All Forums | Penalty Box

Tracking thread for 2017

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 12245
Posts: 706
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2002
Posts: 22961
Posted: #1
Anyone who would like for me to track their wagers, let me know and I will do my best to keep an accurate tally of all posted plays.

This tracking will be done for all plays graded as of 1/1/17

I will start with ... I don't know ... ummmm ... how about scal?!?!?!?

2017 overall record 0-4

NFL; 0-2 lost the Skins bet on 1/1, and the Bills TT bet on 1/1
CFB; 0-1 lost the Purdue TT bet on 1/9 (as per scal, this loss wouldn't be counted until the season is over. Season ends on 1/9)
NBA; 0-1 lost his "i'm winning or quitting" bet on the Knicks on 1/2

bigreds daddy
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2011
Posts: 44633
Posted: #2

Scal is a pompous, whiny douche with a wining % in posted plays.
But you suffer from pathologic, obsessive-compulsive cyber stalking. That, added to your hypocrisy, your nauseating world view, your arrogant narrow mindedness makes you the nr 1 troll on this site for me. The leash they got you on is not short enough. 
CPL XIX Winner. Punter. Scotch lover. Big Man.
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2002
Posts: 22961
Posted: #3
I am expecting BIG things from Covers only 70% capper.
You might ask ... "why is that, Hugh"
My response is, don't ask me, just ask scal himself ...

"For those who have lost with my picks, you will be paid back. I will personally play picks as usual and return when the time is right, and simply pick fewer games. I'm on too many games. That is for certain. You'll have winners back and we will settle for nothing less than 65% and my goal is 70% over smaller sample sizes"

bigreds daddy
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2010
Posts: 35334
Posted: #4
Quote Originally Posted by Ganda:


Scal is a pompous, whiny douche with a wining % in posted plays.
But you suffer from pathologic, obsessive-compulsive cyber stalking. That, added to your hypocrisy, your nauseating world view, your arrogant narrow mindedness makes you the nr 1 troll on this site for me. The leash they got you on is not short enough. 

Ganda, Hugh now has a job here, let's let him do it.    

No bashing in this thread...   The link to this thread will be placed in each of his pick threads so people can have an honest look at exactly what they are tailing.   


 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2011
Posts: 44633
Posted: #5
Never thought you'd be part of hugh's bullying clique BWS, thought you were your own man. His obsession with Scal is pathetic and creepy. You know what hugh is all about. Weird to see you on that side. 
CPL XIX Winner. Punter. Scotch lover. Big Man.
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2005
Posts: 12670
Posted: #6
Quote Originally Posted by BWS77:

No bashing in this thread...   The link to this thread will be placed in each of his pick threads so people can have an honest look at exactly what they are tailing.   


Oh, this is excellent!
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2010
Posts: 35334
Posted: #7
Quote Originally Posted by Ganda:

Never thought you'd be part of hugh's bullying clique BWS, thought you were your own man. His obsession with Scal is pathetic and creepy. You know what hugh is all about. Weird to see you on that side. 

Hugh and I haven't seen eye to eye on many things.  Not bullying or ganging up, just keeping things straight and easy to find.  Lots of history here Ganda.....scal brings it on himself with personal attacks going back for years.  


 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2011
Posts: 44633
Posted: #8
If you say so. Can't say I've followed it all, but don't think scal cheats with his record, so what's the point? Anyway, all I see from hugh is negativity, hate mongering, instigating, bullying, putting people down, twisting and turning every fact and event to fit a vile ideological world view etc...
I'll leave you guys to it. Can't wait till Covers flip the switch on him. 
CPL XIX Winner. Punter. Scotch lover. Big Man.
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2002
Posts: 22961
Posted: #9
Quote Originally Posted by Ganda:

Never thought you'd be part of hugh's bullying clique BWS, thought you were your own man. His obsession with Scal is pathetic and creepy. You know what hugh is all about. Weird to see you on that side. 

Gandi, I will make a rare exception here, and address you in a thread which is outside of your very own thread here in the PB.

I find the term "clique" to be passé. 
I like to think of me and my gang to be more of a posse. 
Please refer to us as a posse going forward.

