Locked my plays in so far, will update if I make any plays in the future:
NE- 8.5 (1 Unit)
NE - 9 (1.25 Units)
MIN +4 (1 Unit)
SD -15 (1.25 Units)
4 Team parlay- NYJ, ATL, GB, MIN- .28 Units to win 3.45 Units
I decided to take Min +4 instead of the ML. Safe play IMHO. Although I initially though Min would win outright, I could also see something terrible happening and detroit winning by a FG, which is why I took the points just to be on the safe side. Im not greedy, and I won' regret not cashing in more if MIN does win outright, because if MIN happens to lose by a FG, then I will be pissed at myself for not playing it safe taking the points.
Haven't bet on ATL, GB, or PIT for the 2 o'clock games yet. I will lock up the rest as the 12 o'clock games begin to conclude on Sunday. Also, I will have an in depth write up on the cowboys game, although I will probably avoid it. I am from Dallas and have followed the team extensively, and every time they play the redskins it is BRUTAL watch. You simply don't know what's going to happen.
BOL everyone
0
Locked my plays in so far, will update if I make any plays in the future:
NE- 8.5 (1 Unit)
NE - 9 (1.25 Units)
MIN +4 (1 Unit)
SD -15 (1.25 Units)
4 Team parlay- NYJ, ATL, GB, MIN- .28 Units to win 3.45 Units
I decided to take Min +4 instead of the ML. Safe play IMHO. Although I initially though Min would win outright, I could also see something terrible happening and detroit winning by a FG, which is why I took the points just to be on the safe side. Im not greedy, and I won' regret not cashing in more if MIN does win outright, because if MIN happens to lose by a FG, then I will be pissed at myself for not playing it safe taking the points.
Haven't bet on ATL, GB, or PIT for the 2 o'clock games yet. I will lock up the rest as the 12 o'clock games begin to conclude on Sunday. Also, I will have an in depth write up on the cowboys game, although I will probably avoid it. I am from Dallas and have followed the team extensively, and every time they play the redskins it is BRUTAL watch. You simply don't know what's going to happen.
Be careful about the Packers D. Nick Collins is now gone and they've gotten eaten up 2 weeks straight. The Bears defense, including last week, has shown to be more impressive this year than the Packers have. You have to think there will be adjustments for the Bears offense now (they played two defenses that can get after the QB afterall--Saints finished 4th in D last year despite injuries/Atlanta has very good ends).
Other side on that one.
0
Be careful about the Packers D. Nick Collins is now gone and they've gotten eaten up 2 weeks straight. The Bears defense, including last week, has shown to be more impressive this year than the Packers have. You have to think there will be adjustments for the Bears offense now (they played two defenses that can get after the QB afterall--Saints finished 4th in D last year despite injuries/Atlanta has very good ends).
Be careful about the Packers D. Nick Collins is now gone and they've gotten eaten up 2 weeks straight. The Bears defense, including last week, has shown to be more impressive this year than the Packers have. You have to think there will be adjustments for the Bears offense now (they played two defenses that can get after the QB afterall--Saints finished 4th in D last year despite injuries/Atlanta has very good ends).
Other side on that one.
Yeah, but Peprah is replacing Collins and Peprah played WELL last season. Also, GB has just as good of, if not a better pass rush than both the Saints and Falcons. Mathews is quick of the corner, and both BJ Raji and Ryan picket collapse the pocket from the inside, which is even worse than an outside rush.
Cutler has been very mistake prone when he is uncomfortable in the pocket, and while I do believe that Mike Martz will have plays in place to protect him by doubling Mathews with a Tackle and TE, GB will still be able to get to him. This will be a close game, and like I said I have not placed a wager on the game yet. I will wait to see that Tramon Williams is playing. Lastly, I just like the way GB matches up with the Bears, and I suspect that they may keep it close in this one but still lose by 3. I may tease this game with either SD or PIT, depending on how I do with the 11 oclock games.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Aalon:
Be careful about the Packers D. Nick Collins is now gone and they've gotten eaten up 2 weeks straight. The Bears defense, including last week, has shown to be more impressive this year than the Packers have. You have to think there will be adjustments for the Bears offense now (they played two defenses that can get after the QB afterall--Saints finished 4th in D last year despite injuries/Atlanta has very good ends).
