All Forums | Penalty Box

2 or maybe 3 HUGE plays this week

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 29189
Posts: 164
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 1916
Posted: #51
SMU
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2002
Posts: 2300
Posted: #52
SMU  
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 5935
Posted: #53
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2009
Posts: 422
Posted: #54
Quote Originally Posted by research:

 

I'm almost 100% sure that I will be against one of your listed plays



which one is it? they aren't my plays btw, but I'm guessing that you are either playing Tulsa or Washington
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2007
Posts: 1173
Posted: #55
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 444
Posted: #56
Second confirmed huge play:
 
Middle Tennessee State +4.5
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2009
Posts: 1331
Posted: #57
  Pony Express +8     MTS 3-18 vs SEC 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 444
Posted: #58
Quote Originally Posted by allicat:

  Pony Express +8     MTS 3-18 vs SEC 

 

FIRST EVER HOME VS SEC

 
Covers Rehab
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2009
Posts: 41
Posted: #59

on it.  thanks . obviously md. tenn is 3-18 vs. SEC but what is

ats record vs. SEC?

and they"ve always played on road.

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2007
Posts: 1173
Posted: #60
Already have MTSU circled. I couldn't agree more. MissSt obviously plays better talent in the SEC, but could not beat a 105th ranked Houston defense at home. MTSU is coming off a poor showing vs Troy 11 days prior. I really like this game, especially if I get better than 3 points.
Your SMU pick is intriguing too. Navy has some interesting injuries, and SMU appears to be able to throw the ball.
BOL.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2006
Posts: 414
Posted: #61
MTSU...all I can say is WOW.I was all over the other side, now I don't know.GL to all, follow or fade?Thanks research.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2007
Posts: 22613
Posted: #62
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 415
Posted: #63
SMU's 74th-ranked rushing defense meets Navy's 6th-ranked rushing offense. Navy has won the last two meetings by 27 and 31, including 34-7 last year. In last week's 28-21 upset of ECU, the Mustangs scored touchdowns on an interception return and a 63-yard blocked FG return. An offensive TD came on a 96-yard pass. Only 1 SMU score came on a drive that lasted more than 1 play.
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2009
Posts: 5107
Posted: #64
Love both picks -- Got MTSU +5.5 personally, think this will be a steal.
Probably gonna jump on SMU as well, just waiting as well.  BOL and as always, thanks for the great research, research
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 415
Posted: #65
Research:

Your MTSU play looks good, I would reconsider your units on the SMU play imo. BOL Below is what the Congrove Computer Ranking has this match-up at.

MIDDLE TENNESSEE by 5.39 over Mississippi State (-3)
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 444
Posted: #66

@atxcojo

 

SMU defense forced 19 turnovers YTD and that's the 2nd best in the NCAA so far. Actually, the only team that forced 20 turnovers so far (Air Force) played one more game than SMU. They are a top 30 team in punt/kickoff returns. That usually gives them a relatively short field and with their passing attack that is a big +. Navy should pile up rushing yards against SMU, but they do that against every team in the nation because that's all they do offensively. SMU was outrushed by 148 vs ECU and won outright (Won ATS), by 138 at UAB and won SU and ATS and by 245 at TCU and stil covered ATS and played TCU much closer than expected.

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 460
Posted: #67
BOL Research
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2007
Posts: 2024
Posted: #68
Good Luck with the plays.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 444
Posted: #69
Also, Bo Levi Michell is more experienced than last year. SMU has seen this Navy offense last season and now they have a better idea what to expect. Last season they were 1-7 when they went to Navy allowing over 41 ppg. This season they are 3-2 allowing just over 29 ppg. Last year Navy beat SMU at home in a horrible weather.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2005
Posts: 3683
Posted: #70
SMU    and Middle Tenn

oppositie on both , Good luck anyway
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 26029
Posted: #71
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 1117
Posted: #72
Hey Research, you're 2 big plays this week, are those bigger than the Arkansas big play last week? Thanks for your work bro.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2007
Posts: 1296
Posted: #73
Im a mfootball whisperer
 
I predict your 3rd choice will be
 
Purdue or SD St
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2003
Posts: 142
Posted: #74
keep it up research.  I love to watch these fools bad mouth your picks and eat crow on sat night.  Keep up the good work
 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2008
Posts: 3823
Posted: #75
why do people make threads saying that they are going to have a play later?  why not just wait until you have a play?

No big deal, just don't see the point.
All Forums | Penalty Box
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2025 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.