Cyrax
Warriors TT Over 59.5 1H
Warriors TT Over 114
Warriors / Grizzlies Over 110 1H
Cyrax
Warriors TT Over 59.5 1H
Warriors TT Over 114
Warriors / Grizzlies Over 110 1H
LOL
Ok, now this is rich and I'd LOVE for everyone to read this.
BWS posts a line in a thread almost a MONTH later, wins, say NOTHING about the closed line which everyone lost at (-8.5) and adds a win to his record (and on top of this, the wins are weighted. The win for the wisky game with the month old line only took $100 off a $1205 loss).
I post a line almost TWO MONTHS IN ADVANCE of the NBA season, a line that didn't move for several weeks because NO ONE paid attention to it, told everyone to take it at posting and thereafter and it WINS.
And along the way, after I warned them exactly what would happen, that it would rise, and it did, and said it's up to you to deal with a different line which you were told would move.
And BWS equates THAT to his -7.5 month-old line posting on the Wisky game.
WOW. If you are seriously going to use that as an argument that and you don't think that doesn't make YOU look bad, I don't know what will.
Hugh, the Purdue bet was counted in last year's total. I clearly specified that in my thread which you are free to search for. Now you can keep it here in the Penalty Box with your falsified record keeping, like other trolls, and that is up to you.
I am 1-2 with picks this year and 0-1 on a team total I made over a half a year ago. Keep tallying them up in an attempt to make me look bad. I welcome it. Your time here is being well spent.
LOL
Ok, now this is rich and I'd LOVE for everyone to read this.
BWS posts a line in a thread almost a MONTH later, wins, say NOTHING about the closed line which everyone lost at (-8.5) and adds a win to his record (and on top of this, the wins are weighted. The win for the wisky game with the month old line only took $100 off a $1205 loss).
I post a line almost TWO MONTHS IN ADVANCE of the NBA season, a line that didn't move for several weeks because NO ONE paid attention to it, told everyone to take it at posting and thereafter and it WINS.
And along the way, after I warned them exactly what would happen, that it would rise, and it did, and said it's up to you to deal with a different line which you were told would move.
And BWS equates THAT to his -7.5 month-old line posting on the Wisky game.
WOW. If you are seriously going to use that as an argument that and you don't think that doesn't make YOU look bad, I don't know what will.
Hugh, the Purdue bet was counted in last year's total. I clearly specified that in my thread which you are free to search for. Now you can keep it here in the Penalty Box with your falsified record keeping, like other trolls, and that is up to you.
I am 1-2 with picks this year and 0-1 on a team total I made over a half a year ago. Keep tallying them up in an attempt to make me look bad. I welcome it. Your time here is being well spent.
Now it needs 'it's own thread' for it to be a pick.
But of course, if it didn't hit, he would be THE FIRST PERSON posting it as a loss.
Not a lot of people missed it BWS. The thread only has a mere 25+K views.
Now it needs 'it's own thread' for it to be a pick.
But of course, if it didn't hit, he would be THE FIRST PERSON posting it as a loss.
Not a lot of people missed it BWS. The thread only has a mere 25+K views.
LOL
Ok, now this is rich and I'd LOVE for everyone to read this.
BWS posts a line in a thread almost a MONTH later, wins, say NOTHING about the closed line which everyone lost at (-8.5) and adds a win to his record (and on top of this, the wins are weighted. The win for the wisky game with the month old line only took $100 off a $1205 loss).
I post a line almost TWO MONTHS IN ADVANCE of the NBA season, a line that didn't move for several weeks because NO ONE paid attention to it, told everyone to take it at posting and thereafter and it WINS.
And along the way, after I warned them exactly what would happen, that it would rise, and it did, and said it's up to you to deal with a different line which you were told would move.
And BWS equates THAT to his -7.5 month-old line posting on the Wisky game.
WOW. If you are seriously going to use that as an argument that and you don't think that doesn't make YOU look bad, I don't know what will.
Hugh, the Purdue bet was counted in last year's total. I clearly specified that in my thread which you are free to search for. Now you can keep it here in the Penalty Box with your falsified record keeping, like other trolls, and that is up to you.
I am 1-2 with picks this year and 0-1 on a team total I made over a half a year ago. Keep tallying them up in an attempt to make me look bad. I welcome it. Your time here is being well spent.
LOL
Ok, now this is rich and I'd LOVE for everyone to read this.
BWS posts a line in a thread almost a MONTH later, wins, say NOTHING about the closed line which everyone lost at (-8.5) and adds a win to his record (and on top of this, the wins are weighted. The win for the wisky game with the month old line only took $100 off a $1205 loss).
I post a line almost TWO MONTHS IN ADVANCE of the NBA season, a line that didn't move for several weeks because NO ONE paid attention to it, told everyone to take it at posting and thereafter and it WINS.
And along the way, after I warned them exactly what would happen, that it would rise, and it did, and said it's up to you to deal with a different line which you were told would move.
And BWS equates THAT to his -7.5 month-old line posting on the Wisky game.
WOW. If you are seriously going to use that as an argument that and you don't think that doesn't make YOU look bad, I don't know what will.
Hugh, the Purdue bet was counted in last year's total. I clearly specified that in my thread which you are free to search for. Now you can keep it here in the Penalty Box with your falsified record keeping, like other trolls, and that is up to you.
I am 1-2 with picks this year and 0-1 on a team total I made over a half a year ago. Keep tallying them up in an attempt to make me look bad. I welcome it. Your time here is being well spent.
Now it needs 'it's own thread' for it to be a pick.
But of course, if it didn't hit, he would be THE FIRST PERSON posting it as a loss.
Not a lot of people missed it BWS. The thread only has a mere 25+K views.
Now it needs 'it's own thread' for it to be a pick.
But of course, if it didn't hit, he would be THE FIRST PERSON posting it as a loss.
Not a lot of people missed it BWS. The thread only has a mere 25+K views.
Now it needs 'it's own thread' for it to be a pick.
But of course, if it didn't hit, he would be THE FIRST PERSON posting it as a loss.
Not a lot of people missed it BWS. The thread only has a mere 25+K views.
Now it needs 'it's own thread' for it to be a pick.
But of course, if it didn't hit, he would be THE FIRST PERSON posting it as a loss.
Not a lot of people missed it BWS. The thread only has a mere 25+K views.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.