You have been doing this for 15 years on here, I have been stepping in on your abusive, offensive jabs at non-GOP posters since this forum was created. It is fortunate you lasted this long because there has been more than enough reason to ban your account multiple times over. Given that you banished yourself after a lost wager then decided to not keep your agreement because of a hilarious claim of a rigged election might be reason enough for you to avoid repeating the same tactics that you fall back on and actually try to restrain yourself from the partisan approach you have. But no you cannot help yourself even given that you slumped back in because your dood is in office and it is time to put the screws down on the libs for four years. Why not make conversation and add value to all sides instead of instigating and baiting, trolling non-GOP members, try stopping yourself from the dividing and annoying that you always do.
You are a lurker, why are you offended at him saying this? You have trolled that member for over a decade taking shots and intentionally baiting him AND others, why do you need someone to step in when their claim is true? Your comments to cd were more of the same and as you said he was asked 12 times to answer your question when he is not required to follow your mandates, he was doing nothing wrong in posting about Musk, he does not need to get your approval to post on topic in a thread and is not required to respond to you in any fashion given you are being combative and antagonistic as you always are with him.
1
@SarasotaSlim
You have been doing this for 15 years on here, I have been stepping in on your abusive, offensive jabs at non-GOP posters since this forum was created. It is fortunate you lasted this long because there has been more than enough reason to ban your account multiple times over. Given that you banished yourself after a lost wager then decided to not keep your agreement because of a hilarious claim of a rigged election might be reason enough for you to avoid repeating the same tactics that you fall back on and actually try to restrain yourself from the partisan approach you have. But no you cannot help yourself even given that you slumped back in because your dood is in office and it is time to put the screws down on the libs for four years. Why not make conversation and add value to all sides instead of instigating and baiting, trolling non-GOP members, try stopping yourself from the dividing and annoying that you always do.
You are a lurker, why are you offended at him saying this? You have trolled that member for over a decade taking shots and intentionally baiting him AND others, why do you need someone to step in when their claim is true? Your comments to cd were more of the same and as you said he was asked 12 times to answer your question when he is not required to follow your mandates, he was doing nothing wrong in posting about Musk, he does not need to get your approval to post on topic in a thread and is not required to respond to you in any fashion given you are being combative and antagonistic as you always are with him.
"hes nutty and loves to instigate people. Always has been. He vanished from this site for years, so he was probably in jail somewhere. Am not a maga cult member, so i cant be a racist lolllllllll" "
0
Why are you picking on him slim????
"Maga fools",
"all the traitors"
"lmfaooooooooooooo typical maga dumb response."
"hes nutty and loves to instigate people. Always has been. He vanished from this site for years, so he was probably in jail somewhere. Am not a maga cult member, so i cant be a racist lolllllllll" "
You have no perspective or knowledge of what went on here for a very long period of time. Your claim about him generalizing conservatives is not unique, your side does the same thing and you are one of the worst offenders so it is funny seeing you step in on this topic.
SS has trolled cd for so many years he knows better than to stir the pot as he is doing especially given that he nixed is word as he did, not a smart decision and then to return back to his baiting and combative approach goading other members and he knows the result because he has done it for over a decade here.
We allow a ton of room for non-member to member slop and we allow it on both sides, we allow YOU plenty but there is a line and how this is not fully understood by now is bonkers.
0
@UNIMAN
You have no perspective or knowledge of what went on here for a very long period of time. Your claim about him generalizing conservatives is not unique, your side does the same thing and you are one of the worst offenders so it is funny seeing you step in on this topic.
SS has trolled cd for so many years he knows better than to stir the pot as he is doing especially given that he nixed is word as he did, not a smart decision and then to return back to his baiting and combative approach goading other members and he knows the result because he has done it for over a decade here.
We allow a ton of room for non-member to member slop and we allow it on both sides, we allow YOU plenty but there is a line and how this is not fully understood by now is bonkers.
Quote Originally Posted by joe pockets: @wallstreetcappers Slims a lurker! I’ve read lurker tend to live behind black painted window and horde aluminum foil! What say you Wallstreetcappers .will you defend me as vigorously as you did cd329 ?
