Since I don't watch any of Sniffy McAdderall speeches anymore, it's all starting to come back to me what a dumbass he is. And he's still rambling. What is he going to do, talk until November? Between Hulk Hogan, Dana White and Trump I've already lost too many IQ points. I'm turning off this shiit.
its over now
but the gop lying continues
"I'm the MOST HONEST HUMAN BEING that God has EVER created!!" - Donald Trump
1
Quote Originally Posted by DrStrangelove:
Since I don't watch any of Sniffy McAdderall speeches anymore, it's all starting to come back to me what a dumbass he is. And he's still rambling. What is he going to do, talk until November? Between Hulk Hogan, Dana White and Trump I've already lost too many IQ points. I'm turning off this shiit.
Quote Originally Posted by DrStrangelove: Since I don't watch any of Sniffy McAdderall speeches anymore, it's all starting to come back to me what a dumbass he is. And he's still rambling. What is he going to do, talk until November? Between Hulk Hogan, Dana White and Trump I've already lost too many IQ points. I'm turning off this shiit. its over now but the gop lying continues
what lying? Just curious what lying you're referring to. Feel free to point out the lies as there might be several you can find. I mean, if you watched it, which I am assuming you did since you're commenting about it as if you did, you'd have some instances picked out that you'd like to discuss in this forum. Or do you just make comments to try to degrade one party because you don't like them?
@DrStrangelove the UFC might be the largest growing sport worldwide in the last 30 years. Which Dana White has a large roll in building. He must be an idiot, right?
0
Quote Originally Posted by KellyM_1964:
Quote Originally Posted by DrStrangelove: Since I don't watch any of Sniffy McAdderall speeches anymore, it's all starting to come back to me what a dumbass he is. And he's still rambling. What is he going to do, talk until November? Between Hulk Hogan, Dana White and Trump I've already lost too many IQ points. I'm turning off this shiit. its over now but the gop lying continues
what lying? Just curious what lying you're referring to. Feel free to point out the lies as there might be several you can find. I mean, if you watched it, which I am assuming you did since you're commenting about it as if you did, you'd have some instances picked out that you'd like to discuss in this forum. Or do you just make comments to try to degrade one party because you don't like them?
@DrStrangelove the UFC might be the largest growing sport worldwide in the last 30 years. Which Dana White has a large roll in building. He must be an idiot, right?
Quote Originally Posted by DrStrangelove: Since I don't watch any of Sniffy McAdderall speeches anymore, it's all starting to come back to me what a dumbass he is. And he's still rambling. What is he going to do, talk until November? Between Hulk Hogan, Dana White and Trump I've already lost too many IQ points. I'm turning off this shiit.
its over now
but the gop lying continues
@KellyM_1964
Of course not. Never stops. Aint seen nuthin yet! Wait til we see their lying MAGAtt ads during football games in September and October
2
Quote Originally Posted by KellyM_1964:
Quote Originally Posted by DrStrangelove: Since I don't watch any of Sniffy McAdderall speeches anymore, it's all starting to come back to me what a dumbass he is. And he's still rambling. What is he going to do, talk until November? Between Hulk Hogan, Dana White and Trump I've already lost too many IQ points. I'm turning off this shiit.
its over now
but the gop lying continues
@KellyM_1964
Of course not. Never stops. Aint seen nuthin yet! Wait til we see their lying MAGAtt ads during football games in September and October
Post 39 was directed at WHICH MEMBER specifically?
See we can play this semantics game you keep playing but in the end the only measure of importance is the site rules, nothing else. So you can say that they are abrasive, combative, rude etc to the general RNC group and Trump...ok so you are CORRECT. And we can point out that your clan does the same towards the DNC, that is CORRECT.
Where you lose is that it doesnt cause immediate issue the same way that it does when you are attacking a member DIRECTLY....DIRECTLY....get that? so when you guys go attack a Covers member, when you guys call names to Covers members (including me) when you guys make retaliatory threads and posts aimed at Covers members, then that is when the rubber hits the road and it is where your side is losing...losing losing losing all the time. And that is why your side gets boxed and banned more, you break the rules and then cry foul when you get boxed or banned.
Both sides abuse the other with regards to general political insults. If we went only off the general content then most all of you would be tossed out.
