I hit my NFL goy, CFB goy, and NFL play of the decade last week. I have a posted record of 7-2 and this will be the biggest play of my life.
A lot of people are on GB and I can see why. They have the 2nd rated defense in the NFL, 6th rated offense, playing at home, and they have a winning record at 7-4. etc etc etc etc. Baltimore on the other hand sit at 6-5. Their offense has been struggling as of late and they lost a few key defensive players in Suggs and Washington.
GB's record is at 7-4 and have the 2nd best defense in the NFL. This is nothing but pure smoke and mirrors. They only played 3 teams with a winning record. The three teams are Minnesota (twice), Cincinnati and Dallas. That would be a total of 4 out of their 11 games were aganist teams with a winning record. Their record would be 1-3 including THREE of those losses were at home. Most impressive win to date? Beating Dallas 17-7 at home. Although is beating Dallas anything worth of praise? Not so sure about that. The rest of the teams they played have a combined record of 24-52! Add to the fact that those teams have an average rank of 26.6 in total defense in the NFL.
Baltimore's record is 6-5. Look into their record and they could EASILY be at 8-2 and maybe even 9-1. The first loss came @NE. With just 40 seconds left on the clock, Mason dropped a pass on the 4th down that would have given the Ravens a first down. They get that first down and most likely win that game. The second lost came to Cinn. In went down to the final few seconds. Ray Lewis late hit on Ocho Cinco might have costed the game. Cinn drove the field in the last few minutes and took the lead. The third loss was to Minn and probably the toughest loss this year. Former kicker Steve Hauschka missed a 41 yard field goal in the final few seconds. Their 4th loss was a striaght up smash. They lost to Cinn 17-0. The lastest lost came to Indy. A late INT by Joe Flacco caused them a go ahead lead with just minutes left on the clock.
With all of that they sit at 6-5. If boucnes go their way, who really knows what their record would be. With all of that, Baltimore has played one of the toughest schedules in the NFL. Out of the 11 games they played, 8 games were aganist teams with a record of 500 or better. They played 6 different teams with a winning record and 1 team that sits at 500. All 6 of those teams very well could make the playoffs.
The Ravens have one of the most talented O-line in all of the NFL. Give them a few more years and this very well could be the best O-line in all of the NFL. They have been playing really well as of late. They gashed the league's best rush defense in Pitt last week for 132 yards. I think the loss of multiple time Pro Bowler Aaron Kampman is a big time loss both in the run defense and pass rush. Take it for what it's worth
It's Primetime on MNF and don't think for a second the Ravens will laydown for anyone. Ray Lewis, Ed Reed, and his boys getting a bunch of points. Play the Ravens and play it BIG.
Ravens (+4 buy hook) 1000 Units
Ravens (ML +175) 200 Units
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
I hit my NFL goy, CFB goy, and NFL play of the decade last week. I have a posted record of 7-2 and this will be the biggest play of my life.
A lot of people are on GB and I can see why. They have the 2nd rated defense in the NFL, 6th rated offense, playing at home, and they have a winning record at 7-4. etc etc etc etc. Baltimore on the other hand sit at 6-5. Their offense has been struggling as of late and they lost a few key defensive players in Suggs and Washington.
GB's record is at 7-4 and have the 2nd best defense in the NFL. This is nothing but pure smoke and mirrors. They only played 3 teams with a winning record. The three teams are Minnesota (twice), Cincinnati and Dallas. That would be a total of 4 out of their 11 games were aganist teams with a winning record. Their record would be 1-3 including THREE of those losses were at home. Most impressive win to date? Beating Dallas 17-7 at home. Although is beating Dallas anything worth of praise? Not so sure about that. The rest of the teams they played have a combined record of 24-52! Add to the fact that those teams have an average rank of 26.6 in total defense in the NFL.
Baltimore's record is 6-5. Look into their record and they could EASILY be at 8-2 and maybe even 9-1. The first loss came @NE. With just 40 seconds left on the clock, Mason dropped a pass on the 4th down that would have given the Ravens a first down. They get that first down and most likely win that game. The second lost came to Cinn. In went down to the final few seconds. Ray Lewis late hit on Ocho Cinco might have costed the game. Cinn drove the field in the last few minutes and took the lead. The third loss was to Minn and probably the toughest loss this year. Former kicker Steve Hauschka missed a 41 yard field goal in the final few seconds. Their 4th loss was a striaght up smash. They lost to Cinn 17-0. The lastest lost came to Indy. A late INT by Joe Flacco caused them a go ahead lead with just minutes left on the clock.
