LOL. Those fans must of though you were nuts. Especially if they were like me and recalled how the Vikings broke our hearts in the playoffs when Montana was benched for Young and Carter torched us. Was Craig still with the Niners then? I don't recall. I just remember that Young almost brought us back with that amazing run. Ah, the good old days. I think if mangenius tries all those exotic blitzes against Big Ben, the Niners will get torched. Good luck.
Yeah, it was definitely one of those, "WTF" moments. It was cool to see all of the 49ers hall of famers last night. Many more great Sundays to come at Levis and the Coliseum.
0
Quote Originally Posted by begginerboy:
LOL. Those fans must of though you were nuts. Especially if they were like me and recalled how the Vikings broke our hearts in the playoffs when Montana was benched for Young and Carter torched us. Was Craig still with the Niners then? I don't recall. I just remember that Young almost brought us back with that amazing run. Ah, the good old days. I think if mangenius tries all those exotic blitzes against Big Ben, the Niners will get torched. Good luck.
Yeah, it was definitely one of those, "WTF" moments. It was cool to see all of the 49ers hall of famers last night. Many more great Sundays to come at Levis and the Coliseum.
I don't post much but I always look at your picks to see if we are on the same page as well as a couple other guys that post on the forums. I know your a solid capper and so do alot on this site. I know you don't post for attention and nobody forces you to post, so I just wanted to say thank you your picks and don't listen to people who troll on this site. Always appreciate the insight and I know you will get this money back.
0
Quote Originally Posted by amd:
Ytd 1-6
Kansas City -3 -115
Seattle +4
Miami -6.5 -115
Tennessee -1
I don't post much but I always look at your picks to see if we are on the same page as well as a couple other guys that post on the forums. I know your a solid capper and so do alot on this site. I know you don't post for attention and nobody forces you to post, so I just wanted to say thank you your picks and don't listen to people who troll on this site. Always appreciate the insight and I know you will get this money back.
What edge does Denver have in this game that has you wagering on them? Denver defense Will keep them in every game this year, but I believe this is a really tough spot for them. The books certainly out on Manning and he took an absolute beating Sunday vs the ravens, I'm not sure I've ever seen him take as many hits flush as he did vs Baltimore and now he's facing an even better pass rush on the road in what will be a deafening arrowhead. They will press cover the receivers just like every other team has Denver for the last ten games And attempt to make Manning beat them over the top, I'm not sure he can anymore.
Having said that Denver defense is also no joke as they are very fast and I'm talib when healthy is as good as it gets. It should be an interesting game , though I believe kc has a much better o line and the advantage of playing at home, along with the threat of jamal Charles and Davis out of the backfield should slow down Denver pass rush alot more than what we saw when they teed off on flacco
I just went through the coaches film on NFL replay. If week one is an indication the Chiefs will have more problems moving the ball than Denver. Denver's "D" is so quick. Th Chiefs left side gave up a lot of yardage in the passing game. On the same token they had heavy pressure on the Texans QB's who sorely missed Arian Foster. If Denver"s "D" shows up again and Denver runs the ball well, the spread is on the wrong team.
0
Quote Originally Posted by degengambler34:
What edge does Denver have in this game that has you wagering on them? Denver defense Will keep them in every game this year, but I believe this is a really tough spot for them. The books certainly out on Manning and he took an absolute beating Sunday vs the ravens, I'm not sure I've ever seen him take as many hits flush as he did vs Baltimore and now he's facing an even better pass rush on the road in what will be a deafening arrowhead. They will press cover the receivers just like every other team has Denver for the last ten games And attempt to make Manning beat them over the top, I'm not sure he can anymore.
Having said that Denver defense is also no joke as they are very fast and I'm talib when healthy is as good as it gets. It should be an interesting game , though I believe kc has a much better o line and the advantage of playing at home, along with the threat of jamal Charles and Davis out of the backfield should slow down Denver pass rush alot more than what we saw when they teed off on flacco
I just went through the coaches film on NFL replay. If week one is an indication the Chiefs will have more problems moving the ball than Denver. Denver's "D" is so quick. Th Chiefs left side gave up a lot of yardage in the passing game. On the same token they had heavy pressure on the Texans QB's who sorely missed Arian Foster. If Denver"s "D" shows up again and Denver runs the ball well, the spread is on the wrong team.
What edge does Denver have in this game that has you wagering on them?
I think that Peyton Manning bounces back strong against a limping Chiefs team and the D gives him and his WR core multiple opportunities to exploit rookie CB Marcus Petersen. He's played and won many times in Arrow Head, so the noise wont be a factor.
I think the Chiefs looked good winning against a bad Houston team, and the Broncos looked bad winning against a good Balty team, so public perception is off hence the line jump from -1.5 DEN to -3 KC.
Against a 1st team defense Manning bumbled around and look lost in Kubiaks system...until the 4th quarter when he led an 80+ yd 10+min drive. It ended with a field goal, but I dot think the drought continues.
The Chiefs O-Line concerns were masked by the early HOU turnovers, they have an entirely new makeup from last season...at least DEN has some leadership returning from last year, and one of their new O-Linemen was a former chief (intel conspiracy on the D line). On top of that, I think Kubiak puts together a plan to force KC to go airborn, with an eager TJ Ward waiting to lay the boom down.
Just my 2 cents, I could be totally off. GL
0
Quote Originally Posted by amd:
What edge does Denver have in this game that has you wagering on them?
