@Raiders22
You should be more worried about domestic terrorists and militia members because since 9/11 more people died at the hands of those men
@Raiders22
You should be more worried about domestic terrorists and militia members because since 9/11 more people died at the hands of those men
@Raiders22
You should be more worried about domestic terrorists and militia members because since 9/11 more people died at the hands of those men
I am not in the insult group like you guys,.........
...that is how the cookie crumbles even for Grimace.
Ahhhh, yes you are.
I am not in the insult group like you guys,.........
...that is how the cookie crumbles even for Grimace.
Ahhhh, yes you are.
@Brooklyncapper
For example?
@Brooklyncapper
For example?
hahahahaha. Now this hilarious.
hahahahaha. Now this hilarious.
@Brooklyncapper
I get your point and think it is misplaced. It is at best conflating issues and at worst a false equivalency because in logic it is what we would say is a superb case of 'unreasonable comparison'.
I do not remember where -- START, maybe -- had the numbers around 115 to 110 or so.
But consider how many 'legal' citizens committed the 115, then consider how many 'legal' citizens there are available to commit the 115.
Then consider how many 'legal' jihadists committed the 110. Then consider how many available 'legal' jihadists committed the 110.
Per/availability the comparison is staggering.
Now consider how many jihadists consider these things and plan for them as opposed to the other group(s).
So why would you guys not want to curb the potential of having more jihadists enter the country 'illegally'?
These are two separate issues and it is not a case of 'either/or' -- you can work both issues at the same time. In fact, various government departments handle each.
The focus can be on both; it does not have to neglect one in preference of the other.
These are the facts that folks should not be denying.
@Brooklyncapper
I get your point and think it is misplaced. It is at best conflating issues and at worst a false equivalency because in logic it is what we would say is a superb case of 'unreasonable comparison'.
I do not remember where -- START, maybe -- had the numbers around 115 to 110 or so.
But consider how many 'legal' citizens committed the 115, then consider how many 'legal' citizens there are available to commit the 115.
Then consider how many 'legal' jihadists committed the 110. Then consider how many available 'legal' jihadists committed the 110.
Per/availability the comparison is staggering.
Now consider how many jihadists consider these things and plan for them as opposed to the other group(s).
So why would you guys not want to curb the potential of having more jihadists enter the country 'illegally'?
These are two separate issues and it is not a case of 'either/or' -- you can work both issues at the same time. In fact, various government departments handle each.
The focus can be on both; it does not have to neglect one in preference of the other.
These are the facts that folks should not be denying.
@UNIMAN
Insulting someone not a member of the site is quite quite different than a member, plus you do not need to feel sorry for Grimace, he brings all of the hammer onto himself and that is due to how he treats other people. I dont have to put up with his trash mouth and abusive way of treating nearly anyone around him so unless you want to get banned for bashing DNC guys how can YOU more than anyone blink an eye about making insults to a politician?
@UNIMAN
Insulting someone not a member of the site is quite quite different than a member, plus you do not need to feel sorry for Grimace, he brings all of the hammer onto himself and that is due to how he treats other people. I dont have to put up with his trash mouth and abusive way of treating nearly anyone around him so unless you want to get banned for bashing DNC guys how can YOU more than anyone blink an eye about making insults to a politician?
We are waiting….
We are waiting….
@Kadejax
I guess you are just blind to what has happened in this country contiously
over the last 5 years. Or do you know what the meaning of a domestic terrorist
is
@Kadejax
I guess you are just blind to what has happened in this country contiously
over the last 5 years. Or do you know what the meaning of a domestic terrorist
is
@Raiders22
How many terroristic acts have their been on US Soil in the last 15 years? How
many domestic terrorists have their been in the last 15 years?
@Raiders22
How many terroristic acts have their been on US Soil in the last 15 years? How
many domestic terrorists have their been in the last 15 years?
@Brooklyncapper
Off the top of my head I think that was the 115 -- and I think 30 or so.
But you can look it up in a few places. try the START site. If you cannot find it, I can look it up later for you.
@Brooklyncapper
Off the top of my head I think that was the 115 -- and I think 30 or so.
But you can look it up in a few places. try the START site. If you cannot find it, I can look it up later for you.
@Kadejax
You didn't say what you thought at all Cause you are just
like all the Maga boys here who ignore any straight up facts and call
it fake news. I can tell you the meaning of domestic terrorist if
you don't know
@Kadejax
You didn't say what you thought at all Cause you are just
like all the Maga boys here who ignore any straight up facts and call
it fake news. I can tell you the meaning of domestic terrorist if
you don't know
Dude you have not shown any facts. We are asking you to provide them and you can’t. Biden and his staff say it and you repeat it. That’s your source.
Dude you have not shown any facts. We are asking you to provide them and you can’t. Biden and his staff say it and you repeat it. That’s your source.
@Brooklyncapper
I cannot remember if they isolate out on that site. But you can find it elsewhere easily enough.