With all of that they sit at 6-5. If boucnes go their way, who really knows what their record would be. With all of that, Baltimore has played one of the toughest schedules in the NFL. Out of the 11 games they played, 8 games were aganist teams with a record of 500 or better. They played 6 different teams with a winning record and 1 team that sits at 500. All 6 of those teams very well could make the playoffs.
The Ravens have one of the most talented O-line in all of the NFL. Give them a few more years and this very well could be the best O-line in all of the NFL. They have been playing really well as of late. They gashed the league's best rush defense in Pitt last week for 132 yards. I think the loss of multiple time Pro Bowler Aaron Kampman is a big time loss both in the run defense and pass rush. Take it for what it's worth
It's Primetime on MNF and don't think for a second the Ravens will laydown for anyone. Ray Lewis, Ed Reed, and his boys getting a bunch of points. Play the Ravens and play it BIG.
Good write up! I was leaning towards Green Bay, but you make a compelling argument. As the season rolls on, I tend to just focus on records (a bad thing) and not how they got there. I needed a reminder on some of the "bad beats" the Ravens have had.
I would assume that you think the snow (if any) will play in the Ravens and their run game?
0
Good write up! I was leaning towards Green Bay, but you make a compelling argument. As the season rolls on, I tend to just focus on records (a bad thing) and not how they got there. I needed a reminder on some of the "bad beats" the Ravens have had.
I would assume that you think the snow (if any) will play in the Ravens and their run game?
Since the bye (5 games) the Ravens have held their opponents to 17 points or less. If they are able to do this tonight then they would only need to score two touchdowns to cover the spread (+3.5). Best of luck and I am on the Ravens as well. Nice writeup
0
Since the bye (5 games) the Ravens have held their opponents to 17 points or less. If they are able to do this tonight then they would only need to score two touchdowns to cover the spread (+3.5). Best of luck and I am on the Ravens as well. Nice writeup
Adding to the trend that the Packers are 0-6 in their last 6 games in Week 13, I think I will go all-in on this. Maybe number 13 is bad luck for the Packers.
0
Adding to the trend that the Packers are 0-6 in their last 6 games in Week 13, I think I will go all-in on this. Maybe number 13 is bad luck for the Packers.
jesus christ man are your units in zimbabwean dollars ??
you guys should know that a unit is a percentage of your starting bankroll . so 1 unit should be 1% of your starting roll. unless you are keeping a counter for the past 20 years of gambling, 1000 units is a crazy unit size to say
0
jesus christ man are your units in zimbabwean dollars ??
you guys should know that a unit is a percentage of your starting bankroll . so 1 unit should be 1% of your starting roll. unless you are keeping a counter for the past 20 years of gambling, 1000 units is a crazy unit size to say
Good write up! I was leaning towards Green Bay, but you make a compelling argument. As the season rolls on, I tend to just focus on records (a bad thing) and not how they got there. I needed a reminder on some of the "bad beats" the Ravens have had.
I would assume that you think the snow (if any) will play in the Ravens and their run game?
thx man! Yeah I really hope there is a lot of snow and wetness to the game. Not only does it favor the underdog but the better running game in the Ravens.
0
Quote Originally Posted by CASTORTROY:
Good write up! I was leaning towards Green Bay, but you make a compelling argument. As the season rolls on, I tend to just focus on records (a bad thing) and not how they got there. I needed a reminder on some of the "bad beats" the Ravens have had.
I would assume that you think the snow (if any) will play in the Ravens and their run game?
thx man! Yeah I really hope there is a lot of snow and wetness to the game. Not only does it favor the underdog but the better running game in the Ravens.
Adding to the trend that the Packers are 0-6 in their last 6 games in Week 13, I think I will go all-in on this. Maybe number 13 is bad luck for the Packers.
This line very well might move to 4 before gametime
0
Quote Originally Posted by lazyclouds:
Adding to the trend that the Packers are 0-6 in their last 6 games in Week 13, I think I will go all-in on this. Maybe number 13 is bad luck for the Packers.
