Math is wrong here.
1. 1696
2. 1800
Strike three, you're out.
BINGO
For me, this thread has been a study in just how many people who gamble have absolutely no idea what they are doing, and when presented with step by step proof of the folly, they deny it and make anecdotal claims like "I am up 34 units...." without ever thinking that if they didnt hedge they would be able to say "I am up 40 units..."
This moron is so proud he is up, but constantly fails to realize he would be up MORE if he didnt hedge. I cant scream it any louder.
And people wonder why the house always wins....
BINGO
For me, this thread has been a study in just how many people who gamble have absolutely no idea what they are doing, and when presented with step by step proof of the folly, they deny it and make anecdotal claims like "I am up 34 units...." without ever thinking that if they didnt hedge they would be able to say "I am up 40 units..."
This moron is so proud he is up, but constantly fails to realize he would be up MORE if he didnt hedge. I cant scream it any louder.
And people wonder why the house always wins....
Way to avoid this:
they deny it and make anecdotal claims like "I am up 34 units...." without ever thinking that if they didnt hedge they would be able to say "I am up 40 units..."
Way to avoid this:
they deny it and make anecdotal claims like "I am up 34 units...." without ever thinking that if they didnt hedge they would be able to say "I am up 40 units..."
C. The rest, would be at least 85% of all potential sports wagerers. They don't particularly care about the math of it, they just want to win. They will bet on anything and everything at any terrible price, just because they want to bet and they think they can win. They don't care to see that the odds are against them, and they can document their losses, and still think " this is my week", "i'm gonna make a run". They are constantly chasing their tail, and you can show them the math and the hole they dig themselves, and they will steal your shovel to get started. For them, to offset some losses, and get a guaranteed win, is rare, so they put a higher price tag on ANY win. Their financial state is constantly changing, which is why you can tell them that they're stealing from themselves and they tell you that they don't care.
Hedging
I guess it's closer to 95%. totalguy, i wonder if these guys read it put that way, and STILL disagree. I was scrolling down to try and use an analogy myself, but if someone were to read all the facts presented here, and still disagree, well then you're right, they shouldn't be gambling
C. The rest, would be at least 85% of all potential sports wagerers. They don't particularly care about the math of it, they just want to win. They will bet on anything and everything at any terrible price, just because they want to bet and they think they can win. They don't care to see that the odds are against them, and they can document their losses, and still think " this is my week", "i'm gonna make a run". They are constantly chasing their tail, and you can show them the math and the hole they dig themselves, and they will steal your shovel to get started. For them, to offset some losses, and get a guaranteed win, is rare, so they put a higher price tag on ANY win. Their financial state is constantly changing, which is why you can tell them that they're stealing from themselves and they tell you that they don't care.
Hedging
I guess it's closer to 95%. totalguy, i wonder if these guys read it put that way, and STILL disagree. I was scrolling down to try and use an analogy myself, but if someone were to read all the facts presented here, and still disagree, well then you're right, they shouldn't be gambling
Way to avoid this:
they deny it and make anecdotal claims like "I am up 34 units...." without ever thinking that if they didnt hedge they would be able to say "I am up 40 units..."
...or I would be able to say, "How come I've lost the last game of a parlay 1,209,566 times in a row? Why didn't that last team hit 50% like it was 'SUPPOSED' to do."
Way to avoid this:
they deny it and make anecdotal claims like "I am up 34 units...." without ever thinking that if they didnt hedge they would be able to say "I am up 40 units..."
...or I would be able to say, "How come I've lost the last game of a parlay 1,209,566 times in a row? Why didn't that last team hit 50% like it was 'SUPPOSED' to do."
Each hedging situation is different.Like I would definitly hedge if I HAD A MIDDLE AND COULD WIN BOTH BETS!Like -3 and +4.5.Then I would do it for sure.
Each hedging situation is different.Like I would definitly hedge if I HAD A MIDDLE AND COULD WIN BOTH BETS!Like -3 and +4.5.Then I would do it for sure.
Option 1: Bet a 4 team parlay at 10-1. Bet 100, win 1,000.
Option 2: Bet a 3 team parlay at 6-1, bet all proceeds straight up on Monday team. Bet 100, win 1,336.
Option 2 makes you MUCH more money (1,336 vs 1,000) on your 100 dollar bet. This is a no brainer.
Option 1: Bet a 4 team parlay at 10-1. Bet 100, win 1,000.
Option 2: Bet a 3 team parlay at 6-1, bet all proceeds straight up on Monday team. Bet 100, win 1,336.
Option 2 makes you MUCH more money (1,336 vs 1,000) on your 100 dollar bet. This is a no brainer.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.