I think that Peyton Manning bounces back strong against a limping Chiefs team and the D gives him and his WR core multiple opportunities to exploit rookie CB Marcus Petersen. He's played and won many times in Arrow Head, so the noise wont be a factor.
I think the Chiefs looked good winning against a bad Houston team, and the Broncos looked bad winning against a good Balty team, so public perception is off hence the line jump from -1.5 DEN to -3 KC.
Against a 1st team defense Manning bumbled around and look lost in Kubiaks system...until the 4th quarter when he led an 80+ yd 10+min drive. It ended with a field goal, but I dot think the drought continues.
The Chiefs O-Line concerns were masked by the early HOU turnovers, they have an entirely new makeup from last season...at least DEN has some leadership returning from last year, and one of their new O-Linemen was a former chief (intel conspiracy on the D line). On top of that, I think Kubiak puts together a plan to force KC to go airborn, with an eager TJ Ward waiting to lay the boom down.
amd,if ya get a chance cud you give us a few words on seattle,please??...i get the feeling most of the forum will be on the packers perhaps and just fishing to see wat angle and strengths/weaknesses attracts bettors to each side....wud be most appreciated....oh,and try not to use too many big,fancy words.im pretty dumb with regards to gridiron.
you'll come back strong,there is zero doubt about that.
0
amd,if ya get a chance cud you give us a few words on seattle,please??...i get the feeling most of the forum will be on the packers perhaps and just fishing to see wat angle and strengths/weaknesses attracts bettors to each side....wud be most appreciated....oh,and try not to use too many big,fancy words.im pretty dumb with regards to gridiron.
you'll come back strong,there is zero doubt about that.
Seahawks are 5-11 ATS on the road vs. teams that average 24+ ppg since 2007.
Of course that's just one trend. But it supports the idea that the Hawks won't be able to keep up with the Packers. If Seattle can run the ball and keep Rodgers off the field, then they will win. But that is a big if.
0
Seahawks are 5-11 ATS on the road vs. teams that average 24+ ppg since 2007.
Of course that's just one trend. But it supports the idea that the Hawks won't be able to keep up with the Packers. If Seattle can run the ball and keep Rodgers off the field, then they will win. But that is a big if.
I think that Peyton Manning bounces back strong against a limping Chiefs team and the D gives him and his WR core multiple opportunities to exploit rookie CB Marcus Petersen. He's played and won many times in Arrow Head, so the noise wont be a factor.
I think the Chiefs looked good winning against a bad Houston team, and the Broncos looked bad winning against a good Balty team, so public perception is off hence the line jump from -1.5 DEN to -3 KC.
Against a 1st team defense Manning bumbled around and look lost in Kubiaks system...until the 4th quarter when he led an 80+ yd 10+min drive. It ended with a field goal, but I dot think the drought continues.
The Chiefs O-Line concerns were masked by the early HOU turnovers, they have an entirely new makeup from last season...at least DEN has some leadership returning from last year, and one of their new O-Linemen was a former chief (intel conspiracy on the D line). On top of that, I think Kubiak puts together a plan to force KC to go airborn, with an eager TJ Ward waiting to lay the boom down.
Just my 2 cents, I could be totally off. GL
Thanks Forbes, appreciate your input
0
Quote Originally Posted by TheForbes777:
I think that Peyton Manning bounces back strong against a limping Chiefs team and the D gives him and his WR core multiple opportunities to exploit rookie CB Marcus Petersen. He's played and won many times in Arrow Head, so the noise wont be a factor.
I think the Chiefs looked good winning against a bad Houston team, and the Broncos looked bad winning against a good Balty team, so public perception is off hence the line jump from -1.5 DEN to -3 KC.
Against a 1st team defense Manning bumbled around and look lost in Kubiaks system...until the 4th quarter when he led an 80+ yd 10+min drive. It ended with a field goal, but I dot think the drought continues.
The Chiefs O-Line concerns were masked by the early HOU turnovers, they have an entirely new makeup from last season...at least DEN has some leadership returning from last year, and one of their new O-Linemen was a former chief (intel conspiracy on the D line). On top of that, I think Kubiak puts together a plan to force KC to go airborn, with an eager TJ Ward waiting to lay the boom down.
Seattle is just a better team. Period. Their defense is miles and miles and miles better than Green Bay. Would love to see Green Bay win tho.
excuse my ignorance cos i dont follow gridiron closely but how is seattle an outrite better team??...in playoff game last season didnt the packers give them all they cud handle and more and required a freakish, miraculous sequence of events to deny them victory IN seahawks place??...not sure wat personnel changes have been made but its hard to see the gap being widened all that much..packers only missing one dude i know..but seattle clearly havent started out well after hemmoraging a truckload of points first up to a team not known to be all that potent offensively.
not saying packers are the best play but wanna see amd view on why he likes the side he chose.
0
Quote Originally Posted by mushroomspore:
Seattle is just a better team. Period. Their defense is miles and miles and miles better than Green Bay. Would love to see Green Bay win tho.
excuse my ignorance cos i dont follow gridiron closely but how is seattle an outrite better team??...in playoff game last season didnt the packers give them all they cud handle and more and required a freakish, miraculous sequence of events to deny them victory IN seahawks place??...not sure wat personnel changes have been made but its hard to see the gap being widened all that much..packers only missing one dude i know..but seattle clearly havent started out well after hemmoraging a truckload of points first up to a team not known to be all that potent offensively.
not saying packers are the best play but wanna see amd view on why he likes the side he chose.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.