All Forums | NFL Betting

That was a CATCH by Dez

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 13152
Posts: 149
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2014
Posts: 3178
Posted: #76
Quote Originally Posted by MrWhatsItToYa:

I'm not sure if it was a catch or not,its a judgement call,depending what you think a football move is,i thought the calvin johson play was a catch when I first saw it,but it leaves it up to the officials judgement unfortunately.But I do think they ball touched the ground.
That was supposed to read.But I do think the ball touched the ground
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2008
Posts: 3809
Posted: #77

KHARMA IS A girl; DETROIT CLEARLY SHOOULD HAVE BEEN TEAM PLAYING TODAY! Also by NFL Rulebook and precedence set in prior case THIS WAS NOT A CASE.
You can argue and argue but NFL rulebook made it an "easy"
reversal and that's all there is to it folks!

I hate the cowboys and Jerry Jones so I'm happier than a mo-fo!
Maybe Christie can blow Jerry to make him feel better!

 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2010
Posts: 26777
Posted: #78
Quote Originally Posted by DA_BOYS:


Pereira said it doesn't matter how many steps he took after Long says it looks like he took 3 steps. 

 

Think about what you just said though...What if Dez caught that ball at the 10 yard line, take 9 steps and then elbow hits the ground (with no clear evidence of ball hitting the ground mind you) ....you still think the amount of steps doesn't matter?

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2006
Posts: 311
Posted: #79
No need to watch late game the NFL will make sure the other golden boy(old man) Manning make it to next week.lol
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2008
Posts: 2713
Posted: #80
 What a dck    bye cow girls when they win the bet  I know your favorite team won LOL great recipe for losing money  7-1 now all posted .No one who bet the Cowboys waited till it was 5   everyone had it at 7   7.5   Or in teasers  maybe a few late comers at 6 .Most packer bettors took  the-6  -7very few at -5    This is a gambling site not a teenage girl crush forum  .How much u lose betting the Pats
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2009
Posts: 5673
Posted: #81
Quote Originally Posted by VegasVandal:

 

Think about what you just said though...What if Dez caught that ball at the 10 yard line, take 9 steps and then elbow hits the ground (with no clear evidence of ball hitting the ground mind you) ....you still think the amount of steps doesn't matter?


It's not what I said but what pereira said. I completely agree with you. I think the number of steps matter. I thought that the number of steps he took and the stretch for the line both were football moves. 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2009
Posts: 1627
Posted: #82
Quote Originally Posted by Syddigs:




So the fix is for the UNDER and NOT for GB winning the game?

Holy crap! Its week 2 of 2015 and you are already a guaranteed finalist for dumbest post of the year.



If dumbest post of the year consists of me stating exactly what happened for the game to stay Under and for me to hit Exactly 6 touchdowns then talk all the **** you want while I cash in. It was clearly a catch. Why so much controversy?? Are you that narrow minded
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2004
Posts: 25585
Posted: #83
Why argue over something you can't change?

Geez, it's NOT a catch by NFL rules, it's quite easy to understand

For fawks sake, stop arguing like children as if your opinion or interpretation matters, it doesn't & Green Bay moves on

.
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2014
Posts: 48376
Posted: #84
Quote Originally Posted by sevenout44:

No need to watch late game the NFL will make sure the other golden boy(old man) Manning make it to next week.lol

People will still watch for Indy to cover 9. 
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2007
Posts: 12527
Posted: #85
No Super Bow for Jerry  

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2009
Posts: 8153
Posted: #86
terrible play call on 4th n 2   get it 2 witten or Beasley underneath and continue the drive!!  There's always next year Cowgirl fans 
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2009
Posts: 8153
Posted: #87
Quote Originally Posted by undermysac:


People will still watch for Indy to cover 9. 
  don't b sooooo sure 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2011
Posts: 10
Posted: #88
This should not even be questionable and I even had GB ml and the under.

I have watched the reply 12 times in slow motion!!

He caught the ball and landed with both feet down on the 5 yard line

He he tucked the ball in with both hands

He took a step to the 3 yard line

He grabbed the ball with one hand took another step to the 2 yard line

He reached out with the ball in possession of his left hand

He came short of the goal line with the elbow down and his knee

Even if the hit the ground and moved, the ground can't cause a fumble.
Possession was very obvious way before the lunge. 

And if you were to call it a fumble he regained possession in the end zone.

