Posted:
#1
Bill O'Reilly ,,,Trump has destroyed the republican party that I knew and loved
Posted:
#4
Quote Originally Posted by ClubDirt:
similar article today written by a republican
https://www.latimes.com/opinion/op-ed/la-oe-boot-republicans-in-exile-20160508-story.html
similar article today written by a republican
https://www.latimes.com/opinion/op-ed/la-oe-boot-republicans-in-exile-20160508-story.html
I'am shocked..shocked I tell you that Max Boot a fmr.senior foreign policy adviser to John McCain ,,,a fmr.defense policy adviser to Mitt Romney ,,,, and fmr.head of the Counter-Terrorism Working Group for Marco Rubio..............would write a scathing article about Trump...shocking indeed..
Posted:
#5
[Politics] Topic: Bill O'Reilly ,,,Trump has destroyed the republican party that I knew and loved
Darkhorse,, you need to double check your sources before you post a thread trying to slam Donald Trump...
This article isn't by FOX's Bill O'Reilly...it's by William Francis Buckley "Bill" O'Reilly....Not to be confused with Bill O'Reilly the political commentator on FNN ...
Darkhorse,, you need to double check your sources before you post a thread trying to slam Donald Trump...
This article isn't by FOX's Bill O'Reilly...it's by William Francis Buckley "Bill" O'Reilly....Not to be confused with Bill O'Reilly the political commentator on FNN ...
.......keep em coming boys .........lol
Posted:
#8
Quote Originally Posted by ClubDirt:
similar article today written by a republican
https://www.latimes.com/opinion/op-ed/la-oe-boot-republicans-in-exile-20160508-story.html
similar article today written by a republican
https://www.latimes.com/opinion/op-ed/la-oe-boot-republicans-in-exile-20160508-story.html
I guess this article kinda makes it show that the GOP was either too weak or too dumb to do their part to protect the country from trump. Could be both.
But either way 5/4/16 was the day conservatism died.
And ever since then you see some of the partisan lemmings, the real lost and sad ones trying desperately to spin it otherwise in any and every way possible.
It's gotten sad to watch this type of desperation 
Posted:
#9
Quote Originally Posted by dl36:
I guess this article kinda makes it show that the GOP was either too weak or too dumb to do their part to protect the country from trump. Could be both.
But either way 5/4/16 was the day conservatism died.
And ever since then you see some of the partisan lemmings, the real lost and sad ones trying desperately to spin it otherwise in any and every way possible.
It's gotten sad to watch this type of desperation
Yep... now all of the sudden the usual suspects are trying to say that they never really liked the GOP after all.
Posted:
#10
Quote Originally Posted by SarasotaSlim:
[Politics] Topic: Bill O'Reilly ,,,Trump has destroyed the republican party that I knew and loved
Darkhorse,, you need to double check your sources before you post a thread trying to slam Donald Trump...
This article isn't by FOX's Bill O'Reilly...it's by William Francis Buckley "Bill" O'Reilly....Not to be confused with Bill O'Reilly the political commentator on FNN ...
[Politics] Topic: Bill O'Reilly ,,,Trump has destroyed the republican party that I knew and loved
Darkhorse,, you need to double check your sources before you post a thread trying to slam Donald Trump...
This article isn't by FOX's Bill O'Reilly...it's by William Francis Buckley "Bill" O'Reilly....Not to be confused with Bill O'Reilly the political commentator on FNN ...
Where did I say it was faux's Bill O'Reilly slim? In fact the link clearly shows which O it is.
Posted:
#11
Quote Originally Posted by darkhorse12:
Where did I say it was faux's Bill O'Reilly slim? In fact the link clearly shows which O it is.
You have to be careful with this darkhorse12 cat, he will try to keel you with ignorance.
In the other thread he tried to argue with me about the viability of Obamacare using a link from 2014 compared to my current day link.
The only question is was he trying to slip that past and being deceitful, or was he simply oblivious and ignorant?