Sorry Slim type o error! Should read …I’ve read LURKERS tend to live…..It’s funny how the letter S can change a comment when forgotten! The comment was generally speaking not personal! I hope feel better now !
0
Quote Originally Posted by SarasotaSlim:
Quote Originally Posted by joe pockets: @wallstreetcappers Slims a lurker! I’ve read lurker tend to live behind black painted window and horde aluminum foil! What say you Wallstreetcappers .will you defend me as vigorously as you did cd329 ?
Sorry Slim type o error! Should read …I’ve read LURKERS tend to live…..It’s funny how the letter S can change a comment when forgotten! The comment was generally speaking not personal! I hope feel better now !
When Slim returned he was unmercifully attacked with ZERO moderation or caution.
Another thread headed in the same direction it is suggested:
If you have a specific direct rule breaking item to discuss regarding the other member then do so right here and now
Now, inasmuch as I personally have no problem with profanity, I refrain in my postings as:
The use of inappropriate or offensive language is not permitted at Covers.
This thread contains objective indisputable infractions that go unaddressed and yet Slim finds himself in the box again for interpretations and/or history.
0
Honestly this is madness.
When Slim returned he was unmercifully attacked with ZERO moderation or caution.
Another thread headed in the same direction it is suggested:
If you have a specific direct rule breaking item to discuss regarding the other member then do so right here and now
Now, inasmuch as I personally have no problem with profanity, I refrain in my postings as:
The use of inappropriate or offensive language is not permitted at Covers.
This thread contains objective indisputable infractions that go unaddressed and yet Slim finds himself in the box again for interpretations and/or history.
This has been explained here and to you a number of times and yet you continue with your conspiracy narrative. Are you interested in what is considered an infraction per the site rules and how we moderate? No you want to use a partisan slant to complain about the other side while dismissing the same style yourself and by your other conservative members you side with.
I will say this to you as I have said to the others, it is a good thing we do not moderate in the perceived way you are suggesting because using your parameters you would have also been banned. So thank the site for being reasonable on what is allowed that is not a direct MEMBER TO MEMBER incident.
Sheesh
0
@unplucked_gem
This has been explained here and to you a number of times and yet you continue with your conspiracy narrative. Are you interested in what is considered an infraction per the site rules and how we moderate? No you want to use a partisan slant to complain about the other side while dismissing the same style yourself and by your other conservative members you side with.
I will say this to you as I have said to the others, it is a good thing we do not moderate in the perceived way you are suggesting because using your parameters you would have also been banned. So thank the site for being reasonable on what is allowed that is not a direct MEMBER TO MEMBER incident.
“What, if anything, would you have done something differently than President Biden during the past four years?” The View” Sunny Hostin asked Harris.... “There is not a thing that comes to mind,” she said.
Lifer politicians stuck in the same old same old status quo ,
with their criminal activity and profit on the sneak tip shenanigans
has stopped ,
now that those liberal marxists are out of office
BACK PATTING and KISSING threads are like passing HAM SANDWICHES around over and over-wall
2
Quote Originally Posted by SarasotaSlim:
“What, if anything, would you have done something differently than President Biden during the past four years?” The View” Sunny Hostin asked Harris.... “There is not a thing that comes to mind,” she said.
Lifer politicians stuck in the same old same old status quo ,
with their criminal activity and profit on the sneak tip shenanigans
Ok so lets explore since you gave a number and nothing else. In 237 where is the direct member to member insult? Is him saying "you MAGAS" the insult you are directly taking? It would be similar to how several of your pals have been throwing out generalizing slang crap just for the sake of stirring the pot TODAY RIGHT NOW, is this your example?
So we should wipe the site of someone generalizing YOU MAGAS as a direct member to member insult, is this your contention? It is inaccurate and flawed to your disadvantage if you say yes. You and many of your group do the exact same thing, the faults and flaws are in every group not just the one you disagree with.
