I would like to help everyone here that has been loosing money with this Morrison guy, that's why I create a blog so everybody can have access for free.
I'm using the same system but whit the "labourchere" money management at a low level, but just adjust it to your betting level.
https://nbasystem.blogspot.com/
you can ask as many question you have regarding the way I'm doing it. We will reduce the risk to go to a third bet and lost that one. So feel free to join me for the rest of the season.
0
Hi there,
I would like to help everyone here that has been loosing money with this Morrison guy, that's why I create a blog so everybody can have access for free.
I'm using the same system but whit the "labourchere" money management at a low level, but just adjust it to your betting level.
https://nbasystem.blogspot.com/
you can ask as many question you have regarding the way I'm doing it. We will reduce the risk to go to a third bet and lost that one. So feel free to join me for the rest of the season.
For those who still don't believe the $#33+ this guy is made of, i would like to post the REAL results from this system in the last Season(2007-2008) of the NBA. It's nothing real close to what he posts in his site.He claims that the record for the last season was 80-1. but i made some research and came up with the real results.
I'll split the records for the 3 bets(Bet A, Bet B, and Bet C) with and withou buying the 3 point he sugest.
Records without buying 3 points(-110 odds)
Bet A Record 34-34. With 1 unit p/bet there would be a lost of 3.09 units
Bet B Record: 18-16. With 2 unit p/bet there would be a profit of 0.73 units
Bet C Record: 9-7. With 4 units p/bet there would be a profit of 4.73 units
So the Net profit for the 3 bets is =-3.09+0.73+4.73=2.37 units.
This means that using this system without buying any point would have made a profit of 2.37 at the end of the NBA 2007-2008 season. So if you use a unit of $100.00 there would be a $237 profit. So if you substract the $200.00 fee this jerk charges would be a $37.00 profit for an entire Season.
Now the records buying the 3 points(odds -180)
Bet A Record 45-23. With 1 unit p/bet there would be a profit of 2 units.
Bet B Record 13-10. With 2 unit p/bet there would be a lost a 5.56 units.
Bet C Record 7-3. With 4 units p/bet there would be a 3.56 profit
The net profit for the 3 bets is =2-5.56+3.56=0.
This means that buying 3 points using this system would have broken even at the end of the NBA 2007-2008 season. It means that with the tecnique he sugests, the profits don't even pays for his fee.
Take out your own conclusions.
Thanks,
Adal
0
For those who still don't believe the $#33+ this guy is made of, i would like to post the REAL results from this system in the last Season(2007-2008) of the NBA. It's nothing real close to what he posts in his site.He claims that the record for the last season was 80-1. but i made some research and came up with the real results.
I'll split the records for the 3 bets(Bet A, Bet B, and Bet C) with and withou buying the 3 point he sugest.
Records without buying 3 points(-110 odds)
Bet A Record 34-34. With 1 unit p/bet there would be a lost of 3.09 units
Bet B Record: 18-16. With 2 unit p/bet there would be a profit of 0.73 units
Bet C Record: 9-7. With 4 units p/bet there would be a profit of 4.73 units
So the Net profit for the 3 bets is =-3.09+0.73+4.73=2.37 units.
This means that using this system without buying any point would have made a profit of 2.37 at the end of the NBA 2007-2008 season. So if you use a unit of $100.00 there would be a $237 profit. So if you substract the $200.00 fee this jerk charges would be a $37.00 profit for an entire Season.
Now the records buying the 3 points(odds -180)
Bet A Record 45-23. With 1 unit p/bet there would be a profit of 2 units.
Bet B Record 13-10. With 2 unit p/bet there would be a lost a 5.56 units.
Bet C Record 7-3. With 4 units p/bet there would be a 3.56 profit
The net profit for the 3 bets is =2-5.56+3.56=0.
This means that buying 3 points using this system would have broken even at the end of the NBA 2007-2008 season. It means that with the tecnique he sugests, the profits don't even pays for his fee.