Thanks for calling me a snowflake then again MINIMIZING the insult and qualifying it as if that changes the fact you resort to petty personal insults because you have no self control.
4
@BigGame90
Post 39 was directed at WHICH MEMBER specifically?
See we can play this semantics game you keep playing but in the end the only measure of importance is the site rules, nothing else. So you can say that they are abrasive, combative, rude etc to the general RNC group and Trump...ok so you are CORRECT. And we can point out that your clan does the same towards the DNC, that is CORRECT.
Where you lose is that it doesnt cause immediate issue the same way that it does when you are attacking a member DIRECTLY....DIRECTLY....get that? so when you guys go attack a Covers member, when you guys call names to Covers members (including me) when you guys make retaliatory threads and posts aimed at Covers members, then that is when the rubber hits the road and it is where your side is losing...losing losing losing all the time. And that is why your side gets boxed and banned more, you break the rules and then cry foul when you get boxed or banned.
Both sides abuse the other with regards to general political insults. If we went only off the general content then most all of you would be tossed out.
Thanks for calling me a snowflake then again MINIMIZING the insult and qualifying it as if that changes the fact you resort to petty personal insults because you have no self control.
If I call someone an idiot, that doesn't mean they are factually an idiot. It's my opinion of that person for whatever reason or comment that person made. Does that mean I believe they are in fact, an 100% an idiot, no. It might mean a comment, in my opinion was idiotic. But that doesn't mean the poster is an actual idiot. I agree, name calling should get someone boxed if it's directed at a person without merit. Sometimes, people need to be called out of lies. Calling someone out for what they post may not be an attack. If I call someone out, I just want them to back up the comment they made. For instance, if someone responds to a comment with; "but the GOP lying continues" but gives no context about what lies the GOP continues with, I feel I should be able to call that poster out and ask for references and examples so I can check to see if the lying does actually continue. Afterall, they commented in a free and open public FORUM that is OPEN for discussion. If that poster doesn't want to respond, that's ok and that's on them. But without a response to back up their statement, I'll consider that post(er) to be incapable of a discussion, which is the point of FREE and OPEN FORUMS.
0
@wallstreetcappers
If I call someone an idiot, that doesn't mean they are factually an idiot. It's my opinion of that person for whatever reason or comment that person made. Does that mean I believe they are in fact, an 100% an idiot, no. It might mean a comment, in my opinion was idiotic. But that doesn't mean the poster is an actual idiot. I agree, name calling should get someone boxed if it's directed at a person without merit. Sometimes, people need to be called out of lies. Calling someone out for what they post may not be an attack. If I call someone out, I just want them to back up the comment they made. For instance, if someone responds to a comment with; "but the GOP lying continues" but gives no context about what lies the GOP continues with, I feel I should be able to call that poster out and ask for references and examples so I can check to see if the lying does actually continue. Afterall, they commented in a free and open public FORUM that is OPEN for discussion. If that poster doesn't want to respond, that's ok and that's on them. But without a response to back up their statement, I'll consider that post(er) to be incapable of a discussion, which is the point of FREE and OPEN FORUMS.
Quote Originally Posted by KellyM_1964: Quote Originally Posted by DrStrangelove: Since I don't watch any of Sniffy McAdderall speeches anymore, it's all starting to come back to me what a dumbass he is. And he's still rambling. What is he going to do, talk until November? Between Hulk Hogan, Dana White and Trump I've already lost too many IQ points. I'm turning off this shiit. its over now but the gop lying continues
@KellyM_1964 Of course not. Never stops. Aint seen nuthin yet! Wait til we see their lying MAGAtt ads during football games in September and October
@Zeus4par
I am certain that's coming. Their fundraising has been through the roof the past week since that republican tried to take out the CONVICTED FELON and they've twisted that to their uninformed cult to make it seem like it's all Joe Biden's fault.
Without logic or evidence, they're already blaming President Biden for the worldwide cyber outage causing flights to be cancelled.
All Joe Biden's fault!
