank you for answering this somewhat square question.
I was leaning the Chargers originally, because of one simple reason: I couldn't see the Fins outscoring the Chargers at California. But now that the Chargers are missing both ILBs again along with Addae, I will stay away from the side and take the Over instead which I just locked in for 1.5u. I expect this game to fly over 55.
I think the Titans are going to pound the rock to keep Rodgers sidelined and the GB receivers don't expire confidence for a big game on the road. Don't see a high scoring game honestly.
BOL this week!
But wouldn't that be GB's strength... though Murray and Dixon are more than capable... Noticed you had the Saints as a play, but didn't see a write up.... would like to know your thoughts on that game and the San Diego game if possible... Does Brees or Rivers have an easier time...? Brees has his full compliment of receivers and Talib is out,,, while Rivers does not have his receivers, but an easier secondary matchup I would think. What say you...? Thanks for taking the time to do write ups and for sharing your insights on the games you like... I for one appreciate your thoughts and it's good to see a different perspective on the games...
0
Quote Originally Posted by suuma:
I think the Titans are going to pound the rock to keep Rodgers sidelined and the GB receivers don't expire confidence for a big game on the road. Don't see a high scoring game honestly.
BOL this week!
But wouldn't that be GB's strength... though Murray and Dixon are more than capable... Noticed you had the Saints as a play, but didn't see a write up.... would like to know your thoughts on that game and the San Diego game if possible... Does Brees or Rivers have an easier time...? Brees has his full compliment of receivers and Talib is out,,, while Rivers does not have his receivers, but an easier secondary matchup I would think. What say you...? Thanks for taking the time to do write ups and for sharing your insights on the games you like... I for one appreciate your thoughts and it's good to see a different perspective on the games...
But wouldn't that be GB's strength... though Murray and Dixon are more than capable... Noticed you had the Saints as a play, but didn't see a write up.... would like to know your thoughts on that game and the San Diego game if possible... Does Brees or Rivers have an easier time...? Brees has his full compliment of receivers and Talib is out,,, while Rivers does not have his receivers, but an easier secondary matchup I would think. What say you...? Thanks for taking the time to do write ups and for sharing your insights on the games you like... I for one appreciate your thoughts and it's good to see a different perspective on the games...
The Broncos have no interior rush, Von Miller will have his hands full with Zach Strief und Ware lost a step IMO. Saints offense should be able to score nearly at will whereas Siemian and his banged up shoulder don't expire confidence outscoring Brees in the dome. Saints should have an advantage in the trenches. Seeing a 31-21 type of game.
SD miss both ILBs and Addae which makes me think the Dolphins can put up enough points to make this game competitive but on the flip side their defense doesn't present a good matchup for Rivers and his offense. Henry and Gates will terrify the Fins. Game should really fly into the 50s.
0
Quote Originally Posted by nakadinhi:
But wouldn't that be GB's strength... though Murray and Dixon are more than capable... Noticed you had the Saints as a play, but didn't see a write up.... would like to know your thoughts on that game and the San Diego game if possible... Does Brees or Rivers have an easier time...? Brees has his full compliment of receivers and Talib is out,,, while Rivers does not have his receivers, but an easier secondary matchup I would think. What say you...? Thanks for taking the time to do write ups and for sharing your insights on the games you like... I for one appreciate your thoughts and it's good to see a different perspective on the games...
The Broncos have no interior rush, Von Miller will have his hands full with Zach Strief und Ware lost a step IMO. Saints offense should be able to score nearly at will whereas Siemian and his banged up shoulder don't expire confidence outscoring Brees in the dome. Saints should have an advantage in the trenches. Seeing a 31-21 type of game.
SD miss both ILBs and Addae which makes me think the Dolphins can put up enough points to make this game competitive but on the flip side their defense doesn't present a good matchup for Rivers and his offense. Henry and Gates will terrify the Fins. Game should really fly into the 50s.
You can go into Scals thread and read the important things. The Jets are falling apart personnel and team-wise. Rams D in full strength will make it a very long day for the Jets. It's time to start scouting, this team is terrible.
0
Jets:
You can go into Scals thread and read the important things. The Jets are falling apart personnel and team-wise. Rams D in full strength will make it a very long day for the Jets. It's time to start scouting, this team is terrible.
I like both. The playcalling of the Vikes was an improvement last week as Bradford threw most of his passes under 2.5 seconds. With a full week, they should work out a solid gameplan against a mediocre Skins defense.