Coincidentally, his lap donkey DL36 had his back and blindly went all in and over the cliff as well. Just like in this thread too.
They both set the bar pretty low, perhaps it makes it easier to grab the low hanging fruit.
Posted:
#13
Quote Originally Posted by dl36:
Like I said it's just getting sad
Like I said it's just getting sad
Thanks for proving my point
I'm sure you will continue to do so 
Are you sad that you will now have to avoid my direct questions in yet ANOTHER thread or are you sad because you've finally accepted that you are Glass Joe and I am Soda Popinski
Posted:
#14
Quote Originally Posted by bowlslit:
You have to be careful with this darkhorse12 cat, he will try to keel you with ignorance.
In the other thread he tried to argue with me about the viability of Obamacare using a link from 2014 compared to my current day link.
The only question is was he trying to slip that past and being deceitful, or was he simply oblivious and ignorant?
Coincidentally, his lap donkey DL36 had his back and blindly went all in and over the cliff as well. Just like in this thread too.
They both set the bar pretty low, perhaps it makes it easier to grab the low hanging fruit.
I believe you have the market cornered on ignorance.
Posted:
#15
Quote Originally Posted by darkhorse12:
Where did I say it was faux's Bill O'Reilly slim? In fact the link clearly shows which O it is.
It's just that the title of the thread is misleading---intentional or not. Obviously, the link then clears it up. Plenty of these articles to choose from. You just happened to choose the one with the same name is all. 
Posted:
#17
Quote Originally Posted by darkhorse12:
I believe you have the market cornered on ignorance.
Honestly I'm not sure what his incoherent babble is about anyways. Other than he's lost his mind all upset, negative and insulting. It's interesying how emotional and ignorant seem to go together.
It's just getting sad at this point as he nothing to offer the actual topic and disucssion other than his typical drama.
Typical bowslit 
I guess if he would actually debate the topic he would, but he is too ignorant or just too inept to engage in an actual discussion about the topic.
At least that what this thread is showing everyone
Posted:
#18
Oh my god that blog is nonsense. Trump is the only candidate with the ability to think.
For the Civil War, President Lincoln suspended the writ of habeas corpus without consulting Congress. Lincoln enabled the military to arrest and imprisonment of civilians. The suspension applied to Confederate spies or to those who aided the rebel cause, interfered with military enlistments, resisted the draft, or were "guilty of any disloyal practice." Lincoln ordered that persons arrested under his proclamation were subject to martial law, which meant they would be tried and punished by military courts.
For WW1, President Woodrow Wilson ordered the internment of 6,000 German and Austro Hungarian aliens in the United States.
For WW2, President Franklin D. Roosevelt authorized Executive Order 9066, the order forced relocation and incarceration in camps. President FDR ordered the incarceration of people of Japanese ancestry shortly after Imperial Japan's attack on Pearl Harbor.
Trump doesn’t need to create a law against Muslims. There is already one. The Immigration and Nationality act passed June 27, 1953 and became public law 414 states in Chapter 2 section 212 the prohibition of entry to the US if the Alien belongs to an organization seeking to overthrow the government of the United States by “Force, Violence, or other unconstitutional means.”
It also prohibits the entry of aliens who are members of or affiliated with any organization that advocates or teaches the overthrow by force, violence or other unconstitutional means of the US, or all forms of law, and Aliens who publish, circulate and distribute materials teaching or advocating the overthrow by force, violence or other unconstitutional means of the US Government or of all forms of law.
This by its very definition would rule out Islam in the US and would rule out all Islamic immigration to the US, but is being ignored by the White House and ignorant RINOs and democrats who think it’s divisive and reprehensible to ban the entry of those whose ideology is Islamic. Also the Federal Code in Title 8 chapter 12 says the President can, by proclamation, suspend illegal aliens from entering the country.