This will be my 1st season monitoring his NBA system. MLB was until he put in his new filter. He did legitimately close the season out without a loss under the filtered system, but I don't like that he extrapalated the filter backwards and ignored the losses he had. Not sure about him touting this new soccer system now. We shall see
0
Thanks for the info Adal. Covers at its finest
This will be my 1st season monitoring his NBA system. MLB was until he put in his new filter. He did legitimately close the season out without a loss under the filtered system, but I don't like that he extrapalated the filter backwards and ignored the losses he had. Not sure about him touting this new soccer system now. We shall see
Did you have the service for last year's NBA? I can't weigh in on last year either way, but here is what he sent out regarding last year's results. After losing the first NBA series with Utah so far this season, he has won 5 A games in a row.
Final record for this year's NBA season using the
system: 80-1 1104
cleveland won [A] 1106
LA Clippers won [A] 1106 Phoenix
won [A] 1109 denver won [C] 1111
cleveland won [B] 1111
detroit won [A] 1113 New
York won [A] 1114
Seattle won [B] 1114 Utah won
[A] 1116 Portland
won [A] 1117 chicago won [B] 1118
golden state won [A] 1120 LA
Lakers won [A] 1121 New
Jersey won [B] 1124
Washington won [A] 1125
Utah won [A] 1126 Orlando won
[A] 1127 Indiana won [A] 1202 Phoenix
won [A] 1203 Miami won
[B] 1204 Milwaukee won
[A] 1204 Phoenix won [A] 1207 houston
won [A] 1207 Miami won
[A] 1212 Sacramento won
[A] 1218 LA Lakers won
[A] 1219 Toronto won [B] 1221
Utah won [C] 1226 boston won
[A] 1227 boston won [A] 1228
Toronto won [B] 1228 Philadelphia won
[A] 1302 Philadelphia won
[A] 1302 Sacramento won
[A] 104 Miami won
[A] 109 Indiana won
[C] 109 Seattle won
[C] 109 Orlando won
[B] 111 Milwaukee
won [A] 113
Portland won
[A] 118 golden state won
[B] 118 Sacramento won
[B] 118
Portland won
[A] 122 New Jersey lost
[C] 123 atlanta won
[A] 124 New Jersey won
[A] 127 cleveland
won [A] 127 New
York won
[A] 128 charlotte
won [A] 131 LA
Lakers won
[A] 202 chicago won
[B] 204 dallas won
[C] 204 LA Clippers won
[B] 205 LA Lakers
won [A] 205 San Antonio won
[A] 206 chicago won
[A] 208 LA Clippers won
[A] 208 Washington won
[A] 210 Washington won
[A] 210 denver won
[A] 211 San Antonio won
[B] 222 Atlanta won
[C] 222 Sacramento won
[A] 224 detroit won
[A] 229 Miami won
[B] 301 Philadelphia won
[B] 304 New Jersey won
[A] 304 golden state won
[A] 304 Seattle won
[A] 307
Portland won
[A] 309 Seattle won
[A] 310 LA Clippers won
[A] 311 Toronto won
[A] 314 Utah won
[C] 319 denver won
[B] 325 New Orleans won
[A] 326 charlotte
won [B] 326 Washington
won [B] 328 Phoenix won
[C] 330 New Orleans won
[A] 611 Boston won [A]
0
Adal,
Did you have the service for last year's NBA? I can't weigh in on last year either way, but here is what he sent out regarding last year's results. After losing the first NBA series with Utah so far this season, he has won 5 A games in a row.
