Harris is encouraging the American people to go out and participate in violent protests and is warning USA citizens to prepare for more violence.....EVEN AFTER ELECTION DAY SHE SAYS? She went as far as to say that the violence SHOULD NOT STOP.
Is she out of her mind? Is she trying to throw the election for Biden?
Gamble for entertainment, invest for wealth!
2
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
Harris is encouraging the American people to go out and participate in violent protests and is warning USA citizens to prepare for more violence.....EVEN AFTER ELECTION DAY SHE SAYS? She went as far as to say that the violence SHOULD NOT STOP.
Is she out of her mind? Is she trying to throw the election for Biden?
It's been on all the news channels. She first tells the American public to BEWARE. She is warning the public about protests and violence, concluding that it will not stop and it should continue and she says all this with a smile on her face while she is obviously encouraging the behavior. Google the clip and judge for yourself.
Of course, she now claims she was speaking of only the "peaceful protests" that she was encouraging.
Her back pedaling really doesn't compute logically. If she is only speaking of peaceful protests, then why is she warning the public and telling them to "beware"?
Finding this sort of news does require being open to changing the channel from CNN.
Gamble for entertainment, invest for wealth!
1
It's been on all the news channels. She first tells the American public to BEWARE. She is warning the public about protests and violence, concluding that it will not stop and it should continue and she says all this with a smile on her face while she is obviously encouraging the behavior. Google the clip and judge for yourself.
Of course, she now claims she was speaking of only the "peaceful protests" that she was encouraging.
Her back pedaling really doesn't compute logically. If she is only speaking of peaceful protests, then why is she warning the public and telling them to "beware"?
Finding this sort of news does require being open to changing the channel from CNN.
It's been on all the news channels. She first tells the American public to BEWARE. She is warning the public about protests and violence, concluding that it will not stop and it should continue and she says all this with a smile on her face while she is obviously encouraging the behavior. Google the clip and judge for yourself. Of course, she now claims she was speaking of only the "peaceful protests" that she was encouraging. Her back pedaling really doesn't compute logically. If she is only speaking of peaceful protests, then why is she warning the public and telling them to "beware"? Finding this sort of news does require being open to changing the channel from CNN.
Typical bullshit answer.
I asked for a source & you state all the channels. You sound just like the POS in the WH.
And now you are the one doing the back pedaling.
Fake News when you can't produce a source.
10
Quote Originally Posted by gambleholic63:
It's been on all the news channels. She first tells the American public to BEWARE. She is warning the public about protests and violence, concluding that it will not stop and it should continue and she says all this with a smile on her face while she is obviously encouraging the behavior. Google the clip and judge for yourself. Of course, she now claims she was speaking of only the "peaceful protests" that she was encouraging. Her back pedaling really doesn't compute logically. If she is only speaking of peaceful protests, then why is she warning the public and telling them to "beware"? Finding this sort of news does require being open to changing the channel from CNN.
Typical bullshit answer.
I asked for a source & you state all the channels. You sound just like the POS in the WH.
Quote Originally Posted by gambleholic63: It's been on all the news channels. She first tells the American public to BEWARE. She is warning the public about protests and violence, concluding that it will not stop and it should continue and she says all this with a smile on her face while she is obviously encouraging the behavior. Google the clip and judge for yourself. Of course, she now claims she was speaking of only the "peaceful protests" that she was encouraging. Her back pedaling really doesn't compute logically. If she is only speaking of peaceful protests, then why is she warning the public and telling them to "beware"? Finding this sort of news does require being open to changing the channel from CNN. Typical bullshit answer. I asked for a source & you state all the channels. You sound just like the POS in the WH. And now you are the one doing the back pedaling. Fake News when you can't produce a source.
The source is likely Dan Bongino or the Gateway Pundit. Both highly reputable.
7
Quote Originally Posted by Midnight1:
Quote Originally Posted by gambleholic63: It's been on all the news channels. She first tells the American public to BEWARE. She is warning the public about protests and violence, concluding that it will not stop and it should continue and she says all this with a smile on her face while she is obviously encouraging the behavior. Google the clip and judge for yourself. Of course, she now claims she was speaking of only the "peaceful protests" that she was encouraging. Her back pedaling really doesn't compute logically. If she is only speaking of peaceful protests, then why is she warning the public and telling them to "beware"? Finding this sort of news does require being open to changing the channel from CNN. Typical bullshit answer. I asked for a source & you state all the channels. You sound just like the POS in the WH. And now you are the one doing the back pedaling. Fake News when you can't produce a source.
