We have an official play... something about movie awards and road trips.
Of course Jorgan wants to leave the thread when his own record, a record he tried to prove was 'better than Scal's' is a ::::Drumroll please:::, after 40 picks,
HUGH JORGAN'S FINAL RECORD after 40 picks: 19-21 (~48%)
So I ask Jorgan, on a Win/Loss basis, because that is all we are doing here, who is down more money right now in 2017, me or you?
Your winning percentage may be greater but the winning percentage of someone 6,595W-6,596L would also be better than yours but of course, they'd lose their entire roll and then some on just the vig.
So after all this, a thread you created:
You did not do better than me in 2015: 70%
You did not do better than me in 2016: 62%
and you are actually down more money than me in 2017 with all the vigs you paid and in straight units, even with adding an additional loss for Purdue that was included in last year's total, falsifying my record.
You REALLY proved your point about who the true fraud is here with this tracking thread Hugh! Congrats!!! What an embarrassment....
Now you have to piggyback off Challoot's record compared to mine just to save face..In a thread you were close because of a below .500 record...Wow. What a disgrace!
Of course Jorgan wants to leave the thread when his own record, a record he tried to prove was 'better than Scal's' is a ::::Drumroll please:::, after 40 picks,
HUGH JORGAN'S FINAL RECORD after 40 picks: 19-21 (~48%)
So I ask Jorgan, on a Win/Loss basis, because that is all we are doing here, who is down more money right now in 2017, me or you?
Your winning percentage may be greater but the winning percentage of someone 6,595W-6,596L would also be better than yours but of course, they'd lose their entire roll and then some on just the vig.
So after all this, a thread you created:
You did not do better than me in 2015: 70%
You did not do better than me in 2016: 62%
and you are actually down more money than me in 2017 with all the vigs you paid and in straight units, even with adding an additional loss for Purdue that was included in last year's total, falsifying my record.
You REALLY proved your point about who the true fraud is here with this tracking thread Hugh! Congrats!!! What an embarrassment....
Now you have to piggyback off Challoot's record compared to mine just to save face..In a thread you were close because of a below .500 record...Wow. What a disgrace!
Is Peter Funt in thread somewhere?
If Peter Funt comes out and tells me I'm on Capping Camera, I'll forgive one and all for this embarrassment of a thread.
Is Peter Funt in thread somewhere?
If Peter Funt comes out and tells me I'm on Capping Camera, I'll forgive one and all for this embarrassment of a thread.
Still harping on winning percentages when they are in your favor...lol.
So let's get this straight (ignoring the ridiculous records where I hit 70% and 62% and this key, actually had write-ups for every play making everyone else even more money than I bet), you think that
19-21 down 2 units and paying juice on 19 units is BETTER
than someone who is 3-4 down 1 unit and paying juice on 3 units.
And even if you want to use your falsified record of 3-5, down 2 units and paying juice on 3 units.
Tell me how that math works Hugh because the WL does not make distinction about unit size, only flat bets in theory.
I'm going to love to hear this one and the fuzzy math that is coming up!
Talk to me after I bet 40 games...LOL. I won't be even close to 19-21!
Still harping on winning percentages when they are in your favor...lol.
So let's get this straight (ignoring the ridiculous records where I hit 70% and 62% and this key, actually had write-ups for every play making everyone else even more money than I bet), you think that
19-21 down 2 units and paying juice on 19 units is BETTER
than someone who is 3-4 down 1 unit and paying juice on 3 units.
And even if you want to use your falsified record of 3-5, down 2 units and paying juice on 3 units.
Tell me how that math works Hugh because the WL does not make distinction about unit size, only flat bets in theory.
I'm going to love to hear this one and the fuzzy math that is coming up!
Talk to me after I bet 40 games...LOL. I won't be even close to 19-21!
Yes, yes. I am going to trust you with $5,000 of my money with your "reputable NYC professionals!!!"
LOLOLOLOLOL.
Lead the way Hugh! I'm right behind you with money in hand!!!
Yes, yes. I am going to trust you with $5,000 of my money with your "reputable NYC professionals!!!"
LOLOLOLOLOL.
Lead the way Hugh! I'm right behind you with money in hand!!!
I've won a lot more than 2 games Hugh. I've been capping at 65% going on 3 years now.
You? You're ONE significant sample size EVER on this site puts you at 48%, a percentage you wanted to close the thread on.
Now who REALLY is the putz here???? Gimmee a break!!!
I've won a lot more than 2 games Hugh. I've been capping at 65% going on 3 years now.
You? You're ONE significant sample size EVER on this site puts you at 48%, a percentage you wanted to close the thread on.
Now who REALLY is the putz here???? Gimmee a break!!!
Yes, yes. I am going to trust you with $5,000 of my money with your "reputable NYC professionals!!!"
LOLOLOLOLOL.
Lead the way Hugh! I'm right behind you with money in hand!!!
Yes, yes. I am going to trust you with $5,000 of my money with your "reputable NYC professionals!!!"
LOLOLOLOLOL.
Lead the way Hugh! I'm right behind you with money in hand!!!
Lead the way Hugh! I'm right behind you with money in hand!!!
Lead the way Hugh! I'm right behind you with money in hand!!!
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.