Quote Originally Posted by BIGDTITLE: been telling wreck and Eddie that for years but ill let them keep thinking we all carry and dip Copenhagen and marry our cousins What if the cousin is hot?
Exceptions may be granted.
0
Quote Originally Posted by BWS77:
Quote Originally Posted by BIGDTITLE: been telling wreck and Eddie that for years but ill let them keep thinking we all carry and dip Copenhagen and marry our cousins What if the cousin is hot?
Reading today that the Raiders had the flu bug going into the Saints game.
Do we give the Raiders a Mulligan? I lost on both the Raiders and Jags last week, they both owe me $. And now they play each other, so one of these atrocious teams will pay, leaning Raiders. Fwiw, the Raiders are staying on the east coast all week to nullify shitty travel.
Now for MNF, are the Saints as good as televised vs a flu ridden Raider team? Leaning Ravens. Want to know the status of their TE though. Roquon can run with Kamara, he has in the past.
0
Reading today that the Raiders had the flu bug going into the Saints game.
Do we give the Raiders a Mulligan? I lost on both the Raiders and Jags last week, they both owe me $. And now they play each other, so one of these atrocious teams will pay, leaning Raiders. Fwiw, the Raiders are staying on the east coast all week to nullify shitty travel.
Now for MNF, are the Saints as good as televised vs a flu ridden Raider team? Leaning Ravens. Want to know the status of their TE though. Roquon can run with Kamara, he has in the past.
Yeah I caught wind of the Raiders flu bug yesterday. I know the Jaguars players are still fully invested in Doug Peterson. Are the Raider players still invested in Josh McDaniels? Other than taking the over 47 this is a coinflip of a game to bet a side. I do think we see points rack up over time. (Cyrax are you listening?)
0
@undermysac
Yeah I caught wind of the Raiders flu bug yesterday. I know the Jaguars players are still fully invested in Doug Peterson. Are the Raider players still invested in Josh McDaniels? Other than taking the over 47 this is a coinflip of a game to bet a side. I do think we see points rack up over time. (Cyrax are you listening?)
I just don't see the Vikings continuing the winning streak. No reason really other than that it's a hard thing to do in the nfl.
If you guys remember, sharps had a real hard on for Washington earlier in the year, and would back them week after week and got destroyed. Now with a different(and better) qb, maybe whatever they liked about Washington will come to fruition.
Really hating how much I put on Detroit and Chicago. I need some big time luck on those wagers.
0
36-31-2 (+8.95)
Lions +3.5(-110) *2.50/2.27
ML(+260) *.50/.80
Bears +3.5(-105) *2.10/2.00
ML(+165) *50/.83
Commanders +3.5(-115) *1.15/1.00
ML(+158) *.25/.40
I just don't see the Vikings continuing the winning streak. No reason really other than that it's a hard thing to do in the nfl.
If you guys remember, sharps had a real hard on for Washington earlier in the year, and would back them week after week and got destroyed. Now with a different(and better) qb, maybe whatever they liked about Washington will come to fruition.
Really hating how much I put on Detroit and Chicago. I need some big time luck on those wagers.
Heard some podcast stuff saying that people were wrong about him being a generational talent. Sure at Clemson he won games by 47+, but when it's a tight game on the line he was pedestrian. Don't quote me on that, I barely watch college, just what I heard.
0
@Getty3
How do you feel about Trevor Lawrence?
Heard some podcast stuff saying that people were wrong about him being a generational talent. Sure at Clemson he won games by 47+, but when it's a tight game on the line he was pedestrian. Don't quote me on that, I barely watch college, just what I heard.
Reading today that the Raiders had the flu bug going into the Saints game. Do we give the Raiders a Mulligan? I lost on both the Raiders and Jags last week, they both owe me $. And now they play each other, so one of these atrocious teams will pay, leaning Raiders. Fwiw, the Raiders are staying on the east coast all week to nullify shitty travel. Now for MNF, are the Saints as good as televised vs a flu ridden Raider team? Leaning Ravens. Want to know the status of their TE though. Roquon can run with Kamara, he has in the past.
I highly doubt Andrews plays unless he's 100%, i dont think he plays.Likely looked good and i have no idea why Boyles is not playing more, he is capable, doghouse possibility.Glad you made it out of Texas.
0
Quote Originally Posted by undermysac:
Reading today that the Raiders had the flu bug going into the Saints game. Do we give the Raiders a Mulligan? I lost on both the Raiders and Jags last week, they both owe me $. And now they play each other, so one of these atrocious teams will pay, leaning Raiders. Fwiw, the Raiders are staying on the east coast all week to nullify shitty travel. Now for MNF, are the Saints as good as televised vs a flu ridden Raider team? Leaning Ravens. Want to know the status of their TE though. Roquon can run with Kamara, he has in the past.
