All Forums | NFL Betting

The Okland Riaders this season!

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 1647
Posts: 32
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2013
Posts: 165
Posted: #1
Anyone the Raiders have a chance at the playoffs this year.  I would say obviously a wild card at best with like a 10-6 record?  I was just looking at their roster and they do have decent receivers, a pretty solid secondary and mcfadden if he's healthy.  Their linebackers and d line could be dicy though.  Will Pryor start or Flynn?  Personally, I'd like to see Flynn start.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2013
Posts: 75
Posted: #2
i just bet them to win less than 5.5 games. They're going to be horrible
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2012
Posts: 2537
Posted: #3
Yep, under 5.5 is the play. This team is a walking/talking dumpster fire.
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2011
Posts: 6622
Posted: #4
10-6? lmao, they should be more than happy if they can go 6-10
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2006
Posts: 19693
Posted: #5
Secondary? Mike Huff cut, Mike Mitchell signed with the Panthers

McFadden? 12 games last year, 3.3 avg, always injured

Wideout Darius Hayward-Bey cut. 1st round pick, 1st wr selected!

And a new Qb starting.......................yeah. Get your playoff tickets now.
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2004
Posts: 13089
Posted: #6

Look at their schedule......They might win 5 games this year if their lucky. I'm a huge Raiders fan and I have to laugh when I see someone predicting them to be a 10-6 team with maybe a wildcard birth 

You learn more from losing than winning. You learn how to keep going.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2013
Posts: 165
Posted: #7
Quote Originally Posted by Kurylyk98:

Anyone the Raiders have a chance at the playoffs this year.  I would say obviously a wild card AT BEST with like a 10-6 record?  I was just looking at their roster and they do have decent receivers, a pretty solid secondary and mcfadden if he's healthy.  Their linebackers and d line could be dicy though.  Will Pryor start or Flynn?  Personally, I'd like to see Flynn start.


Where did I predict a 10-6 record?  It's not like SD or KC are that good.  If they could go 4-2 in the division they may  a shot.
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2011
Posts: 6622
Posted: #8
u did...
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2004
Posts: 13089
Posted: #9

Here is their schedule and what I think the result will probably be....

Week 1 at Indy....loss

Week 2 Jax....Decent shot at a win

Week 3 at Denver....loss

Week 4 Wash....loss

 SD.....slight chance of a win

at KC....50/50 shot at winning

Pitt.....loss

Philly....loss

at  Gmen....loss

at Houston....loss

Tenn....50/50 shot at winning

at Dallas....loss

at Jets.....50/50 shot at winning

KC see above

at SD see above

Den.....Last game of the year depends on how Denver is sitting...

I can't see them going any better than 5-11.....

You learn more from losing than winning. You learn how to keep going.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2012
Posts: 79
Posted: #10
K98 I feel sorry for you as you seem to be on your own so sure I'll go with 10 wins for the Raiders this season, and I'll stake an entire dollar on it!
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 16675
Posted: #11
10-6?  No.  Over 5.5 wins?  Yes.
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2006
Posts: 19693
Posted: #12
" I would say obviously a wild card at best with like a 10-6 record?"

Does this sound familiar? Think back. Way back. All the way to June 26th...........
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2013
Posts: 165
Posted: #13
Quote Originally Posted by The Hawk:

" I would say obviously a wild card at best with like a 10-6 record?"

Does this sound familiar? Think back. Way back. All the way to June 26th...........


I don't know why I even chat with people who didn't get their grade 8 even.  Notice the question mark at the end of that?  I would say at best?  Now to anyone even remotely intelligent that would probably indicate 10-6 at best?  Meaning could they could go 10-6?  If I were to say "I could see them going 10-6" that would be a statement rather a question.  Anyone on here not work at McDonald's or Burger King?
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2011
Posts: 6622
Posted: #14
No u didnt. U said "They could get a wild card AT BEST" and then after u said that u said "With a like 10-6 record".
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2011
Posts: 6622
Posted: #15
ure way out of ur mind
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2013
Posts: 165
Posted: #16
Quote Originally Posted by Asomugha:

No u didnt. U said "They could get a wild card AT BEST" and then after u said that u said "With a like 10-6 record".


