When I posted it did not have an appro line. I now have +120 but Nylander likely put so not a qualifier. If nylander is in then it would qualify but consider this. If nylander is in why wouldn't the line move from +120? So highly doubt this will qualify.
0
@CallmeBookie
When I posted it did not have an appro line. I now have +120 but Nylander likely put so not a qualifier. If nylander is in then it would qualify but consider this. If nylander is in why wouldn't the line move from +120? So highly doubt this will qualify.
May God be watching over Lippsman. I miss him too Julie.
I am on the split for a cool 0-4 so far...lol. But there are two rounds so lets chip away at some of that tonight and tommorrow. Don't really remember a home dominance like this in hockey playoffs to begin things.
0
May God be watching over Lippsman. I miss him too Julie.
I am on the split for a cool 0-4 so far...lol. But there are two rounds so lets chip away at some of that tonight and tommorrow. Don't really remember a home dominance like this in hockey playoffs to begin things.
I can't remember the exact stat but I think I heard last night first time since 1970something home teams open 6-0 lol. The first year I try this strategy haha I still have faith!
0
@BooBunny
I can't remember the exact stat but I think I heard last night first time since 1970something home teams open 6-0 lol. The first year I try this strategy haha I still have faith!
[Quote: Originally Posted by pcollins]Quote Originally Posted by pcollins: Hilarious system but I’m in. All these years and I don’t think I’ve seen it but it will make handicapping very easy this playoff system. It’s on me now but thanks for the posts.. ouch!Slow start. 0-2 -$400 but sticking with it. let’s go dogs![/. OK 0-6. -$1200 so far. I may be missing some rules or qualifying terms but sticking with it tonight. Believe it hasn’t started 6-0 home team since 1978, is that right? C’mon dogs.
0
[Quote: Originally Posted by pcollins]Quote Originally Posted by pcollins: Hilarious system but I’m in. All these years and I don’t think I’ve seen it but it will make handicapping very easy this playoff system. It’s on me now but thanks for the posts.. ouch!Slow start. 0-2 -$400 but sticking with it. let’s go dogs![/. OK 0-6. -$1200 so far. I may be missing some rules or qualifying terms but sticking with it tonight. Believe it hasn’t started 6-0 home team since 1978, is that right? C’mon dogs.
What a coincidence, my first time lol. I trust but man it's a torturous start that's certain. Going to need VGK to salvage tonight because LAK is not doing it.
0
@GASportsDoc
What a coincidence, my first time lol. I trust but man it's a torturous start that's certain. Going to need VGK to salvage tonight because LAK is not doing it.
So, not sure on Washington in the strict adherence to the original entrance criteria of Lippsman formula. Nicklas Backstrom is their #1 Center, but he has basically missed the entire season, so is he truly a top 6 player not in action...?
I took them Game 1 and will take them again Game 2 because I think the spirit of the Split would say that he is not considered as part of that top 6 due to missing 70+ games due to injury. But I am also not putting up a full unit bet b/c at +245 you do not need to...
1
So, not sure on Washington in the strict adherence to the original entrance criteria of Lippsman formula. Nicklas Backstrom is their #1 Center, but he has basically missed the entire season, so is he truly a top 6 player not in action...?
I took them Game 1 and will take them again Game 2 because I think the spirit of the Split would say that he is not considered as part of that top 6 due to missing 70+ games due to injury. But I am also not putting up a full unit bet b/c at +245 you do not need to...
I definitely agree. However this is on the fade team so NSH is no longer +120 or longer. I grabbed them at +133 based on the parameters. Does it still count as a split play? Either way I secured value and will obviously not cash out, but just curious for tracking purposes. I also grabbed NSH series +210.
0
@Osser
I definitely agree. However this is on the fade team so NSH is no longer +120 or longer. I grabbed them at +133 based on the parameters. Does it still count as a split play? Either way I secured value and will obviously not cash out, but just curious for tracking purposes. I also grabbed NSH series +210.
The +120 was based on the value of the price of the dog only. +120 puts you at implied probability of 45% and I am guessing that Lipps went back and did the math to find the min value of the dog price from years prior to ensure you profit, or at minimum break even based on many splits occured vs all games total.
So if you get it at +133, it meets the criteria. Now that the line is in +110 range, it is below that min value, and the system would recommend to not bet it.
0
The +120 was based on the value of the price of the dog only. +120 puts you at implied probability of 45% and I am guessing that Lipps went back and did the math to find the min value of the dog price from years prior to ensure you profit, or at minimum break even based on many splits occured vs all games total.
So if you get it at +133, it meets the criteria. Now that the line is in +110 range, it is below that min value, and the system would recommend to not bet it.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.