Interesting situation on Cleveland’s final possession. 4th and 2 and Tomlin declined the 5 yard penalty. After he sees Cleveland line up to go for it, he calls the ref over and accepts the penalty.
First of all this should be completely illegal. Secondly, that decision could have lost him the game right there. If Cleveland goes for 4th and 2 and doesn’t get it, it’s likely game over. If they line up to kick it’s a 40+ yarder and 50/50 at best. Even if they kick and take a 2 point lead, Steelers still have plenty of time to go back down the field. Instead, 3rd and 7 and Cleveland ends up scoring the touchdown. Why in the world would you give the other team a 3rd down when they could be in 4th down? In that weather, two yards is a long way and the field goal is brutal (maybe even a bad snap).
Is it just me or was that the dumbest decision of the whole game?
2
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
First of all I had no wager on this game.
Interesting situation on Cleveland’s final possession. 4th and 2 and Tomlin declined the 5 yard penalty. After he sees Cleveland line up to go for it, he calls the ref over and accepts the penalty.
First of all this should be completely illegal. Secondly, that decision could have lost him the game right there. If Cleveland goes for 4th and 2 and doesn’t get it, it’s likely game over. If they line up to kick it’s a 40+ yarder and 50/50 at best. Even if they kick and take a 2 point lead, Steelers still have plenty of time to go back down the field. Instead, 3rd and 7 and Cleveland ends up scoring the touchdown. Why in the world would you give the other team a 3rd down when they could be in 4th down? In that weather, two yards is a long way and the field goal is brutal (maybe even a bad snap).
Is it just me or was that the dumbest decision of the whole game?
Definitely. Especially the way Winston plays, a 4th down play he might screw up, let him know he has 2 downs and he's looser and looks downfield. They weren't gonna try and run for 2 yards either even tho most teams would in the snow.
0
Definitely. Especially the way Winston plays, a 4th down play he might screw up, let him know he has 2 downs and he's looser and looks downfield. They weren't gonna try and run for 2 yards either even tho most teams would in the snow.
Definitely. Especially the way Winston plays, a 4th down play he might screw up, let him know he has 2 downs and he's looser and looks downfield. They weren't gonna try and run for 2 yards either even tho most teams would in the snow.
0
Quote Originally Posted by NutinButtLove:
Definitely. Especially the way Winston plays, a 4th down play he might screw up, let him know he has 2 downs and he's looser and looks downfield. They weren't gonna try and run for 2 yards either even tho most teams would in the snow.
Given the psychological dynamics, Team A is better off declining the penalty. Here’s why:
4th and 2 brings more immediate psychological pressure. Team B has to convert or lose. This all-or-nothing pressure can lead to mistakes, especially in difficult weather conditions.
Even though 3rd and 7 is a harder play, having a backup on 4th down relieves some of that pressure, making it easier for Team B to remain focused and execute their plays.
So, while the physical yardage (4th and 2 vs 3rd and 7) may seem like the deciding factor, the psychological pressure of a 4th down makes declining the penalty the better choice for Team A. The stress of a do-or-die 4th down could cause Team B to falter, whereas with two opportunities, they have a better chance of staying composed and executing.
4
Here is what chat GPT said about the decision:
Given the psychological dynamics, Team A is better off declining the penalty. Here’s why:
4th and 2 brings more immediate psychological pressure. Team B has to convert or lose. This all-or-nothing pressure can lead to mistakes, especially in difficult weather conditions.
Even though 3rd and 7 is a harder play, having a backup on 4th down relieves some of that pressure, making it easier for Team B to remain focused and execute their plays.
So, while the physical yardage (4th and 2 vs 3rd and 7) may seem like the deciding factor, the psychological pressure of a 4th down makes declining the penalty the better choice for Team A. The stress of a do-or-die 4th down could cause Team B to falter, whereas with two opportunities, they have a better chance of staying composed and executing.
Insanity that the officials let him change his mind. Imagine if this was to happen regularly throughout the season? How much more foolish this league would look.
2
@Killer_B
Insanity that the officials let him change his mind. Imagine if this was to happen regularly throughout the season? How much more foolish this league would look.
