for a team that doesnt belong in the playoffs they are doing very well against a team that is in the playoffs
WAY TO GO NUMBER 2 DEFENSE (based on scal's stats)
for a team that doesnt belong in the playoffs they are doing very well against a team that is in the playoffs
WAY TO GO NUMBER 2 DEFENSE (based on scal's stats)
for a team that doesnt belong in the playoffs they are doing very well against a team that is in the playoffs
WAY TO GO NUMBER 2 DEFENSE (based on scal's stats)
Dude - you should be apologizing less, and you should have kept your mouth shut more.
If they played 10 times, the Bengals MIGHT still win 9 of those.
Where you went wrong is you put all your eggs in one basket which is ONE GAME (way to short of a sample size for variance to be removed). Maybe your capping was perfect. Maybe everythying you said in the first several posts was right.
The problem is that even though you might be 100% right, the variance on a single football game is WAY TOO HIGH to ever apologize for, or hype the way you did.
Dude - you should be apologizing less, and you should have kept your mouth shut more.
If they played 10 times, the Bengals MIGHT still win 9 of those.
Where you went wrong is you put all your eggs in one basket which is ONE GAME (way to short of a sample size for variance to be removed). Maybe your capping was perfect. Maybe everythying you said in the first several posts was right.
The problem is that even though you might be 100% right, the variance on a single football game is WAY TOO HIGH to ever apologize for, or hype the way you did.
Dude - you should be apologizing less, and you should have kept your mouth shut more.
If they played 10 times, the Bengals MIGHT still win 9 of those.
Where you went wrong is you put all your eggs in one basket which is ONE GAME (way to short of a sample size for variance to be removed). Maybe your capping was perfect. Maybe everythying you said in the first several posts was right.
The problem is that even though you might be 100% right, the variance on a single football game is WAY TOO HIGH to ever apologize for, or hype the way you did.
Dude - you should be apologizing less, and you should have kept your mouth shut more.
If they played 10 times, the Bengals MIGHT still win 9 of those.
Where you went wrong is you put all your eggs in one basket which is ONE GAME (way to short of a sample size for variance to be removed). Maybe your capping was perfect. Maybe everythying you said in the first several posts was right.
The problem is that even though you might be 100% right, the variance on a single football game is WAY TOO HIGH to ever apologize for, or hype the way you did.
even the zebras cant help the bookmakers.....awwwwwwwwwww
go AHEAD MAKE YOUR EXCUSES...if they would have made field goals...hehehehehhahahahahahah.....we drop balls in the endzone so we are equal.
even the zebras cant help the bookmakers.....awwwwwwwwwww
go AHEAD MAKE YOUR EXCUSES...if they would have made field goals...hehehehehhahahahahahah.....we drop balls in the endzone so we are equal.
even the zebras cant help the bookmakers.....awwwwwwwwwww
go AHEAD MAKE YOUR EXCUSES...if they would have made field goals...hehehehehhahahahahahah.....we drop balls in the endzone so we are equal.
even the zebras cant help the bookmakers.....awwwwwwwwwww
go AHEAD MAKE YOUR EXCUSES...if they would have made field goals...hehehehehhahahahahahah.....we drop balls in the endzone so we are equal.
Dude - you should be apologizing less, and you should have kept your mouth shut more.
If they played 10 times, the Bengals MIGHT still win 9 of those.
Where you went wrong is you put all your eggs in one basket which is ONE GAME (way to short of a sample size for variance to be removed). Maybe your capping was perfect. Maybe everythying you said in the first several posts was right.
The problem is that even though you might be 100% right, the variance on a single football game is WAY TOO HIGH to ever apologize for, or hype the way you did.
Dude - you should be apologizing less, and you should have kept your mouth shut more.
If they played 10 times, the Bengals MIGHT still win 9 of those.
Where you went wrong is you put all your eggs in one basket which is ONE GAME (way to short of a sample size for variance to be removed). Maybe your capping was perfect. Maybe everythying you said in the first several posts was right.
The problem is that even though you might be 100% right, the variance on a single football game is WAY TOO HIGH to ever apologize for, or hype the way you did.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.