• Forums
  • Best Betting Sites
  • Sportsbook Promos
  • Best Sports Betting Apps
  • NFL Betting Forum
  • NBA Betting Forum
  • MLB Betting Forum
  • NHL Betting Forum
  • NCAAF Betting Forum
  • NCAAB Betting Forum
  • Soccer Betting Forum
  • Tennis Betting Forum
  • General Discussion
  • Help Forum
  • Guidelines
  • FAQ
  • Forum Updates
    Covers Logo
    Covers App
    Faster picks. Smarter bets.
    All in the NEW Covers App
    Download on the App Store Download on the Google Play Store
    • Sports
      • NFL
        • Back
        • NFL
        • NFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NFL Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NCAAF
        • Back
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAF Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NCAAF Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NBA
        • Back
        • NBA
        • NBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • NCAAB
        • Back
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • NCAAB Picks
        • Injuries
      • MLB
        • Back
        • MLB
        • MLB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • MLB Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NHL
        • Back
        • NHL
        • NHL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NHL Picks
        • Injuries
      • Soccer
      • UFC
      • WNBA
        • Back
        • WNBA
        • WNBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • WNBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • CFL
        • Back
        • CFL
        • CFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • CFL Picks
      • Golf
        • Back
        • Golf
        • Golf Home
        • Golf Odds
        • Masters Odds
        • PGA Championship Odds
        • US Open Odds
        • British Open Odds
        • Ryder Cup Odds
        • Golf Picks
    • Odds
      • All Odds
      • NFL
      • NCAAF
      • NBA
      • NCAAB
      • MLB
      • NHL
      • Golf
      • Soccer Odds
        • Back
        • Soccer Odds
        • MLS Odds
        • Champions League Odds
        • Premier League Odds
      • UFC
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • Election Odds
      • Futures
        • Back
        • Futures
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • MLB
        • NHL
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAF
      • Sports Odds History
    • Picks
      • All Picks
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • NHL
      • MLB
      • NCAAF
      • NCAAB
      • Golf
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • User Picks
      • Team User Picks
      • Consensus Picks
        • Back
        • Consensus Picks
        • All Consensus Picks
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • NHL
        • MLB
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAB
        • CFL
        • WNBA
        • Consensus FAQ
        • Public Money
    • Prop Projections
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • MLB
      • NHL
    • Betting
      • US Betting Sites
      • Canada Betting Sites
      • Sportsbook Reviews
      • States
        • Back
        • States
        • US Legal Tracker
        • Revenue Tracker
        • Arizona
        • Arkansas
        • California
        • Colorado
        • Connecticut
        • DC
        • Florida
        • Georgia
        • Illinois
        • Indiana
        • Iowa
        • Kansas
        • Kentucky
        • Louisiana
        • Maine
        • Maryland
        • Massachusetts
        • Michigan
        • Mississippi
        • Missouri
        • Nevada
        • New Hampshire
        • New Jersey
        • New York
        • North Carolina
        • Ohio
        • Oregon
        • Pennsylvania
        • Tennessee
        • Texas
        • Vermont
        • Virginia
        • West Virginia
        • Wyoming
      • Provinces
        • Back
        • Provinces
        • Alberta
        • British Columbia
        • Manitoba
        • New Brunswick
        • Newfoundland and Labrador
        • Northwest Territories
        • Nova Scotia
        • Nunavut
        • Ontario
        • Prince Edward Island
        • Quebec (English)
        • Quebec (francais)
        • Saskatchewan
        • Yukon
      • By Sport
        • Back
        • By Sport
        • Baseball
        • Basketball
        • Boxing
        • College Football
        • F1
        • Football
        • Super Bowl
        • Golf
        • Hockey
        • Horse Racing
        • March Madness
        • Soccer
        • UFC
        • World Cup
      • Betting Apps
        • Back
        • Betting Apps
        • Best Sports Betting Apps USA
        • Ontario Sports Betting Apps
      • Rest of World
        • Back
        • Rest of World
        • UK Betting Offers
          • Back
          • UK Betting Offers
          • UK Betting Sites
          • bet365 Bonus Code UK
          • 888Sport Promo Code UK
          • William Hill Sign up Offer
          • Betway Sign up Offer
          • BetVictor Bonus Code UK
      • Betting Guides
        • Back
        • Betting Guides
        • All Guides
        • Glossary
        • Betting Calculators
          • Back
          • Betting Calculators
          • Odds Converter
          • Parlay Calculator
        • Futures Betting Guide
        • Moneyline Betting Guide
        • Over/Under Betting Guide
        • Parlay Betting Guide
        • Point Spread Betting Guide
        • Prop Betting Guide
        • Sports Betting Guides
          • Back
          • Sports Betting Guides
          • How To Bet On Sports Guide
          • NFL Betting Guide
          • NHL Betting Guide
          • NBA Betting Guide
          • MLB Betting Guide
          • NCAAB Betting Guide
          • NCAAF Betting Guide
          • Golf Betting Guide
          • Tennis Betting Guide
        • Teaser Betting Guide
      • Betting News
        • Back
        • Betting News
        • All News
        • Industry News
        • Podcasts
        • Covers Videos
        • Covers Writers
        • Offers & Boosts
    • Promos
      • Sportsbook Promos
      • Canada Sportsbook Promos
      • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • bet365 Bonus Code
        • BET99 Promo Code
        • BetMGM Bonus Code
        • BetRivers Bonus Code
        • Caesars Sportsbook Promo
        • DraftKings Promo Code
        • Fanatics Sportsbook Promo
        • FanDuel Promo Code
        • Hard Rock Bet Promo Code
        • Sports Interaction Promo
        • Stake Promo Code
        • theScore Bet Promo Code
        • TonyBet Promo Code
      • Bonuses By Region
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Region
        • Arkansas Promos
        • Arizona Promos
        • Colorado Promos
        • Connecticut Promos
        • DC Promos
        • Illinois Promos
        • Indiana Promos
        • Iowa Promos
        • Kansas Promos
        • Kentucky Promos
        • Louisiana Promos
        • Maine Promos
        • Maryland Promos
        • Massachusetts Promos
        • Michigan Promos
        • Missouri Promos
        • New Jersey Promos
        • New York Promos
        • North Carolina Promos
        • Ohio Promos
        • Pennsylvania Promos
        • Tennessee Promos
        • Vermont Promos
        • Virginia Promos
        • West Virginia Promos
        • Wyoming Promos
    • Forum & Contests
      • All Forums
      • NFL Betting Forum
      • MLB Betting Forum
      • NCAAB Betting Forum
      • NCAAF Betting Forum
      • NBA Betting Forum
      • NHL Betting Forum
      • Soccer Betting Forum
      • Contests
        • Back
        • Contests
        • Contests Home
        • Streak Survivor
        • King of Covers
        • My Contests
    • Casino
      • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Back
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes No-Deposit Bonuses
        • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Back
          • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Card Crush
          • Casino.click
          • Chanced Casino
          • Crown Coins Casino
          • FreeSpin Casino
          • LoneStar
          • McLuck
          • Mega Bonanza Casino
          • PlayFame
          • Pulsz
          • Stake.us
      • US Casinos
        • Back
        • US Casinos
        • US Online Casinos
        • US Online Casino Bonuses
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • bet365 Casino Promo Code
          • BetRivers Casino Promo
          • Borgata Casino Bonus Code
          • Caesars Casino Bonus Code
          • DraftKings Casino Promo
          • Fanatics Casino Promo
          • FanDuel Casino Promo Code
          • Golden Nugget Casino Promo
          • Hard Rock Bet Casino Promo
          • Hollywood Casino Promo Code
      • Canada Casinos
        • Back
        • Canada Casinos
        • Canada Online Casinos
        • Provinces
          • Back
          • Provinces
          • Alberta Online Casino
          • BC Online Casino
          • Ontario Online Casinos
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • BC.GAME Bonus Code
          • Cloudbet Promo Code
          • RainBet Promo Code
          • Roobet Promo Code
          • Shuffle Promo Code
          • Thrill Promo Code
    • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Market Apps
      • Prediction Market Promos
      • Kalshi Promo Code
      • Polymarket Promo Code
      • DraftKings Predictions Promo Code
      • Novig Promo Code
      • ProphetX Promo Code
      • Underdog Promo Code
      • OG Promo Code
      • Fanatics Markets Promo Code
      • Plus500 Promo Code
    • NFL Week 1
      NFL Week 1
      • NFL Picks
      • NFL Odds
      • 49ers vs. Rams Prediction
      • 49ers vs. Rams TD Picks
      • 49ers vs. Rams Prop Picks
      • ATS Picks
      • NFL Betting Sites
    Covers Account
    Log in Create account
    Join free Log in
    All Forums | Politics