I can see why you are mystified, you do not understand the difference between political generalizations and direct member to member insults. You are ok with whatever your side does and outraged at whatever the other side does. Mystery solved..
0
@unplucked_gem
Ok so lets explore since you gave a number and nothing else. In 237 where is the direct member to member insult? Is him saying "you MAGAS" the insult you are directly taking? It would be similar to how several of your pals have been throwing out generalizing slang crap just for the sake of stirring the pot TODAY RIGHT NOW, is this your example?
So we should wipe the site of someone generalizing YOU MAGAS as a direct member to member insult, is this your contention? It is inaccurate and flawed to your disadvantage if you say yes. You and many of your group do the exact same thing, the faults and flaws are in every group not just the one you disagree with.
I can see why you are mystified, you do not understand the difference between political generalizations and direct member to member insults. You are ok with whatever your side does and outraged at whatever the other side does. Mystery solved..
All the magas across the country, this is how your boy trumpy is working for the people. Hes now selling doge membership cards for 47 bucks. For 47 bucks you can have your name printed on a doge membership card that entitles you to jack shit. Is this what people elected this criminal con artist to do? Come up with scams to take magas money and enrich himself. Am sure magas will be sending their hard earned money to this giant grifter con artist,lolllllll. I thought he was gonna work on lowering the prices in the country,lollllllllll.
Also magas when you send your money to him for the membership, you better make sure its not a recurring charge every month for 47 bucks, cause the con artist has been caught doing that many times.
Am sure posters here will find a reason to defend this bullshit, thats okay cause they are only ruining the lives of their kids and their kids.
All the magas across the country, this is how your boy trumpy is working for the people. Hes now selling doge membership cards for 47 bucks. For 47 bucks you can have your name printed on a doge membership card that entitles you to jack shit. Is this what people elected this criminal con artist to do? Come up with scams to take magas money and enrich himself. Am sure magas will be sending their hard earned money to this giant grifter con artist,lolllllll. I thought he was gonna work on lowering the prices in the country,lollllllllll.
Also magas when you send your money to him for the membership, you better make sure its not a recurring charge every month for 47 bucks, cause the con artist has been caught doing that many times.
Am sure posters here will find a reason to defend this bullshit, thats okay cause they are only ruining the lives of their kids and their kids.
And just for the record i use the term maga, because there is no longer a real republican party. Republicans are now magas. If it goes back to republicans some day, then i will use the word republicans. All over the news they say maga party. And for the record, i consider every maga a traitor to MY GREAT COUNTRY I LOVE. Thats just my opinion, just like others can have their opinions. Until trumpy and musk take this free speech right away from me.
0
And just for the record i use the term maga, because there is no longer a real republican party. Republicans are now magas. If it goes back to republicans some day, then i will use the word republicans. All over the news they say maga party. And for the record, i consider every maga a traitor to MY GREAT COUNTRY I LOVE. Thats just my opinion, just like others can have their opinions. Until trumpy and musk take this free speech right away from me.
"Our govt isnt musks personal liter box to shit in. Who the fuck is he to demand every employee send him an email justifying their jobs? " Moving forward this is ok for posting? Simple yes or no deserving an answer.
care to explain whats wrong with me stating my opinion about musk. He might be magas idol but that doesnt mean i cant write what i feel about him. Holy shit another person trying to take away somebodys right to free speech. If you dont feel like musk is using our govt forhbis own personal liter box, then thats your opinin. I suggest you open your eyes thou, cause he got rid of the people investigating his companies. Guess theres no conflict there right?
0
Quote Originally Posted by unplucked_gem:
"Our govt isnt musks personal liter box to shit in. Who the fuck is he to demand every employee send him an email justifying their jobs? " Moving forward this is ok for posting? Simple yes or no deserving an answer.
care to explain whats wrong with me stating my opinion about musk. He might be magas idol but that doesnt mean i cant write what i feel about him. Holy shit another person trying to take away somebodys right to free speech. If you dont feel like musk is using our govt forhbis own personal liter box, then thats your opinin. I suggest you open your eyes thou, cause he got rid of the people investigating his companies. Guess theres no conflict there right?
and yet you are okay for trumpy to add 4.7 trillion to the debt for tax cuts for the rich lmfaooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo.
