Let me talk to you now about a great example of misleading statistics and context... from the article:
"The average Fortune 500 CEO in the United States makes more than $12
million per year, which is nearly five million dollars more than the
amount for top CEOs in Switzerland, where the second highest paid CEOs
live, more than twice that for those in Germany, where the third highest
paid CEOs live, and more than twenty one times that for those in
Poland."
Wait, you're telling me that the average Fortune 500 CEO -- i.e., CEOs of companies with very, very high revenues -- makes nearly 5 million more a year than the top CEOs in Switzerland, which isn't exactly known to be the home to nearly as many high revenue generating companies as the US? YOU DON'T SAY?! Who would have thought that a country that has a lot of businesses that make a lot of money pays their leaders more, on average, than a country who doesn't have that high of a level of high-revenue generating companies.
Always consider the context of statistics. Always.
0
Let me talk to you now about a great example of misleading statistics and context... from the article:
"The average Fortune 500 CEO in the United States makes more than $12
million per year, which is nearly five million dollars more than the
amount for top CEOs in Switzerland, where the second highest paid CEOs
live, more than twice that for those in Germany, where the third highest
paid CEOs live, and more than twenty one times that for those in
Poland."
Wait, you're telling me that the average Fortune 500 CEO -- i.e., CEOs of companies with very, very high revenues -- makes nearly 5 million more a year than the top CEOs in Switzerland, which isn't exactly known to be the home to nearly as many high revenue generating companies as the US? YOU DON'T SAY?! Who would have thought that a country that has a lot of businesses that make a lot of money pays their leaders more, on average, than a country who doesn't have that high of a level of high-revenue generating companies.
Always consider the context of statistics. Always.
The pay gap should be different (and drastic) between CEOs and unskilled workers as the article calls them.
In the mid 1960's, the CEO to Workers pay was roughly 30-1. In 2014 the CEO to Workers pay is roughly 350-1.
Please explain the foundations of modern business systems and the three philosophies of Capitalism, Socialism, and Communism as pertains to Management Fundamentals, Organizing and Staffing, Labor Management, and Operation Production. And finally, please discuss the reasoning of a wage difference 100x magnification and the effect it may or may not inflict upon the Middle Class Community and Society in general.
~~~~~ZOSO~~~~~
0
Quote Originally Posted by kaponofor3:
The pay gap should be different (and drastic) between CEOs and unskilled workers as the article calls them.
In the mid 1960's, the CEO to Workers pay was roughly 30-1. In 2014 the CEO to Workers pay is roughly 350-1.
Please explain the foundations of modern business systems and the three philosophies of Capitalism, Socialism, and Communism as pertains to Management Fundamentals, Organizing and Staffing, Labor Management, and Operation Production. And finally, please discuss the reasoning of a wage difference 100x magnification and the effect it may or may not inflict upon the Middle Class Community and Society in general.
Rhetorical question Rick since I think you and I share the same political philosophy on capitalism...
What would happen when you limit what people can make?
Liquidity would suffer, there would be less investment. Less incentive to produce, lag in GDP (which could be serious). Many would not have incentive to continue operations.
I think mainly what would happen is there would be an exodus of all of the rich to business friendly environments.
To see an extreme example of this you could look at the USSR and how their production suffered when you took away incentive. We would still have price discovery, but possible deflation as a result of less opportunity to earn money. That would dry up the loan markets and make it difficult to buy a car, home etc.
Ultimately there is no sane economist who thinks that this would be a good idea, so there is little to no chance it would ever be enacted. Not to mention the hurdles in the house.
It would have to be an illegal executive order. That also wouldn't play in today's America.
it is a fantasy of socialists everywhere that somehow limiting what upper earners make somehow diffuses to the middle class and poor. It doesn't that value would disappear overseas and into an abyss.
0
Quote Originally Posted by canovsp:
Rhetorical question Rick since I think you and I share the same political philosophy on capitalism...
What would happen when you limit what people can make?
Liquidity would suffer, there would be less investment. Less incentive to produce, lag in GDP (which could be serious). Many would not have incentive to continue operations.
I think mainly what would happen is there would be an exodus of all of the rich to business friendly environments.
To see an extreme example of this you could look at the USSR and how their production suffered when you took away incentive. We would still have price discovery, but possible deflation as a result of less opportunity to earn money. That would dry up the loan markets and make it difficult to buy a car, home etc.
Ultimately there is no sane economist who thinks that this would be a good idea, so there is little to no chance it would ever be enacted. Not to mention the hurdles in the house.
It would have to be an illegal executive order. That also wouldn't play in today's America.
it is a fantasy of socialists everywhere that somehow limiting what upper earners make somehow diffuses to the middle class and poor. It doesn't that value would disappear overseas and into an abyss.
Everything has a limit Soupy. My favorite question to you is.. How about if they all could make a trillion dollars ? a year, and pay lower taxes ( they still wouldn't be happy ) but if they could. What would it do ?
It would wreck the middle class and the government.
That's is exactly what is happening to you, in the middle class. But you are blinded by right wing con artists, who bring up the same old subject every election time, namely, gun control.
Because, you are so afraid they will take your weapon stash that you vote again your own best interests. Meanwhile, behind closed doors the top dogs a laughing at you, all the way to the bank !
0
Everything has a limit Soupy. My favorite question to you is.. How about if they all could make a trillion dollars ? a year, and pay lower taxes ( they still wouldn't be happy ) but if they could. What would it do ?