4
Quote Originally Posted by Zeus4par:
Quote Originally Posted by KellyM_1964: Quote Originally Posted by DrStrangelove: Since I don't watch any of Sniffy McAdderall speeches anymore, it's all starting to come back to me what a dumbass he is. And he's still rambling. What is he going to do, talk until November? Between Hulk Hogan, Dana White and Trump I've already lost too many IQ points. I'm turning off this shiit. its over now but the gop lying continues
@KellyM_1964 Of course not. Never stops. Aint seen nuthin yet! Wait til we see their lying MAGAtt ads during football games in September and October
@Zeus4par
I am certain that's coming. Their fundraising has been through the roof the past week since that republican tried to take out the CONVICTED FELON and they've twisted that to their uninformed cult to make it seem like it's all Joe Biden's fault.
Without logic or evidence, they're already blaming President Biden for the worldwide cyber outage causing flights to be cancelled.
Then you fall back on FREE as if that is some carte blanche to run your temper because it is FREE and OPEN. Well free and open only exist when you respect others at a paramount level...and you do not so in your case FREE is not free as you do not respect others.
How about this...just stop interacting with people you cannot control your temper around, that means quit replying to the DNC group you despise because you have little self control and cause drama and childish tantrums, just please quit replying and interacting with those you cannot do so in a positive respectful way.
In the past we have actually been forced to instruct members to NOT ENTER threads of certain people, NOT engage with certain members because the member could not do so and we were forced to take that level of action. I think in your case and several other RNC guys here that might be required. We have banned members who were asked to not post or reply to certain members and they did not comply, that has been a regular issue here and it might be what happens to you.
So this is a soft request, next step is a bit more firm, just quit interacting with members who bother you so much that you break the rules. Same goes with all the other guys who do the same thing here. Its a pity that so many of you are completely incapable of existing around others who you strongly disagree with and resort to petty childish measures to take revenge.
4
@BigGame90
Then you fall back on FREE as if that is some carte blanche to run your temper because it is FREE and OPEN. Well free and open only exist when you respect others at a paramount level...and you do not so in your case FREE is not free as you do not respect others.
How about this...just stop interacting with people you cannot control your temper around, that means quit replying to the DNC group you despise because you have little self control and cause drama and childish tantrums, just please quit replying and interacting with those you cannot do so in a positive respectful way.
In the past we have actually been forced to instruct members to NOT ENTER threads of certain people, NOT engage with certain members because the member could not do so and we were forced to take that level of action. I think in your case and several other RNC guys here that might be required. We have banned members who were asked to not post or reply to certain members and they did not comply, that has been a regular issue here and it might be what happens to you.
So this is a soft request, next step is a bit more firm, just quit interacting with members who bother you so much that you break the rules. Same goes with all the other guys who do the same thing here. Its a pity that so many of you are completely incapable of existing around others who you strongly disagree with and resort to petty childish measures to take revenge.
Umm, are you getting me confused with someone else? Readers on this site are free to skip over posts they do not wish to read. I practice that very often when I see a select few posters here. Occasionally I'll dabble in their comments to see what they have to say. Cough, I mean what they copy and paste from others. When they do actually speak up, I may or may not comment back to them. If they (he/she/him/they/their) choose to not read and respond, that's their prerogative. Are you my daddy to tell me who I can, and cannot interact with? 95% of my posts try to be interactive, if others choose to or choose not to interact, I'm fine with it. I'll move on to the next post. If someone can not control themselves and they directly attack an individual, I'd support the box. If me calling someone out to give justification to a post offends them, that's their issue. If they do not want to interact, respond, communicate, or have a discussion with someone, maybe they should be the ones that do not post here. Why don't you bring that up to them? This is a public forum, a diary is made for people to keep their ideas to themselves. A forum is meant for discussion. You shouldn't deflect people that are here trying to contribute to the functionally of the site that has been built. I'd argue that those that do not interact are the ones dismissing the purpose of this site and forum. Those are the ones you should take issue with. I am a protestor that stands on the sidewalk. You have protestors in here that block streets.
I can exists with those that I disagree with. I feel that if someone takes the time to post in here, they have the time to discuss. If they copy and paste others work, or if their posts consist of only an emoji, or bolding and highlighting something, I'll call that out. Those posts are meant to provoke and stimulate a retaliation. I wish you could actually take your partisan blinders off and see that. I'd actually like to have a civil conversation with them. If you read almost all my posts, that is how I interact. Some posters in here are incapable of that. Box and ban them. I'll comment back to whomever I want and I'll keep it civil. If they do not wish to respond, so be it. If they do not want to be responded to, they do not need to post.
