I already said that you can provide the option as to who holds the money and I will listen to any reasonable option.
Or, I will drive to your neighborhood and watch the game with you at one of the local bars that you frequent. Although I will insist upon a chair with its back against the wall.
I think it will be fun for anyone who reads this thread (all 4 of them).
And please stop claiming 65% over three years, you make yourself look ridiculous.
Billy Walters emailed me asking if I could get him your phone number.
He said something about "the way the Lakers fought so desperately hard to not lose that game by 50 points, really showed something. It was clear that losing by only 49 was life and death for every player on the team, and once they achieved that fantastic milestone, betting on them the next game was a slam dunk"
Scal, try to stay around this time ... it's no fun when you get your panties in a bunch because of your losing and leave us like you just did.
Hang in there, kid
Folks, a guy who intentionally created a tracking thread to make me look bad calls into question my 65% hit rate going on 3 years now, falsifying my record in the process, when he, in that very thread hit 48% over a whopping 40 games.
I want ONE non-troll to stand with Hugh and tell me that he can be trusted in this regard.
It's incredibly sad!
48%. Not over 5 picks or 6 picks or 7 picks.....FORTY picks.
That's a bankroll buster right there folks. If you want to tail this guy, his picks are all here for the taking. Tread carefully. Please!
0
Quote Originally Posted by Hugh_Jorgan:
I already said that you can provide the option as to who holds the money and I will listen to any reasonable option.
Or, I will drive to your neighborhood and watch the game with you at one of the local bars that you frequent. Although I will insist upon a chair with its back against the wall.
I think it will be fun for anyone who reads this thread (all 4 of them).
And please stop claiming 65% over three years, you make yourself look ridiculous.
Billy Walters emailed me asking if I could get him your phone number.
He said something about "the way the Lakers fought so desperately hard to not lose that game by 50 points, really showed something. It was clear that losing by only 49 was life and death for every player on the team, and once they achieved that fantastic milestone, betting on them the next game was a slam dunk"
Scal, try to stay around this time ... it's no fun when you get your panties in a bunch because of your losing and leave us like you just did.
Hang in there, kid
Folks, a guy who intentionally created a tracking thread to make me look bad calls into question my 65% hit rate going on 3 years now, falsifying my record in the process, when he, in that very thread hit 48% over a whopping 40 games.
I want ONE non-troll to stand with Hugh and tell me that he can be trusted in this regard.
It's incredibly sad!
48%. Not over 5 picks or 6 picks or 7 picks.....FORTY picks.
That's a bankroll buster right there folks. If you want to tail this guy, his picks are all here for the taking. Tread carefully. Please!
Folks, a guy who intentionally created a tracking thread to make me look bad calls into question my 65% hit rate going on 3 years now, falsifying my record in the process, when he, in that very thread hit 48% over a whopping 40 games.
I want ONE non-troll to stand with Hugh and tell me that he can be trusted in this regard.
It's incredibly sad!
48%. Not over 5 picks or 6 picks or 7 picks.....FORTY picks.
That's a bankroll buster right there folks. If you want to tail this guy, his picks are all here for the taking. Tread carefully. Please!
My credo is - if you're right, why fight it.
So, if you keep retorting, there must be something to it.
0
Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:
Folks, a guy who intentionally created a tracking thread to make me look bad calls into question my 65% hit rate going on 3 years now, falsifying my record in the process, when he, in that very thread hit 48% over a whopping 40 games.
I want ONE non-troll to stand with Hugh and tell me that he can be trusted in this regard.
It's incredibly sad!
48%. Not over 5 picks or 6 picks or 7 picks.....FORTY picks.
That's a bankroll buster right there folks. If you want to tail this guy, his picks are all here for the taking. Tread carefully. Please!
My credo is - if you're right, why fight it.
So, if you keep retorting, there must be something to it.
If one had simply tailed Hugh in CD's NFL thread all year, one would be flying first class to the Super Bowl and watching it in a VIP booth instead of on TV. Can't and won't keep up with everyone's records in all sports but his success rate in NFL this year was par excellence.
0
If one had simply tailed Hugh in CD's NFL thread all year, one would be flying first class to the Super Bowl and watching it in a VIP booth instead of on TV. Can't and won't keep up with everyone's records in all sports but his success rate in NFL this year was par excellence.
That's a bankroll buster right there folks. If you want to tail this guy, his picks are all here for the taking. Tread carefully. Please!
Ah!!! Viva La Difference!!!
I am not the one who starts long winded threads, declaring I have a winning pick.
I am not the one who falsely claims I am a 70% capper.
I am not the one who believes that I am God's gift to Covers.
I am not the one encouraging people to tail me because "we will meet at the window to collect"
I am not the one who lost an all-in bet, a bet that was in "so many parlays that I've lost count" ... a bet that was in "every parlay, literally every parlay". A bet that I begged and pleaded everyone to also include in every parlay they bet because it was "free money", even at -300.
I am not the one who kept a record of wins and losses, yet failed to account for the largest bet of the year as even a single loss.