The US government has gone after family and friends of terrorists before. What Trump is advocating is a really brilliant strategy. Los Pepes, a vigilante group composed of enemies of terrorist drug lord Pablo Escobar, worked with the Columbian police, American military officers, many law enforcement agents and CIA operatives to take down the terrorist drug lord Pablo Escobar. The group killed and kidnapped family and friends of Escobar in order to lure out the terrorist drug lord, who was engaging in a terrorist campaign against Columbia and the US. The controversial tactic worked and Escobar was weakened by the tactic and eventually killed and his all powerful Medellin Cartel was demoralized and defeated.
William F. B. O'Reilly is an idiot. The party of Reagan is gone. Good riddance! The United States is in a full scale WAR! Nobody reads anymore.
For the Civil War, President Lincoln suspended the writ of habeas corpus without consulting Congress. Lincoln enabled the military to arrest and imprisonment of civilians. The suspension applied to Confederate spies or to those who aided the rebel cause, interfered with military enlistments, resisted the draft, or were "guilty of any disloyal practice." Lincoln ordered that persons arrested under his proclamation were subject to martial law, which meant they would be tried and punished by military courts.
For WW1, President Woodrow Wilson ordered the internment of 6,000 German and Austro Hungarian aliens in the United States.
For WW2, President Franklin D. Roosevelt authorized Executive Order 9066, the order forced relocation and incarceration in camps. President FDR ordered the incarceration of people of Japanese ancestry shortly after Imperial Japan's attack on Pearl Harbor.
Trump doesn’t need to create a law against Muslims. There is already one. The Immigration and Nationality act passed June 27, 1953 and became public law 414 states in Chapter 2 section 212 the prohibition of entry to the US if the Alien belongs to an organization seeking to overthrow the government of the United States by “Force, Violence, or other unconstitutional means.”
It also prohibits the entry of aliens who are members of or affiliated with any organization that advocates or teaches the overthrow by force, violence or other unconstitutional means of the US, or all forms of law, and Aliens who publish, circulate and distribute materials teaching or advocating the overthrow by force, violence or other unconstitutional means of the US Government or of all forms of law.
This by its very definition would rule out Islam in the US and would rule out all Islamic immigration to the US, but is being ignored by the White House and ignorant RINOs and democrats who think it’s divisive and reprehensible to ban the entry of those whose ideology is Islamic. Also the Federal Code in Title 8 chapter 12 says the President can, by proclamation, suspend illegal aliens from entering the country.
The US government has gone after family and friends of terrorists before. What Trump is advocating is a really brilliant strategy. Los Pepes, a vigilante group composed of enemies of terrorist drug lord Pablo Escobar, worked with the Columbian police, American military officers, many law enforcement agents and CIA operatives to take down the terrorist drug lord Pablo Escobar. The group killed and kidnapped family and friends of Escobar in order to lure out the terrorist drug lord, who was engaging in a terrorist campaign against Columbia and the US. The controversial tactic worked and Escobar was weakened by the tactic and eventually killed and his all powerful Medellin Cartel was demoralized and defeated.
William F. B. O'Reilly is an idiot. The party of Reagan is gone. Good riddance! The United States is in a full scale WAR! Nobody reads anymore.
Posted:
#20
Quote Originally Posted by darkhorse12:
Where did I say it was faux's Bill O'Reilly slim? In fact the link clearly shows which O it is.
Typical liberal bait & switch tactic presenting something other that what they really are just for acceptance .. .e.i. the Obamacare failure and the phony Iran deal..
Posted:
#21
Quote Originally Posted by MoneySRH:
Trump doesn’t need to create a law against Muslims. There is already one. The Immigration and Nationality act passed June 27, 1953 and became public law 414 states in Chapter 2 section 212 the prohibition of entry to the US if the Alien belongs to an organization seeking to overthrow the government of the United States by “Force, Violence, or other unconstitutional means.”
It also prohibits the entry of aliens who are members of or affiliated with any organization that advocates or teaches the overthrow by force, violence or other unconstitutional means of the US, or all forms of law, and Aliens who publish, circulate and distribute materials teaching or advocating the overthrow by force, violence or other unconstitutional means of the US Government or of all forms of law.