    2024 Election could be America’s crossroad!

    «First Previous 12345 Next Last»
    UNIMAN
    thirdperson
    joe pockets
    Raiders22
    Rush51
    ...
    Participants:
    Search model icon
    Views: 877
    Posts: 101
    «First Previous 12345 Next Last»
     
    UNIMAN
    UNIMAN
    All-Star
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jul, 2014
    Posts: 10454
    Posted: Nov. 20, 2023 - 10:48 AM ET #26

    Quote Originally Posted by joe pockets:

    @Barbarossa I was not a huge fan of Obama BUT I would take him over Trump 6 six days a week and twice on Sunday!  My problem is right now is that people with access to wealth are having an outsized impact on government. Whether they should have that wealth is another argument entirely, but I don’t think it should be controversial to say that a billionaire shouldn’t have more influence on government than a blue-collar worker living paycheck to paycheck. Both are citizens of the same government and both should be expected to contribute their share to the common welfare of all. Instead, the rich are pushing policies that negatively impact everyone else, to the point that a breakdown of social order doesn’t seem unlikely. I personally believe that Democrats are more willing to correct this problem…Trump is the poster boy of the rich skating there responsible to pay there fare share! There is doubt in my mind every single person on the list of Forbes 400 and 10,000 below are screwing the country on a remarkable amount of money each and every year….And I’m not speaking about deducting a extra pair of work shoes..I’m saying millions! If the far right wants to scream bloody murder over the deficit they should start with there largest campaign contributor's

     

    You mean like George Soros backed prosecutors?

    Maybe Zuckerburg and his millions affecting an election.

    Bloomburg bailing out felons so they could vote.

    Zuckerburg, Dorsey, FBI restricting the fact that Hunters laptop was real.

    Just to name a few.

    Reply
    Quote Post
    3
    Report User

    Quote Originally Posted by joe pockets:

    @Barbarossa I was not a huge fan of Obama BUT I would take him over Trump 6 six days a week and twice on Sunday!  My problem is right now is that people with access to wealth are having an outsized impact on government. Whether they should have that wealth is another argument entirely, but I don’t think it should be controversial to say that a billionaire shouldn’t have more influence on government than a blue-collar worker living paycheck to paycheck. Both are citizens of the same government and both should be expected to contribute their share to the common welfare of all. Instead, the rich are pushing policies that negatively impact everyone else, to the point that a breakdown of social order doesn’t seem unlikely. I personally believe that Democrats are more willing to correct this problem…Trump is the poster boy of the rich skating there responsible to pay there fare share! There is doubt in my mind every single person on the list of Forbes 400 and 10,000 below are screwing the country on a remarkable amount of money each and every year….And I’m not speaking about deducting a extra pair of work shoes..I’m saying millions! If the far right wants to scream bloody murder over the deficit they should start with there largest campaign contributor's

     

    You mean like George Soros backed prosecutors?

    Maybe Zuckerburg and his millions affecting an election.

    Bloomburg bailing out felons so they could vote.

    Zuckerburg, Dorsey, FBI restricting the fact that Hunters laptop was real.

    Just to name a few.

     
    thirdperson
    thirdperson
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2005
    Posts: 9388
    Posted: Nov. 20, 2023 - 11:03 AM ET #27

    House committee investigating deep state has failed to prove weaponization of government against republicans because of lack of evidences.  Witnesses lack credibility and whistleblowers aren't really whistleblowers.  In contrast, January 6 committee investigation was so successful that its findings lead to justice department prosecution of Trump.  Under Biden administration, justice department operates independently.  However there are far more evidences of weaponization under Trump administration. 

    Reply
    Quote Post
    2
    Report User

    House committee investigating deep state has failed to prove weaponization of government against republicans because of lack of evidences.  Witnesses lack credibility and whistleblowers aren't really whistleblowers.  In contrast, January 6 committee investigation was so successful that its findings lead to justice department prosecution of Trump.  Under Biden administration, justice department operates independently.  However there are far more evidences of weaponization under Trump administration. 

     
    UNIMAN
    UNIMAN
    All-Star
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jul, 2014
    Posts: 10454
    Posted: Nov. 20, 2023 - 11:52 AM ET #28

    You fear that Trump will do the Left what the Left has done to Trump. And you should.

    Better rally MSM to get rid of Biden,................. already started.

    Reply
    Quote Post
    1
    Report User

    You fear that Trump will do the Left what the Left has done to Trump. And you should.

    Better rally MSM to get rid of Biden,................. already started.

     
    joe pockets
    joe pockets
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jul, 2000
    Posts: 5468
    Posted: Nov. 20, 2023 - 12:00 PM ET #29

    @UNIMAN

    Henry Cuellar & Eric Adams are democrats with possible baggage are you of thinking that political participation should supersede a investigation?  All this tells me this case is the scales of justice are blind and in Trumps they are delayed! I have to think there was some operational imperative to do this! How about the New Jersey Senator Melindez you failed to throw him into the group? Gold bars all! …..Everything is a conspiracy with you my man.

