Quote Originally Posted by DRIBBLE4LIFE:
So you're on this thread
talking about how crooked the officiating was, and you think the reason
for that has ZERO to do with Vegas, NFL owners, etc ?
So
the refs just decided to screw Brady on their own? Really? That's your
logic? Why do you think point spreads were invented in the first place?
Serious question.
If not for point spreads,
most books would have gone out of business already. Point spreads allow
for more corruption and game-fixing. I dont have a problem with you
disagreeing with me, but please do pick a side.
You're
being very insulting and arrogant, and I don't know why. I'm not sure
if you're distorting the arguement so badly because you genuinely don't
understand English too well (is English your 2nd language?) or if you have me confused with another poster and you're combining our 2 separate arguments into 1. There are several points here:
1)
You are pretending this is a discussion about rigged vs not rigged.
That's BS. I've stated on several occasions I think rigs are real. Even in this very thread I've posted that I think rigs are real. Just
this week I did a write up saying I'm avoiding betting the Panthers
because it's suspicious (of a rig):
https://www.covers.com/postingforum/post01/showmessage.aspx?spt=21&sub=102200097
This isn't a discussion about whether rigs are real or not. Stop making strawman arguments.
2) You're pretending last night's Patriots game supports your theory
("The
NFL will rig this match so that the Patriots win because undefeated
Panthers vs undefeated Patriots is a great storyline ... the NFL will
also rig this match so that Denver covers"). Last night's game proves your theory wrong not correct.
If
the NFL wanted the Patriots to win because it's a good storyline, why
did they ignore the penalty late into the game when the Patriots were up
by a few points, where a Broncos player held the face mask? That would
have been the perfect call for your theory because it would have
reversed the Broncos TD that put them in the lead.
If the game
is so controlled that the NFL scripts it ahead of time based on story,
why did they let the Patriots take a 14 point lead into the 4th quarter,
which makes them rigging a cover of the 2.5-point spread all the more obvious?
Why does the NFL even care about rigging a spread's cover? That's something Vegas cares about not the NFL.
3)
You still haven't addressed the thing we're talking about: my claim
that surgical rigs controlling the game's score down to a 1-2 point
margin are nearly impossible in football (unless many key players are
bought) ... which if you're not paying attention, last night's game
supports.
If anyone is rigging spreads, it's Vegas or betting
rings not the NFL. The NFL couldn't care less about spreads. And when Vegas/Betting Rings do rig games, it's nothing even remotely refined or surgical. It's
crude and obvious. It relies on crooked refs and weak links on a team.
I stand by my original comment which started this discussion between us, incase you've forgot:
A rig that's so surgical it falls within a 3 point spread goes beyond
the usual avenues people discuss in a rigged game such as bad referee
calls, etc. You're talking about something that would have to involve
the entire team here. A fine control of every aspect of the score. Keep in mind, this surgical rig did not happen last night and your claim is NOT supported by last night game. If anything, last night proves my theory that rigs are crude and can not be surgical enough to both control a winner AND keep the winning margin within 1-2 points. That's a taaaaaaaaaaaaall order to fill and would need almost the entire team behind to script.
Look, in the end, I think this discussion is silly. We're obviously on the same side here (games are rigged / suspicious) and having an argument over who is doing the rigs and how surgical these rigs are seems like a waste of time to me. I'd rather focus on methods of identifying them ahead of time and profiting off them so that we can all kick the bookies in the nuts together