Nobody reads anymore.
Trump doesn’t need to create a law against Muslims. There is already one. The Immigration and Nationality act passed June 27, 1953 and became public law 414 states in Chapter 2 section 212 the prohibition of entry to the US if the Alien belongs to an organization seeking to overthrow the government of the United States by “Force, Violence, or other unconstitutional means.”
It also prohibits the entry of aliens who are members of or affiliated with any organization that advocates or teaches the overthrow by force, violence or other unconstitutional means of the US, or all forms of law, and Aliens who publish, circulate and distribute materials teaching or advocating the overthrow by force, violence or other unconstitutional means of the US Government or of all forms of law.
Nobody reads anymore.
That includes you apparently. Facts are your (and other far right extremists) worst enemies.
https://www.snopes.com/islam-banned-u-s-1952/
Posted:
#23
Quote Originally Posted by darkhorse12:
I believe you have the market cornered on ignorance.
f that is the case then why did you try to argue about the viability of Obamacare with an article about facts from before the law had a chance to take hold?
If I were truly ignorant as you say I would never have picked up on your absurd link.. But I'm the ignorant one. OK.
And I'm certainly more ignorant than DL because he went all in blind without even checking on your absurd link. But I'm the ignorant one, okay, yah right.
Now, when I expose the ignorance of DL the like that he has been putting on exhibit for years, he suddenly can't comprehend my posts. But I'm the ignorant one.
I promise you DL comprehends my posts, he just all about trying to save face now.
Another example about ignorance....DL posted several times that 5/4/16 is the day that conservatism died.
For one there is no evidence that conservatism has died. For two, maybe conservatism is just being fundemantally changed which is very much needed.
For 3 he also posted that 5/5/16 was the day that conservatism died. Which is it, the 4th or the 5th?
Bottom line for you darkhorse12 is you need to pick smarter lap donkeys in the future.
Posted:
#25
Quote Originally Posted by djbrow:
Point out where I said "ISLAM WAS BANNED FROM THE USA IN 1952." The FACT is the law is REAL and IS currently in place and CAN be enforced against Muslims! My advice to you is before you call someone out for not reading. You best be sure you can read yourself. Did you fail to notice the writer’s conclusion was that the law goes against “Any accepted interpretation of Islam?” That includes you apparently. Facts are your (and other far right extremists) worst enemies.
https://www.snopes.com/islam-banned-u-s-1952/
Quran (2:216) - "Fighting is prescribed for you, and ye dislike it, but it is possible that ye dislike a thing which is good for you, and that ye love a thing which is bad for you. But Allah knoweth, and ye know not." The word prescribed is in this verse.
Quran (8:12) - "I will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve. Therefore strike off their heads and strike off every fingertip of them"
Quran (3:85) - “Muslims must not take the infidels as friends”
Quran (5:33) - “Any religion other than Islam is not acceptable”
Quran (8:65) - “Terrorize and behead those who believe in scriptures other than the Quran”
Quran (8:65) - “Muslims must muster all weapons to terrorize the infidels”
Quran (9:30) - “When opportunity arises, kill the infidels wherever you find them”
Quran (9:123) - “The person and Christians are perverts, fight them”
Quran (22:19) - “Make war on the infidels living in your neighborhood”
None of these verses are out of context, misconstrued, or need historical interpretation. The Quran itself claims to be clear and complete; you pedophile worshiper apologists speak of the "risks" of trying to interpret verses without “proper assistance." I don’t need assistance. I can read. The above is quite clear. The Quran is a prescriptive book for terrorism.
The Quran contains at least 109 verses that call Muslims to war with nonbelievers for the sake of Islamic rule. You can’t just ignore things away. You can’t just subjectively mitigate the verses so that the message fits your personal preference. This argument that it’s “mistaken interpretation” is a complete joke. Now go be a ghost troll again because I know I’m not getting any response real from you.
Hot Forum Topics