Final record for this year's NBA season using the
system: 80-1 1104
cleveland won [A] 1106
LA Clippers won [A] 1106 Phoenix
won [A] 1109 denver won [C] 1111
cleveland won [B] 1111
detroit won [A] 1113 New
York won [A] 1114
Seattle won [B] 1114 Utah won
[A] 1116 Portland
won [A] 1117 chicago won [B] 1118
golden state won [A] 1120 LA
Lakers won [A] 1121 New
Jersey won [B] 1124
Washington won [A] 1125
Utah won [A] 1126 Orlando won
[A] 1127 Indiana won [A] 1202 Phoenix
won [A] 1203 Miami won
[B] 1204 Milwaukee won
[A] 1204 Phoenix won [A] 1207 houston
won [A] 1207 Miami won
[A] 1212 Sacramento won
[A] 1218 LA Lakers won
[A] 1219 Toronto won [B] 1221
Utah won [C] 1226 boston won
[A] 1227 boston won [A] 1228
Toronto won [B] 1228 Philadelphia won
[A] 1302 Philadelphia won
[A] 1302 Sacramento won
[A] 104 Miami won
[A] 109 Indiana won
[C] 109 Seattle won
[C] 109 Orlando won
[B] 111 Milwaukee
won [A] 113
Portland won
[A] 118 golden state won
[B] 118 Sacramento won
[B] 118
Portland won
[A] 122 New Jersey lost
[C] 123 atlanta won
[A] 124 New Jersey won
[A] 127 cleveland
won [A] 127 New
York won
[A] 128 charlotte
won [A] 131 LA
Lakers won
[A] 202 chicago won
[B] 204 dallas won
[C] 204 LA Clippers won
[B] 205 LA Lakers
won [A] 205 San Antonio won
[A] 206 chicago won
[A] 208 LA Clippers won
[A] 208 Washington won
[A] 210 Washington won
[A] 210 denver won
[A] 211 San Antonio won
[B] 222 Atlanta won
[C] 222 Sacramento won
[A] 224 detroit won
[A] 229 Miami won
[B] 301 Philadelphia won
[B] 304 New Jersey won
[A] 304 golden state won
[A] 304 Seattle won
[A] 307
Portland won
[A] 309 Seattle won
[A] 310 LA Clippers won
[A] 311 Toronto won
[A] 314 Utah won
[C] 319 denver won
[B] 325 New Orleans won
[A] 326 charlotte
won [B] 326 Washington
won [B] 328 Phoenix won
[C] 330 New Orleans won
[A] 611 Boston won [A]
John Morrison did go 80-1 last season, I was with him. The loss came on 1/22 when the Nets could not cover the 3rd game (which was unlucky as 3 major injured players from the other team were put back into the lineup for that game)
0
John Morrison did go 80-1 last season, I was with him. The loss came on 1/22 when the Nets could not cover the 3rd game (which was unlucky as 3 major injured players from the other team were put back into the lineup for that game)
[Quote: Originally Posted by S_A_I_N_T_S] I was a victim of the Morrison shenanigans also. The system isn't all that bad, but the money management is terrible & will cause you to lose your a$$. Also the dude is SHADY asking for more money and making excuses for losses so they won't show up on the record. Total BS.
If you're interested in checking out a proven winning NBA system, send me a msg and I will send you a link to it. Can't place any in here.
What is this proven NBA system?
0
[Quote: Originally Posted by S_A_I_N_T_S] I was a victim of the Morrison shenanigans also. The system isn't all that bad, but the money management is terrible & will cause you to lose your a$$. Also the dude is SHADY asking for more money and making excuses for losses so they won't show up on the record. Total BS.
If you're interested in checking out a proven winning NBA system, send me a msg and I will send you a link to it. Can't place any in here.
Like Manifesto, I'm also on the John Morrison system. So far this year he 19-0!!! Some are saying his first 3 games should count against him but they should be because they won't fit the parameters of his system. I think he just threw in those games because he couldn't wait for the season to finally start. Tell me who has a record similar to John? I can't wait for MLB to start again because his system was awesome last season even though he fine tuned it towards the end. Anyone interested? I can send you the link...
0
Like Manifesto, I'm also on the John Morrison system. So far this year he 19-0!!! Some are saying his first 3 games should count against him but they should be because they won't fit the parameters of his system. I think he just threw in those games because he couldn't wait for the season to finally start. Tell me who has a record similar to John? I can't wait for MLB to start again because his system was awesome last season even though he fine tuned it towards the end. Anyone interested? I can send you the link...
Like Manifesto, I'm also on the John Morrison system. So far this year he 19-0!!! Some are saying his first 3 games should count against him but they should be because they won't fit the parameters of his system. I think he just threw in those games because he couldn't wait for the season to finally start. Tell me who has a record similar to John? I can't wait for MLB to start again because his system was awesome last season even though he fine tuned it towards the end. Anyone interested? I can send you the link...
I would love the link. Thanks
0
Quote Originally Posted by kuntax:
Like Manifesto, I'm also on the John Morrison system. So far this year he 19-0!!! Some are saying his first 3 games should count against him but they should be because they won't fit the parameters of his system. I think he just threw in those games because he couldn't wait for the season to finally start. Tell me who has a record similar to John? I can't wait for MLB to start again because his system was awesome last season even though he fine tuned it towards the end. Anyone interested? I can send you the link...