That is all 
bigreds daddy
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2002
Posts: 22961
Posted: #10
Quote Originally Posted by Ganda:

 
Can't wait till Covers flip the switch on him. 

Rare exception #2 in posting to Gandhi outside of his own thread (Gandhi, you should feel privileged that you finally have my attention. Lord knows you beg for it often enough) 

On the internet, we all have the option to ignore someone, anyone, or everyone.
Unless, of course, that someone is dancing inside your head every waking minute, as well as half the sleeping ones.
In this event, one simply cannot ignore another, as they become consumed with them, impatiently waiting for their next post.
This is referred  to as "being inside your head"

So Gandhi, as I dance around inside your noggin, do you approve of my rhythm? 

Do me a favor, put on some latin music, I feel like doing the Salsa! 

Olé 
bigreds daddy
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2015
Posts: 2874
Posted: #11
Quote Originally Posted by Hugh_Jorgan:

  
 
I like to think of me and my gang to be more of a posse. 
Please refer to us as a posse going forward.


"I'm your huckleberry"

 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2010
Posts: 35334
Posted: #12
Quote Originally Posted by Ganda:

If you say so. Can't say I've followed it all, but don't think scal cheats with his record, so what's the point? Anyway, all I see from hugh is negativity, hate mongering, instigating, bullying, putting people down, twisting and turning every fact and event to fit a vile ideological world view etc...
I'll leave you guys to it. Can't wait till Covers flip the switch on him. 

Short version...  scal was 4-5-1 in NFL for the 2016 season, yet he posts a record of 36-23 (or whatever he ended up) on his picks.   Someone who stumbles upon an NFL play of his should know that he is not a 65-70% NFL capper this season.  When asked, he refuses to post a record by sport.  You wouldn't want to hire a painter to change out a toilet for you, so why would someone want to tail a guy in a sport that he is obviously not as strong in this year?   Transparency is the goal of this  
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2002
Posts: 22961
Posted: #13
BWS, I see that scal is questioning your line on the Wisky game.

You should point out that in his most recent pick/loss, he posted the Knicks -3.
He then went on to say that the line was -3.5 at the time he was writing, but he "expected it to dance to -3"
So the line was 3.5, yet he used 3, which was not available anywhere when he wrote his essay, or anytime thereafter.

Folks, ya can't make this stuff up 
bigreds daddy
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2004
Posts: 9818
Posted: #14
Quote Originally Posted by BWS77:


Short version...  scal was 4-5-1 in NFL for the 2016 season, yet he posts a record of 36-23 (or whatever he ended up) on his picks.   Someone who stumbles upon an NFL play of his should know that he is not a 65-70% NFL capper this season.  When asked, he refuses to post a record by sport.  You wouldn't want to hire a painter to change out a toilet for you, so why would someone want to tail a guy in a sport that he is obviously not as strong in this year?   Transparency is the goal of this  

Why do you worry about someone else keeping a 100% posted record when you don't once you start losing? 


HOCKEY........?

MMA.......?


I'll   you on this one......

HOOPS......3-12 



You shouldn't throw stones. 












































Oh.......Don't forget to bump up ONLY my losing threads from years ago....Not the winning ones.   Either way it doesn't help your case. 

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2011
Posts: 6458
Posted: #15
Quote Originally Posted by Hugh_Jorgan:

BWS, I see that scal is questioning your line on the Wisky game.

You should point out that in his most recent pick/loss, he posted the Knicks -3.
He then went on to say that the line was -3.5 at the time he was writing, but he "expected it to dance to -3"
So the line was 3.5, yet he used 3, which was not available anywhere when he wrote his essay, or anytime thereafter.

Folks, ya can't make this stuff up 
STFU 

you fu.cking box.  Dont expect to be out of the box any time soon  
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2011
Posts: 6458
Posted: #16
Quote Originally Posted by Hugh_Jorgan:


Gandi, I will make a rare exception here, and address you in a thread which is outside of your very own thread here in the PB.

I find the term "clique" to be passé. 
I like to think of me and my gang to be more of a posse. 
Please refer to us as a posse going forward.