It would wreck the middle class and the government.
That's is exactly what is happening to you, in the middle class. But you are blinded by right wing con artists, who bring up the same old subject every election time, namely, gun control.
Because, you are so afraid they will take your weapon stash that you vote again your own best interests. Meanwhile, behind closed doors the top dogs a laughing at you, all the way to the bank !
In the mid 1960's, the CEO to Workers pay was roughly 30-1. In 2014 the CEO to Workers pay is roughly 350-1.
Please explain the foundations of modern business systems and the three philosophies of Capitalism, Socialism, and Communism as pertains to Management Fundamentals, Organizing and Staffing, Labor Management, and Operation Production. And finally, please discuss the reasoning of a wage difference 100x magnification and the effect it may or may not inflict upon the Middle Class Community and Society in general.
What is this supposed to be, a final term paper essay that you want me to write?
Re: the ratio between CEO and lowest worker pay in the 60's vs. in 2014 -- I wonder if revenues increased during that time frame as well? I would imagine that has a lot to do with your inquiry.
0
Quote Originally Posted by TheGoldenGoose:
In the mid 1960's, the CEO to Workers pay was roughly 30-1. In 2014 the CEO to Workers pay is roughly 350-1.
Please explain the foundations of modern business systems and the three philosophies of Capitalism, Socialism, and Communism as pertains to Management Fundamentals, Organizing and Staffing, Labor Management, and Operation Production. And finally, please discuss the reasoning of a wage difference 100x magnification and the effect it may or may not inflict upon the Middle Class Community and Society in general.
What is this supposed to be, a final term paper essay that you want me to write?
Re: the ratio between CEO and lowest worker pay in the 60's vs. in 2014 -- I wonder if revenues increased during that time frame as well? I would imagine that has a lot to do with your inquiry.
GG: If you have specific questions, I will gladly address anything you may wish to inquire about. But the "prompt" you gave me in Post 4 really is calling for a narrative and is a little too open ended IMO
0
GG: If you have specific questions, I will gladly address anything you may wish to inquire about. But the "prompt" you gave me in Post 4 really is calling for a narrative and is a little too open ended IMO
What is this supposed to be, a final term paper essay that you want me to write?
Re: the ratio between CEO and lowest worker pay in the 60's vs. in 2014 -- I wonder if revenues increased during that time frame as well? I would imagine that has a lot to do with your inquiry.
At ease Soldier.
If revenues have increased, as you stated, why have Workers Pay been SEVERELY BEATEN DOWN opposed to CEO Compensation?
Simple question...
Give us an answer.
The Middle Class in the USA has been assassinated.
I'm confused as to why Middle Class citizens like yourself continue to take it up the azz while the ONE % ers laugh behind your back?
You must be a Corporate Attorney.
Please tell us you ARE NOT a Corporate Attorney.
~~~~~ZOSO~~~~~
0
Quote Originally Posted by kaponofor3:
What is this supposed to be, a final term paper essay that you want me to write?
Re: the ratio between CEO and lowest worker pay in the 60's vs. in 2014 -- I wonder if revenues increased during that time frame as well? I would imagine that has a lot to do with your inquiry.
At ease Soldier.
If revenues have increased, as you stated, why have Workers Pay been SEVERELY BEATEN DOWN opposed to CEO Compensation?
Simple question...
Give us an answer.
The Middle Class in the USA has been assassinated.
I'm confused as to why Middle Class citizens like yourself continue to take it up the azz while the ONE % ers laugh behind your back?
In the mid 1960's, the CEO to Workers pay was roughly 30-1. In 2014 the CEO to Workers pay is roughly 350-1.
Please discuss the reasoning of a wage difference 100x
magnification and the effect it may or may not inflict upon the Middle
Class Community and Society in general.
~~~~~ZOSO~~~~~
0
ANSWER THE GOD-DAMNED FUKKING QUESTION...
In the mid 1960's, the CEO to Workers pay was roughly 30-1. In 2014 the CEO to Workers pay is roughly 350-1.
Please discuss the reasoning of a wage difference 100x
magnification and the effect it may or may not inflict upon the Middle
Class Community and Society in general.
The OP was making a point that the CEO compensation is insanely out of whack and that has a direct effect on Workers Wages. I concur. You apparently do not.
It is just unbelievable to me that Middle Class America continues to accept the continuing shiitier jobs with lower pay, longer hours, reduced benefits, no overtime pay and zero pensions.
THE SYSTEM FUKKED EVERYBODY THIRTY-FIVE YEARS AGO.
And nobody seems to notice. Nobody seems to care.
And you know what? I really don't care either way.
I have a plan. My plan.
I am bailing out of this country in July of 2015. Bye-Bye.
But you guys hold the fort. Keep supporting those Corporate Fukks.
~~~~~ZOSO~~~~~
0
The OP was making a point that the CEO compensation is insanely out of whack and that has a direct effect on Workers Wages. I concur. You apparently do not.
It is just unbelievable to me that Middle Class America continues to accept the continuing shiitier jobs with lower pay, longer hours, reduced benefits, no overtime pay and zero pensions.
THE SYSTEM FUKKED EVERYBODY THIRTY-FIVE YEARS AGO.
And nobody seems to notice. Nobody seems to care.
And you know what? I really don't care either way.
I have a plan. My plan.
I am bailing out of this country in July of 2015. Bye-Bye.
But you guys hold the fort. Keep supporting those Corporate Fukks.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.