0
@wallstreetcappers
Umm, are you getting me confused with someone else? Readers on this site are free to skip over posts they do not wish to read. I practice that very often when I see a select few posters here. Occasionally I'll dabble in their comments to see what they have to say. Cough, I mean what they copy and paste from others. When they do actually speak up, I may or may not comment back to them. If they (he/she/him/they/their) choose to not read and respond, that's their prerogative. Are you my daddy to tell me who I can, and cannot interact with? 95% of my posts try to be interactive, if others choose to or choose not to interact, I'm fine with it. I'll move on to the next post. If someone can not control themselves and they directly attack an individual, I'd support the box. If me calling someone out to give justification to a post offends them, that's their issue. If they do not want to interact, respond, communicate, or have a discussion with someone, maybe they should be the ones that do not post here. Why don't you bring that up to them? This is a public forum, a diary is made for people to keep their ideas to themselves. A forum is meant for discussion. You shouldn't deflect people that are here trying to contribute to the functionally of the site that has been built. I'd argue that those that do not interact are the ones dismissing the purpose of this site and forum. Those are the ones you should take issue with. I am a protestor that stands on the sidewalk. You have protestors in here that block streets.
I can exists with those that I disagree with. I feel that if someone takes the time to post in here, they have the time to discuss. If they copy and paste others work, or if their posts consist of only an emoji, or bolding and highlighting something, I'll call that out. Those posts are meant to provoke and stimulate a retaliation. I wish you could actually take your partisan blinders off and see that. I'd actually like to have a civil conversation with them. If you read almost all my posts, that is how I interact. Some posters in here are incapable of that. Box and ban them. I'll comment back to whomever I want and I'll keep it civil. If they do not wish to respond, so be it. If they do not want to be responded to, they do not need to post.
I think you get what I am asking, Ive asked it many times in the past and the concept of respecting others and not being combative or personal is something Ive brought up 100 times and this is not new.
So the soft ask has been made and I hope you either respect that OR completely stop with insults, digs, personal comments etc. You resorted to calling me a snowflake which is insulting since you are not meaning it as something positive, you are attempting to put me down by saying that...I do not believe you are capable of respecting others but you can prove me wrong.
5
@BigGame90
I think you get what I am asking, Ive asked it many times in the past and the concept of respecting others and not being combative or personal is something Ive brought up 100 times and this is not new.
So the soft ask has been made and I hope you either respect that OR completely stop with insults, digs, personal comments etc. You resorted to calling me a snowflake which is insulting since you are not meaning it as something positive, you are attempting to put me down by saying that...I do not believe you are capable of respecting others but you can prove me wrong.
Quote Originally Posted by KellyM_1964: Quote Originally Posted by DrStrangelove: Since I don't watch any of Sniffy McAdderall speeches anymore, it's all starting to come back to me what a dumbass he is. And he's still rambling. What is he going to do, talk until November? Between Hulk Hogan, Dana White and Trump I've already lost too many IQ points. I'm turning off this shiit. its over now but the gop lying continues @KellyM_1964 Of course not. Never stops. Aint seen nuthin yet! Wait til we see their lying MAGAtt ads during football games in September and October
good one
COVERS allows u to tell someone they are sexually frustrated so long as ur hands are clean
0
Quote Originally Posted by Zeus4par:
Quote Originally Posted by KellyM_1964: Quote Originally Posted by DrStrangelove: Since I don't watch any of Sniffy McAdderall speeches anymore, it's all starting to come back to me what a dumbass he is. And he's still rambling. What is he going to do, talk until November? Between Hulk Hogan, Dana White and Trump I've already lost too many IQ points. I'm turning off this shiit. its over now but the gop lying continues @KellyM_1964 Of course not. Never stops. Aint seen nuthin yet! Wait til we see their lying MAGAtt ads during football games in September and October
Given Trump’s propensity for telling bombastic lies, it’s often difficult to discern whether he’s confused & rambling or if he’s just telling another lie. I could very well see Trump pointing to a man who hasn’t been governor since 2019 and telling him he’s doing a great job. Not because he’s confused, but because he never cared to begin with. Trump is for Trump!
2
Given Trump’s propensity for telling bombastic lies, it’s often difficult to discern whether he’s confused & rambling or if he’s just telling another lie. I could very well see Trump pointing to a man who hasn’t been governor since 2019 and telling him he’s doing a great job. Not because he’s confused, but because he never cared to begin with. Trump is for Trump!