    Reply
    Quote Post
    2
    Report User

    @UNIMAN

    Henry Cuellar & Eric Adams are democrats with possible baggage are you of thinking that political participation should supersede a investigation?  All this tells me this case is the scales of justice are blind and in Trumps they are delayed! I have to think there was some operational imperative to do this! How about the New Jersey Senator Melindez you failed to throw him into the group? Gold bars all! …..Everything is a conspiracy with you my man.

     
    joe pockets
    joe pockets
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jul, 2000
    Posts: 5468
    Posted: Nov. 20, 2023 - 12:43 PM ET #30

    @ColonelKlink

     Derangement? You Trumpers don’t listen to your masters enough! Less than 3 weeks ago Trump said he wants a power called Schedule F, which would enable him to fire employees who presently have employment protection. Schedule F would be dangerous for even an honorable president to have; in Trump's hands it would be disastrous. He has already shown how he would use such power. Replacing acting attorney general Rosen with Jeffrey Clark, who agreed to help Trump overturn the Georgia election, is one of many examples. He fired Acting Attorney General Sally Yates, FBI Director James Comey, Colonel Alexander Vindman, and Cybersecurity Director Chris Krebs, and drove Director of Intelligence Dan Coats to resign, all for telling the truth when it conflicted with his lies. He couldn't fire Fauci so he sidelined him because Fauci would not go along with Trump's lies about covid. He fired the Inspector General Steve Linick at Mike Pompeo's behest because Linick was investigating Pompeo. The people he replaced these people with often had meager experience but they had the qualification that mattered: they were willing to support Trump's lies. 

    Reply
    Quote Post
    3
    Report User

    @ColonelKlink

     Derangement? You Trumpers don’t listen to your masters enough! Less than 3 weeks ago Trump said he wants a power called Schedule F, which would enable him to fire employees who presently have employment protection. Schedule F would be dangerous for even an honorable president to have; in Trump's hands it would be disastrous. He has already shown how he would use such power. Replacing acting attorney general Rosen with Jeffrey Clark, who agreed to help Trump overturn the Georgia election, is one of many examples. He fired Acting Attorney General Sally Yates, FBI Director James Comey, Colonel Alexander Vindman, and Cybersecurity Director Chris Krebs, and drove Director of Intelligence Dan Coats to resign, all for telling the truth when it conflicted with his lies. He couldn't fire Fauci so he sidelined him because Fauci would not go along with Trump's lies about covid. He fired the Inspector General Steve Linick at Mike Pompeo's behest because Linick was investigating Pompeo. The people he replaced these people with often had meager experience but they had the qualification that mattered: they were willing to support Trump's lies. 

     
    Raiders22
    Raiders22
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2010
    Posts: 33753
    Posted: Nov. 20, 2023 - 2:34 PM ET #31

    @joe pockets

     My problem is right now is that people with access to wealth are having an outsized impact on government.

    Quantify this for me.  What is the amount of impact they should have?  Compared to what, and why?  What are your examples?  This sounds like you are just posting vague rhetoric the Left has as talking points. 

    Whether they should have that wealth is another argument entirely, but I don’t think it should be controversial to say that a billionaire shouldn’t have more influence on government than a blue-collar worker living paycheck to paycheck.

    Why not?  I am not even disagreeing but would I am interested if you can articulate this?  Why should the folks that have an interest in starting businesses that employ 10s, 100, or 1000s of people not have more say about some things?  For sure they have more of an idea of how to create jobs and help the economy than the average guy that cuts people's grass.  

    If everyone had the same amount of interest and concern and influence, we might all still be small-time farmers.  You have to cater to folks that are advancing and growing the country a bit -- for sure it has to be fair and legal.  But these are the guys that are going to try to get sites zoned for a business and lobby to get business-friendly laws passed, etc.  What is the average guy going to do -- nothing but the same thing he has done for the last 30 years.  Usually go to work for the highly-motivated guy's business.

    Both are citizens of the same government and both should be expected to contribute their share to the common welfare of all.

    This is another Leftist talking point.  Look at simply the money these people and their businesses pay in taxes compared to the average guy.  Then include the fact that a lot of folks do not pay any taxes.  Then factor in how much they provide in the way of jobs and services.  You can make a very, very good argument the average guy is scamming, in a sense, nd the rich guy is being overly penalized.  This is propaganda by the Left -- do not fall for this.

    Instead, the rich are pushing policies that negatively impact everyone else, to the point that a breakdown of social order doesn’t seem unlikely.

    For example?

    I personally believe that Democrats are more willing to correct this problem…

    Of course you do.  Because you, like all Democrats, think this is a problem; and a problem that only government can fix.

    Trump is the poster boy of the rich skating there responsible to pay there fare share!

    For example, exactly?

    There is doubt in my mind every single person on the list of Forbes 400 and 10,000 below are screwing the country on a remarkable amount of money each and every year….

    That is nonsense and a completely jaded way of looking at things.  This shows you have not studied the issue yourself and are simply repeating talking points to stir your side into a frenzy.

    And I’m not speaking about deducting a extra pair of work shoes..I’m saying millions!

    They are cracking down on folks all of the time and you just hear about it more nowadays because of the 24-hour newscycle.  For the ones that are doing this, there are FAR more that are NOT doing it.  There are many average people that are scamming as well and percentage-wise a larger amount of their 'fair' share.

    If the far right wants to scream bloody murder over the deficit they should start with there largest campaign contributor's 

    What do you even mean by this?

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    @joe pockets

     My problem is right now is that people with access to wealth are having an outsized impact on government.

    Quantify this for me.  What is the amount of impact they should have?  Compared to what, and why?  What are your examples?  This sounds like you are just posting vague rhetoric the Left has as talking points. 

    Whether they should have that wealth is another argument entirely, but I don’t think it should be controversial to say that a billionaire shouldn’t have more influence on government than a blue-collar worker living paycheck to paycheck.

    Why not?  I am not even disagreeing but would I am interested if you can articulate this?  Why should the folks that have an interest in starting businesses that employ 10s, 100, or 1000s of people not have more say about some things?  For sure they have more of an idea of how to create jobs and help the economy than the average guy that cuts people's grass.  

    If everyone had the same amount of interest and concern and influence, we might all still be small-time farmers.  You have to cater to folks that are advancing and growing the country a bit -- for sure it has to be fair and legal.  But these are the guys that are going to try to get sites zoned for a business and lobby to get business-friendly laws passed, etc.  What is the average guy going to do -- nothing but the same thing he has done for the last 30 years.  Usually go to work for the highly-motivated guy's business.

    Both are citizens of the same government and both should be expected to contribute their share to the common welfare of all.

    This is another Leftist talking point.  Look at simply the money these people and their businesses pay in taxes compared to the average guy.  Then include the fact that a lot of folks do not pay any taxes.  Then factor in how much they provide in the way of jobs and services.  You can make a very, very good argument the average guy is scamming, in a sense, nd the rich guy is being overly penalized.  This is propaganda by the Left -- do not fall for this.

    Instead, the rich are pushing policies that negatively impact everyone else, to the point that a breakdown of social order doesn’t seem unlikely.

    For example?

    I personally believe that Democrats are more willing to correct this problem…

    Of course you do.  Because you, like all Democrats, think this is a problem; and a problem that only government can fix.

    Trump is the poster boy of the rich skating there responsible to pay there fare share!

    For example, exactly?

