Harris is encouraging the American people to go out and participate in violent protests and is warning USA citizens to prepare for more violence.....EVEN AFTER ELECTION DAY SHE SAYS? She went as far as to say that the violence SHOULD NOT STOP. Is she out of her mind? Is she trying to throw the election for Biden?
although in his current condition he was never going to beat trump anyway, the second he made Harris his VP the election was over. zero chance biden wins.
buy $BTC
1
Quote Originally Posted by gambleholic63:
Harris is encouraging the American people to go out and participate in violent protests and is warning USA citizens to prepare for more violence.....EVEN AFTER ELECTION DAY SHE SAYS? She went as far as to say that the violence SHOULD NOT STOP. Is she out of her mind? Is she trying to throw the election for Biden?
although in his current condition he was never going to beat trump anyway, the second he made Harris his VP the election was over. zero chance biden wins.
Eddy. I am starting to agree with this statement. Harris can not hide from these statements. Her statements are political suicide.
HOWEVER.....and it's a big HOWEVER......The question is will the news that she even said these horrible things and funded criminals by paying their bail money even hit the ears or eyes of the typical Democrat????
Most people will be blind to the fact that this even happened thanks to our crooked media.
Gamble for entertainment, invest for wealth!
2
Eddy. I am starting to agree with this statement. Harris can not hide from these statements. Her statements are political suicide.
HOWEVER.....and it's a big HOWEVER......The question is will the news that she even said these horrible things and funded criminals by paying their bail money even hit the ears or eyes of the typical Democrat????
Most people will be blind to the fact that this even happened thanks to our crooked media.
The Democrats are giving the green light for people to do whatever they want and not to worry cause Democrats have they backs and bail.
Yes Scooby. This is true but they can no longer hide from their actions. They took their stand and made their moves and perpetuated criminal acts. It's time for all of them to be exposed. Let the people decide on November 3rd.
Gamble for entertainment, invest for wealth!
1
Quote Originally Posted by scooby-doos:
The Democrats are giving the green light for people to do whatever they want and not to worry cause Democrats have they backs and bail.
Yes Scooby. This is true but they can no longer hide from their actions. They took their stand and made their moves and perpetuated criminal acts. It's time for all of them to be exposed. Let the people decide on November 3rd.
Midnight with all due respect, you have 100 other threads where you can spew your anti-Trump rhetoric and you have done plenty of it in those threads. This thread is dealing with the horrifying fact that KH encouraged and solicited financial donations to post bail money for convicted rapists and murderers from jail so that they could be put back on the streets in Minneapolis during a very difficult time for the city.
Her actions 100% made the situation in Minneapolis worse. She condoned violence. She encouraged violence. She FUNDED violence.
That's what this thread is about.
Gamble for entertainment, invest for wealth!
3
Midnight with all due respect, you have 100 other threads where you can spew your anti-Trump rhetoric and you have done plenty of it in those threads. This thread is dealing with the horrifying fact that KH encouraged and solicited financial donations to post bail money for convicted rapists and murderers from jail so that they could be put back on the streets in Minneapolis during a very difficult time for the city.
Her actions 100% made the situation in Minneapolis worse. She condoned violence. She encouraged violence. She FUNDED violence.
Democrats are consistently on the side of defending criminals. This is because criminals, as a group, have the lowest IQ’s of any group in America. They are easily persuaded by fake news. And Dem operatives have calculated that these groups are worth defending because they bring in x amount of votes. Truly disgusting behavior.
0
Democrats are consistently on the side of defending criminals. This is because criminals, as a group, have the lowest IQ’s of any group in America. They are easily persuaded by fake news. And Dem operatives have calculated that these groups are worth defending because they bring in x amount of votes. Truly disgusting behavior.