The source is likely Dan Bongino or the Gateway Pundit. Both highly reputable.
Quote Originally Posted by gambleholic63: It's been on all the news channels. She first tells the American public to BEWARE. She is warning the public about protests and violence, concluding that it will not stop and it should continue and she says all this with a smile on her face while she is obviously encouraging the behavior. Google the clip and judge for yourself. Of course, she now claims she was speaking of only the "peaceful protests" that she was encouraging. Her back pedaling really doesn't compute logically. If she is only speaking of peaceful protests, then why is she warning the public and telling them to "beware"? Finding this sort of news does require being open to changing the channel from CNN. Typical bullshit answer. I asked for a source & you state all the channels. You sound just like the POS in the WH. And now you are the one doing the back pedaling. Fake News when you can't produce a source.
A lot of what she has said can be taken that way even if not explicitly stated that way. If she does not understand that, you have to ask yourself should you be voting for someone that detached from what she is saying.
Besides if you do not know some of what she has said or cannot find it yourself with a quick search -- does it matter to you? Would this 'NEW' information change your vote?
Quote Originally Posted by gambleholic63: It's been on all the news channels. She first tells the American public to BEWARE. She is warning the public about protests and violence, concluding that it will not stop and it should continue and she says all this with a smile on her face while she is obviously encouraging the behavior. Google the clip and judge for yourself. Of course, she now claims she was speaking of only the "peaceful protests" that she was encouraging. Her back pedaling really doesn't compute logically. If she is only speaking of peaceful protests, then why is she warning the public and telling them to "beware"? Finding this sort of news does require being open to changing the channel from CNN. Typical bullshit answer. I asked for a source & you state all the channels. You sound just like the POS in the WH. And now you are the one doing the back pedaling. Fake News when you can't produce a source.
A lot of what she has said can be taken that way even if not explicitly stated that way. If she does not understand that, you have to ask yourself should you be voting for someone that detached from what she is saying.
Besides if you do not know some of what she has said or cannot find it yourself with a quick search -- does it matter to you? Would this 'NEW' information change your vote?
Quote Originally Posted by Midnight1: Quote Originally Posted by gambleholic63: It's been on all the news channels. She first tells the American public to BEWARE. She is warning the public about protests and violence, concluding that it will not stop and it should continue and she says all this with a smile on her face while she is obviously encouraging the behavior. Google the clip and judge for yourself. Of course, she now claims she was speaking of only the "peaceful protests" that she was encouraging. Her back pedaling really doesn't compute logically. If she is only speaking of peaceful protests, then why is she warning the public and telling them to "beware"? Finding this sort of news does require being open to changing the channel from CNN. Typical bullshit answer. I asked for a source & you state all the channels. You sound just like the POS in the WH. And now you are the one doing the back pedaling. Fake News when you can't produce a source. A lot of what she has said can be taken that way even if not explicitly stated that way. If she does not understand that, you have to ask yourself should you be voting for someone that detached from what she is saying. Besides if you do not know some of what she has said or cannot find it yourself with a quick search -- does it matter to you? Would this 'NEW' information change your vote? https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/kamala-harris-wants-to-let-dangerous-rioters-back-onto-our-streets https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2020/09/01/fact-check-kamala-harris-said-protests-arent-going-stop/5678687002/ https://www.redstate.com/streiff/2020/08/28/kamala-harris-laughs-as-she-warns-that-violent-riots-will-continue/ https://www.redstate.com/streiff/2020/08/28/kamala-harris-laughs-as-she-warns-that-violent-riots-will-continue/
No doubt Raiders.
They make zero effort to find the clip when it can be found in literally 20 seconds. That's why I don't even bother posting links or responding to the blind mice here. You are too kind to spoon feed them, but you are correct that it will not change their mind.
The facts are that Harris made extremely contradictory, back peddling statements. The smile on her face about warning the public about the past violence and the violence to come is frightening.
Gamble for entertainment, invest for wealth!