No, not me, I never did those things. Those are the actions of a self absorbed, delusional azzhole.
Regardless, I'm glad you came back, scal. I missed you
bigreds daddy
0
Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:
That's a bankroll buster right there folks. If you want to tail this guy, his picks are all here for the taking. Tread carefully. Please!
Ah!!! Viva La Difference!!!
I am not the one who starts long winded threads, declaring I have a winning pick.
I am not the one who falsely claims I am a 70% capper.
I am not the one who believes that I am God's gift to Covers.
I am not the one encouraging people to tail me because "we will meet at the window to collect"
I am not the one who lost an all-in bet, a bet that was in "so many parlays that I've lost count" ... a bet that was in "every parlay, literally every parlay". A bet that I begged and pleaded everyone to also include in every parlay they bet because it was "free money", even at -300.
I am not the one who kept a record of wins and losses, yet failed to account for the largest bet of the year as even a single loss.
No, not me, I never did those things. Those are the actions of a self absorbed, delusional azzhole.
Regardless, I'm glad you came back, scal. I missed you
I am not the one who starts long winded threads, declaring I have a winning pick.
I am not the one who falsely claims I am a 70% capper.
I am not the one who believes that I am God's gift to Covers.
I am not the one encouraging people to tail me because "we will meet at the window to collect"
I am not the one who lost an all-in bet, a bet that was in "so many parlays that I've lost count" ... a bet that was in "every parlay, literally every parlay". A bet that I begged and pleaded everyone to also include in every parlay they bet because it was "free money", even at -300.
I am not the one who kept a record of wins and losses, yet failed to account for the largest bet of the year as even a single loss.
No, not me, I never did those things. Those are the actions of a self absorbed, delusional azzhole.
Regardless, I'm glad you came back, scal. I missed you
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=a_HpVbD1_Ao
0
Quote Originally Posted by Hugh_Jorgan:
Ah!!! Viva La Difference!!!
I am not the one who starts long winded threads, declaring I have a winning pick.
I am not the one who falsely claims I am a 70% capper.
I am not the one who believes that I am God's gift to Covers.
I am not the one encouraging people to tail me because "we will meet at the window to collect"
I am not the one who lost an all-in bet, a bet that was in "so many parlays that I've lost count" ... a bet that was in "every parlay, literally every parlay". A bet that I begged and pleaded everyone to also include in every parlay they bet because it was "free money", even at -300.
I am not the one who kept a record of wins and losses, yet failed to account for the largest bet of the year as even a single loss.
No, not me, I never did those things. Those are the actions of a self absorbed, delusional azzhole.
Regardless, I'm glad you came back, scal. I missed you
I'll dissent and take the biggest little state in the union.These 2 teams are almost mirror images of each other yet the oddsmakers made Dave just a 1 point home fave over Rhody. People have bet it to it's current 2.5 based mainly I suppose on the Davidson name. However, the Davids are 0-2 S/U the last 2 times they came off 2+ road games for a home tilt, while URI is 3-0 S/U in the exact opposite situation. Something a bit off kilter in the cosmos this evening.
I'll put the money on the URI Rams +2.5. Good Luck to you my friend and may God have mercy on us all.
0
Quote Originally Posted by chaloots:
50-33
Pistons -4
Davidson -2
St Peters +9
2-2
I'll dissent and take the biggest little state in the union.These 2 teams are almost mirror images of each other yet the oddsmakers made Dave just a 1 point home fave over Rhody. People have bet it to it's current 2.5 based mainly I suppose on the Davidson name. However, the Davids are 0-2 S/U the last 2 times they came off 2+ road games for a home tilt, while URI is 3-0 S/U in the exact opposite situation. Something a bit off kilter in the cosmos this evening.
I'll put the money on the URI Rams +2.5. Good Luck to you my friend and may God have mercy on us all.
I'll dissent and take the biggest little state in the union.These 2 teams are almost mirror images of each other yet the oddsmakers made Dave just a 1 point home fave over Rhody. People have bet it to it's current 2.5 based mainly I suppose on the Davidson name. However, the Davids are 0-2 S/U the last 2 times they came off 2+ road games for a home tilt, while URI is 3-0 S/U in the exact opposite situation. Something a bit off kilter in the cosmos this evening.
I'll put the money on the URI Rams +2.5. Good Luck to you my friend and may God have mercy on us all.
nicely done Getty
0
Quote Originally Posted by Getty3:
2-2
I'll dissent and take the biggest little state in the union.These 2 teams are almost mirror images of each other yet the oddsmakers made Dave just a 1 point home fave over Rhody. People have bet it to it's current 2.5 based mainly I suppose on the Davidson name. However, the Davids are 0-2 S/U the last 2 times they came off 2+ road games for a home tilt, while URI is 3-0 S/U in the exact opposite situation. Something a bit off kilter in the cosmos this evening.
I'll put the money on the URI Rams +2.5. Good Luck to you my friend and may God have mercy on us all.