What is wrong with you Trump supporters? Why do you have to stoop so low in deflecting when the OP is 100% right and you ALL know it?
NO, it is not 100% right, not at all. Remove the word incoherent and stop making stupid comments like Joe had "one bad night" and I wouldn't be here in this thread.
What is wrong with you Trump haters? You know who the incoherent one is.
1
Quote Originally Posted by wallstreetcappers:
What is wrong with you Trump supporters? Why do you have to stoop so low in deflecting when the OP is 100% right and you ALL know it?
NO, it is not 100% right, not at all. Remove the word incoherent and stop making stupid comments like Joe had "one bad night" and I wouldn't be here in this thread.
What is wrong with you Trump haters? You know who the incoherent one is.
I am and always have been a liberal leaning MODERATE - who has voted multiple times for both democrat and REPUBLICAN candidates up and down the ballot, but I have no affiliation - nor will I ever - to either major party. And I oppose FASCISM, neo-FASCISM, quasi-FASCISM, semi-FASCISM and psuedo-FASCISM as well as any form of authoritariansim and extremism on either end of the politcal spectrum.
I've pretty much always been a democrat. My mother was a activist and fundraiser in the Democratic Party for years, so the apple doesn't fall far from the tree. Plus I was in a strong union for many years, and we pretty much knew every move republicans were making in Congress in trying to pass things like anti-worker or anti-union legislation such as right to work and eliminating workman's compensation to name a couple of the larger issues. They would have been devastating to the blue collar workers in this country if passed. Luckily, the Dems almost always stopped these bills before they got out of the sub-committees for a vote. You know, stuff you don't hear about everyday in the news. But it was always a constant fight with these wingnuts.
I know everybody has different back stories which have molded their opinions on this board. But that's mine. There are things I like and things I hate about my party, which should go for everybody here when it comes to their respective parties. If you don't feel this way, you are probably in a cult. One thing I'll admit I hate is, with just a couple of exceptions, the Dems have always been shitty at campaigns. Almost every single election they've have the numbers, along with more independents leaning left, yet, still find a way to lose elections. Hillary's campaIgn was a perfect example with their overconfidence that she would take those communities in the swing states that they didn't feel a need to go into with their campaign. You can't assume anything in politics. I guarantee you the Repuclicans don't because they know they are the unpopular party. But they've outdone themselves with this Biden election. And it couldn't come at a worse time. Now they find themselves in election purgatory. I don't care how crazy Trump is, they can't put that toothpaste back in the tube after what happened with the first debate. They should have discovered and prepared for this 2 years ago, not 3 months before the election. And now thanks to downballot voting, they could lose all branches of government. And that will leave the poor and working class in this country flying without a safety net for the next 4 or more years. I guarantee you it's not going to be pretty, I don't care what you hear the Magas promise. It makes me sick and angry since it's looking like this could be the most important election of my lifetime.
2
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
I am and always have been a liberal leaning MODERATE - who has voted multiple times for both democrat and REPUBLICAN candidates up and down the ballot, but I have no affiliation - nor will I ever - to either major party. And I oppose FASCISM, neo-FASCISM, quasi-FASCISM, semi-FASCISM and psuedo-FASCISM as well as any form of authoritariansim and extremism on either end of the politcal spectrum.
I've pretty much always been a democrat. My mother was a activist and fundraiser in the Democratic Party for years, so the apple doesn't fall far from the tree. Plus I was in a strong union for many years, and we pretty much knew every move republicans were making in Congress in trying to pass things like anti-worker or anti-union legislation such as right to work and eliminating workman's compensation to name a couple of the larger issues. They would have been devastating to the blue collar workers in this country if passed. Luckily, the Dems almost always stopped these bills before they got out of the sub-committees for a vote. You know, stuff you don't hear about everyday in the news. But it was always a constant fight with these wingnuts.