    There is doubt in my mind every single person on the list of Forbes 400 and 10,000 below are screwing the country on a remarkable amount of money each and every year….

    That is nonsense and a completely jaded way of looking at things.  This shows you have not studied the issue yourself and are simply repeating talking points to stir your side into a frenzy.

    And I’m not speaking about deducting a extra pair of work shoes..I’m saying millions!

    They are cracking down on folks all of the time and you just hear about it more nowadays because of the 24-hour newscycle.  For the ones that are doing this, there are FAR more that are NOT doing it.  There are many average people that are scamming as well and percentage-wise a larger amount of their 'fair' share.

    If the far right wants to scream bloody murder over the deficit they should start with there largest campaign contributor's 

    What do you even mean by this?

     
    joe pockets
    joe pockets
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jul, 2000
    Posts: 5468
    Posted: Nov. 20, 2023 - 4:28 PM ET #32

    @Raiders22

     “Quantify this for me.  What is the amount of impact they should have?  Compared to what, and why?  What are your examples?  This sounds like you are just posting vague rhetoric the Left has as talking points. “

     Since the 1970s or so, conservatives have racked up a series of victories in rolling back government’s role in taxing and regulating the rich and powerful. As a result, the rich and powerful — who often lavish conservative politicians with donations — have run roughshod over poor and middle-class people, sucking up a horrifying proportion of the nation’s wealth in the process….If don’t see this your living in another universe!

    “Why should the folks that have an interest in starting businesses that employ 10s, 100, or 1000s of people not have more say about some things?  For sure they have more of an idea of how to create jobs and help the economy than the average guy that cuts people's grass.”

    First off I don’t agree with analogy on business owns! Corporations are in business making money the shareholder! As far there blue collar they are expendable and nothing more than a byproduct of making money ! I’m money can be made with less a cut in employees happens! To make things worse is the decline of unions: nothing has replaced them as a muscular lobby for government interventions on behalf of the less-well-off. Meanwhile, the biggest, most technologically progressive industries (which are usually the focus of regulatory activity) now hire mostly highly skilled workers. So subsidies to these companies don’t leak out much to ordinary workers.

    “Of course you do.  Because you, like all Democrats, think this is a problem; and a problem that only government can fix.”

    Have you ever looked at Democratic lead legislation ? Like The civil Rights act, The voting rights act,Medicare & Medicaid act, Social Security act, Afordable Care Act “ Obama care,…I’m sure this is just the tip of the ice berg! 

    Your next 2 are “ you have your opinion and I …..and so be it

    “They are cracking down on folks all of the time and you just hear about it more nowadays because of the 24-hour newscycle.  For the ones that are doing this, there are FAR more that are NOT doing it.  There are many average people that are scamming as well and percentage-wise a larger amount of their 'fair' share.”

    Not near enough for me! Do you realize no one really looks at Fortune 500 companies Tax returns as they are to complicated and time consuming for the IRS ….They need 87000 more & while there at it do away with the 15% capital gain tax. Make it 25%! ….Money earned is money earned !

    “If the far right wants to scream bloody murder over the deficit they should start with there largest campaign contributor's “

    Get the folks who are lining there pockets with lobbyists to pay there fare share of taxes also as far as the deficit didnt President Donald Trump already slash corporate tax rates back in 2017, as part of a tax package that bled $1.7 trillion from the federal Treasury….Who did that help ?….Yep more trickle down nonsense! 

    Raider 22 …Don’t you ever look down the other side of the road…Try it as it will cost you nothing but a little time.

    later I’m on a 6 day cease fire ! Midnight called for.

     

    Reply
    Quote Post
    2
    Report User

    @Raiders22

     “Quantify this for me.  What is the amount of impact they should have?  Compared to what, and why?  What are your examples?  This sounds like you are just posting vague rhetoric the Left has as talking points. “

     Since the 1970s or so, conservatives have racked up a series of victories in rolling back government’s role in taxing and regulating the rich and powerful. As a result, the rich and powerful — who often lavish conservative politicians with donations — have run roughshod over poor and middle-class people, sucking up a horrifying proportion of the nation’s wealth in the process….If don’t see this your living in another universe!

    “Why should the folks that have an interest in starting businesses that employ 10s, 100, or 1000s of people not have more say about some things?  For sure they have more of an idea of how to create jobs and help the economy than the average guy that cuts people's grass.”

    First off I don’t agree with analogy on business owns! Corporations are in business making money the shareholder! As far there blue collar they are expendable and nothing more than a byproduct of making money ! I’m money can be made with less a cut in employees happens! To make things worse is the decline of unions: nothing has replaced them as a muscular lobby for government interventions on behalf of the less-well-off. Meanwhile, the biggest, most technologically progressive industries (which are usually the focus of regulatory activity) now hire mostly highly skilled workers. So subsidies to these companies don’t leak out much to ordinary workers.

    “Of course you do.  Because you, like all Democrats, think this is a problem; and a problem that only government can fix.”

    Have you ever looked at Democratic lead legislation ? Like The civil Rights act, The voting rights act,Medicare & Medicaid act, Social Security act, Afordable Care Act “ Obama care,…I’m sure this is just the tip of the ice berg! 

    Your next 2 are “ you have your opinion and I …..and so be it

    “They are cracking down on folks all of the time and you just hear about it more nowadays because of the 24-hour newscycle.  For the ones that are doing this, there are FAR more that are NOT doing it.  There are many average people that are scamming as well and percentage-wise a larger amount of their 'fair' share.”

    Not near enough for me! Do you realize no one really looks at Fortune 500 companies Tax returns as they are to complicated and time consuming for the IRS ….They need 87000 more & while there at it do away with the 15% capital gain tax. Make it 25%! ….Money earned is money earned !

    “If the far right wants to scream bloody murder over the deficit they should start with there largest campaign contributor's “

    Get the folks who are lining there pockets with lobbyists to pay there fare share of taxes also as far as the deficit didnt President Donald Trump already slash corporate tax rates back in 2017, as part of a tax package that bled $1.7 trillion from the federal Treasury….Who did that help ?….Yep more trickle down nonsense! 

    Raider 22 …Don’t you ever look down the other side of the road…Try it as it will cost you nothing but a little time.

    later I’m on a 6 day cease fire ! Midnight called for.

     

     
    Raiders22
    Raiders22
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2010
    Posts: 33753
    Posted: Nov. 20, 2023 - 4:49 PM ET #33

    @joe pockets

     Since the 1970s or so, conservatives have racked up a series of victories in rolling back government’s role in taxing and regulating the rich and powerful. As a result, the rich and powerful — who often lavish conservative politicians with donations — have run roughshod over poor and middle-class people, sucking up a horrifying proportion of the nation’s wealth in the process….If don’t see this your living in another universe!

    This is not really quantifying it.  What 'victories'?  

    What do you mean by 'the rich and powerful running roughshod over poor and middle-class people'?  What does that mean?  Are they prospering?  Sure, but so is every class since the 1970s.  If anything the rich and powerful are lifting up the poor -- even those who do not try, simply by default.

