Anybody watching this incoherent rambling?

its over now  

but the gop lying continues 

what lying? Just curious what lying you're referring to. Feel free to point out the lies as there might be several you can find. I mean, if you watched it, which I am assuming you did since you're commenting about it as if you did, you'd have some instances picked out that you'd like to discuss in this forum. Or do you just make comments to try to degrade one party because you don't like them? 

@DrStrangelove  the UFC might be the largest growing sport worldwide in the last 30 years. Which Dana White has a large roll in building. He must be an idiot, right? 

followed by Macho Man Randy Savage running in. 

@KellyM_1964

Of course not.  Never stops.  Aint seen nuthin yet!  Wait til we see their lying MAGAtt ads during football games in September and October

@BigGame90

 Post 39 was directed at WHICH MEMBER specifically?

See we can play this semantics game you keep playing but in the end the only measure of importance is the site rules, nothing else. So you can say that they are abrasive, combative, rude etc to the general RNC group and Trump...ok so you are CORRECT. And we can point out that your clan does the same towards the DNC, that is CORRECT.

Where you lose is that it doesnt cause immediate issue the same way that it does when you are attacking a member DIRECTLY....DIRECTLY....get that? so when you guys go attack a Covers member, when you guys call names to Covers members (including me) when you guys make retaliatory threads and posts aimed at Covers members, then that is when the rubber hits the road and it is where your side is losing...losing losing losing all the time. And that is why your side gets boxed and banned more, you break the rules and then cry foul when you get boxed or banned. 

Both sides abuse the other with regards to general political insults. If we went only off the general content then most all of you would be tossed out.

Thanks for calling me a snowflake then again MINIMIZING the insult and qualifying it as if that changes the fact you resort to petty personal insults because you have no self control.

@wallstreetcappers

If I call someone an idiot, that doesn't mean they are factually an idiot. It's my opinion of that person for whatever reason or comment that person made. Does that mean I believe they are in fact, an 100% an idiot, no. It might mean a comment, in my opinion was idiotic. But that doesn't mean the poster is an actual idiot. I agree, name calling should get someone boxed if it's directed at a person without merit. Sometimes, people need to be called out of lies. Calling someone out for what they post may not be an attack. If I call someone out, I just want them to back up the comment they made. For instance, if someone responds to a comment with; "but the GOP lying continues" but gives no context about what lies the GOP continues with, I feel I should be able to call that poster out and ask for references and examples so I can check to see if the lying does actually continue. Afterall, they commented in a free and open public FORUM that is OPEN for discussion. If that poster doesn't want to respond, that's ok and that's on them. But without a response to back up their statement, I'll consider that post(er) to be incapable of a discussion, which is the point of FREE and OPEN FORUMS.  

@Zeus4par

I am certain that's coming. Their fundraising has been through the roof the past week since that republican tried to take out the CONVICTED FELON and they've twisted that to their uninformed cult to make it seem like it's all Joe Biden's fault.

Without logic or evidence, they're already blaming President Biden for the worldwide cyber outage causing flights to be cancelled.

All Joe Biden's fault! 

@BigGame90

 Then you fall back on FREE as if that is some carte blanche to run your temper because it is FREE and OPEN. Well free and open only exist when you respect others at a paramount level...and you do not so in your case FREE is not free as you do not respect others.

How about this...just stop interacting with people you cannot control your temper around, that means quit replying to the DNC group you despise because you have little self control and cause drama and childish tantrums, just please quit replying and interacting with those you cannot do so in a positive respectful way.

In the past we have actually been forced to instruct members to NOT ENTER threads of certain people, NOT engage with certain members because the member could not do so and we were forced to take that level of action. I think in your case and several other RNC guys here that might be required. We have banned members who were asked to not post or reply to certain members and they did not comply, that has been a regular issue here and it might be what happens to you.

So this is a soft request, next step is a bit more firm, just quit interacting with members who bother you so much that you break the rules. Same goes with all the other guys who do the same thing here. Its a pity that so many of you are completely incapable of existing around others who you strongly disagree with and resort to petty childish measures to take revenge.

