Based on experiments in laboratory animals, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has identified at least ninety-six different pesticide active ingredients registered for use that are potential human carcinogens.[6] Studies of human populations, particularly farmers, also demonstrate the carcinogenic potential of certain pesticides. A 1992 National Cancer Institute review of two dozen epidemiological studies found pesticides to be one of five likely suspects explaining why farmers had elevated risks of several forms of cancer including Hodgkin's disease, multiple myeloma, leukemia, melanoma, and cancers of the lip.[7] There is some evidence that the breakdown product of the organochlorine pesticide DDT, which is now banned but still persists in the environment, may be associated with breast cancer.[8]
Studies demonstrate that in addition to acute poisoning, pesticides can cause long-term damage to the nervous system. Every year, an estimated 300,000 farmworkers are poisoned by pesticides.[9] According to the Office of Technology Assessment, an estimated 4 to 9 percent of agricultural and other workers acutely poisoned by pesticides experience delayed persistent neurological and psychiatric effects including agitation, insomnia, weakness, nervousness, irritation, forgetfulness, confusion, and depression.[10] Additional studies of agricultural workers indicate that pesticide poisoning can lead to poor performance on tests involving intellectual functioning, motor skills, and memory.[11]
Some pesticides are associated with diminishing reproductive capacity and causing birth defects. The state of California maintains a list of reproductive toxins that currently includes fifteen pesticides, ten of which are still in use. The California Department of Pesticide Regulation (DPR) evaluates pesticides for their potential to cause birth defects and reproductive harm. Of the sixty-three chemicals evaluated by the DPR, fifteen have tested positive for birth defects and twenty-two have tested positive for other reproductive effects in experimental studies.[12]
There is growing awareness in the scientific community that toxic chemicals, including pesticides, can damage the immune system. Laboratory animal studies indicate a variety of immunotoxic effects from exposure to certain pesticides, particularly several organochlorine and organophosphate insecticides.[13] The immune system plays a critical role in helping ward off disease.
Based on experiments in laboratory animals, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has identified at least ninety-six different pesticide active ingredients registered for use that are potential human carcinogens.[6] Studies of human populations, particularly farmers, also demonstrate the carcinogenic potential of certain pesticides. A 1992 National Cancer Institute review of two dozen epidemiological studies found pesticides to be one of five likely suspects explaining why farmers had elevated risks of several forms of cancer including Hodgkin's disease, multiple myeloma, leukemia, melanoma, and cancers of the lip.[7] There is some evidence that the breakdown product of the organochlorine pesticide DDT, which is now banned but still persists in the environment, may be associated with breast cancer.[8]
Studies demonstrate that in addition to acute poisoning, pesticides can cause long-term damage to the nervous system. Every year, an estimated 300,000 farmworkers are poisoned by pesticides.[9] According to the Office of Technology Assessment, an estimated 4 to 9 percent of agricultural and other workers acutely poisoned by pesticides experience delayed persistent neurological and psychiatric effects including agitation, insomnia, weakness, nervousness, irritation, forgetfulness, confusion, and depression.[10] Additional studies of agricultural workers indicate that pesticide poisoning can lead to poor performance on tests involving intellectual functioning, motor skills, and memory.[11]
Some pesticides are associated with diminishing reproductive capacity and causing birth defects. The state of California maintains a list of reproductive toxins that currently includes fifteen pesticides, ten of which are still in use. The California Department of Pesticide Regulation (DPR) evaluates pesticides for their potential to cause birth defects and reproductive harm. Of the sixty-three chemicals evaluated by the DPR, fifteen have tested positive for birth defects and twenty-two have tested positive for other reproductive effects in experimental studies.[12]
There is growing awareness in the scientific community that toxic chemicals, including pesticides, can damage the immune system. Laboratory animal studies indicate a variety of immunotoxic effects from exposure to certain pesticides, particularly several organochlorine and organophosphate insecticides.[13] The immune system plays a critical role in helping ward off disease.
This is what happens when politicians make decisions based on the image of their policies. Any rational person could have predicted this, yet the legislators failed to take it into consideration.
This is what happens when politicians make decisions based on the image of their policies. Any rational person could have predicted this, yet the legislators failed to take it into consideration.
People get almost as much money for unemployment as they would for working on a farm. I used to know a guy that work on a farm 6 months a year and collect unemployment the other 6 months.
He worked 60 hours a week and only made $25 a week more then he did on unemployment. If he missed a day of work and only had 50 hours for the week he made less then unemployment.
People get almost as much money for unemployment as they would for working on a farm. I used to know a guy that work on a farm 6 months a year and collect unemployment the other 6 months.