I know everybody has different back stories which have molded their opinions on this board. But that's mine. There are things I like and things I hate about my party, which should go for everybody here when it comes to their respective parties. If you don't feel this way, you are probably in a cult. One thing I'll admit I hate is, with just a couple of exceptions, the Dems have always been shitty at campaigns. Almost every single election they've have the numbers, along with more independents leaning left, yet, still find a way to lose elections. Hillary's campaIgn was a perfect example with their overconfidence that she would take those communities in the swing states that they didn't feel a need to go into with their campaign. You can't assume anything in politics. I guarantee you the Repuclicans don't because they know they are the unpopular party. But they've outdone themselves with this Biden election. And it couldn't come at a worse time. Now they find themselves in election purgatory. I don't care how crazy Trump is, they can't put that toothpaste back in the tube after what happened with the first debate. They should have discovered and prepared for this 2 years ago, not 3 months before the election. And now thanks to downballot voting, they could lose all branches of government. And that will leave the poor and working class in this country flying without a safety net for the next 4 or more years. I guarantee you it's not going to be pretty, I don't care what you hear the Magas promise. It makes me sick and angry since it's looking like this could be the most important election of my lifetime.
The thread was made after Trump went drunk uncle at the RNC and that is not bashing it is not inaccurate it is completely true. How can you or any RNC guy here try and say Trump does not meander, wander like every single time he makes a public appearance?
If you want another Biden thread, your friend made one its still on page 1 you can go and jump in there. Notice that the Biggame thread has zero cheap shots or deflection from the DNC group, the same cannot be said about your side in this and most every Trump thread.
2
@UNIMAN
The thread was made after Trump went drunk uncle at the RNC and that is not bashing it is not inaccurate it is completely true. How can you or any RNC guy here try and say Trump does not meander, wander like every single time he makes a public appearance?
If you want another Biden thread, your friend made one its still on page 1 you can go and jump in there. Notice that the Biggame thread has zero cheap shots or deflection from the DNC group, the same cannot be said about your side in this and most every Trump thread.
You just addressed me and never mentioned the core of what I said, "incoherent" and "one bad night". And you seem to do that a lot.
"Drunk Uncle". That's your opinion and the weapon currently being used by the left and I'm fine with that because the Left has lost all credibility.
I just read the transcript, many pages long, and the last 3-1/2 pages he bounces around touching on issues he left out. If you found it rambling, fine. I didn't till the end.
Now, if you what to claim it's incoherent, I object, nothing incoherent. Just like I objected to this same OP claiming hydroxychloroquine causes immediate strokes back in 2020.
I'm done here, last word is yours.
0
@wallstreetcappers
You just addressed me and never mentioned the core of what I said, "incoherent" and "one bad night". And you seem to do that a lot.
"Drunk Uncle". That's your opinion and the weapon currently being used by the left and I'm fine with that because the Left has lost all credibility.
I just read the transcript, many pages long, and the last 3-1/2 pages he bounces around touching on issues he left out. If you found it rambling, fine. I didn't till the end.
Now, if you what to claim it's incoherent, I object, nothing incoherent. Just like I objected to this same OP claiming hydroxychloroquine causes immediate strokes back in 2020.
@wallstreetcappers Really? How does anyone "add value" to yet another Trump-bashing thread? What value does this thread have at all? I understand your frustration & that of all the Biden backers. Many had high hopes for his "success", even though deep down inside they knew he wasn't a leader & wasn't cognitively up to this task. But they donned their pom-poms & pretended it not to be so. This was the horse they backed. In lieu of his failed admin. & ultimate collapse, they want to take it out on Trump.....& have been for years...... that's fine, knock yourselves out. I don't give a shit. I don't like Trump but my disdain for him doesn't reach the depths of hate that many here have for him. But as an observer of this whole debacle, I find it sad....... all one can do at times is shake their head & chuckle. These are our POTUS choices? Will they be any better four years from now? Will this country still be as divided then as it is now? So please, spare me the sanctimony. You allow all kinds of derogatory comments to anyone not on the left & don't say a word. Is that the "value" you speak of?
0
Quote Originally Posted by THEMUGG:
@wallstreetcappers Really? How does anyone "add value" to yet another Trump-bashing thread? What value does this thread have at all? I understand your frustration & that of all the Biden backers. Many had high hopes for his "success", even though deep down inside they knew he wasn't a leader & wasn't cognitively up to this task. But they donned their pom-poms & pretended it not to be so. This was the horse they backed. In lieu of his failed admin. & ultimate collapse, they want to take it out on Trump.....& have been for years...... that's fine, knock yourselves out. I don't give a shit. I don't like Trump but my disdain for him doesn't reach the depths of hate that many here have for him. But as an observer of this whole debacle, I find it sad....... all one can do at times is shake their head & chuckle. These are our POTUS choices? Will they be any better four years from now? Will this country still be as divided then as it is now? So please, spare me the sanctimony. You allow all kinds of derogatory comments to anyone not on the left & don't say a word. Is that the "value" you speak of?