Other side on that one.
Yeah, but Peprah is replacing Collins and Peprah played WELL last season. Also, GB has just as good of, if not a better pass rush than both the Saints and Falcons. Mathews is quick of the corner, and both BJ Raji and Ryan picket collapse the pocket from the inside, which is even worse than an outside rush.
Cutler has been very mistake prone when he is uncomfortable in the pocket, and while I do believe that Mike Martz will have plays in place to protect him by doubling Mathews with a Tackle and TE, GB will still be able to get to him. This will be a close game, and like I said I have not placed a wager on the game yet. I will wait to see that Tramon Williams is playing. Lastly, I just like the way GB matches up with the Bears, and I suspect that they may keep it close in this one but still lose by 3. I may tease this game with either SD or PIT, depending on how I do with the 11 oclock games.
Also, Bears D is over-hyped. Yeah, they got to ATL in week 1, but they showed that against a good saints team that they can be picked apart. By picked apart, I mean their linebackers. I love Urlacher and Briggs, and I love the DE combination of Peppers and Idonije (both of whom are quick off the edge), but last week when Drew Brees was marching down the field (much like how Rodgers marched on the Saints), he did so by exploiting the linebackers in coverage and short yardage situations. He picked them apart, and there were SEVERAL plays where the WR in the slot ran an option route and the outside reciever ran a drag/crossing route and Lance Briggs was STUMPED in coverage. He had no clue who to pick up, and thats what lead to that short yardage completion for a TD near the goaline. I think, and I expect the Pack to do the same this week, and believe me, they WILL show up for this divisional game. IMHO, we will witness the superbowl-esque Packers that we saw last year, and they will win this game, not only to prove their the favorite in the division but to get the win for Collins. All of them are talking about Collins and saying this game is for him, which is added motivation for that team.
0
Also, Bears D is over-hyped. Yeah, they got to ATL in week 1, but they showed that against a good saints team that they can be picked apart. By picked apart, I mean their linebackers. I love Urlacher and Briggs, and I love the DE combination of Peppers and Idonije (both of whom are quick off the edge), but last week when Drew Brees was marching down the field (much like how Rodgers marched on the Saints), he did so by exploiting the linebackers in coverage and short yardage situations. He picked them apart, and there were SEVERAL plays where the WR in the slot ran an option route and the outside reciever ran a drag/crossing route and Lance Briggs was STUMPED in coverage. He had no clue who to pick up, and thats what lead to that short yardage completion for a TD near the goaline. I think, and I expect the Pack to do the same this week, and believe me, they WILL show up for this divisional game. IMHO, we will witness the superbowl-esque Packers that we saw last year, and they will win this game, not only to prove their the favorite in the division but to get the win for Collins. All of them are talking about Collins and saying this game is for him, which is added motivation for that team.
dude, although you have no ability to write, i like your passion. read one of my 'write-ups' and understand argumentative style. Never include 'I think", I would, ,maybe, etc.
Instead of saying 'I think the Lions have overplayed themselves", say 'the Lions have outplayed themselves". The 'I think" is weak....i would like to see more statistical info in this blabber pertinent to the next team that a team is up against; I dont need you to tell me what already happened.
If you took the time to do this I like your footing...have you played football?....it doesnt sound like you have...hmmm....rock on dude get better with your overall personell in your writing
0
dude, although you have no ability to write, i like your passion. read one of my 'write-ups' and understand argumentative style. Never include 'I think", I would, ,maybe, etc.
Instead of saying 'I think the Lions have overplayed themselves", say 'the Lions have outplayed themselves". The 'I think" is weak....i would like to see more statistical info in this blabber pertinent to the next team that a team is up against; I dont need you to tell me what already happened.