It really helps that Desean Jackson is out this week, because I believe he is one of the best route runners in the league and he would have been a terrible matchup for a guy like Trae Waynes. Floyd and Joseph out hurts the Vikes every game and as soon as both come back, that defense is gonna be on a SB level again. I think their current personnel is enough to contain the run and make Kirk Cousins air it out. The Vikes are one of three teams that hasn't gotten up a TD to a TE. Opponents are 1/6 when targeting a TE in the Vikes red zone. All in all, I like the matchup for the Vikes.
Will have more thoughts on NYG on Monday. I don't think the Bengals should lay -4 on a neutral field, that's laughable. Locked in Giants pk +100
Last week you bet the Giants against the Eagles who are in a very similar spot to the Vikings this week, Yet no love for the Redskins this week? The Vikes are off an OT game, Facing an opponent coming off it's a bye, Surely there's an edge in this game for the Redskins? Unless you haven't really looked into the game much and therefore forgot that scenario, I was betting on you being on the Redskins this week.
0
Quote Originally Posted by suuma:
I like both. The playcalling of the Vikes was an improvement last week as Bradford threw most of his passes under 2.5 seconds. With a full week, they should work out a solid gameplan against a mediocre Skins defense.
It really helps that Desean Jackson is out this week, because I believe he is one of the best route runners in the league and he would have been a terrible matchup for a guy like Trae Waynes. Floyd and Joseph out hurts the Vikes every game and as soon as both come back, that defense is gonna be on a SB level again. I think their current personnel is enough to contain the run and make Kirk Cousins air it out. The Vikes are one of three teams that hasn't gotten up a TD to a TE. Opponents are 1/6 when targeting a TE in the Vikes red zone. All in all, I like the matchup for the Vikes.
Will have more thoughts on NYG on Monday. I don't think the Bengals should lay -4 on a neutral field, that's laughable. Locked in Giants pk +100
Last week you bet the Giants against the Eagles who are in a very similar spot to the Vikings this week, Yet no love for the Redskins this week? The Vikes are off an OT game, Facing an opponent coming off it's a bye, Surely there's an edge in this game for the Redskins? Unless you haven't really looked into the game much and therefore forgot that scenario, I was betting on you being on the Redskins this week.
Last week you bet the Giants against the Eagles who are in a very similar spot to the Vikings this week, Yet no love for the Redskins this week? The Vikes are off an OT game, Facing an opponent coming off it's a bye, Surely there's an edge in this game for the Redskins? Unless you haven't really looked into the game much and therefore forgot that scenario, I was betting on you being on the Redskins this week.
The spot favors Washington, the matchup favors Minnesota. I am just staying away.
0
Quote Originally Posted by SwishSwish1234:
Last week you bet the Giants against the Eagles who are in a very similar spot to the Vikings this week, Yet no love for the Redskins this week? The Vikes are off an OT game, Facing an opponent coming off it's a bye, Surely there's an edge in this game for the Redskins? Unless you haven't really looked into the game much and therefore forgot that scenario, I was betting on you being on the Redskins this week.
The spot favors Washington, the matchup favors Minnesota. I am just staying away.
The Broncos have no interior rush, Von Miller will have his hands full with Zach Strief und Ware lost a step IMO. Saints offense should be able to score nearly at will whereas Siemian and his banged up shoulder don't expire confidence outscoring Brees in the dome. Saints should have an advantage in the trenches. Seeing a 31-21 type of game.
SD miss both ILBs and Addae which makes me think the Dolphins can put up enough points to make this game competitive but on the flip side their defense doesn't present a good matchup for Rivers and his offense. Henry and Gates will terrify the Fins. Game should really fly into the 50s.
Thank you Suuma for the response,,, BOL today with your plays... will be on Phil and Pitt with you
0
Quote Originally Posted by suuma:
The Broncos have no interior rush, Von Miller will have his hands full with Zach Strief und Ware lost a step IMO. Saints offense should be able to score nearly at will whereas Siemian and his banged up shoulder don't expire confidence outscoring Brees in the dome. Saints should have an advantage in the trenches. Seeing a 31-21 type of game.
SD miss both ILBs and Addae which makes me think the Dolphins can put up enough points to make this game competitive but on the flip side their defense doesn't present a good matchup for Rivers and his offense. Henry and Gates will terrify the Fins. Game should really fly into the 50s.
Thank you Suuma for the response,,, BOL today with your plays... will be on Phil and Pitt with you
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.