How was that goal Henrik's fault? Went off Girardi's skate and in. If they kept track of "own goals" like they do in soccer, the Rangers would be leading the league by a mile.
0
How was that goal Henrik's fault? Went off Girardi's skate and in. If they kept track of "own goals" like they do in soccer, the Rangers would be leading the league by a mile.
Wasnt Henriks fault in any of the previous games either?
Dude has been the best goalie in the league over the course of the entire playoffs by a country mile. And I am the last one to admit when he's playing well.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Asomugha:
Wasnt Henriks fault in any of the previous games either?
Dude has been the best goalie in the league over the course of the entire playoffs by a country mile. And I am the last one to admit when he's playing well.
Are you watching the game? Or are you just watching the scoreboard? You saw the ridiculous bounce right? Blaming Henrik for these goals are ridiculous on all levels, and comparing him to Fleury is even more absurd.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Asomugha:
Theres number 3
Are you watching the game? Or are you just watching the scoreboard? You saw the ridiculous bounce right? Blaming Henrik for these goals are ridiculous on all levels, and comparing him to Fleury is even more absurd.
Are you watching the game? Or are you just watching the scoreboard? You saw the ridiculous bounce right? Blaming Henrik for these goals are ridiculous on all levels, and comparing him to Fleury is even more absurd.
Yes, im watching it.
0
Quote Originally Posted by rangerz2478:
Are you watching the game? Or are you just watching the scoreboard? You saw the ridiculous bounce right? Blaming Henrik for these goals are ridiculous on all levels, and comparing him to Fleury is even more absurd.
Lundqvist & the pathetic eastern conference are the only reason this team made it here...I still think they are a well coached team but the lack of talent eventually catches up to...always.
0
Lundqvist & the pathetic eastern conference are the only reason this team made it here...I still think they are a well coached team but the lack of talent eventually catches up to...always.
Ok so please explain to me where he was to blame for tonight then? Even assuming the Fleury comment was a partial joke, I just don't get it.
All 3 were tipped Lundqvist barely had a chance.
So how much did you lose thinking Kings would score on the empty netter? I remember our convo so I didnt put as much on it but got LA -3.5 at +319 which was bought down to +190 in like 40 seconds. I just cant believe in 4 minutes LA couldn't score.
0
Quote Originally Posted by rangerz2478:
Ok so please explain to me where he was to blame for tonight then? Even assuming the Fleury comment was a partial joke, I just don't get it.
All 3 were tipped Lundqvist barely had a chance.
So how much did you lose thinking Kings would score on the empty netter? I remember our convo so I didnt put as much on it but got LA -3.5 at +319 which was bought down to +190 in like 40 seconds. I just cant believe in 4 minutes LA couldn't score.
So how much did you lose thinking Kings would score on the empty netter? I remember our convo so I didnt put as much on it but got LA -3.5 at +319 which was bought down to +190 in like 40 seconds. I just cant believe in 4 minutes LA couldn't score.
A lot, lol.
That's about 20 minutes of empty net time in 5 games I've lost on with the Rangers. 3 of them were close to 5 minutes of empty net time, and lost. Outside of the fact they're looking like they might get swept, I seriously despise them right now.
0
Quote Originally Posted by wiggins:
All 3 were tipped Lundqvist barely had a chance.
So how much did you lose thinking Kings would score on the empty netter? I remember our convo so I didnt put as much on it but got LA -3.5 at +319 which was bought down to +190 in like 40 seconds. I just cant believe in 4 minutes LA couldn't score.
A lot, lol.
That's about 20 minutes of empty net time in 5 games I've lost on with the Rangers. 3 of them were close to 5 minutes of empty net time, and lost. Outside of the fact they're looking like they might get swept, I seriously despise them right now.
I saw it was +105 over on 365 with 5 mins left. Absolutely absurd price. If they knew there was going to be 4:30 of empty net, would have been -200 minimum. They obviously haven't built it into their odds in these 3 goal games.
0
I saw it was +105 over on 365 with 5 mins left. Absolutely absurd price. If they knew there was going to be 4:30 of empty net, would have been -200 minimum. They obviously haven't built it into their odds in these 3 goal games.
It's absolutely ridiculous. Rangers don't even push though..at that point there is no need for both dmen to be back or for the forward to take the Dman's place at the point..you are going for goals. There was not 1 odd man rush
Sorry about your rangers. At least you will be able to get some talent when you buy out Richards..dont know what you will do with Nash...2 straight playoffs he has been brutal. Or maybe he was just unlucky...only a 2.8 shooting %....maybe Gainey will consult Dallas to gift you another McDonagh for 1 of them
0
It's absolutely ridiculous. Rangers don't even push though..at that point there is no need for both dmen to be back or for the forward to take the Dman's place at the point..you are going for goals. There was not 1 odd man rush
Sorry about your rangers. At least you will be able to get some talent when you buy out Richards..dont know what you will do with Nash...2 straight playoffs he has been brutal. Or maybe he was just unlucky...only a 2.8 shooting %....maybe Gainey will consult Dallas to gift you another McDonagh for 1 of them
It's absolutely ridiculous. Rangers don't even push though..at that point there is no need for both dmen to be back or for the forward to take the Dman's place at the point..you are going for goals. There was not 1 odd man rush
Sorry about your rangers. At least you will be able to get some talent when you buy out Richards..dont know what you will do with Nash...2 straight playoffs he has been brutal. Or maybe he was just unlucky...only a 2.8 shooting %....maybe Gainey will consult Dallas to gift you another McDonagh for 1 of them
Yea, they just looked defeated with no interest at all. You'd think in 4:30 you'd get a COUPLE breaks with out of control pinches, but nothing.
No need to apologize about them. At this stage in my life, I'm a gambler first, and a fan second. I was at game 6 vs Montreal and as amazing as it was, didn't have the same effect as going to Mets game 7 vs St. Louis in 2006. I'm still a fan, but gambling has ruined me in terms of being that die hard fan that lives and dies with the team. After that Mets game in 06, I couldn't eat for weeks lol. Right now, I'm more mad at the Rangers for the crazy amount of money I've lost on them over the course of the playoffs, than angry at them for getting swept in the cup.
0
Quote Originally Posted by wiggins:
It's absolutely ridiculous. Rangers don't even push though..at that point there is no need for both dmen to be back or for the forward to take the Dman's place at the point..you are going for goals. There was not 1 odd man rush
Sorry about your rangers. At least you will be able to get some talent when you buy out Richards..dont know what you will do with Nash...2 straight playoffs he has been brutal. Or maybe he was just unlucky...only a 2.8 shooting %....maybe Gainey will consult Dallas to gift you another McDonagh for 1 of them
Yea, they just looked defeated with no interest at all. You'd think in 4:30 you'd get a COUPLE breaks with out of control pinches, but nothing.
No need to apologize about them. At this stage in my life, I'm a gambler first, and a fan second. I was at game 6 vs Montreal and as amazing as it was, didn't have the same effect as going to Mets game 7 vs St. Louis in 2006. I'm still a fan, but gambling has ruined me in terms of being that die hard fan that lives and dies with the team. After that Mets game in 06, I couldn't eat for weeks lol. Right now, I'm more mad at the Rangers for the crazy amount of money I've lost on them over the course of the playoffs, than angry at them for getting swept in the cup.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.