If you are going to get in the arena with the big boys you need to stop and think before you post an @ me.
Please show me where I said I was OK with adding anything to the Federal debt. We will be waiting here too long while you attempt to search out anything remotely in support of this statement. On the contrary, you will find quite the opposite as I have many a posts of record on the subject.....both of the last two administrations are responsible for adding record amounts to this debt. We have not been a serious Country in this aspect and that is on the uniparty, not the left or the right, but the uniparty government. The bureaucratic red tape thiccly layered nightmare that no Administration in the last 80 years has been able to successfully address aka reduce government bloat, waste, spending, etc.
When we actually see an Administration that provides any leeway on successfully navigating this issue with RESULTS, then that will be a first in our lifetime. I will be the first to tip the cap to either of these parties, or perhaps a different future party that accomplishes this on any meaningful level.
America First
0
@cd329
and yet you are okay for trumpy to add 4.7 trillion to the debt for tax cuts for the rich lmfaooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo.
If you are going to get in the arena with the big boys you need to stop and think before you post an @ me.
Please show me where I said I was OK with adding anything to the Federal debt. We will be waiting here too long while you attempt to search out anything remotely in support of this statement. On the contrary, you will find quite the opposite as I have many a posts of record on the subject.....both of the last two administrations are responsible for adding record amounts to this debt. We have not been a serious Country in this aspect and that is on the uniparty, not the left or the right, but the uniparty government. The bureaucratic red tape thiccly layered nightmare that no Administration in the last 80 years has been able to successfully address aka reduce government bloat, waste, spending, etc.
When we actually see an Administration that provides any leeway on successfully navigating this issue with RESULTS, then that will be a first in our lifetime. I will be the first to tip the cap to either of these parties, or perhaps a different future party that accomplishes this on any meaningful level.
I am enjoying the exaggeration of cost savings and the fake news partisan narrative that Musk leads with and Trump laps up only to be debunked and minimized. It is quite clear the path and purpose for this nonsense.
When I see defense contractors cut back versus forest service workers or an elimination of carbon credit trading, then I might be moderately interested. Thus far and in totality it is a partisan circus lead by an ultra conservative wack job.
0
I am enjoying the exaggeration of cost savings and the fake news partisan narrative that Musk leads with and Trump laps up only to be debunked and minimized. It is quite clear the path and purpose for this nonsense.
When I see defense contractors cut back versus forest service workers or an elimination of carbon credit trading, then I might be moderately interested. Thus far and in totality it is a partisan circus lead by an ultra conservative wack job.
"The use of inappropriate or offensive language is not permitted at Covers. Inappropriate or offensive language includes, but is not limited to, any language or content that is sexually oriented, sexually suggestive or abusive, harassing, defamatory, vulgar, obscene, profane, hateful, or that contains racially, ethnically or otherwise objectionable material of any kind."
"Our govt isnt musks personal liter box to shit in. Who the fuck is he to demand every employee send him an email justifying their jobs? "
"Holy shit another person trying to take away somebodys right to free speech"
If you read anything of my posts, it's obvious this is not the case. We're all trying to operate within the framework of the Covers guidelines equally.
1
@cd329
I welcome your opinions on Musk.
"The use of inappropriate or offensive language is not permitted at Covers. Inappropriate or offensive language includes, but is not limited to, any language or content that is sexually oriented, sexually suggestive or abusive, harassing, defamatory, vulgar, obscene, profane, hateful, or that contains racially, ethnically or otherwise objectionable material of any kind."
"Our govt isnt musks personal liter box to shit in. Who the fuck is he to demand every employee send him an email justifying their jobs? "
"Holy shit another person trying to take away somebodys right to free speech"
If you read anything of my posts, it's obvious this is not the case. We're all trying to operate within the framework of the Covers guidelines equally.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
The comment was generally speaking not personal! I hope feel better now !
Hot Forum Topics