    No, I do not see it.  You are treating it as a closed system or a zero sum game.

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    @joe pockets

     Since the 1970s or so, conservatives have racked up a series of victories in rolling back government’s role in taxing and regulating the rich and powerful. As a result, the rich and powerful — who often lavish conservative politicians with donations — have run roughshod over poor and middle-class people, sucking up a horrifying proportion of the nation’s wealth in the process….If don’t see this your living in another universe!

    This is not really quantifying it.  What 'victories'?  

    What do you mean by 'the rich and powerful running roughshod over poor and middle-class people'?  What does that mean?  Are they prospering?  Sure, but so is every class since the 1970s.  If anything the rich and powerful are lifting up the poor -- even those who do not try, simply by default.

    No, I do not see it.  You are treating it as a closed system or a zero sum game.

     
    Raiders22
    Raiders22
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2010
    Posts: 33753
    Posted: Nov. 20, 2023 - 4:59 PM ET #34

    @joe pockets

     First off I don’t agree with analogy on business owns!

    Huh?

    Corporations are in business making money the shareholder!

    Take them out of it if it makes it easier for you.  Take it down to the mom-and-pop level where most of the workers are at anyway.  There are no shareholders.  

    Now what?

    As far there blue collar they are expendable and nothing more than a byproduct of making money ! I’m money can be made with less a cut in employees happens!

    So?  That is one way to make money but will it offset the loss in production.

    Besides the worker isn not owed a job.

    The worker can live the job for more money.  What does the employer do then, sue him to force him to stay?  That works both ways.  The worker is out for himself and the employer is out to make his business more profitable.

    If you are worried about being let go -- make yourself more valuable to your employer.

    To make things worse is the decline of unions: nothing has replaced them as a muscular lobby for government interventions on behalf of the less-well-off. Meanwhile, the biggest, most technologically progressive industries (which are usually the focus of regulatory activity) now hire mostly highly skilled workers.

    Again the big companies out of it, in order to see where your argument falls flat.  At the 10-man machine shop there are no unions.

    What government interventions have you seen the unions do lately that are needed?

    Of course those companies need highly skilled workers.  What is your point there?  I just told you people should make themselves more valuable.

    So subsidies to these companies don’t leak out much to ordinary workers.

    So?  This is not the same equivalence.  Workers do not run the business, they work for the business.  

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    @joe pockets

     First off I don’t agree with analogy on business owns!

    Huh?

    Corporations are in business making money the shareholder!

    Take them out of it if it makes it easier for you.  Take it down to the mom-and-pop level where most of the workers are at anyway.  There are no shareholders.  

    Now what?

    As far there blue collar they are expendable and nothing more than a byproduct of making money ! I’m money can be made with less a cut in employees happens!

    So?  That is one way to make money but will it offset the loss in production.

    Besides the worker isn not owed a job.

    The worker can live the job for more money.  What does the employer do then, sue him to force him to stay?  That works both ways.  The worker is out for himself and the employer is out to make his business more profitable.

    If you are worried about being let go -- make yourself more valuable to your employer.

    To make things worse is the decline of unions: nothing has replaced them as a muscular lobby for government interventions on behalf of the less-well-off. Meanwhile, the biggest, most technologically progressive industries (which are usually the focus of regulatory activity) now hire mostly highly skilled workers.

    Again the big companies out of it, in order to see where your argument falls flat.  At the 10-man machine shop there are no unions.

    What government interventions have you seen the unions do lately that are needed?

    Of course those companies need highly skilled workers.  What is your point there?  I just told you people should make themselves more valuable.

    So subsidies to these companies don’t leak out much to ordinary workers.

    So?  This is not the same equivalence.  Workers do not run the business, they work for the business.  

     
    Raiders22
    Raiders22
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2010
    Posts: 33753
    Posted: Nov. 20, 2023 - 5:01 PM ET #35

    @joe pockets

     Have you ever looked at Democratic lead legislation ? Like The civil Rights act, The voting rights act,Medicare & Medicaid act, Social Security act, Afordable Care Act “ Obama care,…I’m sure this is just the tip of the ice berg! 

    Yes.  What about them?

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    @joe pockets

     Have you ever looked at Democratic lead legislation ? Like The civil Rights act, The voting rights act,Medicare & Medicaid act, Social Security act, Afordable Care Act “ Obama care,…I’m sure this is just the tip of the ice berg! 

    Yes.  What about them?

     
    Raiders22
    Raiders22
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2010
    Posts: 33753
    Posted: Nov. 20, 2023 - 5:08 PM ET #36

    @joe pockets

     Not near enough for me! Do you realize no one really looks at Fortune 500 companies Tax returns as they are to complicated and time consuming for the IRS ….They need 87000 more & while there at it do away with the 15% capital gain tax. Make it 25%! ….Money earned is money earned !

    Are you kidding?  Those are the very ones they do look at!  The overly, complicated ones are audited way more.  Some of these folks have multiple CPAs and tax guys to do their taxes.

    How is it not enough for you?  You do not even know how many it is.

    They do NOT need 87k more agents -- they WANT them.

    What difference does the capital gains tax matter to you?  Do you really think that would bring up income?  Study up on it and see what reaction that sort of thing would cause.

    Take it down to the lowest level and think about what you would do if someone did that to you in your situation -- you would make adjustments.

    If 'money earned is money earned' why does the Left think a higher percentage of a rich person's money is 'more earned than other person's money earned'?

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    @joe pockets

     Not near enough for me! Do you realize no one really looks at Fortune 500 companies Tax returns as they are to complicated and time consuming for the IRS ….They need 87000 more & while there at it do away with the 15% capital gain tax. Make it 25%! ….Money earned is money earned !

    Are you kidding?  Those are the very ones they do look at!  The overly, complicated ones are audited way more.  Some of these folks have multiple CPAs and tax guys to do their taxes.

    How is it not enough for you?  You do not even know how many it is.

    They do NOT need 87k more agents -- they WANT them.

    What difference does the capital gains tax matter to you?  Do you really think that would bring up income?  Study up on it and see what reaction that sort of thing would cause.

    Take it down to the lowest level and think about what you would do if someone did that to you in your situation -- you would make adjustments.

    If 'money earned is money earned' why does the Left think a higher percentage of a rich person's money is 'more earned than other person's money earned'?

     
    Raiders22
    Raiders22
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2010
    Posts: 33753
    Posted: Nov. 20, 2023 - 5:10 PM ET #37

    @joe pockets 

    “If the far right wants to scream bloody murder over the deficit they should start with there largest campaign contributor's “

    Get the folks who are lining there pockets with lobbyists to pay there fare share of taxes also as far as the deficit didnt President Donald Trump already slash corporate tax rates back in 2017, as part of a tax package that bled $1.7 trillion from the federal Treasury….Who did that help ?….Yep more trickle down nonsense!

    Sorry.  This still does not add up and make sense the two issues are not that related.