That is all 
Cocksucker 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2013
Posts: 3267
Posted: #17
Hugh, I am afraid that you may have to start a new thread for this, something tells me the bashings in here will continue..
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2013
Posts: 3267
Posted: #18
BTW, Chaloots 4-1-1 2017 so far.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 28221
Posted: #19
The Purdue team total bet was included in 2016 and I noted this in my thread.

So it's 0-2 sides

0-1 TT on a miracle with a pick made early in 2016.

Thanks for the help and nice to see you where you belong.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 28221
Posted: #20
Quote Originally Posted by BWS77:


Short version...  scal was 4-5-1 in NFL for the 2016 season, yet he posts a record of 36-23 (or whatever he ended up) on his picks.   Someone who stumbles upon an NFL play of his should know that he is not a 65-70% NFL capper this season.  When asked, he refuses to post a record by sport.  You wouldn't want to hire a painter to change out a toilet for you, so why would someone want to tail a guy in a sport that he is obviously not as strong in this year?   Transparency is the goal of this  

Why would I post a record by sport when it was you the trolls who demanded I provide a record as an overall capper after relentlessly harassing me as a 50% capper overall???

Then when that hits the roof because it is so good you want to go back to individual sport. 

TRANSPARENCY IS THE MAIN REASON I PROVIDED AN OVERALL RECORD

Transparency, from a poster who provides a favorable online on 12/6 that no one has access to, and the real lines loses. Now that's transparent folks!
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 28221
Posted: #21
Quote Originally Posted by coldsnap55:


Why do you worry about someone else keeping a 100% posted record when you don't once you start losing? 


HOCKEY........?

MMA.......?


I'll   you on this one......

HOOPS......3-12 



You shouldn't throw stones. 












































Oh.......Don't forget to bump up ONLY my losing threads from years ago....Not the winning ones.   Either way it doesn't help your case. 


I'm putting you on the payroll cold
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 28221
Posted: #22
And I BEG YOU TO CONTINUE TRACKING. I'M ALL FOR IT. 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 4681
Posted: #23
Quote Originally Posted by Hugh_Jorgan:

Anyone who would like for me to track their wagers, let me know and I will do my best to keep an accurate tally of all posted plays.

This tracking will be done for all plays graded as of 1/1/17

I will start with ... I don't know ... ummmm ... how about scal?!?!?!?

2017 overall record 0-4

NFL; 0-2 lost the Skins bet on 1/1, and the Bills TT bet on 1/1
CFB; 0-1 lost the Purdue TT bet on 1/9 (as per scal, this loss wouldn't be counted until the season is over. Season ends on 1/9)
NBA; 0-1 lost his "i'm winning or quitting" bet on the Knicks on 1/2


I am glad you have started to track this.


Scal lied about his 2016 record, and now it can be documented he is a phony.


Keep up the good work

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 4681
Posted: #24
Quote Originally Posted by Ganda:

If you say so. Can't say I've followed it all, but don't think scal cheats with his record, so what's the point? Anyway, all I see from hugh is negativity, hate mongering, instigating, bullying, putting people down, twisting and turning every fact and event to fit a vile ideological world view etc...
I'll leave you guys to it. Can't wait till Covers flip the switch on him. 

Regarding the bolded. It's been proven fact he inflated his record in 2016. Included a hot dog eating contest, but didn't include his play of the year on Hillary, amongst others

 
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2010
Posts: 35334
Posted: #25
Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:


Why would I post a record by sport when it was you the trolls who demanded I provide a record as an overall capper after relentlessly harassing me as a 50% capper overall???

Then when that hits the roof because it is so good you want to go back to individual sport. 

TRANSPARENCY IS THE MAIN REASON I PROVIDED AN OVERALL RECORD

Transparency, from a poster who provides a favorable online on 12/6 that no one has access to, and the real lines loses. Now that's transparent folks!

 

  Everyone had access to line when it came out.  That line was there from 12/4 to 12/29 and was posted on 12/6.   When you're worried about writing short stories about battleships I'm out getting a great line and posting it.  

https://www.scoresandodds.com/linemovement/20170102/308767689
All Forums | Penalty Box
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.