All Forums | NHL Betting

SATURDAY PUCKS/PICKS.....

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 2371
Posts: 47
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2012
Posts: 1308
Posted: #1
Will post my numbers shortly, though yesterday was a negative flow day ..... BOL today 2 all 



BOSTON ML @ -165 FOR 1.65 UNITS TO WIN 1 UNIT

BOSTON 1ST PD PL @ +165 FOR 0.5 UNITS TO WIN 0.825 UNITS
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2012
Posts: 14718
Posted: #2
BOL 7's 

Cheers 
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2012
Posts: 508
Posted: #3
Why did it have to be against the Flyers?!
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2014
Posts: 6719
Posted: #4
BOL 7
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2012
Posts: 1308
Posted: #5

A Rough road recently—it happens—feel free to fade, or follow.  BOL 2 ALL

TOTALS:     133-101 (58.2%)  &  +51.77  UNITS 

 YESTERDAY:    3-4    -4.19

 FINAL RUN TOTALS, #’s thru 2/21:(STARTED ON 2/20/15):  36-32  (53.1 %) &  -5.52

TODAY’S PLAY(s):  (will be playing/posting the other game (s) as time allows…)

(LISTED ABOVE)  BOSTON 1st PD PL @ +165 FOR 0.5 UNITS TO WIN 0.825 UNITS

 (LISTED ABOVE)  BOSTON ML @ -165 FOR 1.65 UNITS TO WIN 1 UNIT



 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2012
Posts: 1308
Posted: #6

 YESTERDAY’S PLAYS:   

PITTSBURGH/ANAHEIM OVER 5.5 @ +110 FOR 2 UNITS TO WIN 2.2 UNITS

 EDMONTON OILERS / CHICAGO BLACKHAWKS OVER 5.5 @ +100 FOR 1.5 UNITS TO WIN 1.5 UNITS

 DETROIT REDWINGS ML @ -220 FOR 5.5 UNITS TO WIN 2.5 UNITS

 DETROIT REDWINGS 1ST PD PL @ +135 FOR 0.5 UNITS TOWIN 0.68 UNITS

 DETROIT REDWINGS OVER TT  3.5 GLS @ +130 FOR 0.5 UNITS TO WIN 0.65 UNITS

 MINNESOTA WILD 1ST PD  PL @ +190 FOR 0.75 UNITS TO WIN 1.43 UNITS

 NJD’S 1ST PD  PL @ +180 FOR 1 UNIT TO WIN 1.8 UNITS

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2012
Posts: 1308
Posted: #7
@Jeeves... Back at you Sir, and thank you 

@Hardtimes... yeah we did... the numbers are the numbers my friend 

@Kipper....Thanks 2 U Sir, and same 2 U 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2012
Posts: 1308
Posted: #8
CORRECTION::::::::

RECENT RUN IS 

FINAL RUN TOTALS, #’s thru 2/21:(STARTED ON 2/20/15):  39-36  &  -9.71

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2014
Posts: 135
Posted: #9
7's i'm not accusing you of anything but you've had a rough few days where you went (roughly) -12u's, -5u's, and -4's in the past week, how is your recent run total at only -9.71u's?

I checked all you threads and the math is right for your overall record and gain but not for the "recent run", just wondering if your only recording certain plays or something for that category because the math is off for me. 

Bol

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2012
Posts: 2104
Posted: #10
BOL 77
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2007
Posts: 7827
Posted: #11
7 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2012
Posts: 1308
Posted: #12
Quote Originally Posted by Skxv:

7's i'm not accusing you of anything but you've had a rough few days where you went (roughly) -12u's, -5u's, and -4's in the past week, how is your recent run total at only -9.71u's?

I checked all you threads and the math is right for your overall record and gain but not for the "recent run", just wondering if your only recording certain plays or something for that category because the math is off for me. 

Bol


I appreciate the way you approached this, hence I will list you the numbers: (and yes, a very rough last few days):

3/6:  -4.19, 3/5: +1.63, 3/4 -12.1, 3/3: +0.6, 3/2: +1.8, 3/1: +3.25, 2/28: +4.35, 2/27: +1.03, 2/26: -2, 2/25: -4.8, 2/24: -3.25,  2/23  +1.15, 2/22: +1.8, 2/21: -3.48, 2/20 +4.5

 I also have a list of every game played.  You have always been a nice guy, but I still have to be candid here.  I am fully aware of most every one on this site that 'fudges' their numbers, because if I suspect it, I follow it, and match it for accuracy, and then, if need be I have fact to state.  Though I believe you were not accusing me, your simply asking that question will lead many to assume a result, which is highly unfair of you.  Common sense would dictate that you followed my thread long enough to know I have a certain mathematical aptitude, AND that we are ALL aware if I posted in accurate numbers I would be jumped on immediately--would be a foolhardy move if I were the lying type to start with.

