All Forums | Penalty Box

Bahamas Bowl Obvious Rig Job

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 4593
Posts: 86
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2007
Posts: 937
Posted: #26
All you guys making fun of him saying he's a joke shut up. This game was one of the great fixes of all time last year. F UK the MAC. Like someone before said, sketchy players, sketchy refs, sketchy coaches. BGSU no points second half last night? LOL
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2008
Posts: 4870
Posted: #27
They also called a questionable holding call that wiped out a TD
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2015
Posts: 709
Posted: #28
Exactly. These commentators suck!
It ain't over til it's over
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2013
Posts: 2296
Posted: #29
Its a fix if we see 80 points.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2014
Posts: 1283
Posted: #30
Quote Originally Posted by JUSTWINNERZ12:

Live in-game O/U is 87.5

Wow!!!!!

And it will stay under 62.5 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2015
Posts: 46
Posted: #31

BGSU under 34.5 was a hilarious fix. I called Under winning, but not the way it happened. If I had bet the over there, I would have been fuming with how it happened.

Matt Johnson looked completely apathetic. I'm telling you, some of these NCAA players are getting paid off. It's a matter of whether the coach notices and can bench them in time like the WMU coach did with his paid off RB in this game.

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2011
Posts: 2667
Posted: #32
Quote Originally Posted by LETGOPACK1234:

And what about that?  THe defender had has hand on the ball OUT OF BOUNDS when he caused the fumble

Quote Originally Posted by thecentaur:

How was that a fumble?  Defender was either out of bounds when he caused the fumble or came back in after going out on his own.  How can that be a fumble?


I'll do you 2 a favor and explain football to you.

It does NOT matter if a defender is out of bounds and touches a ball carrier or the football.If there is a change of possession then it matters where the defender is. He was out of bounds when he initially touched the ball carried but had gotten his feet back in bounds when he stripped it.


All that is necessary is the defender re-establish in the field of play. A defender only needs to have 1 foot back in play to be considered live, unlike an offensive player that must have 2 feet back in bounds if he goes out of bounds. 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2013
Posts: 2296
Posted: #33
Holding call after TD was scored. Then defender had 1 foot out of bounds while stripping the ball to cause fumble.


Then they take 10 minutes to review fumble. WOW.

2nd half please let them score 50 points or OVERTIME, because I just want to see how many different ways they can fix this game.
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2012
Posts: 860
Posted: #34
So let me get this right...According to your brilliant analysis, both teams and the ref are in on the fix?
I think the fans in the stands are in on it to...

Gambling probably isn't 4 u if your conspiracies surface before the outcome of the game..( 1st Q )..

Do yourself a favor... and get

BL my friend.. 
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2011
Posts: 12243
Posted: #35
Quote Originally Posted by TopHog:


Quote Originally Posted by thecentaur:

How was that a fumble?  Defender was either out of bounds when he caused the fumble or came back in after going out on his own.  How can that be a fumble?


I'll do you 2 a favor and explain football to you.

It does NOT matter if a defender is out of bounds and touches a ball carrier or the football.If there is a change of possession then it matters where the defender is. He was out of bounds when he initially touched the ball carried but had gotten his feet back in bounds when he stripped it.


All that is necessary is the defender re-establish in the field of play. A defender only needs to have 1 foot back in play to be considered live, unlike an offensive player that must have 2 feet back in bounds if he goes out of bounds. 

Youre joking right?

Then why if a defender is out of bounds recovering a fumble, it will not be a recovery?  

If the ball is on the ground, and a player dives for it, but his foot or hand is out-of-bounds when he recovers it...it wont be a recovery.

The defender was out-of-bounds touching the ball.  It should have been called out-of-bounds since he caused the fumble.  
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2013
Posts: 399
Posted: #36
Why didn't MTSU call a timeout with :53 seconds left in the second quarter to stop the clock and get the ball back...I mean you got 3 timeouts left? Stupidest shitt I've ever seen!
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2015
Posts: 46
Posted: #37

Quote Originally Posted by BARNUN:

Why didn't MTSU call a timeout with :53 seconds left in the second quarter to stop the clock and get the ball back...I mean you got 3 timeouts left? Stupidest shitt I've ever seen!

Did you see the coach for MTSU? The bald guy who looks like Jim Caldwell. That's why. Coaches like that aren't known for having good football IQ. Just look at Mike Tomlin with the Steelers how he always goes for 2 even though he has NFL kickers on his roster. He only does that because he probably used to do it when he was playing Madden with his friends in the ghetto.

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2012
Posts: 2049
Posted: #38
Quote Originally Posted by LETGOPACK1234:


Youre joking right?

Then why if a defender is out of bounds recovering a fumble, it will not be a recovery?  

If the ball is on the ground, and a player dives for it, but his foot or hand is out-of-bounds when he recovers it...it wont be a recovery.

