Martingale Hockey System

System Update.  System is up $410 or or 41 units. Results submitted from game 15 of the season to present in 2 Posts.

(Totals to the right are YTD.  Previous results are in earlier post)        

TO LOSE TEAMS

ISLES
(OPPOSING TEAMS ODDS)
Gm  V.S. W/L  Odds Bet  P/L
15  ana   L  -200   10    5
16  sjs   L  -220   10    5
17  lak   L  -240   10    4
18  tbl   L  -125   10    8
19  fla   L  -105   10   10
20  atl   L  -200   10    5
21  cbj   L  -140   10    7
23  njd   W  -120   10  -10
24  nyr   L  -140   20   14   +87

 

WILD
(OPPOSING TEAMS ODDS)
15  fla   L  -150   10    7
16  tbl   W  -165   10  -10
17  ana   W   145   20  -20
18  det   W  -235   40  -40
19  nyr   L   120   80   96
20  phi   L  -120   10    8
21  nsh   W   105   10  -10
22  col   L  -155   20    6
23  cgy   L  -155   10    6
24  pho   L   125   10   13
25  cgy   L   120   10   12
26  dal   L  -190   10    5   +129

 

System Update:  +$472 or 47 units
(Update posted in 2 sections due to size limitations)

   TO WIN TEAMS

KINGS
Gm  V.S. W/L  Odds Bet  P/L
15  nyi   W  -240   10    4
16  sjs   L   140   10  -10
17  cbj   L  -190   20  -20
18  buf   L   110    0    0
19  bos   W   125   40   50
20  ott   L  -125   10  -10
21  mon   L   105   20  -20
22  chi   L  -125   40  -40
23  ana   L  -135   80  -80
24  fla   W  -210  160   76
25  det   W  -130   10    8  

26  cgy   W  -160   10    6

27  min   L  -200    0    0

28  det   W   155   20   31

+80

SABRES
15  tor   W   130  320  416
16  njd   W   120   10   12
17  nyr   L   150   10  -10
18  was   W   100   20   20
19  van   W  -115   10    9
20  was   W   100   10  -10
21  lak   W  -130    0    0
22  tbl   L  -130   20  -20
23  pit   L  -105   40  -40
24  tor   W  -165   80   48
25  mon   L   120   10  -10
26  cbj   W  -135   20   14
27  ott   W  -105   10   10  

28  bos   L   130   10  -10

29  sjs   W   100   20   20

30  pit   L  -115   10  -10

+151

        TO LOSE TEAMS

ISLES
(OPPOSING TEAMS ODDS)
Gm  V.S. W/L  Odds Bet  P/L
15  ana   L  -200   10    5
16  sjs   L  -220   10    5
17  lak   L  -240   10    4
18  tbl   L  -125   10    8
19  fla   L  -105   10   10
20  atl   L  -200   10    5
21  cbj   L  -140   10    7
23  njd   W  -120   10  -10
24  nyr   L  -140   20   14  

25  bos   L  -220   10    5

26  atl   L  -130   10    8

27  nsh   L  -250   10    4

+110

 

WILD
(OPPOSING TEAMS ODDS)
15  fla   L  -150   10    7
16  tbl   W  -165   10  -10
17  ana   W   145   20  -20
18  det   W  -235   40  -40
19  nyr   L   120   80   96
20  phi   L  -120   10    8
21  nsh   W   105   10  -10
22  col   L  -155   20    6
23  cgy   L  -155   10    6
24  pho   L   125   10   13
25  cgy   L   120   10   12
26  dal   L  -190   10    5  

27  phx   L  -160   10  -10

28  lak   W  -200    0    0

29  ana   W  -165   20   24

+131

 

NYI to lose, Pitt to win

Toronto to lose, Montreal to win

As noted in the previous post the system is up just under $500.  We were a bit unlucky with LA drawing FLA at home after a couple of loses or we would be over $600 or 60 units.
We ran this system using several teams from the 2009/10 season with similar results.  It will work if you have the bankroll and gonads.  If you get queasy having to lay out 4 or 5 times your normal wager then you shouldn't even consider any type of martingale. Period
Some of the comments were entertaining and I'll pick out a few for response:
Equating any type of sports martingale system to a "casino" martingale is moronic.  For some reason people want to compare a sports martingale to a roulette wheel.  Whereas roulette spins are independent of one another, sports plays are not.  But if you are hell bent on comparing the two I'll ask this question; Have you ever seen one roulette wheel with 7 Reds in a row?  The answer is of course yes.  Have you ever seen 4 side by side Roulette wheels with 7 Reds in a row from the last number spun to the 7th number?  Hence this is a big part of our strategy.
Another comment that is simply false is that a Martingale will always lose in the long run.  The answer is exactly the opposite of that; it will always win.  Again it is a function of bankroll and balls. 

Personally I am not a systems player; I'd rather handicap games.  We tested this in theory from last years games and it worked.  We implemented it for real this year to see if we could get to $500 and it worked.  That is all.