He sends out Utah as his system play today with a note that star player Carlos Boozer is questionable, so check on his status before taking Utah.. Anyway, Utah goes on to cover if you bought the 3 points that the system recommends. Boozer did not play at all however... I'm sure he will count this as a win, bringing him to 20-0.. Had Utah not covered, I'm sure he would not have counted it..
Folks, that is DISHONEST, pure and simple...
0
Here is what bothers me about this morrison guy:
He sends out Utah as his system play today with a note that star player Carlos Boozer is questionable, so check on his status before taking Utah.. Anyway, Utah goes on to cover if you bought the 3 points that the system recommends. Boozer did not play at all however... I'm sure he will count this as a win, bringing him to 20-0.. Had Utah not covered, I'm sure he would not have counted it..
I don't know why everyone is doubting his system I'm now $2200 up from the first of the year. I bet big tonight and won. You can not bet only $100 and expect to win when you buy points your minimum bet should be $170.00 and be prepaired to double up that if you loose bet a I've done so and have been extremely happy with his system so far. 19 and 0
0
I don't know why everyone is doubting his system I'm now $2200 up from the first of the year. I bet big tonight and won. You can not bet only $100 and expect to win when you buy points your minimum bet should be $170.00 and be prepaired to double up that if you loose bet a I've done so and have been extremely happy with his system so far. 19 and 0
you obviously did not join before nba began because it is a known fact that the very first series play he put out was Sacramento who lost all 3 games in the series starting him out at 0-1 and about 12 units down. He later emails his clients explaining that Sac had the worst road record and should have been filtered out, therefore he did not count the series loss in his record. don't get me wrong, i still follow the picks, but if you use the double up method of money management, just one lost series will wipe out 12-15 system wins.
0
you obviously did not join before nba began because it is a known fact that the very first series play he put out was Sacramento who lost all 3 games in the series starting him out at 0-1 and about 12 units down. He later emails his clients explaining that Sac had the worst road record and should have been filtered out, therefore he did not count the series loss in his record. don't get me wrong, i still follow the picks, but if you use the double up method of money management, just one lost series will wipe out 12-15 system wins.
Just checked his site. His record now 20-0. You gotta laugh, if Utah didn't cover, he would have claimed it doesn't pass his filter and should not have been played. There is some Bullshiggidy goin on here...
0
Just checked his site. His record now 20-0. You gotta laugh, if Utah didn't cover, he would have claimed it doesn't pass his filter and should not have been played. There is some Bullshiggidy goin on here...
Anybody who buys a system should ask whether it is based on progressive betting. If it is, then run away from it and fast! Bookies love em. A year ago one of my later too be handicapping students asked me to critique this system. It did not take me long. It is a FRAUD. The guy who pedals it claimed to be a math major especially in the field of statistics. He is not. Any Ivy League math professor would discredit his system immediately as being mathemathically unsound . I know for a fact He had a long running feud with somebody who was selling the same system for much less. Both were doing a disservice to the public. I publicly trashed his system on a web site he was trying to sell it. I explained in detail why it did not work. Many thanked me. He offered a money back guarantee if it did not work. They did not get their money back until he was asked not to use that web site any more.
When I taught my handicapping class in the early 70's these fraudulantly bad systems were around. They will be around 30 years from now. Stay away from them and learn how to handicap yourself. The other thing you want to stay away from is trend betting. Trends come and go. They are the effect rather then the cause. To make money you need to know the cause. Create a good money management plan along with learning universal principals and you can make a living doing this.
0
Anybody who buys a system should ask whether it is based on progressive betting. If it is, then run away from it and fast! Bookies love em. A year ago one of my later too be handicapping students asked me to critique this system. It did not take me long. It is a FRAUD. The guy who pedals it claimed to be a math major especially in the field of statistics. He is not. Any Ivy League math professor would discredit his system immediately as being mathemathically unsound . I know for a fact He had a long running feud with somebody who was selling the same system for much less. Both were doing a disservice to the public. I publicly trashed his system on a web site he was trying to sell it. I explained in detail why it did not work. Many thanked me. He offered a money back guarantee if it did not work. They did not get their money back until he was asked not to use that web site any more.
