why do you think its ok to repeatedly make unfounded personal claims against me and box me when i call you out on your hypocrisy?
why dont you be a big boy, and stop hiding behind your internet forum moderator label, and either provide an iota of evidence of why you think im some fake libertarian, or apologize for repeatedly and often unprovokedly claiming so.
or you could take the wuss way out and box me a third time bc you are too scared to provide an answer.
and while im at it, you never apologize for claiming i was around years ago and was previously banned, that makes 2 100% unfounded claims that you dont have a single piece of evidence of yet you go around boxing ppl that question you... how mature and american of you.
I find it fascinating that you have my exact quote from over two years
ago, yet can't provide one specific example of a rule I have violated or
where I have not been impartial. Not to mention that you were obviously
around at that time, under a different screenname. Who was your other
name? Why was he banned? I don't really care actually. I am not one who
bans just because of a prior banning.
furthermore, now you are making false accusations about me being banned
from before. newsflash you idiot
https://spaces.covers.com/community/search.aspx. i dont understand how
you can continue to make false accusations without consequence yet box
someone and demand repentance when you THINK they did so.
As far as being a previous user, again, I don't care. But you posted an
exact quote that I made over two years ago, yet you were a member only
as of January of 2010. Perhaps your were previously banned and this is
why you have come in with a chip on your shoulder to Wall and myself. I
know I didn't originally ban you.
for the second time, covers has a search function. just bc i joined at a
certain point in time doesnt mean i am unable to see any posts before
that time, also, there is this new thing now called google. why is this
concept so hard for you to understand? but instead, for a second time,
falsely accuse me of being a previously banned member.
So you are telling me you went through every post I have made to find
that quote (since the easiest search method poster name/thread created)
wouldn't give you that quote. I guess it is theoretically possible, but
would show a rather unhealthy obsession. Then again, I do think there
are some pretty interesting issues with you...
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
why do you think its ok to repeatedly make unfounded personal claims against me and box me when i call you out on your hypocrisy?
why dont you be a big boy, and stop hiding behind your internet forum moderator label, and either provide an iota of evidence of why you think im some fake libertarian, or apologize for repeatedly and often unprovokedly claiming so.
or you could take the wuss way out and box me a third time bc you are too scared to provide an answer.
and while im at it, you never apologize for claiming i was around years ago and was previously banned, that makes 2 100% unfounded claims that you dont have a single piece of evidence of yet you go around boxing ppl that question you... how mature and american of you.
I find it fascinating that you have my exact quote from over two years
ago, yet can't provide one specific example of a rule I have violated or
where I have not been impartial. Not to mention that you were obviously
around at that time, under a different screenname. Who was your other
name? Why was he banned? I don't really care actually. I am not one who
bans just because of a prior banning.
furthermore, now you are making false accusations about me being banned
from before. newsflash you idiot
https://spaces.covers.com/community/search.aspx. i dont understand how
you can continue to make false accusations without consequence yet box
someone and demand repentance when you THINK they did so.
As far as being a previous user, again, I don't care. But you posted an
exact quote that I made over two years ago, yet you were a member only
as of January of 2010. Perhaps your were previously banned and this is
why you have come in with a chip on your shoulder to Wall and myself. I
know I didn't originally ban you.
for the second time, covers has a search function. just bc i joined at a
certain point in time doesnt mean i am unable to see any posts before
that time, also, there is this new thing now called google. why is this
concept so hard for you to understand? but instead, for a second time,
falsely accuse me of being a previously banned member.
So you are telling me you went through every post I have made to find
that quote (since the easiest search method poster name/thread created)
wouldn't give you that quote. I guess it is theoretically possible, but
would show a rather unhealthy obsession. Then again, I do think there
are some pretty interesting issues with you...
This seems to happen quite regularly, I dont respond to methods like this, I imagine DJ likely wont either.
well, he wouldnt respond to any of the times it was brought up in countless threads, he wouldnt respond via PM, he then resorted to boxing me 2x for continuing to bring it up. I dont see what else i can do to have this resolved.
do you think im out of line for wanting an explanation why dj can make such claims, not back them up, and then box me when i point out his inconsistencies when he asks other posters for proof of their claims?
hes been dodging this issue for months now, which is fine, but once he started boxing me for bringing it up, then it became a real problem.
0
Quote Originally Posted by wallstreetcappers:
Probably a thread better suited for a PM.
This seems to happen quite regularly, I dont respond to methods like this, I imagine DJ likely wont either.
well, he wouldnt respond to any of the times it was brought up in countless threads, he wouldnt respond via PM, he then resorted to boxing me 2x for continuing to bring it up. I dont see what else i can do to have this resolved.
do you think im out of line for wanting an explanation why dj can make such claims, not back them up, and then box me when i point out his inconsistencies when he asks other posters for proof of their claims?
hes been dodging this issue for months now, which is fine, but once he started boxing me for bringing it up, then it became a real problem.
well, he wouldnt respond to any of the times it was brought up in countless threads, he wouldnt respond via PM, he then resorted to boxing me 2x for continuing to bring it up. I dont see what else i can do to have this resolved.
do you think im out of line for wanting an explanation why dj can make such claims, not back them up, and then box me when i point out his inconsistencies when he asks other posters for proof of their claims?
hes been dodging this issue for months now, which is fine, but once he started boxing me for bringing it up, then it became a real problem.
