Would you rather have Aaron Rodgers now or Peyton in his prime?

You can look at the numbers of say Wayne or Clark this year and say they are not as good because Manning made the pro-bowlers...but I mean come on

Curtis Painter???  Really???  This guy is not a qb....Collins???  Dude was sitting on his couch weeks before the season....

No good players would have good numbers with those qbs.....

Look at Fitz?  He doesnt have the numbers this year....thats because Kolb sucks and Skelton is worse....are you saying Fitz was only good cause Warner???

Great players like Wayne and Clark still need half a QB to throw the ball....

Painter is a joke....

Colts f'ed up not having a backup for Manning

isnt fitz still putting up decent numbers while all colts players have taken major falls??   im asking because im not sure and i dont wanna look up the stats right now cause im hungover still lol.

Any fantasy gurus here that have been following Fitzgerald, and the other colts players that can shed some light on their years stat wise??

thanks in advnace..

Fitz is having a decent year, but NOWHERE close to what he has been doing years past....

Even with how bad Kolb is, Kolb is 1000% times better than Painter....

Im not saying Manning makes players much better than they are....but to say Wayne and Clark are only good cause Manning is a joke.  Painter is not, and could not ever be a QB...

I watch many Indy games....balls are getting 3-bounced into wrs or missing by 5 yards...it has nothing to do with Wayne or Clark not being open...

You cant catch a ball that is rolling or not within 5 yards of where you are

Rodgers.

They have same amount of titles and Peyton has about 10 more seasons under his belt.

Yeah, I guess beating the #3 seed, then #1 seed, then #1 seed ALL on the road last year in the playoffs was nothing and not coming through in the clutch

Oh, then beat another #2 seed in the Championship

You do realize the Packers had 7 points at half-time because they had 6 flags and 4 dropped passes correct???

They had the ball for 10 minutes in the 1st half because of 3 drops on 3rd downs, and 3 flags that backed them up. 

Once they stopped making mistakes and CATCHING the ball, game over.

But, I guess you only look at one side of it.  He was 22-33 and GB had 5 drops all game.  27-33 for 360+ if they catch the ball.

He sure was rattled

Wont be able to win shit in crunch time...haha thats right.  4 Road wins last year in the playoffs

They probably wont need crunch time anyways, no team will have the lead on them in the 4th quarter this year

Who says your opinion is right???

Who said superbowl is comparison for which is better????

But, you can look at playoff and superbowl records to help the argument.

The question was who would you rather have.  People have their answers.

Why cant you look at stats??

If someone says who would you rather have to lead a comeback with 2 minutes left and you can pick QB A or QB B....

QB A has 9 comeback victories and QB B has 0....who would you pick????

People say Rodgers is still young and bla bla bla,

I explained why I would rather have Rodgers.  I am not even saying Rodgers is better, but if I had to pick I would take Rodgers.

If you football brains actually want to come on here and say Manning had NO weapons that is a fricken joke.

Harrison is one of the best wr of all-time.  Wayne was his #2 wr for years, HIS NUMBER 2.  Oh, and he had a great runningback with James and a great tight-end with Clark.  So, to say Manning had no weapons is a joke.

To say Manning is clutch and Rodger isnt, doesnt make sense.  I dont consider a 9-10 playoff QB clutch.  If Im wrong thats fine.  But, that isnt clutch to me.

Rodgers is 4-1 in the playoffs, all on the road.  If that isnt clutch, I dont know what clutch is. 

You say stats dont matter, but some do.

As GREAT as Manning has been, has he ever completed 73% of passes in 1 season??  No, he hasnt even had 68%. 

He played half his games in a dome under perfect weather.  Against a weaker division. 

Rodgers plays atleast 20% of his games in weather colder than freezing with snow. 

I never said Rodgers was better, but they way he is playing right now has never be seen.

Another reason, why I Rodgers, is because Manning cant move back there. 

Rodgers has had, and will have many more big 1st downs or TD runs. 

The number arent there yet, and the years arent there yet, but if he continues to play this way for the next 4-5 years, he will go down as being better than Manning.

If you dont agree thats fine.  Who cares.  There is not a correct answer.  Atleast not yet.

But, to say you cant look at stats thats a joke. 

If I want a clutch QB, I want someone who wins in the playoffs, not in the regular season.  9-10 in the playoffs is NOT CLUTCH

Quote Originally Posted by Derrrty19:

Please. Are you telling me that if Aaron Rodgers goes out in pre-season this team would be winless at this point in the year? No, they'd still be a playoff team.

And yeah, I am saying Manning's cast was overrated. Not Harrison. Guy's a great WR. But look at Reggie Wayne/Dallas Clark/Austin Collie. Reggie was considered a top 10 WR the entire time. He finally doesn't have Peyton, and he's barely top 50. A great WR or playmaker would still be able to produce with a half ass QB. And Manning had even less of a running game. Addai/Rhodes was terrible. Brady has no one other than Gronkowski. Deion Branch and Wes Welker are not 1 and 2 recievers. Jordy Nelson, Donald Driver, Jermichael Finley, Greg Jennings, and even James Jones are all good players who could produce elsewhere.

I'm admitting the Packers are truly one of the top 5 teams in the league, and Rodgers is a good QB. You're the moron for defending him saying he's better than 2 of the best QBs of all time. And you know why they're considered 2 of the best? Because they've been great for more than 2 damn years, you moron. If Aaron Rodgers is still playing at this level in 5 years, then the argument COULD be open. But for now, it's not. And only an ignorant Packers fan would think it is. 

Wow, I cant even believe what you are saying.

Reggie Wayne and Clark are having down years ALL becuase MANNING???

No, its because they have Curtis fuckign Painter throwing the ball.  Dude cant make an open pass. 

Wayne and Clark are running the exact same routes, but now the ball is bouncing to them or 10 yards over their head.  Is that their fault??? NO, Painted isnt a QB.  Wayne and Clark would be a pro-bowler on every other team in the league but maybe 3. 

How was Larry Fitz doing with Kolb at QB????  He was having his WORST year EVER....So Fitz is only good with Warner???  No, you need a guy who can throw the ball.  Painter or Collins dont qualify for that. 

You think Driver and Jones could produce everywhere???  Wow, man.  Have you ever heard of Jordy Nelson or James Jones prior to Rodgers at QB??  Quick, where did they go to college??  You have no idea. 

If im such a homer why would I claim I would rather have had the combo of Harrison, Wayne, Clark and James????

You dont even make sense in your posts

Exactly, beating the #3 seed, #1 seed, then #2 seed in the NFC on the road isnt clutch.  Then, beating the top AFC seed. 

What a joke you guys are. 

When did Manning do that???  Oh, wait HE NEVER DID.

He was losing HOME PLAYOFF games