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    @joe pockets 

    “If the far right wants to scream bloody murder over the deficit they should start with there largest campaign contributor's “

    Get the folks who are lining there pockets with lobbyists to pay there fare share of taxes also as far as the deficit didnt President Donald Trump already slash corporate tax rates back in 2017, as part of a tax package that bled $1.7 trillion from the federal Treasury….Who did that help ?….Yep more trickle down nonsense!

    Sorry.  This still does not add up and make sense the two issues are not that related.

     
    Rush51
    Rush51
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2005
    Posts: 8840
    Posted: Nov. 20, 2023 - 6:27 PM ET #38

    @Raiders22

     I think JoePockets has invoked a self- imposed ""ceasefire "" , because he doesn't have the answers...   Lol.  

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    @Raiders22

     I think JoePockets has invoked a self- imposed ""ceasefire "" , because he doesn't have the answers...   Lol.  

     
    Rush51
    Rush51
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2005
    Posts: 8840
    Posted: Nov. 20, 2023 - 6:43 PM ET #39

    @joe pockets

     My problem is right now is that people with access to wealth are having an outsized impact on government

     

    And don't you find it interesting JP that " your party" typically outspends conservatives groups, particularly at the state and local level.  For example,  Just a few short weeks ago, " your party" of the progressive left significantly outspent conservative groups by $42 million in Kentucky,  Ohio, Virginia,  and Pennsylvania.  

    I swear,  if you actually understood what you were writing,  you may feel differently about " your party" . an_light

    Reply
    Quote Post
    1
    Report User

    @joe pockets

     My problem is right now is that people with access to wealth are having an outsized impact on government

     

    And don't you find it interesting JP that " your party" typically outspends conservatives groups, particularly at the state and local level.  For example,  Just a few short weeks ago, " your party" of the progressive left significantly outspent conservative groups by $42 million in Kentucky,  Ohio, Virginia,  and Pennsylvania.  

    I swear,  if you actually understood what you were writing,  you may feel differently about " your party" . an_light

     
    Raiders22
    Raiders22
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2010
    Posts: 33753
    Posted: Nov. 20, 2023 - 6:55 PM ET #40

    @Rush51

     if you actually understood what you were writing,  you may feel differently about " your party"

    I really think this is a good point.  Not for some die-hard-no-matter-what loyalists.  But quite a few folks I know that have amended their views or even switched parties as they got older say exactly that.  They say they felt misled or at least misinformed on the issues.  It is weird that you do not seem to see the opposite as much.  Like when someone on the Right gets older and learns more they seem to be more steadfast, yet, now more informed.

    Too many people think if they see a snippet on the news or a podcast or an article online -- that it is research.

    People really do need to do more research on things instead of just trying to find things and ways to reinforce their loyalties.

    Because if you are asked about your positions and cannot break them down decently it looks uninformed at best, or misinformed at worst.

    peace_5

    Reply
    Quote Post
    1
    Report User

    @Rush51

     if you actually understood what you were writing,  you may feel differently about " your party"

    I really think this is a good point.  Not for some die-hard-no-matter-what loyalists.  But quite a few folks I know that have amended their views or even switched parties as they got older say exactly that.  They say they felt misled or at least misinformed on the issues.  It is weird that you do not seem to see the opposite as much.  Like when someone on the Right gets older and learns more they seem to be more steadfast, yet, now more informed.

    Too many people think if they see a snippet on the news or a podcast or an article online -- that it is research.

    People really do need to do more research on things instead of just trying to find things and ways to reinforce their loyalties.

    Because if you are asked about your positions and cannot break them down decently it looks uninformed at best, or misinformed at worst.

    peace_5

     
    Rush51
    Rush51
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2005
    Posts: 8840
    Posted: Nov. 20, 2023 - 7:50 PM ET #41

    Quote Originally Posted by Raiders22:

    @Rush51  if you actually understood what you were writing,  you may feel differently about " your party" I really think this is a good point.  Not for some die-hard-no-matter-what loyalists.  But quite a few folks I know that have amended their views or even switched parties as they got older say exactly that.  They say they felt misled or at least misinformed on the issues.  It is weird that you do not seem to see the opposite as much.  Like when someone on the Right gets older and learns more they seem to be more steadfast, yet, now more informed. Too many people think if they see a snippet on the news or a podcast or an article online -- that it is research. People really do need to do more research on things instead of just trying to find things and ways to reinforce their loyalties. Because if you are asked about your positions and cannot break them down decently it looks uninformed at best, or misinformed at worst.

    Thank you for that Raiders..  

    And people should re-read your post again.  Great points .... and  those 2 words...   "uninformed " and " misinformed "  are so important.  They fit lots of lefties to a tee IMO. 

    It didn't take long for you , UNIMAN, and myself to expose the inconsistencies in JP''s arguments.   Uniman did a great job in post #26. peace_5

     

    There is still time JP to educate yourself,  and get more knowledgeable about the issues.  Because your arguments are  "boomeranging"  right back to "your party" an_light

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    Quote Originally Posted by Raiders22:

    @Rush51  if you actually understood what you were writing,  you may feel differently about " your party" I really think this is a good point.  Not for some die-hard-no-matter-what loyalists.  But quite a few folks I know that have amended their views or even switched parties as they got older say exactly that.  They say they felt misled or at least misinformed on the issues.  It is weird that you do not seem to see the opposite as much.  Like when someone on the Right gets older and learns more they seem to be more steadfast, yet, now more informed. Too many people think if they see a snippet on the news or a podcast or an article online -- that it is research. People really do need to do more research on things instead of just trying to find things and ways to reinforce their loyalties. Because if you are asked about your positions and cannot break them down decently it looks uninformed at best, or misinformed at worst.

    Thank you for that Raiders..  

    And people should re-read your post again.  Great points .... and  those 2 words...   "uninformed " and " misinformed "  are so important.  They fit lots of lefties to a tee IMO. 

    It didn't take long for you , UNIMAN, and myself to expose the inconsistencies in JP''s arguments.   Uniman did a great job in post #26. peace_5

     

    There is still time JP to educate yourself,  and get more knowledgeable about the issues.  Because your arguments are  "boomeranging"  right back to "your party" an_light

     
    kcblitzkrieg
    kcblitzkrieg
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2008
    Posts: 7997
    Posted: Nov. 29, 2023 - 3:35 PM ET #42

    Quote Originally Posted by joe pockets:

    If you step back and take a good look at it, One can see democracy as we know it in danger of taking over and all but outlawing opposition parties “ The Vermin “.  After that there will be a fight inside the R party and MAGA taking total control and then deciding which policies they enact in their new reactionary permanent dictatorship…..Never forget the Electoral College doesn’t need the majority! The next step could be a mix of letting the oligarchs “ Billionaires “ steal the economy while the racists and religious wackos run the civil society into the ground and meantime the defense establishment bleeds the taxpayers white !  Remember the majority of the MAGA base are folks who could name 10 Presidents or 5 Vice Presidents most could have cared less about politics before the OBama administration! This not an informed group to say the least but angry one that can be lead to violence with a simple speech ! …Now I know many who read this will say I’m Nutz but think about ….they already have control of the Supreme Court, at least for the next generation. If they win the house and the senate at the next election they will solidify control of the courts. And while they aren’t directly in control of the thousands of different police departments in the country, they certainly have their support and undying loyalty. I see no danger of them “destroying themselves.” I see the long game of capturing institutions and delegitimizing federal government as the goal, and I think they are well along in that plan….. these are the type of steps that lead from Democracy to Fascism or at least Totalitarianism. It scares the hell out of me!!! I’m not a religious person but it’s not a far fetched conspiracy theory that MAGA hats are the mark of the beast. Of course the beast is Trump ….just listen to what comes out of his mouth daily!……The writing is on the wall for the fall of this Great Land!

    sorry, not sure how I missed this doozy of a thread.....but....never too late right....

