I followed TDR's play. Thesis jived with my own. Was going to take the Akers over 64.5 but actually liked the + vig better. Also took Rams less than 7.5 players with a reception -200. They literally haven't done this all season, although a couple of times they targeted 8 players at least 1 time. Higbee active status doesn't look good.
Darrell Henderson most rushing yards SB 56 +1600 was my rare longshot play. Leading rusher when he went down and best YPC by far. McVay claims he's going with the hot hand Sunday, but Akers will get first dibs. But why the fuck not for +1600 in case he breaks a couple early and sees some action.
That's my card so far. Game line is too tight/uncertain IMO so this will be a prop super bowl for me.
I followed TDR's play. Thesis jived with my own. Was going to take the Akers over 64.5 but actually liked the + vig better. Also took Rams less than 7.5 players with a reception -200. They literally haven't done this all season, although a couple of times they targeted 8 players at least 1 time. Higbee active status doesn't look good.
Darrell Henderson most rushing yards SB 56 +1600 was my rare longshot play. Leading rusher when he went down and best YPC by far. McVay claims he's going with the hot hand Sunday, but Akers will get first dibs. But why the fuck not for +1600 in case he breaks a couple early and sees some action.
That's my card so far. Game line is too tight/uncertain IMO so this will be a prop super bowl for me.
@Mangowoman
Love it!
Bengals Over 1.5 FG’s -115 is my favorite.
Ive been thinking that’s one of the most probable props. Especially at near Even money.
I would have not been surprised if it had been at high as -180-200.
I’ll be in Vegas looking for this prop.
BOL my friend!
@Mangowoman
Love it!
Bengals Over 1.5 FG’s -115 is my favorite.
Ive been thinking that’s one of the most probable props. Especially at near Even money.
I would have not been surprised if it had been at high as -180-200.
I’ll be in Vegas looking for this prop.
BOL my friend!
Line on yes went from -160 to -115... from. When props opened to a couple days ago... no is probably the play for sure
Line on yes went from -160 to -115... from. When props opened to a couple days ago... no is probably the play for sure
well, either way you won't have to waste 4 hours.
however, to address your point, i chose the under based on the singer--mickey guyton is not nearly as well-known as others chosen for this. she won't make this about herself and drag it out. plus, her last rehearsal time went under.
well, either way you won't have to waste 4 hours.
however, to address your point, i chose the under based on the singer--mickey guyton is not nearly as well-known as others chosen for this. she won't make this about herself and drag it out. plus, her last rehearsal time went under.
Amazing to see almost universal consensus on the Cam Akers under 64.5 rushing yards—and a few expected Stafford to pass a lot. I think they're wrong on both counts. Akers is going to do more & less what McKinnon did to the Bengals last week, except McVay will still with the run this time. Rams are going to be balanced and not fall into the trap of passing into tight coverage when the Bengals only rush 3. Bengals will blitz very little. When the safeties press in because the Rams are getting 5,6,7, yards a carry, Stafford will strike with play action.
Akers most yards in SB 56 best bet. Even Akers over 64.5 rushing yards and Michel over 18.5 both look good.
Amazing to see almost universal consensus on the Cam Akers under 64.5 rushing yards—and a few expected Stafford to pass a lot. I think they're wrong on both counts. Akers is going to do more & less what McKinnon did to the Bengals last week, except McVay will still with the run this time. Rams are going to be balanced and not fall into the trap of passing into tight coverage when the Bengals only rush 3. Bengals will blitz very little. When the safeties press in because the Rams are getting 5,6,7, yards a carry, Stafford will strike with play action.
Akers most yards in SB 56 best bet. Even Akers over 64.5 rushing yards and Michel over 18.5 both look good.
Joe Burrow over 2.5 rushing attempts.
---Expecting the Rams defensive front to put a lot of pressure on Burrow and move him out of the pocket.
---Also like this bet if the Bengals are playing from behind and have to throw the ball.
---Burrow is a smart quarterback; don't expect to force things downfield, thereby taking what he can/and what the Rams give him.
Joe Burrow over 2.5 rushing attempts.
---Expecting the Rams defensive front to put a lot of pressure on Burrow and move him out of the pocket.
---Also like this bet if the Bengals are playing from behind and have to throw the ball.
---Burrow is a smart quarterback; don't expect to force things downfield, thereby taking what he can/and what the Rams give him.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.