If you took the time to do this I like your footing...have you played football?....it doesnt sound like you have...hmmm....rock on dude get better with your overall personell in your writing
dude, although you have no ability to write, i like your passion. read one of my 'write-ups' and understand argumentative style. Never include 'I think", I would, ,maybe, etc.
Instead of saying 'I think the Lions have overplayed themselves", say 'the Lions have outplayed themselves". The 'I think" is weak....i would like to see more statistical info in this blabber pertinent to the next team that a team is up against; I dont need you to tell me what already happened.
If you took the time to do this I like your footing...have you played football?....it doesnt sound like you have...hmmm....rock on dude get better with your overall personell in your writing
i say I think because I can't predict the future, but I can only speculate based on what I think/how I feel from watching previous games and looking at players and personnel. I am not a big trend guy, but I look at pertinent numbers, and included some in my write up like Cutler being sacked 5 times last week, and his O-line gave up the most sacks last year. I also updated injured players, Rookies starting at key positions, and other intangibles that will play into the game.
if you don't like my insight, and don't have anything nice to say, then F*** OFF. Others have expressed that they like my info, so I will continue writing for them and see what they have to say. If you disagree with my picks, you can just point it out nicely instead of sounding like a 5 year old.
0
Quote Originally Posted by onebrokebloke:
dude, although you have no ability to write, i like your passion. read one of my 'write-ups' and understand argumentative style. Never include 'I think", I would, ,maybe, etc.
Instead of saying 'I think the Lions have overplayed themselves", say 'the Lions have outplayed themselves". The 'I think" is weak....i would like to see more statistical info in this blabber pertinent to the next team that a team is up against; I dont need you to tell me what already happened.
If you took the time to do this I like your footing...have you played football?....it doesnt sound like you have...hmmm....rock on dude get better with your overall personell in your writing
i say I think because I can't predict the future, but I can only speculate based on what I think/how I feel from watching previous games and looking at players and personnel. I am not a big trend guy, but I look at pertinent numbers, and included some in my write up like Cutler being sacked 5 times last week, and his O-line gave up the most sacks last year. I also updated injured players, Rookies starting at key positions, and other intangibles that will play into the game.
if you don't like my insight, and don't have anything nice to say, then F*** OFF. Others have expressed that they like my info, so I will continue writing for them and see what they have to say. If you disagree with my picks, you can just point it out nicely instead of sounding like a 5 year old.
Argumentative style....what a joke. Don't let your head get too big. I love it when people come on this forum and claim to be experts and try to have a d*** measuring contest with other people.
Why don't you post your picks and let others be the judge.
0
Argumentative style....what a joke. Don't let your head get too big. I love it when people come on this forum and claim to be experts and try to have a d*** measuring contest with other people.
Why don't you post your picks and let others be the judge.
dude, although you have no ability to write, i like your passion. read one of my 'write-ups' and understand argumentative style. Never include 'I think", I would, ,maybe, etc.
Instead of saying 'I think the Lions have overplayed themselves", say 'the Lions have outplayed themselves". The 'I think" is weak....i would like to see more statistical info in this blabber pertinent to the next team that a team is up against; I dont need you to tell me what already happened.
If you took the time to do this I like your footing...have you played football?....it doesnt sound like you have...hmmm....rock on dude get better with your overall personell in your writing
Just so you know, this is a sports betting page full of anonymous individuals. Not a debate or advanced writing class. There is no sure thing in betting, so "I think" is very appropriate. Nobody's picks can be proven or tested because none of them have happened yet and nobody here has any control over them. You either tail or you don't. Not his job to convince you.
You sound like you got a pat on the back in class today or something.
0
Quote Originally Posted by onebrokebloke:
dude, although you have no ability to write, i like your passion. read one of my 'write-ups' and understand argumentative style. Never include 'I think", I would, ,maybe, etc.