The defender was out-of-bounds touching the ball.  It should have been called out-of-bounds since he caused the fumble.  

Agreed

Even if the defender reestablished in bounds before the fumble happened, at the very least the defender touched the ball while out of bounds.  That would be a penalty and everything that happened after would be negated
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2011
Posts: 2667
Posted: #39
lmao......you guys bet football and you don't have a clue about the rules
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2011
Posts: 12243
Posted: #40
Quote Originally Posted by TopHog:

lmao......you guys bet football and you don't have a clue about the rules


So, what would have happened, had the defender who was out of bounds who caused the fumble, stripped it clean while he was out of bounds?  Would it have been WMU ball?  No because he was out of bounds

But, he can be touching the ball, cause a fumble OUT OF BOUNDS and still recover it because it was in the field of play?  If that is the rule, then yes, I didnt know that, and that is a terrible rule!!!
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2012
Posts: 2049
Posted: #41
Quote Originally Posted by TopHog:

lmao......you guys bet football and you don't have a clue about the rules

You sound really sure about it but I think you are mistaken

Please post the rule that says a defender out of bounds can touch the ball or make a play while out of bounds.  The only rule I have come across is:

-ENTERING THE FIELD OF PLAY

A player may not run out of bounds and then run back inbounds to make a play. For example, a receiver may not run down the sidelines, step out of bounds and make a catch. If a player makes a catch under those circumstances, a penalty flag is thrown for illegal touching. However, if the player is shoved out of bounds by a defensive player and then gets back inbounds as quickly as possible, the illegal touching penalty flag is not thrown, and the catch can be ruled as legal by the officials.


Notice it says "player", not just "receiver" or "offensive player"

I will accept nudes of the girl in your avatar as an apology


 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2011
Posts: 12243
Posted: #42
Quote Originally Posted by TopHog:

lmao......you guys bet football and you don't have a clue about the rules


More and more this doesnt make sense...if the ball is rolling out of bounds and a player tries to save it but touches the sideline the ball is dead...

On a punt, if a defender is trying to avoid a touchback, but touches the goaline...its a touchback

All the same principle...the player was touching the ball while out-of-bounds...he simply cant touch it again even if he restablishes himself...the ball should have been dead.  
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2013
Posts: 2296
Posted: #43
This game is staying under. They are milking the clock.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2011
Posts: 2667
Posted: #44
lmao, like I said, the change of possession didn't occur until the defender had gotten 1 foot back in play. It's a legal play


I know you guys want to pretend that it was a fix or that you know more about the rules than the officials do but you don't.


I don't know of anyway to explain the rules to you guys any better than what I did. If you chose to keep your tinfoil hat on, power to ya pals. 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2011
Posts: 2667
Posted: #45
Quote Originally Posted by LETGOPACK1234:



More and more this doesnt make sense...if the ball is rolling out of bounds and a player tries to save it but touches the sideline the ball is dead...

On a punt, if a defender is trying to avoid a touchback, but touches the goaline...its a touchback

All the same principle...the player was touching the ball while out-of-bounds...he simply cant touch it again even if he restablishes himself...the ball should have been dead.  
'

Once again you are wrong kid. A player can be in the endzone if he is downing a punt, the only thing that matters is the ball doesn't cross the goal line.....lol
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2011
Posts: 12243
Posted: #46
Quote Originally Posted by TopHog:

'

Once again you are wrong kid. A player can be in the endzone if he is downing a punt, the only thing that matters is the ball doesn't cross the goal line.....lol


So, you are telling me, on a punt...if a player runs into the endzone, turns around and stops before the goaline(still in the endzone)...turns around and stops the ball just before the goalline..it wont be a touchback?  
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2011
Posts: 12243
Posted: #47
Quote Originally Posted by TopHog:

lmao, like I said, the change of possession didn't occur until the defender had gotten 1 foot back in play. It's a legal play


I know you guys want to pretend that it was a fix or that you know more about the rules than the officials do but you don't.


I don't know of anyway to explain the rules to you guys any better than what I did. If you chose to keep your tinfoil hat on, power to ya pals. 

Well, Ive made thousands of bets in 15 years of pro and college football....and ive NEVER seen a player who was out-of-bounds cause a fumble, who was out-of-bounds touching the ball...recover the fumble...

I guess there is a first for everything 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2011
Posts: 2667
Posted: #48
Quote Originally Posted by LETGOPACK1234:



So, you are telling me, on a punt...if a player runs into the endzone, turns around and stops before the goaline(still in the endzone)...turns around and stops the ball just before the goalline..it wont be a touchback?  

YES!!! lmao, it's 2015 bro. Rules have changed, I suggest you read them before making yourself look silly. 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2013
Posts: 454
Posted: #49
Jesus... There is a lot of stupid in this thread.
 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2011
Posts: 2667
Posted: #50
You ain't lying bro
All Forums | Penalty Box
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.