All Forums | NHL Betting

So my friends in Canada....Are the Nucks getting ripped hard ?

...

Participants:

Search

Posts: 65

wiggins

Captain

Joined: Aug, 2006

Posts: 8740

Posted: Jun. 9, 2011 - 4:58 PM ET #51

https://tsn.ca/blogs/bob_mckenzie/?id=368339

0

moneym8

Rookie

Joined: Jul, 2009

Posts: 512

Posted: Jun. 9, 2011 - 5:22 PM ET #52

Quote Originally Posted by LeRinkRat:

plenty comments in Vancouver Sun. an unofficial poll calling for Schneider in game five 52.43% to 47.57% alsthough it's doubtful that happens. also craping about the Sedins and Kesler's lack of production.

https://www.vancouversun.com/sports/hockey/vancouver-canucks/next+Canucks+goal+probably+know+until+game+time+Friday/4915797/story.html

I think Schneider definitely should have got the call in Game 4 and then go back to Luongo in Game 5 regardless if Schneider won or not.

Now, if Luongo loses Game 5 they have a tough choice going into Game 6...If Schneids gets the call in Game 6 and wins, do you go back with Luongo at home for Game 7 or do you go with Schneids?

If Luongo wins game 5 and then they start him again for 6 and he gets blown out, Game 7 is another tough call.

Schneider definitely looked more calm in net the little he did play in Boston, it's probably good I'm not Van's coach, caused I'd give Cory the shot in Game 6 even if Van wins Game 5 with Luongo because of Luongo's problems in Boston, but I don't think they would want to win the Cup with Cory in net and Luongo on the bench.

0

dienasty

Prospect

Joined: Feb, 2011

Posts: 51

Posted: Jun. 9, 2011 - 5:27 PM ET #53

Home ice advantage will win the series. Boston isn't dumb. They know a slow ice surface is to their advantage. Watch how the Canucks are so much faster on home ice. Canucks in 7, not because I said so but because EA sports said so. lol

0

WeMoveLines

Veteran

Joined: Mar, 2011

Posts: 3059

Posted: Jun. 9, 2011 - 8:05 PM ET #54

Quote Originally Posted by Flutiemaniac341:

What Polar_Bear said is pretty bang on!! unless you actually live in the 3 major cities (Van, Mtl and T-Dot) you do not support them anywhere else in the country

The team itself is unlikable!

Comparing the underdog, hardworking Canucks team from 1994 to this team is comparing apples and oranges

Guys with character and blue collar mentality such as Linden, Craig Adams, Cliff Ronning and Kirk are replaced by arrogant guys like Kesler and Lapierre and the Girly line of the Sedins and Burrows

Lapierre almost single handily turned this series around in game 2

Emotion has so much to do with this game, to me, hockey is the most emotional of all the 4 major sports

Lappy put his fingers to Bergeron's face in that mock bitting incident that started all this in Boston

Maxim Lapierre and Patrice Bergeron know each other and talk to each other in the off season

Patrice is a respected member of that bruins team and what Lapierre did was over the line

The entire Bruins team has rallied around the incident and reminded them the kind of scum on the other side

Are you kidding me flutie!?? So your a no show all playoffs cuz you talked so much shit about VAN and how they were gonna lose and how MTL was Canadas 'best chance'.. Now your back to call the Canucks an 'arrogant' and 'less hard-working' team then 94?? What a joke you are.. These guys are the hardest working players in the NHL.. Why do you think we were number 1?? HARD WORK.. Sedins are hard workers.. You don't get that many points and up for MVP by NOT WORKING.. Kesler and Burrows are the kind of character guys you need to win.. Torres and Lappierre also.. I don't condone what he did with the fingers but look at Boston!! They called us classless and did the same thing the next game!! Your so wrong in everything you say man.. Really you should not post your dumbass opinions.. It makes you look just that.. It's better when your just not here.. The forum doesn't need your lack of knowledge..