2
Quote Originally Posted by Raiders22:
Quote Originally Posted by Midnight1: Quote Originally Posted by gambleholic63: It's been on all the news channels. She first tells the American public to BEWARE. She is warning the public about protests and violence, concluding that it will not stop and it should continue and she says all this with a smile on her face while she is obviously encouraging the behavior. Google the clip and judge for yourself. Of course, she now claims she was speaking of only the "peaceful protests" that she was encouraging. Her back pedaling really doesn't compute logically. If she is only speaking of peaceful protests, then why is she warning the public and telling them to "beware"? Finding this sort of news does require being open to changing the channel from CNN. Typical bullshit answer. I asked for a source & you state all the channels. You sound just like the POS in the WH. And now you are the one doing the back pedaling. Fake News when you can't produce a source. A lot of what she has said can be taken that way even if not explicitly stated that way. If she does not understand that, you have to ask yourself should you be voting for someone that detached from what she is saying. Besides if you do not know some of what she has said or cannot find it yourself with a quick search -- does it matter to you? Would this 'NEW' information change your vote? https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/kamala-harris-wants-to-let-dangerous-rioters-back-onto-our-streets https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2020/09/01/fact-check-kamala-harris-said-protests-arent-going-stop/5678687002/ https://www.redstate.com/streiff/2020/08/28/kamala-harris-laughs-as-she-warns-that-violent-riots-will-continue/ https://www.redstate.com/streiff/2020/08/28/kamala-harris-laughs-as-she-warns-that-violent-riots-will-continue/
No doubt Raiders.
They make zero effort to find the clip when it can be found in literally 20 seconds. That's why I don't even bother posting links or responding to the blind mice here. You are too kind to spoon feed them, but you are correct that it will not change their mind.
The facts are that Harris made extremely contradictory, back peddling statements. The smile on her face about warning the public about the past violence and the violence to come is frightening.
Typical bullshit answer. I asked for a source & you state all the channels. You sound just like the POS in the WH. And now you are the one doing the back pedaling. Fake News when you can't produce a source.
ya so typical same old bs from the repos
"I'm the MOST HONEST HUMAN BEING that God has EVER created!!" - Donald Trump
8
Quote Originally Posted by Midnight1:
Typical bullshit answer. I asked for a source & you state all the channels. You sound just like the POS in the WH. And now you are the one doing the back pedaling. Fake News when you can't produce a source.
Quote Originally Posted by Midnight1: Quote Originally Posted by gambleholic63: It's been on all the news channels. She first tells the American public to BEWARE. She is warning the public about protests and violence, concluding that it will not stop and it should continue and she says all this with a smile on her face while she is obviously encouraging the behavior. Google the clip and judge for yourself. Of course, she now claims she was speaking of only the "peaceful protests" that she was encouraging. Her back pedaling really doesn't compute logically. If she is only speaking of peaceful protests, then why is she warning the public and telling them to "beware"? Finding this sort of news does require being open to changing the channel from CNN. Typical bullshit answer. I asked for a source & you state all the channels. You sound just like the POS in the WH. And now you are the one doing the back pedaling. Fake News when you can't produce a source.
The source is likely Dan Bongino or the Gateway Pundit. Both highly reputable.
reputable and rightwing r a contradiction in terms
"I'm the MOST HONEST HUMAN BEING that God has EVER created!!" - Donald Trump
8
Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81:
Quote Originally Posted by Midnight1: Quote Originally Posted by gambleholic63: It's been on all the news channels. She first tells the American public to BEWARE. She is warning the public about protests and violence, concluding that it will not stop and it should continue and she says all this with a smile on her face while she is obviously encouraging the behavior. Google the clip and judge for yourself. Of course, she now claims she was speaking of only the "peaceful protests" that she was encouraging. Her back pedaling really doesn't compute logically. If she is only speaking of peaceful protests, then why is she warning the public and telling them to "beware"? Finding this sort of news does require being open to changing the channel from CNN. Typical bullshit answer. I asked for a source & you state all the channels. You sound just like the POS in the WH. And now you are the one doing the back pedaling. Fake News when you can't produce a source.
The source is likely Dan Bongino or the Gateway Pundit. Both highly reputable.