Instead of saying 'I think the Lions have overplayed themselves", say 'the Lions have outplayed themselves". The 'I think" is weak....i would like to see more statistical info in this blabber pertinent to the next team that a team is up against; I dont need you to tell me what already happened.
If you took the time to do this I like your footing...have you played football?....it doesnt sound like you have...hmmm....rock on dude get better with your overall personell in your writing
Just so you know, this is a sports betting page full of anonymous individuals. Not a debate or advanced writing class. There is no sure thing in betting, so "I think" is very appropriate. Nobody's picks can be proven or tested because none of them have happened yet and nobody here has any control over them. You either tail or you don't. Not his job to convince you.
You sound like you got a pat on the back in class today or something.
ill make the money and give usefull info on sunday....go to my space and have respect....my point about the writing is correct....i want messages from all you dead-beats on where your bets are and why...and WHY...!!!....not 'did you see some dude do this to another dude?!!!....im outta this garbage........
0
ill make the money and give usefull info on sunday....go to my space and have respect....my point about the writing is correct....i want messages from all you dead-beats on where your bets are and why...and WHY...!!!....not 'did you see some dude do this to another dude?!!!....im outta this garbage........
I don't know, but even if he was, I would take this game. Just too many things can happen with a concussed player. Vick still can't handle pressure in his face too well, and if it's one thing that the Giants did is that they got pressure on Bradford and made him uncomfortable. Also, 9 points is a lot, and I could honestly see this game going either way depending on which Eli manning decides to show up and depending on whether the Eagles can stop the run.
Also, Hixon is out for the season, and Manningham is concussed as well so with all the injuries I would be really hesitant to take this game.
0
Quote Originally Posted by sloobylover:
is vick playing ?
I don't know, but even if he was, I would take this game. Just too many things can happen with a concussed player. Vick still can't handle pressure in his face too well, and if it's one thing that the Giants did is that they got pressure on Bradford and made him uncomfortable. Also, 9 points is a lot, and I could honestly see this game going either way depending on which Eli manning decides to show up and depending on whether the Eagles can stop the run.
Also, Hixon is out for the season, and Manningham is concussed as well so with all the injuries I would be really hesitant to take this game.
Update, it appears that Haynesworth did not practice yesterday (or today) and that Patrick Chung will be OUT for the pats game after having injured his finger and undergone surgery this week.
This is HUGE. He makes plays all over that defense and hopefully his backups can step up. This was my lock of the week, but I am a bit worried now
0
Update, it appears that Haynesworth did not practice yesterday (or today) and that Patrick Chung will be OUT for the pats game after having injured his finger and undergone surgery this week.
This is HUGE. He makes plays all over that defense and hopefully his backups can step up. This was my lock of the week, but I am a bit worried now
I disagree with your GB/Chic scr of 23-10, GB hasn't broken 21 in the last 9 games against CHIC. Chic has GB's number, I'll that Chic +3.5
maybe they wont score 21. maybe they'l score more, or maybe less. You never know with the bears O-line. I could easily see some turnovers off of cutler fumbles or interceptions due to pressure which could lead to good field position for the packers. However, I cannot see aaron rodgers making those same mistakes.
The O-line is still an issue, and Cutler is still on pace to being the most sacked QB at the end of the season. I think QB pressure and turnovers will be the deciding factor for GB
0
Quote Originally Posted by ChrisGreene:
I disagree with your GB/Chic scr of 23-10, GB hasn't broken 21 in the last 9 games against CHIC. Chic has GB's number, I'll that Chic +3.5
maybe they wont score 21. maybe they'l score more, or maybe less. You never know with the bears O-line. I could easily see some turnovers off of cutler fumbles or interceptions due to pressure which could lead to good field position for the packers. However, I cannot see aaron rodgers making those same mistakes.
The O-line is still an issue, and Cutler is still on pace to being the most sacked QB at the end of the season. I think QB pressure and turnovers will be the deciding factor for GB
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Bills
Hot Forum Topics