Hence, I will implore you, in the future, to actually take the time to follow, record, then verify an "I don't mean to accuse you" with actual facts that you verified in stead of 'guessing' based on your 'impression' .... I will thank you in advance Sir 

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2012
Posts: 1308
Posted: #13
[

I checked all you threads and the math is right for your overall record and gain but not for the "recent run", just wondering if your only recording certain plays or something for that category because the math is off for me. 

Bol

[/Quote]

Now THERE is where I have a problem with your "I am not accusing you", because you actually ARE exactly doing so, and INACCURATELY I might add, which is not only lazy, but downright wrong of you.  

I challenge you to show the ONE day I reported inaccurately...ONE day.. this you cannot do.  Do you think for once second that if I misreported one single day that I would not have 5+ people pointing it out?


 
Covers Referee
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 94159
Posted: #14
Quote Originally Posted by 7NoLuckNeeded7:


Now THERE is where I have a problem with your "I am not accusing you", because you actually ARE exactly doing so, and INACCURATELY I might add, which is not only lazy, but downright wrong of you.  

I challenge you to show the ONE day I reported inaccurately...ONE day.. this you cannot do.  Do you think for once second that if I misreported one single day that I would not have 5+ people pointing it out?


Chill, man. He asked a question. Your showed he was wrong, and I'm sure he'll come back to admit it. There's really no need to get angrier with this.

BOL today.

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2013
Posts: 2326
Posted: #15
Nice hit on the B's this morning  Sevens..... 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2012
Posts: 1308
Posted: #16
Quote Originally Posted by weeble5672:

Chill, man. He asked a question. Your showed he was wrong, and I'm sure he'll come back to admit it. There's really no need to get angrier with this.

BOL today.


I majored in Statistics, and not English, but this >>" I checked all you threads and the math is right for your overall record and gain but not for the "recent run" does not sound like a question to me, nor is it accurate Weeble.  You have been here long enough to know that 'question' is a damage to reputation, as few, if any, would be more likely to go back and verify as opposed to assuming a result. 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2012
Posts: 1308
Posted: #17
Quote Originally Posted by Dangerous1:

Nice hit on the B's this morning  Sevens..... 

Thanks D1... Sir, ride along with consistency... these morons finally pissed me off, and I am going to hit that 'nut' like a laser, and be done with the degenerates that infest this forum.  This in NO WAY refers to you Sir.


 
Covers Referee
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 94159
Posted: #18
Quote Originally Posted by 7NoLuckNeeded7:


I majored in Statistics, and not English, but this >>" I checked all you threads and the math is right for your overall record and gain but not for the "recent run" does not sound like a question to me, nor is it accurate Weeble.  You have been here long enough to know that 'question' is a damage to reputation, as few, if any, would be more likely to go back and verify as opposed to assuming a result. 


To be honest, I give people in this forum the benefit of the doubt. If this were the baskets, football, bases, etc. forums, I'd likely agree with you.

But generally speaking, we're all just here to chat about hockey and post picks. There's a comradarie among us and I truly believe he was just looking for clarification.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2013
Posts: 2326
Posted: #19
Were GOOD Seven's  I always appreciate seeing your plays .... keep your head up
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2011
Posts: 4901
Posted: #20
bol tonite
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2012
Posts: 1308
Posted: #21
PARLAY TO LOOSEN THE WOOD:

WASHINGTON PL @ -155 & TBL   ML @ -200 (TOTAL LINE OF +147) FOR 1 UNIT TO WIN 1.47 UNITS
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2010
Posts: 17021
Posted: #22
Quote Originally Posted by 7NoLuckNeeded7:


Thanks D1... Sir, ride along with consistency... these morons finally pissed me off, and I am going to hit that 'nut' like a laser, and be done with the degenerates that infest this forum.  This in NO WAY refers to you Sir.



Why not just leave now????  Then you can be free of all the degenerates tonight. 

And if you worry about what people on an internet forum think about you...you are taking life too seriously. 

Just saying.

Good luck with whatever you may play.

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2012
Posts: 1308
Posted: #23
NASHVILLE ML @ -210 FOR 2.1 TO WIN 1 UNIT

COLUMBUS ML @ -105 FOR 1.05 UNITS TO WIN 1 UNIT

ST LOUIS PL @ +165 FOR 1 UNIT TO WIN 1.65 UNITS
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2012
Posts: 1308
Posted: #24
DALLAS / TBL 1ST PD OVER 2.5 GLS FOR 0.625 UNITS TO WIN 0.5 UNITS
 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2012
Posts: 1308
Posted: #25
Quote Originally Posted by BooBunny:


Why not just leave now????  Then you can be free of all the degenerates tonight. 

And if you worry about what people on an internet forum think about you...you are taking life too seriously. 

Just saying.

Good luck with whatever you may play.


Though I do not expect you to comprehend this, but I said I would do something, and I do what I say I'll do--not for the "people on the internet", but as a matter of integrity.  Just curious though, why do you care enough to respond?  
All Forums | NHL Betting
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.