It is so very surprising when you look at the numbers and believe that the media want to use this as a way of deflection from the jihadists and the illegal situation. It is just weird that people cannot compare for themselves and conclude that these are very, very separate issues.
@Brooklyncapper
I cannot remember if they isolate out on that site. But you can find it elsewhere easily enough.
It is so very surprising when you look at the numbers and believe that the media want to use this as a way of deflection from the jihadists and the illegal situation. It is just weird that people cannot compare for themselves and conclude that these are very, very separate issues.
@Kadejax
I don't watch the news at all and i can care less about what Biden says.
That's all you Got? 36 mass murders in the country just this
year. One the other day IN Maine where 18 people were killed. Mostly
by White men who continue to have access to assault weapons only
the military should be allowed to have
@Kadejax
I don't watch the news at all and i can care less about what Biden says.
That's all you Got? 36 mass murders in the country just this
year. One the other day IN Maine where 18 people were killed. Mostly
by White men who continue to have access to assault weapons only
the military should be allowed to have
@Raiders22
we have done a great job in this country since 9/11 stopping every
thread on domestic soil we have had. 1 thing i am not concerned about
is that. What i am concerned about is some psycho with mental issues
that has easy access to assault rifles shooting up a public place just
because.
@Raiders22
we have done a great job in this country since 9/11 stopping every
thread on domestic soil we have had. 1 thing i am not concerned about
is that. What i am concerned about is some psycho with mental issues
that has easy access to assault rifles shooting up a public place just
because.
@Brooklyncapper
same. And those same individuals ALL have been on FBI watch lists and somehow still were allowed firearms and still carried out their crimes
@Brooklyncapper
same. And those same individuals ALL have been on FBI watch lists and somehow still were allowed firearms and still carried out their crimes
@Brooklyncapper
115 and 100 are not great numbers and 3 dozen or so attacks are not great numbers.
But 'great job' is a relative phrase for sure.
You are very correct that they are doing a good job. But why should they make it harder than it needs to be by allowing potentials in illegally?
You are also correct that mentals should not be allowed guns or, maybe, even be on the loose.
@Brooklyncapper
115 and 100 are not great numbers and 3 dozen or so attacks are not great numbers.
But 'great job' is a relative phrase for sure.
You are very correct that they are doing a good job. But why should they make it harder than it needs to be by allowing potentials in illegally?
You are also correct that mentals should not be allowed guns or, maybe, even be on the loose.
Amazing that our very Left leaning mod wants to imprison another man who made timely payments on his loan with the specified interest rate, was never late and paid in full! You can only find opinions like this in the very much revered and hallowed pages of Covers! That I promise you!
Amazing that our very Left leaning mod wants to imprison another man who made timely payments on his loan with the specified interest rate, was never late and paid in full! You can only find opinions like this in the very much revered and hallowed pages of Covers! That I promise you!
You may have to put up with him starting next November.
Maybe Trump re-education camps will help with the transition.
You may have to put up with him starting next November.
Maybe Trump re-education camps will help with the transition.
You know someday in the future I can see Senator Ted Cruz become the President of these United States!
Keep up the great work Senator in your beautiful state of Texas!
You know someday in the future I can see Senator Ted Cruz become the President of these United States!
Keep up the great work Senator in your beautiful state of Texas!
@sundance
Make it more simple- Trump signed legal documents misrepresenting real estate values in order to obtain financing from banks. That is fraud. The legal system is in place to prosecute those who break the law and thus Trump has repeated court cases from repeated violations of the law. He is no better than your neighbor or any other human on this planet so since he lives in a society with a legal framework he is subject to that framework and if he is found guilty of fraud he should be convicted and serve a prison term and lose his ability to run a business. It is no more complicated than this.
Do not remove the legal standard because you like him, that is against the constitution and we all know the GOP loves to throw the constitution in the faces of all, so it is time for you to uphold our legal system and the constitution and allow your pal to face the due course of the legal system.
@sundance
Make it more simple- Trump signed legal documents misrepresenting real estate values in order to obtain financing from banks. That is fraud. The legal system is in place to prosecute those who break the law and thus Trump has repeated court cases from repeated violations of the law. He is no better than your neighbor or any other human on this planet so since he lives in a society with a legal framework he is subject to that framework and if he is found guilty of fraud he should be convicted and serve a prison term and lose his ability to run a business. It is no more complicated than this.
Do not remove the legal standard because you like him, that is against the constitution and we all know the GOP loves to throw the constitution in the faces of all, so it is time for you to uphold our legal system and the constitution and allow your pal to face the due course of the legal system.
@SirJohnDrake
Ted cruz President of what the united states of kissing up
to a guy who insulted his wife numerous times. How about leaving
his state during a storm?
@SirJohnDrake
Ted cruz President of what the united states of kissing up
to a guy who insulted his wife numerous times. How about leaving
his state during a storm?
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.