When I taught my handicapping class in the early 70's these fraudulantly bad systems were around. They will be around 30 years from now. Stay away from them and learn how to handicap yourself. The other thing you want to stay away from is trend betting. Trends come and go. They are the effect rather then the cause. To make money you need to know the cause. Create a good money management plan along with learning universal principals and you can make a living doing this.
Anybody who buys a system should ask whether it is based on progressive betting. If it is, then run away from it and fast! Bookies love em. A year ago one of my later too be handicapping students asked me to critique this system. It did not take me long. It is a FRAUD. The guy who pedals it claimed to be a math major especially in the field of statistics. He is not. Any Ivy League math professor would discredit his system immediately as being mathemathically unsound . I know for a fact He had a long running feud with somebody who was selling the same system for much less. Both were doing a disservice to the public. I publicly trashed his system on a web site he was trying to sell it. I explained in detail why it did not work. Many thanked me. He offered a money back guarantee if it did not work. They did not get their money back until he was asked not to use that web site any more.
When I taught my handicapping class in the early 70's these fraudulantly bad systems were around. They will be around 30 years from now. Stay away from them and learn how to handicap yourself. The other thing you want to stay away from is trend betting. Trends come and go. They are the effect rather then the cause. To make money you need to know the cause. Create a good money management plan along with learning universal principals and you can make a living doing this.
Professor, would you share some of the Universal Principals and/or money management plans you sugest to learn?
Thanks
0
Quote Originally Posted by professorkopak:
Anybody who buys a system should ask whether it is based on progressive betting. If it is, then run away from it and fast! Bookies love em. A year ago one of my later too be handicapping students asked me to critique this system. It did not take me long. It is a FRAUD. The guy who pedals it claimed to be a math major especially in the field of statistics. He is not. Any Ivy League math professor would discredit his system immediately as being mathemathically unsound . I know for a fact He had a long running feud with somebody who was selling the same system for much less. Both were doing a disservice to the public. I publicly trashed his system on a web site he was trying to sell it. I explained in detail why it did not work. Many thanked me. He offered a money back guarantee if it did not work. They did not get their money back until he was asked not to use that web site any more.
When I taught my handicapping class in the early 70's these fraudulantly bad systems were around. They will be around 30 years from now. Stay away from them and learn how to handicap yourself. The other thing you want to stay away from is trend betting. Trends come and go. They are the effect rather then the cause. To make money you need to know the cause. Create a good money management plan along with learning universal principals and you can make a living doing this.
Professor, would you share some of the Universal Principals and/or money management plans you sugest to learn?
Based on my personal experience the system has been very effective. 80-1 last year was nice, but what impressed me most is not just the wins, but the way the wins have been made, at least so far this season. I believe out of the 20 wins, 17 of them were won at the very first staking level (A bet), and all the bets have been won at the B level.
0
Based on my personal experience the system has been very effective. 80-1 last year was nice, but what impressed me most is not just the wins, but the way the wins have been made, at least so far this season. I believe out of the 20 wins, 17 of them were won at the very first staking level (A bet), and all the bets have been won at the B level.
WELL I HATE TO TELL EVERYONE COVERS PROFITS FROM YOU LOSES ALSO, EVERYTIME YOU SIGN UP THROUGH THIS SITE THY GET 20% OF YOUR LOSES.
I don't work for Morrison at all
I don't hate to tell you, but you have no damn clue what you are talking about. Covers gets 20% of the losses.
If you are going to post something at least have half a clue.
Also how can you even compare ripoff scammer Morrison to Covers. Here you can click on whatever you want to. But with the scammer you need to use Betus to get the deals.
What a joke
0
Quote Originally Posted by eyeball:
WELL I HATE TO TELL EVERYONE COVERS PROFITS FROM YOU LOSES ALSO, EVERYTIME YOU SIGN UP THROUGH THIS SITE THY GET 20% OF YOUR LOSES.
I don't work for Morrison at all
I don't hate to tell you, but you have no damn clue what you are talking about. Covers gets 20% of the losses.
If you are going to post something at least have half a clue.
Also how can you even compare ripoff scammer Morrison to Covers. Here you can click on whatever you want to. But with the scammer you need to use Betus to get the deals.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
until he put in his new filter. He did legitimately close the season out without a loss under the filtered system, but I don't like that he extrapalated the filter backwards and ignored the losses he had. Not sure about him touting this new soccer system now. We shall see 
Hot Forum Topics