Those who say it was not a catch need to quit, you are embarrassing yourselves. It was obviously a catch that resulted in a bad call, which caused the initial call (a catch) to be overturned (which is really confusing to me)
Without undisputed evidence in should not have been over turned.

It worked out great for my bet but Dallas got screwed!!

 IT WAS A 100% CATCH
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2013
Posts: 394
Posted: #89
more nit picking, frame by frame, millisecond review to ruin the game
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2008
Posts: 1004
Posted: #90
Quote Originally Posted by thorne2265:

This should not even be questionable and I even had GB ml and the under.

I have watched the reply 12 times in slow motion!!

He caught the ball and landed with both feet down on the 5 yard line

He he tucked the ball in with both hands

He took a step to the 3 yard line

He grabbed the ball with one hand took another step to the 2 yard line

He reached out with the ball in possession of his left hand

He came short of the goal line with the elbow down and his knee

Even if the hit the ground and moved, the ground can't cause a fumble.
Possession was very obvious way before the lunge. 

And if you were to call it a fumble he regained possession in the end zone.

Those who say it was not a catch need to quit, you are embarrassing yourselves. It was obviously a catch that resulted in a bad call, which caused the initial call (a catch) to be overturned (which is really confusing to me)
Without undisputed evidence in should not have been over turned.

It worked out great for my bet but Dallas got screwed!!

 IT WAS A 100% CATCH
Did you watch the Fox halftime where they quoted the NFL VP as stating it was the right call?  Just asking.
 
Covers Rehab
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 2278
Posted: #91
Quote Originally Posted by stevopa:

Did you watch the Fox halftime where they quoted the NFL VP as stating it was the right call?  Just asking.

So, they investigated themselves and decided they're not guilty?

You don't say.

Tell me more.
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2010
Posts: 26777
Posted: #92
Quote Originally Posted by tikitom:


So, they investigated themselves and decided they're not guilty?

You don't say.

Tell me more.

 

Yup the sheeple will follow as they are told

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2012
Posts: 1136
Posted: #93
Quote Originally Posted by mightiestmojo:


Now you know how Lions fans felt last week. 



But the difference is the Lions still had every opportunity to win the game they had the ball and could have went on 4th down. Still plenty of opportunities..This cost Dallas their season. their last chance...a little bit of a difference.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2008
Posts: 1004
Posted: #94
Quote Originally Posted by tikitom:


So, they investigated themselves and decided they're not guilty?

You don't say.

Tell me more.
NFL came out last week and said the blown PI call in the Dallas/Detroit was wrong and the flag should never have been picked up.  Seems like you are picking and choosing situations that fit your need.  What else you got?
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2008
Posts: 1004
Posted: #95
Ans suddenly all the voices go quiet.  When you try to make your candle brighter by extinguishing others you might want to take a good look at the things being said for any inconsistencies, and all around BS.  Thank you, come again!
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2013
Posts: 5266
Posted: #96
100% was a catch!
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2010
Posts: 226
Posted: #97
If he would've broke the goal line when he stretches and the ref calls a td, could they have then said that there was no "football move"???

Gimme a break.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2008
Posts: 1004
Posted: #98
Quote Originally Posted by Kraut:

If he would've broke the goal line when he stretches and the ref calls a td, could they have then said that there was no "football move"???

Gimme a break.
No, they couldn't.  The play would have been dead as soon as crossed the goal line and it would have been a TD based on a legitimate "football move".  The determination was that Bryant did not extend the ball in a significant manner to warrant a "football move".  What do you guys not understand about this?  You are talking about hypothetical situations that never occurred.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2006
Posts: 1268
Posted: #99
Quote Originally Posted by DA_BOYS:


I believe he did make a football move a-hole. He took two steps and dove for the end zone after securing the football. 


You my friend are a a-hole
 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2010
Posts: 226
Posted: #100
Quote Originally Posted by stevopa:

Quote Originally Posted by Kraut:

If he would've broke
the goal line when he stretches and the ref calls a td, could they have then said that there was no "football move"???Gimme a break.
No, they couldn't.  The play would have been dead as soon as crossed the goal line and it would have been a TD based on a legitimate "football move".  The determination was that Bryant did not extend the ball in a significant manner to warrant a "football move".  What do you guys not understand about this?  You are talking about hypothetical situations that never occurred.


So what you're saying is because he didn't cross the goal line then it is not a "legitimate" "football move"? Seriously dude??
All Forums | NFL Betting
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2025 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.