I NEVER, EVER, said they were anything like the one that won the bowl. I NEVER said they have any chance at winning the SB. I just won a very large wager on the Baltimore moneyline this weekend. I bashed my "homer" Steelers. Chill with the "homer pipe" shit. You make yourself look stupid.
Stupid..?...lol's.
BTW...Troy Palamalu is NOWHERE close to healthy. I know he's 75% at BEST for a fact. Unlike you who knows squat and thinks he's healthy.
Pride alone will make this game more competitive than the last...but, wont be enough to pull therm thru for the win.
0
Quote Originally Posted by walktheline:
I NEVER, EVER, said they were anything like the one that won the bowl. I NEVER said they have any chance at winning the SB. I just won a very large wager on the Baltimore moneyline this weekend. I bashed my "homer" Steelers. Chill with the "homer pipe" shit. You make yourself look stupid.
Stupid..?...lol's.
BTW...Troy Palamalu is NOWHERE close to healthy. I know he's 75% at BEST for a fact. Unlike you who knows squat and thinks he's healthy.
Pride alone will make this game more competitive than the last...but, wont be enough to pull therm thru for the win.
No Marvel Smith....how are they going to give Big Ben enough time to pass?
plus the weather might be shitty......favoring the running team
I don't know why I reply to these Homers that start these threads....
By keeping your editorial comments to yourself. Last week this same individual posted loud and clear to fade the Steelers....not the normal suggestion of a homer.
0
Quote Originally Posted by jthollywood:
NO max Starks
No Marvel Smith....how are they going to give Big Ben enough time to pass?
plus the weather might be shitty......favoring the running team
I don't know why I reply to these Homers that start these threads....
By keeping your editorial comments to yourself. Last week this same individual posted loud and clear to fade the Steelers....not the normal suggestion of a homer.
By keeping your editorial comments to yourself. Last week this same individual posted loud and clear to fade the Steelers....not the normal suggestion of a homer.
No way? of course they didn't have much to play for and played their JV team.......
0
Quote Originally Posted by Allbutbroke:
By keeping your editorial comments to yourself. Last week this same individual posted loud and clear to fade the Steelers....not the normal suggestion of a homer.
No way? of course they didn't have much to play for and played their JV team.......
Hey, can someone inform me how first time playoff QB starters do in their opening game......THEY BLOWWWWWWWWW......the playoffs r a different animal that the steelers have seen and Mr. Garrard has not, GIMME BIG BEN IN THIS SPOT
0
Hey, can someone inform me how first time playoff QB starters do in their opening game......THEY BLOWWWWWWWWW......the playoffs r a different animal that the steelers have seen and Mr. Garrard has not, GIMME BIG BEN IN THIS SPOT
Hey, can someone inform me how first time playoff QB starters do in their opening game......THEY BLOWWWWWWWWW......the playoffs r a different animal that the steelers have seen and Mr. Garrard has not, GIMME BIG BEN IN THIS SPOT
The Qb's in this years playoffs:
Roethlisberger: won
Brady: Won
Rivers: lost
Manning: Lost
Manning: Lost
Garcia: Lost
Hasselbeck: Lost
Romo: Lost (pee'd on himself holding a chip shot FG)
Favre: Won
Young: 1st start
Garrard 1st start (did get a little playing time against NE a couple years ago)
Collins: 1st start
0
Quote Originally Posted by blackout5:
Hey, can someone inform me how first time playoff QB starters do in their opening game......THEY BLOWWWWWWWWW......the playoffs r a different animal that the steelers have seen and Mr. Garrard has not, GIMME BIG BEN IN THIS SPOT
The Qb's in this years playoffs:
Roethlisberger: won
Brady: Won
Rivers: lost
Manning: Lost
Manning: Lost
Garcia: Lost
Hasselbeck: Lost
Romo: Lost (pee'd on himself holding a chip shot FG)
Favre: Won
Young: 1st start
Garrard 1st start (did get a little playing time against NE a couple years ago)
No way? of course they didn't have much to play for and played their JV team.......
And your point is what exactly?? Not to dwell on the past...but the Steelers were a 75% consensus play at one point so MANY were on them even though they didn't have much to play for. Walktheline said to take the Ravens on the moneyline. I sure didn't because they suck. I wish I had. You did though right. Can't we just cut a guy some slack who is trying to give an opinion versus berating him as a homer.
0
Quote Originally Posted by jthollywood:
No way? of course they didn't have much to play for and played their JV team.......
And your point is what exactly?? Not to dwell on the past...but the Steelers were a 75% consensus play at one point so MANY were on them even though they didn't have much to play for. Walktheline said to take the Ravens on the moneyline. I sure didn't because they suck. I wish I had. You did though right. Can't we just cut a guy some slack who is trying to give an opinion versus berating him as a homer.
As a die hard Ravens fan this could be difficult. But as a money fan I will be all over the Steelers. I have a feeling public money will be all on Jax because of Balt beating them last week. As mentioned the playoffs are a different animal...............This hurts but Go Steelers as thats where my money will be this week.............
0
As a die hard Ravens fan this could be difficult. But as a money fan I will be all over the Steelers. I have a feeling public money will be all on Jax because of Balt beating them last week. As mentioned the playoffs are a different animal...............This hurts but Go Steelers as thats where my money will be this week.............
The guy who started this is an idiot. The Jags will kick the shit of the Steelers and this dumb fuck will lose all his money. What a clown. He'll never win a dollar.
GO JAGS!!
0
The guy who started this is an idiot. The Jags will kick the shit of the Steelers and this dumb fuck will lose all his money. What a clown. He'll never win a dollar.
only way jax loses is if their D loses it for them and they commit multiple turnover's .... if you think that is the scenario you might as well take the Over because you can believe jags will get their 21
0
only way jax loses is if their D loses it for them and they commit multiple turnover's .... if you think that is the scenario you might as well take the Over because you can believe jags will get their 21
On Pittsburgh +3 as well. Home field in the playoffs means everything. Jax was already whining about the field and they'll whine even louder 4 hours after the game.
0
On Pittsburgh +3 as well. Home field in the playoffs means everything. Jax was already whining about the field and they'll whine even louder 4 hours after the game.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.