    You will not survive here. You are not a wolf, and this is the land of wolves now...
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    Quote Originally Posted by joe pockets:

    If you step back and take a good look at it, One can see democracy as we know it in danger of taking over and all but outlawing opposition parties “ The Vermin “.  After that there will be a fight inside the R party and MAGA taking total control and then deciding which policies they enact in their new reactionary permanent dictatorship…..Never forget the Electoral College doesn’t need the majority! The next step could be a mix of letting the oligarchs “ Billionaires “ steal the economy while the racists and religious wackos run the civil society into the ground and meantime the defense establishment bleeds the taxpayers white !  Remember the majority of the MAGA base are folks who could name 10 Presidents or 5 Vice Presidents most could have cared less about politics before the OBama administration! This not an informed group to say the least but angry one that can be lead to violence with a simple speech ! …Now I know many who read this will say I’m Nutz but think about ….they already have control of the Supreme Court, at least for the next generation. If they win the house and the senate at the next election they will solidify control of the courts. And while they aren’t directly in control of the thousands of different police departments in the country, they certainly have their support and undying loyalty. I see no danger of them “destroying themselves.” I see the long game of capturing institutions and delegitimizing federal government as the goal, and I think they are well along in that plan….. these are the type of steps that lead from Democracy to Fascism or at least Totalitarianism. It scares the hell out of me!!! I’m not a religious person but it’s not a far fetched conspiracy theory that MAGA hats are the mark of the beast. Of course the beast is Trump ….just listen to what comes out of his mouth daily!……The writing is on the wall for the fall of this Great Land!

    sorry, not sure how I missed this doozy of a thread.....but....never too late right....

     
    kcblitzkrieg
    kcblitzkrieg
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2008
    Posts: 7997
    Posted: Nov. 29, 2023 - 3:45 PM ET #43

    @joe pockets

    The next step could be a mix of letting the oligarchs “ Billionaires “ steal the economy while the racists and religious wackos run the civil society into the ground and meantime the defense establishment bleeds the taxpayers white !

     

    OK...there is so much awesomeness in this statement right here.  It's almost comical the level of irony and ridiculousness all rolled up in this one single sentence.  Add to it the fact that the OP is opining of something that he thinks could / would happen if Trump wins 2024.  

     

    "oligarchs / billionaires steal the economy" -  Did you completely miss out on 2019 through 2021 ??  Are you unaware that this is exactly what has happened right up to November 2021 ??  

    "racists and religious wackos run the civil society into the ground" -  Again, already been happening since the summer of 2020.  The racists and religious wack jobs are just different than the ones the OP is referring to....these racists and religious wackos are all on the far radical left side of the spectrum.  

     "meantime the defense establishment bleeds the taxpayers white" - Slavi Ukraini, enough said.  

    You will not survive here. You are not a wolf, and this is the land of wolves now...
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    @joe pockets

    The next step could be a mix of letting the oligarchs “ Billionaires “ steal the economy while the racists and religious wackos run the civil society into the ground and meantime the defense establishment bleeds the taxpayers white !

     

    OK...there is so much awesomeness in this statement right here.  It's almost comical the level of irony and ridiculousness all rolled up in this one single sentence.  Add to it the fact that the OP is opining of something that he thinks could / would happen if Trump wins 2024.  

     

    "oligarchs / billionaires steal the economy" -  Did you completely miss out on 2019 through 2021 ??  Are you unaware that this is exactly what has happened right up to November 2021 ??  

    "racists and religious wackos run the civil society into the ground" -  Again, already been happening since the summer of 2020.  The racists and religious wack jobs are just different than the ones the OP is referring to....these racists and religious wackos are all on the far radical left side of the spectrum.  

     "meantime the defense establishment bleeds the taxpayers white" - Slavi Ukraini, enough said.  

     
    Rush51
    Rush51
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2005
    Posts: 8840
    Posted: Nov. 29, 2023 - 4:34 PM ET #44

    @kcblitzkrieg

     JP has no idea he is shooting himself in the foot.... Lol.    "His side" is charged as guilty.  

    I swear , there should be a qualification exam on individuals before ballots are issued to voters.  

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    @kcblitzkrieg

     JP has no idea he is shooting himself in the foot.... Lol.    "His side" is charged as guilty.  

    I swear , there should be a qualification exam on individuals before ballots are issued to voters.  

     
    UNIMAN
    UNIMAN
    All-Star
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jul, 2014
    Posts: 10454
    Posted: Nov. 29, 2023 - 5:12 PM ET #45

    Since the 1970's..............this sums it up. We lost our industrial might. Learn computer code we were told.

     

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    Since the 1970's..............this sums it up. We lost our industrial might. Learn computer code we were told.

     

     
    fubah2
    fubah2
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2012
    Posts: 52765
    Posted: Nov. 5, 2024 - 8:36 AM ET #46

    For retirees like myself, should we follow today's election coverage on

       CNN

     MSNBC

     

      or...

    this dishonest, deceptive, untrustworthy cable network                   

                              |
                              |
                              V

                              |
                              |
                              V

    Fox News Settles Dominion Defamation Case For $787.5 Million an_getaway

    Dominion sued Fox for $1.6 billion in March 2021
    for defamation, alleging the network pushed 2020
    election fraud claims involving the company’s voting
    machines despite knowing they were false
    for financial gain.

    Fox said in a statement following the settlement,
    “We acknowledge the Court’s rulings finding
    certain claims [we made] about Dominion to be false”

    “Fox has admitted to telling lies about Dominion
    that caused enormous damage to my company,”
    Dominion CEO John Poulos said.

     

     

     

     

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    For retirees like myself, should we follow today's election coverage on

       CNN

     MSNBC

     

      or...

    this dishonest, deceptive, untrustworthy cable network                   

                              |
                              |
                              V

                              |
                              |
                              V

    Fox News Settles Dominion Defamation Case For $787.5 Million an_getaway

    Dominion sued Fox for $1.6 billion in March 2021
    for defamation, alleging the network pushed 2020
    election fraud claims involving the company’s voting
    machines despite knowing they were false
    for financial gain.

    Fox said in a statement following the settlement,
    “We acknowledge the Court’s rulings finding
    certain claims [we made] about Dominion to be false”

    “Fox has admitted to telling lies about Dominion
    that caused enormous damage to my company,”
    Dominion CEO John Poulos said.