No, you just reworded it.  My original said.....".  I would say obviously a wild card at best with like a 10-6 record?"

For all you minimum wage uneducated folks that would mean, I would 10-6  AT BEST with a 10-6 record?  Notice the question mark.  That would mean I'm asking, a 10-6 record?  As in could they get a 10-6 record cause that's I think the BEST case scenario is.  How you ever passed grade 5 English class is beyond me.  Or did you?
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2011
Posts: 6196
Posted: #17
Raiders suuuuuuck.

Afc is loaded this year, Raiders have less than 10% chance of making the playoffs.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2013
Posts: 165
Posted: #18
Quote Originally Posted by earthWake:

Raiders suuuuuuck.

Afc is loaded this year, Raiders have less than 10% chance of making the playoffs.


And there's probably a decent chance they don't make it.  Where I guaranteed a playoff berth is beyond me?  As anyone can notice, I asked what people thought about them this year and threw it out there as to whether they could go 10-6 and make a wild card?
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2011
Posts: 6622
Posted: #19
Quote Originally Posted by Kurylyk98:



No, you just reworded it.  My original said.....".  I would say obviously a wild card at best with like a 10-6 record?"

For all you minimum wage uneducated folks that would mean, I would 10-6  AT BEST with a 10-6 record?  Notice the question mark.  That would mean I'm asking, a 10-6 record?  As in could they get a 10-6 record cause that's I think the BEST case scenario is.  How you ever passed grade 5 English class is beyond me.  Or did you?

Why not ask with a 16-0 record? U are implying they could potentially go 10-6 with that post/statement/comment/question whatever u decide to call it, ok?
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2011
Posts: 6622
Posted: #20
Quote Originally Posted by Kurylyk98:



And there's probably a decent chance they don't make it.  Where I guaranteed a playoff berth is beyond me?  As anyone can notice, I asked what people thought about them this year and threw it out there as to whether they could go 10-6 and make a wild card?

youre out of ur mind if u think they could go 10-6
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2011
Posts: 6622
Posted: #21
and 10-6 would win the division. 
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2011
Posts: 6622
Posted: #22
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2013
Posts: 165
Posted: #23
Quote Originally Posted by Asomugha:

and 10-6 would win the division. 


  Ok, I'm not talking to you anymore lol.  The Denver Bronco's are the AFC West.  They have Peyton Manning!  Also, his arm is reported to have strengthened a lot since last season and they have Wes Welker now.  To think they don't go 11-5 or better is foolish.  I would say at least 12-4.
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2011
Posts: 6196
Posted: #24
Quote Originally Posted by Kurylyk98:



And there's probably a decent chance they don't make it.  Where I guaranteed a playoff berth is beyond me?  As anyone can notice, I asked what people thought about them this year and threw it out there as to whether they could go 10-6 and make a wild card?

I know that you didn't predict them to go 10-6, you were saying that was basically their ceiling.

With that being said, their ceiling is more along the lines of 8-8.

If the Raiders make the playoffs this year, I'll gladly post naked pictures of my girl, it WON'T happen 
 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2013
Posts: 165
Posted: #25
Quote Originally Posted by earthWake:


I know that you didn't predict them to go 10-6, you were saying that was basically their ceiling.

With that being said, their ceiling is more along the lines of 8-8.

If the Raiders make the playoffs this year, I'll gladly post naked pictures of my girl, it WON'T happen 




There, finally someone who can read.  I was posing the question could they could go 10-6 as the best case scenario?  To think the Broncos would go worse than 10-6 is just foolish.  I could see them being the best team in the NFL this year.  Is your girlfriend hot?  If she looks like Rosie O'Donnell then please don't post if Raiders make playoffs
All Forums | NFL Betting
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.