I highly doubt Andrews plays unless he's 100%, i dont think he plays.Likely looked good and i have no idea why Boyles is not playing more, he is capable, doghouse possibility.Glad you made it out of Texas.
@Getty3 How do you feel about Trevor Lawrence? Heard some podcast stuff saying that people were wrong about him being a generational talent. Sure at Clemson he won games by 47+, but when it's a tight game on the line he was pedestrian. Don't quote me on that, I barely watch college, just what I heard.
I don't think he ever got better after his first season in college. Either he set the bar so high that anything after was gonna be impossible to sustain, or he peaked.
0
Quote Originally Posted by undermysac:
@Getty3 How do you feel about Trevor Lawrence? Heard some podcast stuff saying that people were wrong about him being a generational talent. Sure at Clemson he won games by 47+, but when it's a tight game on the line he was pedestrian. Don't quote me on that, I barely watch college, just what I heard.
I don't think he ever got better after his first season in college. Either he set the bar so high that anything after was gonna be impossible to sustain, or he peaked.
Quote Originally Posted by undermysac: @Getty3 How do you feel about Trevor Lawrence? Heard some podcast stuff saying that people were wrong about him being a generational talent. Sure at Clemson he won games by 47+, but when it's a tight game on the line he was pedestrian. Don't quote me on that, I barely watch college, just what I heard. I don't think he ever got better after his first season in college. Either he set the bar so high that anything after was gonna be impossible to sustain, or he peaked.
To go along w/everything said - how many 'can't misses', missed? more or less than 80%? The 'best evers' are always the after thoughts. And I'm talking all sports.
0
Quote Originally Posted by BWS77:
Quote Originally Posted by undermysac: @Getty3 How do you feel about Trevor Lawrence? Heard some podcast stuff saying that people were wrong about him being a generational talent. Sure at Clemson he won games by 47+, but when it's a tight game on the line he was pedestrian. Don't quote me on that, I barely watch college, just what I heard. I don't think he ever got better after his first season in college. Either he set the bar so high that anything after was gonna be impossible to sustain, or he peaked.
To go along w/everything said - how many 'can't misses', missed? more or less than 80%? The 'best evers' are always the after thoughts. And I'm talking all sports.
Last week I lost on Pats 1H, then cried about it. So let's bet it again and double it, instead of being a p-u-s-s-y.
I'm sure a lot of folks think that the spread is too high, and that the Pats shouldn't be laying this much to anyone. Rightfully so, Mac Jones is not stellar. He has gotten lucky with a lot of dropped interceptions. The Pats don't pull away convincingly vs anyone not named the Lions. The Pats value field goals, and this doesn't create blow outs.
But I'll say that rookie QB's vs Belichick have gotten decimated over the years. This will be Ehlinger's first road start in the nfl. And he won't have the comfort of a dome which doesn't have weather factors.
The Colts this year have averaged 5.3 points in the 1H. On the road 1.5, that's not a typo.
The Colts are 31st by dvoa, 29th epa on offense, 15th epa on defense(Pats #5).
This is a good spot for the Pats to give their fans a good showing, as their last home game they were embarrassed by the Bears on prime time. It's also hard to believe that they've had only 3 home games so far and are 1-2 in Foxboro.
0
36-31-2 (+8.95)
Lions +3.5(-110) *2.50/2.27
ML(+260) *.50/.80
Bears +3.5(-105) *2.10/2.00
ML(+165) *50/.83
Commanders +3.5(-115) *1.15/1.00
ML(+158) *.25/.40
Patriots 1H -3(-105) *2.10/2.00
Last week I lost on Pats 1H, then cried about it. So let's bet it again and double it, instead of being a p-u-s-s-y.
I'm sure a lot of folks think that the spread is too high, and that the Pats shouldn't be laying this much to anyone. Rightfully so, Mac Jones is not stellar. He has gotten lucky with a lot of dropped interceptions. The Pats don't pull away convincingly vs anyone not named the Lions. The Pats value field goals, and this doesn't create blow outs.
But I'll say that rookie QB's vs Belichick have gotten decimated over the years. This will be Ehlinger's first road start in the nfl. And he won't have the comfort of a dome which doesn't have weather factors.
The Colts this year have averaged 5.3 points in the 1H. On the road 1.5, that's not a typo.
The Colts are 31st by dvoa, 29th epa on offense, 15th epa on defense(Pats #5).
This is a good spot for the Pats to give their fans a good showing, as their last home game they were embarrassed by the Bears on prime time. It's also hard to believe that they've had only 3 home games so far and are 1-2 in Foxboro.