I'm still baffled at why this wasn't intentional grounding. Just because a lineman tries to catch it. Qb's should always throw it off lineman then instead of taking a sack.
0
I'm still baffled at why this wasn't intentional grounding. Just because a lineman tries to catch it. Qb's should always throw it off lineman then instead of taking a sack.
I'm still baffled at why this wasn't intentional grounding. Just because a lineman tries to catch it. Qb's should always throw it off lineman then instead of taking a sack.
I believe his arm got hit during the throwing motion which automatically eliminates the chance for intentional grounding penalties. That’s the way the announcers described it anyway.
0
Quote Originally Posted by DonkeyPunch6446:
I'm still baffled at why this wasn't intentional grounding. Just because a lineman tries to catch it. Qb's should always throw it off lineman then instead of taking a sack.
I believe his arm got hit during the throwing motion which automatically eliminates the chance for intentional grounding penalties. That’s the way the announcers described it anyway.
I'm still baffled at why this wasn't intentional grounding. Just because a lineman tries to catch it. Qb's should always throw it off lineman then instead of taking a sack.
They could have called either and they went with the lesser penalty to keep the game exciting. When in doubt, entertainment wins out. But Tomlin outthought himself. His defense had just gotten to Winston, and he was clearly rattled. Then with the 3rd down, knowing he has a 4th in his pocket if he needs it, he relaxes and delivers. And this to say nothing of how much more intensity Tomlin’s own defense would have brought on that 4th down. Huge tactical mistake.
2
Quote Originally Posted by DonkeyPunch6446:
I'm still baffled at why this wasn't intentional grounding. Just because a lineman tries to catch it. Qb's should always throw it off lineman then instead of taking a sack.
They could have called either and they went with the lesser penalty to keep the game exciting. When in doubt, entertainment wins out. But Tomlin outthought himself. His defense had just gotten to Winston, and he was clearly rattled. Then with the 3rd down, knowing he has a 4th in his pocket if he needs it, he relaxes and delivers. And this to say nothing of how much more intensity Tomlin’s own defense would have brought on that 4th down. Huge tactical mistake.
Quote Originally Posted by DonkeyPunch6446: I'm still baffled at why this wasn't intentional grounding. Just because a lineman tries to catch it. Qb's should always throw it off lineman then instead of taking a sack. I believe his arm got hit during the throwing motion which automatically eliminates the chance for intentional grounding penalties. That’s the way the announcers described it anyway.
FWIW, I am waiting for Herbstreit to bawl again on the air, for no good reason.
1
Quote Originally Posted by brn2loslive2win:
Quote Originally Posted by DonkeyPunch6446: I'm still baffled at why this wasn't intentional grounding. Just because a lineman tries to catch it. Qb's should always throw it off lineman then instead of taking a sack. I believe his arm got hit during the throwing motion which automatically eliminates the chance for intentional grounding penalties. That’s the way the announcers described it anyway.
FWIW, I am waiting for Herbstreit to bawl again on the air, for no good reason.
Quote Originally Posted by brn2loslive2win: @begginerboy You beat me to it. What a horrible decision. They had a chance to get a stop and end the game or kill clock and timeouts. Instead, well… its entirely possible Browns convert 4th and 2 as well. Score a TD.
We will never know but I bet Tomlin is regretting it. having watched sports for a thousand years I can assure you that giving a team two cracks at something instead of one is never a good idea, unless we are talking a ten yard penalty or something. Ironically enough, the Browns were 4 for 4 on 4th downs, but that is when they were playing fast and loose. The only 3rd down they converted in the game was that one.
1
Quote Originally Posted by ActionMagnet:
Quote Originally Posted by brn2loslive2win: @begginerboy You beat me to it. What a horrible decision. They had a chance to get a stop and end the game or kill clock and timeouts. Instead, well… its entirely possible Browns convert 4th and 2 as well. Score a TD.
We will never know but I bet Tomlin is regretting it. having watched sports for a thousand years I can assure you that giving a team two cracks at something instead of one is never a good idea, unless we are talking a ten yard penalty or something. Ironically enough, the Browns were 4 for 4 on 4th downs, but that is when they were playing fast and loose. The only 3rd down they converted in the game was that one.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.