He worked 60 hours a week and only made $25 a week more then he did on unemployment. If he missed a day of work and only had 50 hours for the week he made less then unemployment.
i don't know of any pesticide or chemical that makes food healthier. maybe there is one, but i don't know of it. if there is, show us some research and we can evaluate it. i do know of many pesticides and chemicals that do a good job of keeping fruit and vegetables around longer which is designed to increase profits for the agriculture industry. i'm skeptical that this coincides with making the product healthier but again, i'm not the expert so i'll happily read objective contradictory research.
as for your other question, i wouldn't buy the rotted fruit. i used to buy the fruit and vegetables that looked big and ripe and perfect until i read what is sprayed on those products to make them look that way for a longer period of time than is natural. now, i buy organic fruit adn vegetables and also clean them as a precaution.
i don't know of any pesticide or chemical that makes food healthier. maybe there is one, but i don't know of it. if there is, show us some research and we can evaluate it. i do know of many pesticides and chemicals that do a good job of keeping fruit and vegetables around longer which is designed to increase profits for the agriculture industry. i'm skeptical that this coincides with making the product healthier but again, i'm not the expert so i'll happily read objective contradictory research.
as for your other question, i wouldn't buy the rotted fruit. i used to buy the fruit and vegetables that looked big and ripe and perfect until i read what is sprayed on those products to make them look that way for a longer period of time than is natural. now, i buy organic fruit adn vegetables and also clean them as a precaution.
one more thing, even if there is some magical, artificial chemical that makes food fruit adn vegetables healthier, i still doubt it compensates for the thousands of pesticides and chemicals sprayed on our food that i believe are dangerous.
one more thing, even if there is some magical, artificial chemical that makes food fruit adn vegetables healthier, i still doubt it compensates for the thousands of pesticides and chemicals sprayed on our food that i believe are dangerous.
i don't know that you can compare fast food jobs and other minimum wage jobs to migrant farm worker jobs, which may be the toughest jobs in this country. read up on the migrant farm industry if you haven't. it's some crazy shit.
but i guess we'll see. in georgia, which has a pretty significant agricultural business, we'll see what happens with the jobs that aren't being filled and the hundred of millions in losses. i seriously doubt florida, which has a much bigger agricultural industry, follows georgia's lead. they are way too reliant on illegals.
i don't know that you can compare fast food jobs and other minimum wage jobs to migrant farm worker jobs, which may be the toughest jobs in this country. read up on the migrant farm industry if you haven't. it's some crazy shit.
but i guess we'll see. in georgia, which has a pretty significant agricultural business, we'll see what happens with the jobs that aren't being filled and the hundred of millions in losses. i seriously doubt florida, which has a much bigger agricultural industry, follows georgia's lead. they are way too reliant on illegals.
i don't know of any pesticide or chemical that makes food healthier. maybe there is one, but i don't know of it. if there is, show us some research and we can evaluate it. i do know of many pesticides and chemicals that do a good job of keeping fruit and vegetables around longer which is designed to increase profits for the agriculture industry. i'm skeptical that this coincides with making the product healthier but again, i'm not the expert so i'll happily read objective contradictory research.
as for your other question, i wouldn't buy the rotted fruit. i used to buy the fruit and vegetables that looked big and ripe and perfect until i read what is sprayed on those products to make them look that way for a longer period of time than is natural. now, i buy organic fruit adn vegetables and also clean them as a precaution.
i don't know of any pesticide or chemical that makes food healthier. maybe there is one, but i don't know of it. if there is, show us some research and we can evaluate it. i do know of many pesticides and chemicals that do a good job of keeping fruit and vegetables around longer which is designed to increase profits for the agriculture industry. i'm skeptical that this coincides with making the product healthier but again, i'm not the expert so i'll happily read objective contradictory research.
as for your other question, i wouldn't buy the rotted fruit. i used to buy the fruit and vegetables that looked big and ripe and perfect until i read what is sprayed on those products to make them look that way for a longer period of time than is natural. now, i buy organic fruit adn vegetables and also clean them as a precaution.
i suppose, but i don't see the benefit of eating food sprayed with dangerous pesticides and chemicals. i guess if you are struggling to find food, you are benefitted, but anyone with the luxury of making choices should really consider what they are eating. also, it's hard to learn about monsanto and use the term, "consumer benefit."
i suppose, but i don't see the benefit of eating food sprayed with dangerous pesticides and chemicals. i guess if you are struggling to find food, you are benefitted, but anyone with the luxury of making choices should really consider what they are eating. also, it's hard to learn about monsanto and use the term, "consumer benefit."
i suppose, but i don't see the benefit of eating food sprayed with dangerous pesticides and chemicals. i guess if you are struggling to find food, you are benefitted, but anyone with the luxury of making choices should really consider what they are eating. also, it's hard to learn about monsanto and use the term, "consumer benefit."
i suppose, but i don't see the benefit of eating food sprayed with dangerous pesticides and chemicals. i guess if you are struggling to find food, you are benefitted, but anyone with the luxury of making choices should really consider what they are eating. also, it's hard to learn about monsanto and use the term, "consumer benefit."
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.