CD Newsletter Week 11

@BIGDTITLE

Pretty sure Hugh is just showing off his new avi change 

This new avi will be short lived.

It's so ugly that it's making my eyes bleed

For those who are wondering why I had so many empty replies to myself ...

Well, let's just say you had to be here

Every time I look at it I feel like I need to call the Crime Stoppers 1-800 number. 

@trainwreck66

 Go to bread 

I tend to be socially liberal, but I am in no way shape or form politically correct, and that was really funny 

Watching this MNF game. It’s interesting just how unfocused an entire team can be on a given day. All these dropped passes by the Rams, bad throws by Stafford, poor tackling and just being out efforted all over the field. There has always been cases of good teams losing games they shouldn’t, but this is different. Happened to Dallas and Buffalo last week, and a few teams before that. Strange year 

@Hugh_Jorgan

Rams seemed lifeless , no adjustments . Double team Kupp and the Rams look very one dimensional 

McCay looked pissed post game. Said they are going to come out swinging after the bye. I believe him.

I just blinked, and the Packers are 9-1 ats.

Wtf 

@undermysac

 Remember all the talking heads on tv going on for hours how GB was in trouble after they got trounced in week 1 by NO? So many said Rodgers was done, he was disinterested, he screwed the team by not committing to them. There were an unreal amount of threads in the mains with all the knee jerk reaction fools explaining to the world that Rodgers was going to prove that he didn't want to play for GB.

Rodgers answer? 9-1 ATS

@Hugh_Jorgan

 Agreed. But I think their defence has been the story.

@lbcake

I agree the defense has been the story because how they are playing was unexpected.

Here are Rodgers stats:

66% completions. 17 TD's 4 INT's.

If the defense was playing poorly, he would have more yards throwing and more TD's.

My point being that the narrative being spewed by the majority after week #1 was blatantly false

The Raiders have as many turnovers in the last 2 weeks that they had in the first 7.

Minus the WFT, the NFC East is 18-10 ats.

KC and TB are a combined 6-13 ats.

The AFC North is 15-22 ats. Not 1 team is above .500. But 21-15-1 su, the books have pegged the spreads to their liking with this division. 

Pitt, Sea and GB are 5-22-2 O/U. That's not a typo,  Russ, Aaron and Ben. I mentioned yesterday how all the old qb's in the league have looked old. That 17th game is going to be a bitch for everyone. 

Look ahead for TNF was ATL +4(-115).

Now ATL +6.5(-105)

I said the public would take it to 7. What a magnificent turn of events to people's perception.

A combined score of 88-10 in week 10 will do that.

Rodgers 8-1 ATS

Love 1-0 ATS

Can you repeat that please?

There's someone in the back row who couldn't hear you

GOY #3

This is one of those Bator rules I believe, but double whammy style. I just don't know if I have the strength in my soul to fade NE and back ATL.

The Falcons at 4-5 kind of a do or die game. The Getty's on deck, no look ahead on a short week. Statistically terrible by dvoa and such.

Patriots 6-4 with the 2nd best record in the AFC, right behind Tennessee who is on deck...the Pats have won 4 in a row. Belichick always seems to have that engine purring in Nov/Dec.

We'll get into the matchups later 

@Hugh_Jorgan

 So the Bears will not be GOY3 ?      <Maybe  have 2 GOW GOYs>

I'm assuming Falcs??

WC Qualie   Latvia v The Rock  O2.5  (2.09 Pinny) 

Latvia 2-1, 3-0

- caution -

@lbcake

 I attempted a blind tail (saying I’m betting soccer blindly is redundant) but could not find Latvia in any of the games. I did come across matches between countries I’ve never heard of, but no Latvia. Let me know if I saved money 

I miss bigred and his double posts. Hopefully the Shrimp win this week so he can participate in the thread on a more regular basis 

@Hugh_Jorgan

 Gibraltar is the squad Latvia is playing. It should be available, it's a World Cup qualifier.