This line very well might move to 4 before gametime
Since the bye (5 games) the Ravens have held their opponents to 17 points or less. If they are able to do this tonight then they would only need to score two touchdowns to cover the spread (+3.5). Best of luck and I am on the Ravens as well. Nice writeup
0
Quote Originally Posted by Jovis36:
Since the bye (5 games) the Ravens have held their opponents to 17 points or less. If they are able to do this tonight then they would only need to score two touchdowns to cover the spread (+3.5). Best of luck and I am on the Ravens as well. Nice writeup
jesus christ man are your units in zimbabwean dollars ??
you guys should know that a unit is a percentage of your starting bankroll . so 1 unit should be 1% of your starting roll. unless you are keeping a counter for the past 20 years of gambling, 1000 units is a crazy unit size to say
A unit for me is $10. I acutally follow a unit system by a famous Vegas handicapper. I'm actually up around 1,000 units or so. If I lose it will obv suck but hopefully I can get it back during bowl season and NFL.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Superfigg:
jesus christ man are your units in zimbabwean dollars ??
you guys should know that a unit is a percentage of your starting bankroll . so 1 unit should be 1% of your starting roll. unless you are keeping a counter for the past 20 years of gambling, 1000 units is a crazy unit size to say
A unit for me is $10. I acutally follow a unit system by a famous Vegas handicapper. I'm actually up around 1,000 units or so. If I lose it will obv suck but hopefully I can get it back during bowl season and NFL.
jesus christ man are your units in zimbabwean dollars ??
you guys should know that a unit is a percentage of your starting bankroll . so 1 unit should be 1% of your starting roll. unless you are keeping a counter for the past 20 years of gambling, 1000 units is a crazy unit size to say
who the hell cares??
BTW it was Clayton, not Mason who dropped that ball in N.E I know this because as a raven fan it still haunts me LOL
Yes I agree with your write up and the Ravens latley look like Ravens at old. O sputtering and the D playing much better.
I think they will blitz often and try to eliminate the deep ball. I think they will get their running game going and Packers D is number 1 but nobody is looking at who they played to get that #1 D
come on people, look inside the numbers. Ravens have 1 loss this year where it was a bad one 17-0 Cincy
all other ones they have been in the game till the very end. People are just looking at the Ravens record and seeing 6-5 thinking they suck.
I like Ravens here as well
0
Quote Originally Posted by Superfigg:
jesus christ man are your units in zimbabwean dollars ??
you guys should know that a unit is a percentage of your starting bankroll . so 1 unit should be 1% of your starting roll. unless you are keeping a counter for the past 20 years of gambling, 1000 units is a crazy unit size to say
who the hell cares??
BTW it was Clayton, not Mason who dropped that ball in N.E I know this because as a raven fan it still haunts me LOL
Yes I agree with your write up and the Ravens latley look like Ravens at old. O sputtering and the D playing much better.
I think they will blitz often and try to eliminate the deep ball. I think they will get their running game going and Packers D is number 1 but nobody is looking at who they played to get that #1 D
come on people, look inside the numbers. Ravens have 1 loss this year where it was a bad one 17-0 Cincy
all other ones they have been in the game till the very end. People are just looking at the Ravens record and seeing 6-5 thinking they suck.
I also like the fact that Ravens need this game more then GB. Don't get me wrong they both need this game but if Balt losses, they are going to be on life support for the playoff race.
0
I also like the fact that Ravens need this game more then GB. Don't get me wrong they both need this game but if Balt losses, they are going to be on life support for the playoff race.
jesus christ man are your units in zimbabwean dollars ??
you guys should know that a unit is a percentage of your starting bankroll . so 1 unit should be 1% of your starting roll. unless you are keeping a counter for the past 20 years of gambling, 1000 units is a crazy unit size to say
You must think im absolutely looney then, because i bet exactly 3675.375 units ravens, a total of 247500.65 to win 225675.33
0
Quote Originally Posted by Superfigg:
jesus christ man are your units in zimbabwean dollars ??
you guys should know that a unit is a percentage of your starting bankroll . so 1 unit should be 1% of your starting roll. unless you are keeping a counter for the past 20 years of gambling, 1000 units is a crazy unit size to say
You must think im absolutely looney then, because i bet exactly 3675.375 units ravens, a total of 247500.65 to win 225675.33
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.