     

     

     

     

     
    StumpTownStu
    StumpTownStu
    Hall of Fame
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2016
    Posts: 22234
    Posted: Nov. 5, 2024 - 8:48 AM ET #47

    @fubah2

     

     C-SPAN maybe? Or you could just pull up an election tracker on the interweb.

    R.I.P. #94 MARSHAWN KNEELAND - DC4L
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    @fubah2

     

     C-SPAN maybe? Or you could just pull up an election tracker on the interweb.

     
    fubah2
    fubah2
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2012
    Posts: 52765
    Posted: Nov. 5, 2024 - 8:53 AM ET #48

    Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:

    For retirees like myself, should we follow today's election coverage on

     

       CNN

     MSNBC

     

      or...

    this dishonest, deceptive, untrustworthy cable network                   

                              |
                              |
                              V

    Fox News Settles Dominion Defamation Case For $787.5 Million an_getaway

    Dominion sued Fox for $1.6 billion in March 2021
    for defamation, alleging the network pushed 2020
    election fraud claims involving the company’s voting
    machines despite knowing they were false
    for financial gain.

    Fox said in a statement following the settlement,
    “We acknowledge the Court’s rulings finding
    certain claims [we made] about Dominion to be false”

    “Fox has admitted to telling lies about Dominion
    that caused enormous damage to my company,”
    Dominion CEO John Poulos said.

    .

     

    The news of that high profile settlement came a week after Fox News settled a separate defamation lawsuit over the 2020 election, which was brought by a Venezuelan businessman who was linked to an election fraud conspiracy theory that Fox spread on air.

    Reply
    Quote Post
    1
    Report User

    Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:

    For retirees like myself, should we follow today's election coverage on

     

       CNN

     MSNBC

     

      or...

    this dishonest, deceptive, untrustworthy cable network                   

                              |
                              |
                              V

    Fox News Settles Dominion Defamation Case For $787.5 Million an_getaway

    Dominion sued Fox for $1.6 billion in March 2021
    for defamation, alleging the network pushed 2020
    election fraud claims involving the company’s voting
    machines despite knowing they were false
    for financial gain.

    Fox said in a statement following the settlement,
    “We acknowledge the Court’s rulings finding
    certain claims [we made] about Dominion to be false”

    “Fox has admitted to telling lies about Dominion
    that caused enormous damage to my company,”
    Dominion CEO John Poulos said.

    .

     

    The news of that high profile settlement came a week after Fox News settled a separate defamation lawsuit over the 2020 election, which was brought by a Venezuelan businessman who was linked to an election fraud conspiracy theory that Fox spread on air.

     
    fubah2
    fubah2
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2012
    Posts: 52765
    Posted: Nov. 5, 2024 - 12:52 PM ET #49

    cool After the votes are counted, if the CONVICTED FELON/rapist loses Arizona again, will turn to his infamous "Cyber Ninjas" to get in there and do their spine-timgling forensic ballot recount again to PROVE massive election fraud that he said *DID* definitely occur in AZ?....

    Remember how that turned out?! 

    Reply
    Quote Post
    1
    Report User

    cool After the votes are counted, if the CONVICTED FELON/rapist loses Arizona again, will turn to his infamous "Cyber Ninjas" to get in there and do their spine-timgling forensic ballot recount again to PROVE massive election fraud that he said *DID* definitely occur in AZ?....

    Remember how that turned out?! 

     
     
    KellyM_1964
    KellyM_1964
    MVP
    Participation Meter
    Joined: May, 2009
    Posts: 16722
    Posted: Nov. 5, 2024 - 1:17 PM ET #50

    Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:

    After the votes are counted, if the CONVICTED FELON/rapist loses Arizona again, will turn to his infamous "Cyber Ninjas" to get in there and do their spine-timgling forensic ballot recount again to PROVE massive election fraud that he said *DID* definitely occur in AZ?.... Remember how that turned out?!

    yep  an_beatup    after 4 months of intense investigation and an entire team quitting on them , donnie chumps gestapo brown shirt ninjas discovered that joe biden actually won by more votes than initially recorded ! an_roll_laugh

    way too funny that was         send them in again donnie !

     

    "I'm the MOST HONEST human being that GOD EVER created!" - Donald "the felon" Trump
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:

    After the votes are counted, if the CONVICTED FELON/rapist loses Arizona again, will turn to his infamous "Cyber Ninjas" to get in there and do their spine-timgling forensic ballot recount again to PROVE massive election fraud that he said *DID* definitely occur in AZ?.... Remember how that turned out?!

    yep  an_beatup    after 4 months of intense investigation and an entire team quitting on them , donnie chumps gestapo brown shirt ninjas discovered that joe biden actually won by more votes than initially recorded ! an_roll_laugh

    way too funny that was         send them in again donnie !

     

    All Forums | Politics
    «First Previous 12345 Next Last»

    Hot Forums IconHot Forum Topics

    • 🤢🥴💩_ Fubah's risky baseball bets _🥶😲🥵 446,014 Covers arrow
    • 🏈🏈🏈 “To BEt, or not to BEt, that is the question” ...Fubah2's risky bets 301,803 Covers arrow
    • 🏈🏈🏈 Fubah2's risky CFB bets 253,455 Covers arrow
    • Patriots vs Seahawks in-game live season kickoff 1,444 Covers arrow
    • Thursday 09/10/2026 879 Covers arrow
    • PART TROIS 283 Covers arrow
    • NFL LOCKED IN! 95,232 Covers arrow
    • 9/10 Fast Cash Five 💰??🔥 3,475 Covers arrow
    • 9/9 🫣🫣🔥🔥🔥 4,829 Covers arrow
    • Couple thoughts 4,076 Covers arrow

    Warning - External Link

    Report User

    Thank you for reporting
    This content is abusive or harmful
    This post is spam
    An error has occurred
    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

    Delete Post

    Are you sure you would like to remove this post?

    Remove Thread

    Are you sure you would like to remove this thread?

    Scan Results

    Login/Register

    Happy to have you join the conversation. To do so, please login or create an account.
    Accounts are free and easy to create.

    Search


    Loading…

    Loading…

    About Us
    Contact Us
    Careers
    Our Team
    Brand
    Testimonials
    Betting Guides
    Sportsbook Reviews
    Betting News
    Podcasts
    Responsible Gambling
    Betting Sites
    US Betting Sites
    Canada Betting Sites
    Canada Casinos
    Best Betting Apps
    Contests
    Streak Survivor
    King of Covers
    Ultimate Race
    Office Pools
    The Covers community has
    810,221
    lifetime members worldwide
    Join our community today
    Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
    Covers is the world
    leader in sports
    betting information.
    21+
    Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER
    Help Privacy Terms of Service Cookies Sitemap Forum
    YouTube logo
    Facebook logo
    Twitter logo
    Instagram logo
    LinkedIn logo
    Google News logo
    Covers is verified safe by:
    Evalon Logo Logo GPWA Logo GDPR logo Logo GeoTrust logo Logo PCI DSS logo Logo
    Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Ltd. All Rights Reserved.
    If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.