Quote Originally Posted by THEMUGG: @wallstreetcappers Really? How does anyone "add value" to yet another Trump-bashing thread? What value does this thread have at all? I understand your frustration & that of all the Biden backers. Many had high hopes for his "success", even though deep down inside they knew he wasn't a leader & wasn't cognitively up to this task. But they donned their pom-poms & pretended it not to be so. This was the horse they backed. In lieu of his failed admin. & ultimate collapse, they want to take it out on Trump.....& have been for years...... that's fine, knock yourselves out. I don't give a shit. I don't like Trump but my disdain for him doesn't reach the depths of hate that many here have for him. But as an observer of this whole debacle, I find it sad....... all one can do at times is shake their head & chuckle. These are our POTUS choices? Will they be any better four years from now? Will this country still be as divided then as it is now? So please, spare me the sanctimony. You allow all kinds of derogatory comments to anyone not on the left & don't say a word. Is that the "value" you speak of? Nomination for post of year consideration Fupa, please accept this as my nomination. Let's be inclusive this year and not limit it to only Trump bashing posts for eligibility. Thanks
I second that nomination
0
Quote Originally Posted by kcblitzkrieg:
Quote Originally Posted by THEMUGG: @wallstreetcappers Really? How does anyone "add value" to yet another Trump-bashing thread? What value does this thread have at all? I understand your frustration & that of all the Biden backers. Many had high hopes for his "success", even though deep down inside they knew he wasn't a leader & wasn't cognitively up to this task. But they donned their pom-poms & pretended it not to be so. This was the horse they backed. In lieu of his failed admin. & ultimate collapse, they want to take it out on Trump.....& have been for years...... that's fine, knock yourselves out. I don't give a shit. I don't like Trump but my disdain for him doesn't reach the depths of hate that many here have for him. But as an observer of this whole debacle, I find it sad....... all one can do at times is shake their head & chuckle. These are our POTUS choices? Will they be any better four years from now? Will this country still be as divided then as it is now? So please, spare me the sanctimony. You allow all kinds of derogatory comments to anyone not on the left & don't say a word. Is that the "value" you speak of? Nomination for post of year consideration Fupa, please accept this as my nomination. Let's be inclusive this year and not limit it to only Trump bashing posts for eligibility. Thanks
Quote Originally Posted by wallstreetcappers: @BigGame90 They arent breaking the rules in posting inside a thread they made. The site rules do not say that members cannot post frequently in threads, especially their own. True. But you wonder why some posters get called out? Other guests come here to read a forum of opinions and ideas to have an actual discussion. People do NOT come here to read copying and pasting of news articles. Well, some do. They should take their chats to a diary as it would fit their needs better. Some posters are like that little child that can not stay focused and they distract others from the task at hand. They become a nuisance and they eventually get what they give back.
0
Quote Originally Posted by BigGame90:
Quote Originally Posted by wallstreetcappers: @BigGame90 They arent breaking the rules in posting inside a thread they made. The site rules do not say that members cannot post frequently in threads, especially their own. True. But you wonder why some posters get called out? Other guests come here to read a forum of opinions and ideas to have an actual discussion. People do NOT come here to read copying and pasting of news articles. Well, some do. They should take their chats to a diary as it would fit their needs better. Some posters are like that little child that can not stay focused and they distract others from the task at hand. They become a nuisance and they eventually get what they give back.
@wallstreetcappers If you call my comments "attacks", you might be a snowflake. If you think calling you a snowflake is an attack, you should look at some from the left and the multiple, strung out words they use against other humans. See post #39 for example. This is the posters practically every day word vomit they use. calling a spade a spade.
0
Quote Originally Posted by BigGame90:
@wallstreetcappers If you call my comments "attacks", you might be a snowflake. If you think calling you a snowflake is an attack, you should look at some from the left and the multiple, strung out words they use against other humans. See post #39 for example. This is the posters practically every day word vomit they use. calling a spade a spade.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.