@wallstreetcappers

 Umm, are you getting me confused with someone else? Readers on this site are free to skip over posts they do not wish to read. I practice that very often when I see a select few posters here. Occasionally I'll dabble in their comments to see what they have to say. Cough, I mean what they copy and paste from others. When they do actually speak up, I may or may not comment back to them. If they (he/she/him/they/their) choose to not read and respond, that's their prerogative. Are you my daddy to tell me who I can, and cannot interact with? 95% of my posts try to be interactive, if others choose to or choose not to interact, I'm fine with it. I'll move on to the next post. If someone can not control themselves and they directly attack an individual, I'd support the box. If me calling someone out to give justification to a post offends them, that's their issue. If they do not want to interact, respond, communicate, or have a discussion with someone, maybe they should be the ones that do not post here. Why don't you bring that up to them? This is a public forum, a diary is made for people to keep their ideas to themselves. A forum is meant for discussion. You shouldn't deflect people that are here trying to contribute to the functionally of the site that has been built. I'd argue that those that do not interact are the ones dismissing the purpose of this site and forum. Those are the ones you should take issue with.  I am a protestor that stands on the sidewalk. You have protestors in here that block streets. 

I can exists with those that I disagree with. I feel that if someone takes the time to post in here, they have the time to discuss. If they copy and paste others work, or if their posts consist of only an emoji, or bolding and highlighting something, I'll call that out. Those posts are meant to provoke and stimulate a retaliation. I wish you could actually take your partisan blinders off and see that.    I'd actually like to have a civil conversation with them. If you read almost all my posts, that is how I interact. Some posters in here are incapable of that. Box and ban them. I'll comment back to whomever I want and I'll keep it civil. If they do not wish to respond, so be it. If they do not want to be responded to, they do not need to post. 

@BigGame90

 I think you get what I am asking, Ive asked it many times in the past and the concept of respecting others and not being combative or personal is something Ive brought up 100 times and this is not new.

So the soft ask has been made and I hope you either respect that OR completely stop with insults, digs, personal comments etc. You resorted to calling me a snowflake which is insulting since you are not meaning it as something positive, you are attempting to put me down by saying that...I do not believe you are capable of respecting others but you can prove me wrong.

good one

Damn, I'm attacking members again.

Really? Was it the "one bad night" reply? 

There was nothing incoherent in that speech. Did he ramble on at end, yes. Did he get a message across, yes. 

This place is such a joke.

Given Trump’s propensity for telling bombastic lies, it’s often difficult to discern whether he’s confused & rambling or if he’s just telling another lie. I could very well see Trump pointing to a man who hasn’t been governor since 2019 and telling him he’s doing a great job. Not because he’s confused, but because he never cared to begin with. Trump is for Trump!

NO, it is not 100% right, not at all. Remove the word incoherent and stop making stupid comments like Joe had "one bad night" and I wouldn't be here in this thread.

What is wrong with you Trump haters? You know who the incoherent one is. 

I know everybody has different back stories which have molded their opinions on this board. But that's mine. There are things I like and things I hate about my party, which should go for everybody here when it comes to their respective parties. If you don't feel this way, you are probably in a cult. One thing I'll admit I hate is, with just a couple of exceptions, the Dems have always been shitty at campaigns. Almost every single election they've have the numbers, along with more independents leaning left, yet, still find a way to lose elections. Hillary's campaIgn was a perfect example with their overconfidence that she would take those communities in the swing states that they didn't feel a need to go into with their campaign. You can't assume anything in politics. I guarantee you the Repuclicans don't because they know they are the unpopular party. But they've outdone themselves with this Biden election. And it couldn't come at a worse time. Now they find themselves in election purgatory. I don't care how crazy Trump is, they can't put that toothpaste back in the tube after what happened with the first debate. They should have discovered and prepared for this 2 years ago, not 3 months before the election. And now thanks to downballot voting, they could lose all branches of government. And that will leave the poor and working class in this country flying without a safety net for the next 4 or more years. I guarantee you it's not going to be pretty, I don't care what you hear the Magas promise. It makes me sick and angry since it's looking like this could be the most important election of my lifetime. 

@UNIMAN

 The thread was made after Trump went drunk uncle at the RNC and that is not bashing it is not inaccurate it is completely true. How can you or any RNC guy here try and say Trump does not meander, wander like every single time he makes a public appearance? 

If you want another Biden thread, your friend made one its still on page 1 you can go and jump in there. Notice that the Biggame thread has zero cheap shots or deflection from the DNC group, the same cannot be said about your side in this and most every Trump thread.

@wallstreetcappers

You just addressed me and never mentioned the core of what I said, "incoherent" and "one bad night". And you seem to do that a lot.

 "Drunk Uncle". That's your opinion and the weapon currently being used by the left and I'm fine with that because the Left has lost all credibility.

I just read the transcript, many pages long, and the last 3-1/2 pages he bounces around touching on issues he left out. If you found it rambling, fine. I didn't till the end. 

Now, if you what to claim it's incoherent, I object, nothing incoherent. Just like I objected to this same OP claiming hydroxychloroquine causes immediate strokes back in 2020. 

I'm done here, last word is yours.

I second that nomination