Wrong. You were boxed, now for the third time, for namecalling and personal attacks. I gave you more warnings than I could count. I even let you telling me to go f*^&% myself twice, before I finally did something. I told you that I would no longer debate with you since you couldn't keep it civil. But you don't seem to understand the basic rule.
The first time, you were out in 3 days, even though you publically posted PMs that I sent you. The second time, you were out in a week despite not posting in the box. Then, you posted the above.
Contrary to your assertion above, you were never boxed for being an alias. I don't care if you are. But I do care that you cannot engage in debate without resorting to personal attacks and namecalling.
You were given more chances than most. If I were you, I would make nice with the box boys in here because fool me once, fool me twice, but not again.
0
Quote Originally Posted by steveshane67:
well, he wouldnt respond to any of the times it was brought up in countless threads, he wouldnt respond via PM, he then resorted to boxing me 2x for continuing to bring it up. I dont see what else i can do to have this resolved.
do you think im out of line for wanting an explanation why dj can make such claims, not back them up, and then box me when i point out his inconsistencies when he asks other posters for proof of their claims?
hes been dodging this issue for months now, which is fine, but once he started boxing me for bringing it up, then it became a real problem.
Wrong. You were boxed, now for the third time, for namecalling and personal attacks. I gave you more warnings than I could count. I even let you telling me to go f*^&% myself twice, before I finally did something. I told you that I would no longer debate with you since you couldn't keep it civil. But you don't seem to understand the basic rule.
The first time, you were out in 3 days, even though you publically posted PMs that I sent you. The second time, you were out in a week despite not posting in the box. Then, you posted the above.
Contrary to your assertion above, you were never boxed for being an alias. I don't care if you are. But I do care that you cannot engage in debate without resorting to personal attacks and namecalling.
You were given more chances than most. If I were you, I would make nice with the box boys in here because fool me once, fool me twice, but not again.
Wrong. You were boxed, now for the third time, for namecalling and personal attacks. I gave you more warnings than I could count. I even let you telling me to go f*^&% myself twice, before I finally did something. I told you that I would no longer debate with you since you couldn't keep it civil. But you don't seem to understand the basic rule.
The first time, you were out in 3 days, even though you publically posted PMs that I sent you. The second time, you were out in a week despite not posting in the box. Then, you posted the above.
Contrary to your assertion above, you were never boxed for being an alias. I don't care if you are. But I do care that you cannot engage in debate without resorting to personal attacks and namecalling.
You were given more chances than most. If I were you, I would make nice with the box boys in here because fool me once, fool me twice, but not again.
first off, why dont you address the root issue of everything which in case you have forgotten is
why do you think its ok to repeatedly make unfounded personal claims
against me and box me when i call you out on your hypocrisy?
why
dont you be a big boy, and stop hiding behind your internet forum
moderator label, and either provide an iota of evidence of why you think
im some fake libertarian, or apologize for repeatedly and often
unprovokedly claiming so.
secondly, wheres the name calling that led you to box me this time?
0
Quote Originally Posted by djbrow:
Wrong. You were boxed, now for the third time, for namecalling and personal attacks. I gave you more warnings than I could count. I even let you telling me to go f*^&% myself twice, before I finally did something. I told you that I would no longer debate with you since you couldn't keep it civil. But you don't seem to understand the basic rule.
The first time, you were out in 3 days, even though you publically posted PMs that I sent you. The second time, you were out in a week despite not posting in the box. Then, you posted the above.
Contrary to your assertion above, you were never boxed for being an alias. I don't care if you are. But I do care that you cannot engage in debate without resorting to personal attacks and namecalling.
You were given more chances than most. If I were you, I would make nice with the box boys in here because fool me once, fool me twice, but not again.
first off, why dont you address the root issue of everything which in case you have forgotten is
why do you think its ok to repeatedly make unfounded personal claims
against me and box me when i call you out on your hypocrisy?
why
dont you be a big boy, and stop hiding behind your internet forum
moderator label, and either provide an iota of evidence of why you think
im some fake libertarian, or apologize for repeatedly and often
unprovokedly claiming so.
secondly, wheres the name calling that led you to box me this time?
first off, why dont you address the root issue of everything which in case you have forgotten is
why do you think its ok to repeatedly make unfounded personal claims against me and box me when i call you out on your hypocrisy?
why dont you be a big boy, and stop hiding behind your internet forum moderator label, and either provide an iota of evidence of why you think im some fake libertarian, or apologize for repeatedly and often unprovokedly claiming so.
secondly, wheres the name calling that led you to box me this time?
Shhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh. It's quiet hour in the box from 3-4.
(respect the rules shanesteve)
0
Quote Originally Posted by steveshane67:
first off, why dont you address the root issue of everything which in case you have forgotten is
why do you think its ok to repeatedly make unfounded personal claims against me and box me when i call you out on your hypocrisy?
why dont you be a big boy, and stop hiding behind your internet forum moderator label, and either provide an iota of evidence of why you think im some fake libertarian, or apologize for repeatedly and often unprovokedly claiming so.
secondly, wheres the name calling that led you to box me this time?
Shhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh. It's quiet hour in the box from 3-4.
christ weebs im already exhausted worrying about walls overall image of me in general. Now Im frightened that dj is stressing... please dont make me quiver picturing you with a headache. Gasps
0
Quote Originally Posted by weeble5672:
Oh, my head.
christ weebs im already exhausted worrying about walls overall image of me in general. Now Im frightened that dj is stressing... please dont make me quiver picturing you with a headache. Gasps
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.