reputable and rightwing r a contradiction in terms
Quote Originally Posted by Midnight1: Quote Originally Posted by gambleholic63: It's been on all the news channels. She first tells the American public to BEWARE. She is warning the public about protests and violence, concluding that it will not stop and it should continue and she says all this with a smile on her face while she is obviously encouraging the behavior. Google the clip and judge for yourself. Of course, she now claims she was speaking of only the "peaceful protests" that she was encouraging. Her back pedaling really doesn't compute logically. If she is only speaking of peaceful protests, then why is she warning the public and telling them to "beware"? Finding this sort of news does require being open to changing the channel from CNN. Typical bullshit answer. I asked for a source & you state all the channels. You sound just like the POS in the WH. And now you are the one doing the back pedaling. Fake News when you can't produce a source. A lot of what she has said can be taken that way even if not explicitly stated that way. If she does not understand that, you have to ask yourself should you be voting for someone that detached from what she is saying. Besides if you do not know some of what she has said or cannot find it yourself with a quick search -- does it matter to you? Would this 'NEW' information change your vote? https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/kamala-harris-wants-to-let-dangerous-rioters-back-onto-our-streets https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2020/09/01/fact-check-kamala-harris-said-protests-arent-going-stop/5678687002/ https://www.redstate.com/streiff/2020/08/28/kamala-harris-laughs-as-she-warns-that-violent-riots-will-continue/ https://www.redstate.com/streiff/2020/08/28/kamala-harris-laughs-as-she-warns-that-violent-riots-will-continue/
This reply from Raiders should be the point of discussion (Kelly). If you have something to say about that, please do so.
Gamble for entertainment, invest for wealth!
0
Quote Originally Posted by Raiders22:
Quote Originally Posted by Midnight1: Quote Originally Posted by gambleholic63: It's been on all the news channels. She first tells the American public to BEWARE. She is warning the public about protests and violence, concluding that it will not stop and it should continue and she says all this with a smile on her face while she is obviously encouraging the behavior. Google the clip and judge for yourself. Of course, she now claims she was speaking of only the "peaceful protests" that she was encouraging. Her back pedaling really doesn't compute logically. If she is only speaking of peaceful protests, then why is she warning the public and telling them to "beware"? Finding this sort of news does require being open to changing the channel from CNN. Typical bullshit answer. I asked for a source & you state all the channels. You sound just like the POS in the WH. And now you are the one doing the back pedaling. Fake News when you can't produce a source. A lot of what she has said can be taken that way even if not explicitly stated that way. If she does not understand that, you have to ask yourself should you be voting for someone that detached from what she is saying. Besides if you do not know some of what she has said or cannot find it yourself with a quick search -- does it matter to you? Would this 'NEW' information change your vote? https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/kamala-harris-wants-to-let-dangerous-rioters-back-onto-our-streets https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2020/09/01/fact-check-kamala-harris-said-protests-arent-going-stop/5678687002/ https://www.redstate.com/streiff/2020/08/28/kamala-harris-laughs-as-she-warns-that-violent-riots-will-continue/ https://www.redstate.com/streiff/2020/08/28/kamala-harris-laughs-as-she-warns-that-violent-riots-will-continue/
This reply from Raiders should be the point of discussion (Kelly). If you have something to say about that, please do so.
It's been on all the news channels. She first tells the American public to BEWARE. She is warning the public about protests and violence, concluding that it will not stop and it should continue and she says all this with a smile on her face while she is obviously encouraging the behavior. Google the clip and judge for yourself. Of course, she now claims she was speaking of only the "peaceful protests" that she was encouraging. Her back pedaling really doesn't compute logically. If she is only speaking of peaceful protests, then why is she warning the public and telling them to "beware"? Finding this sort of news does require being open to changing the channel from CNN.
While she was encouraging those peaceful protest to continue....Kamala Harris was promoting the Minnesota Freedom Fund four days after the riots began...encouraged Americans to donate to this so-called Minnesota Freedom Fund… which bailed out the rioters, looters,violent physical attackers,and anarchists from jail...so they could go back out on the streets and do more rioting ...And Biden’s staff did the same thing. Reuters reported that some 13 paid staffers on Biden’s campaign donated to the Minnesota Freedom Fund.
Harris and Biden were for the protest rioters before they were against them.
2
Quote Originally Posted by gambleholic63:
It's been on all the news channels. She first tells the American public to BEWARE. She is warning the public about protests and violence, concluding that it will not stop and it should continue and she says all this with a smile on her face while she is obviously encouraging the behavior. Google the clip and judge for yourself. Of course, she now claims she was speaking of only the "peaceful protests" that she was encouraging. Her back pedaling really doesn't compute logically. If she is only speaking of peaceful protests, then why is she warning the public and telling them to "beware"? Finding this sort of news does require being open to changing the channel from CNN.
While she was encouraging those peaceful protest to continue....Kamala Harris was promoting the Minnesota Freedom Fund four days after the riots began...encouraged Americans to donate to this so-called Minnesota Freedom Fund… which bailed out the rioters, looters,violent physical attackers,and anarchists from jail...so they could go back out on the streets and do more rioting ...And Biden’s staff did the same thing. Reuters reported that some 13 paid staffers on Biden’s campaign donated to the Minnesota Freedom Fund.