Quote Originally Posted by undermysac: 36-31-2 (+8.95) Week 8: 4-4 (-0.09) Lions +3.5(-110) *2.50/2.27 ML(+260) *.50/.80 Bears +3.5(-105) *2.10/2.00 ML(+165) *50/.83 Plays above are look ahead lines I bet, as you guys know. Lost on the Bears value, got the hook with the Lions. Looking back at every week, I only lost 2 out of 8 weeks of betting, and last week was only a $9 loss. I must be doing something right, as each week it feels like this is getting maddening. At BigD, Dallas is a cool city. Real nice people. The Cowboys fans were awesome, no one really talked shit. At the tailgate they were welcoming as can be. Free beers n food the whole time and we didn't even have to ask. I didn't feel like we were in a desert at any point. And the stereotypical notion of big boots, cowboy hats, big ass trucks, and good ole boys that I had in my head going in(as I've never visited the state), just wasn't there. Awesome stadium in Arlington been telling wreck and Eddie that for years but ill let them keep thinking we all carry and dip Copenhagen and marry our cousins
Tap the brakes....you sent a pic outside your place with horses clomping on the asphalt and a spitoon on your porch
0
Quote Originally Posted by BIGDTITLE:
Quote Originally Posted by undermysac: 36-31-2 (+8.95) Week 8: 4-4 (-0.09) Lions +3.5(-110) *2.50/2.27 ML(+260) *.50/.80 Bears +3.5(-105) *2.10/2.00 ML(+165) *50/.83 Plays above are look ahead lines I bet, as you guys know. Lost on the Bears value, got the hook with the Lions. Looking back at every week, I only lost 2 out of 8 weeks of betting, and last week was only a $9 loss. I must be doing something right, as each week it feels like this is getting maddening. At BigD, Dallas is a cool city. Real nice people. The Cowboys fans were awesome, no one really talked shit. At the tailgate they were welcoming as can be. Free beers n food the whole time and we didn't even have to ask. I didn't feel like we were in a desert at any point. And the stereotypical notion of big boots, cowboy hats, big ass trucks, and good ole boys that I had in my head going in(as I've never visited the state), just wasn't there. Awesome stadium in Arlington been telling wreck and Eddie that for years but ill let them keep thinking we all carry and dip Copenhagen and marry our cousins
Tap the brakes....you sent a pic outside your place with horses clomping on the asphalt and a spitoon on your porch
@Biscuiteater1 Boyles great blocker......Likely good receiver....Oliver OK with either.... Bowser/Ojabo both might play on MNF...edge rushers....badly needed.... Andrews doubtful....Jackson was better without him...
Ojabo after the bye.
0
Quote Originally Posted by bigred84:
@Biscuiteater1 Boyles great blocker......Likely good receiver....Oliver OK with either.... Bowser/Ojabo both might play on MNF...edge rushers....badly needed.... Andrews doubtful....Jackson was better without him...
The public is hammering the Eagles I'm taking: Texans +13.5 for 15u Texans ML +576 for 5u Texans TT Over 14.5 for 20u Are the Eagles motivated on a short week while traveling across the country..
Philly may feel they have something to prove and on the other side of the fence you have a team thinking let's shock the world. Cy, have i told you i love you lately.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Cyrax:
The public is hammering the Eagles I'm taking: Texans +13.5 for 15u Texans ML +576 for 5u Texans TT Over 14.5 for 20u Are the Eagles motivated on a short week while traveling across the country..
Philly may feel they have something to prove and on the other side of the fence you have a team thinking let's shock the world. Cy, have i told you i love you lately.
Reading today that the Raiders had the flu bug going into the Saints game. Do we give the Raiders a Mulligan? I lost on both the Raiders and Jags last week, they both owe me $. And now they play each other, so one of these atrocious teams will pay, leaning Raiders. Fwiw, the Raiders are staying on the east coast all week to nullify shitty travel. Now for MNF, are the Saints as good as televised vs a flu ridden Raider team? Leaning Ravens. Want to know the status of their TE though. Roquon can run with Kamara, he has in the past.
If thats the case how in the hell does that flu info not end up on the information highways & byways of civilization.
0
Quote Originally Posted by undermysac:
Reading today that the Raiders had the flu bug going into the Saints game. Do we give the Raiders a Mulligan? I lost on both the Raiders and Jags last week, they both owe me $. And now they play each other, so one of these atrocious teams will pay, leaning Raiders. Fwiw, the Raiders are staying on the east coast all week to nullify shitty travel. Now for MNF, are the Saints as good as televised vs a flu ridden Raider team? Leaning Ravens. Want to know the status of their TE though. Roquon can run with Kamara, he has in the past.
If thats the case how in the hell does that flu info not end up on the information highways & byways of civilization.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