Let's take Alabummer -7 over Awwwbun. 2 weeks ago these 2 teams played and the Tigers won by 20 on home court. They exceeded all year long statistical categories by an average of 32% while Bama minimized the same by 20%. The game at Auburn was a pick and now Bama is a home fave of 7 which is what it should be. Revenge can only be served if you have the ability to do so. Alabama does.
Red Tide -7
0
3-2
Let's take Alabummer -7 over Awwwbun. 2 weeks ago these 2 teams played and the Tigers won by 20 on home court. They exceeded all year long statistical categories by an average of 32% while Bama minimized the same by 20%. The game at Auburn was a pick and now Bama is a home fave of 7 which is what it should be. Revenge can only be served if you have the ability to do so. Alabama does.
Enjoy the game fellas, I will be miserable if they lose. I ecpect a double digit win. The biggest advantage in this game IMO is the Pats offense against the Falcons defense. While I respect what Atl did this year, their defense is terrible and they benefit alot from playing from ahead. I just can't see how the Patriots won't score at will in this game. My biggest concern isn't Julio Jones, it is covering the backs out of the backfield, they have a huge speed advantage against the Pats LB's. If Goodel has to hand the Lombardi/Belichick trophy over to Brady or BB, I hope they tell him to get fucked and walk off the stage. Clearly Brady being a normal human being won't do that, only an assshole like me would..
0
Quote Originally Posted by chaloots:
52-34
TCU -6
Virginia -5
Seton Hall +3
Illinois pick em
Gators -2
Oregon -3
GL All
56-36
Pats -3
Pats -1 first half
Enjoy the game fellas, I will be miserable if they lose. I ecpect a double digit win. The biggest advantage in this game IMO is the Pats offense against the Falcons defense. While I respect what Atl did this year, their defense is terrible and they benefit alot from playing from ahead. I just can't see how the Patriots won't score at will in this game. My biggest concern isn't Julio Jones, it is covering the backs out of the backfield, they have a huge speed advantage against the Pats LB's. If Goodel has to hand the Lombardi/Belichick trophy over to Brady or BB, I hope they tell him to get fucked and walk off the stage. Clearly Brady being a normal human being won't do that, only an assshole like me would..
I am not the one who starts long winded threads, declaring I have a winning pick.
I am not the one who falsely claims I am a 70% capper.
I am not the one who believes that I am God's gift to Covers.
I am not the one encouraging people to tail me because "we will meet at the window to collect"
I am not the one who lost an all-in bet, a bet that was in "so many parlays that I've lost count" ... a bet that was in "every parlay, literally every parlay". A bet that I begged and pleaded everyone to also include in every parlay they bet because it was "free money", even at -300.
I am not the one who kept a record of wins and losses, yet failed to account for the largest bet of the year as even a single loss.
No, not me, I never did those things. Those are the actions of a self absorbed, delusional azzhole.
Regardless, I'm glad you came back, scal. I missed you
I'm shocked, shocked I tell you...... that the man of the people who does this for free hasn't returned to either one of his losing threads yesterday to apologize for costing his flock their hard earned dollars!
Of course, if both had won I'm sure he would have been there accepting the accolades and definitely not treating the thread like a crime scene of which he is the guilty party.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Hugh_Jorgan:
Ah!!! Viva La Difference!!!
I am not the one who starts long winded threads, declaring I have a winning pick.
I am not the one who falsely claims I am a 70% capper.
I am not the one who believes that I am God's gift to Covers.
I am not the one encouraging people to tail me because "we will meet at the window to collect"
I am not the one who lost an all-in bet, a bet that was in "so many parlays that I've lost count" ... a bet that was in "every parlay, literally every parlay". A bet that I begged and pleaded everyone to also include in every parlay they bet because it was "free money", even at -300.
I am not the one who kept a record of wins and losses, yet failed to account for the largest bet of the year as even a single loss.
No, not me, I never did those things. Those are the actions of a self absorbed, delusional azzhole.
Regardless, I'm glad you came back, scal. I missed you
I'm shocked, shocked I tell you...... that the man of the people who does this for free hasn't returned to either one of his losing threads yesterday to apologize for costing his flock their hard earned dollars!
Of course, if both had won I'm sure he would have been there accepting the accolades and definitely not treating the thread like a crime scene of which he is the guilty party.
As lead plaintiff in the; People vs Scal case, I can attest to the fact that scal is indeed 3-7 in 2017.
You ask if it matters?
My response is yes, because whenever someone touts themselves as being a verified 70% capper, it is the responsibility of us, The People, to keep accurate records in an effort to inform those who might otherwise believe that someone is a 70% capper and in turn blindly tail that imposter into the poor house.
To contradict myself ... there is in fact one 70% capper here ..
... and that is scal's bookie
bigreds daddy
0
As lead plaintiff in the; People vs Scal case, I can attest to the fact that scal is indeed 3-7 in 2017.
You ask if it matters?
My response is yes, because whenever someone touts themselves as being a verified 70% capper, it is the responsibility of us, The People, to keep accurate records in an effort to inform those who might otherwise believe that someone is a 70% capper and in turn blindly tail that imposter into the poor house.
To contradict myself ... there is in fact one 70% capper here ..
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.