Harris and Biden were for the protest rioters before they were against them.
Quote Originally Posted by gambleholic63: It's been on all the news channels. She first tells the American public to BEWARE. She is warning the public about protests and violence, concluding that it will not stop and it should continue and she says all this with a smile on her face while she is obviously encouraging the behavior. Google the clip and judge for yourself. Of course, she now claims she was speaking of only the "peaceful protests" that she was encouraging. Her back pedaling really doesn't compute logically. If she is only speaking of peaceful protests, then why is she warning the public and telling them to "beware"? Finding this sort of news does require being open to changing the channel from CNN.
Typical bullshit answer. I asked for a source & you state all the channels. You sound just like the POS in the WH. And now you are the one doing the back pedaling. Fake News when you can't produce a source.
As usual.
3
Quote Originally Posted by Midnight1:
Quote Originally Posted by gambleholic63: It's been on all the news channels. She first tells the American public to BEWARE. She is warning the public about protests and violence, concluding that it will not stop and it should continue and she says all this with a smile on her face while she is obviously encouraging the behavior. Google the clip and judge for yourself. Of course, she now claims she was speaking of only the "peaceful protests" that she was encouraging. Her back pedaling really doesn't compute logically. If she is only speaking of peaceful protests, then why is she warning the public and telling them to "beware"? Finding this sort of news does require being open to changing the channel from CNN.
Typical bullshit answer. I asked for a source & you state all the channels. You sound just like the POS in the WH. And now you are the one doing the back pedaling. Fake News when you can't produce a source.
I appreciate the attempts from the leftists here to hijack this thread. It shows that you are at least exposed to the truth. Do with it as you usually do. Stay tuned for a photo of all the Covers Dems at the beach!
....heads buried in the sand!
Gamble for entertainment, invest for wealth!
0
I appreciate the attempts from the leftists here to hijack this thread. It shows that you are at least exposed to the truth. Do with it as you usually do. Stay tuned for a photo of all the Covers Dems at the beach!
Kamala Harris Tweet: “If you’re able to, chip in now to the @MNFreedomFund to help post bail for those protesting on the ground in Minnesota.” How’s that for a source?
Their heads are buried in the sand Detox.
Prepare for another hijack attempt of "good post", laughing emoji's, or 5th grade behaviors.
The group exhibiting these behaviors are far beyond redemption.
Gamble for entertainment, invest for wealth!
0
Quote Originally Posted by I_Need_A_Detox:
Kamala Harris Tweet: “If you’re able to, chip in now to the @MNFreedomFund to help post bail for those protesting on the ground in Minnesota.” How’s that for a source?
Their heads are buried in the sand Detox.
Prepare for another hijack attempt of "good post", laughing emoji's, or 5th grade behaviors.
The group exhibiting these behaviors are far beyond redemption.
Here is a sample of the "respected" group that KH helped get back on the streets.
Among those bailed out by the Minnesota Freedom Fund (MFF) is a suspect who shot at police, a woman accused of killing a friend, and a twice convicted sex offender, according to court records reviewed by the FOX 9 Investigators.
According to attempted murder charges, Jaleel Stallings shot at members of a SWAT Team during the riots in May. Police recovered a modified pistol that looks like an AK-47. MFF paid $75,000 in cash to get Stallings out of jail.
Darnika Floyd is charged with second degree murder, for stabbing a friend to death. MFF paid $100,000 cash for her release.
Christopher Boswell, a twice convicted rapist, is currently charged with kidnapping, assault, and sexual assault in two separate cases. MFF paid $350,00 [sic] in cash for his release.
Gamble for entertainment, invest for wealth!
0
Here is a sample of the "respected" group that KH helped get back on the streets.
Among those bailed out by the Minnesota Freedom Fund (MFF) is a suspect who shot at police, a woman accused of killing a friend, and a twice convicted sex offender, according to court records reviewed by the FOX 9 Investigators.
According to attempted murder charges, Jaleel Stallings shot at members of a SWAT Team during the riots in May. Police recovered a modified pistol that looks like an AK-47. MFF paid $75,000 in cash to get Stallings out of jail.
Darnika Floyd is charged with second degree murder, for stabbing a friend to death. MFF paid $100,000 cash for her release.
Christopher Boswell, a twice convicted rapist, is currently charged with kidnapping, assault, and sexual assault in two separate cases. MFF paid $350,00 [sic] in cash for his release.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.