Imagine,, Joe Bidens put together a VP selecting team in April the panels job was to vet his VP running mate. After more than 3 months of vetting on August 11th they chose a person who (they had to know,if they vetted that long ) was soliciting funds to bail-out defendants from Twin Cities jails charged with murder, violent felonies, and sex crimes.. sex crimes by criminals who would be free to go out and violate children and others..
13 Biden staffers publicized donations to the Minnesota Freedom Fund (MFF).. a bail fund that sought to free violent criminals who were rioting on the streets.....and defund the police..
Tells us a lot about what a Biden /Harris administration will look like.. This makes voting for the other guy much more attractive.
2
Back to the topic of the thread..
Imagine,, Joe Bidens put together a VP selecting team in April the panels job was to vet his VP running mate. After more than 3 months of vetting on August 11th they chose a person who (they had to know,if they vetted that long ) was soliciting funds to bail-out defendants from Twin Cities jails charged with murder, violent felonies, and sex crimes.. sex crimes by criminals who would be free to go out and violate children and others..
13 Biden staffers publicized donations to the Minnesota Freedom Fund (MFF).. a bail fund that sought to free violent criminals who were rioting on the streets.....and defund the police..
Tells us a lot about what a Biden /Harris administration will look like.. This makes voting for the other guy much more attractive.
Slim, I am the furthest thing from a political expert, but it sure does look like Harris being attached to Biden will cost the Democrats the election. I honestly can not see the people of our country supporting Harris outside of the far, far left.
Gamble for entertainment, invest for wealth!
0
Slim, I am the furthest thing from a political expert, but it sure does look like Harris being attached to Biden will cost the Democrats the election. I honestly can not see the people of our country supporting Harris outside of the far, far left.
Quote Originally Posted by SarasotaSlim: I agree Gamble,Kamala doesn't even like Biden ..she thinks he's a racist..and she's right ..he is.. It certainly takes one to know one.
What's with the personal slur ?
We are talking about politicians ...not members on Covers..
0
Quote Originally Posted by Midnight1:
Quote Originally Posted by SarasotaSlim: I agree Gamble,Kamala doesn't even like Biden ..she thinks he's a racist..and she's right ..he is.. It certainly takes one to know one.
What's with the personal slur ?
We are talking about politicians ...not members on Covers..
Quote Originally Posted by Midnight1: Quote Originally Posted by gambleholic63: It's been on all the news channels. She first tells the American public to BEWARE. She is warning the public about protests and violence, concluding that it will not stop and it should continue and she says all this with a smile on her face while she is obviously encouraging the behavior. Google the clip and judge for yourself. Of course, she now claims she was speaking of only the "peaceful protests" that she was encouraging. Her back pedaling really doesn't compute logically. If she is only speaking of peaceful protests, then why is she warning the public and telling them to "beware"? Finding this sort of news does require being open to changing the channel from CNN. Typical bullshit answer. I asked for a source & you state all the channels. You sound just like the POS in the WH. And now you are the one doing the back pedaling. Fake News when you can't produce a source. A lot of what she has said can be taken that way even if not explicitly stated that way. If she does not understand that, you have to ask yourself should you be voting for someone that detached from what she is saying. Besides if you do not know some of what she has said or cannot find it yourself with a quick search -- does it matter to you? Would this 'NEW' information change your vote? https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/kamala-harris-wants-to-let-dangerous-rioters-back-onto-our-streets https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2020/09/01/fact-check-kamala-harris-said-protests-arent-going-stop/5678687002/ https://www.redstate.com/streiff/2020/08/28/kamala-harris-laughs-as-she-warns-that-violent-riots-will-continue/ https://www.redstate.com/streiff/2020/08/28/kamala-harris-laughs-as-she-warns-that-violent-riots-will-continue/
Not one of these sources ‘proves’ your point. You should actually read then before passing them off as fact.
8
Quote Originally Posted by Raiders22:
Quote Originally Posted by Midnight1: Quote Originally Posted by gambleholic63: It's been on all the news channels. She first tells the American public to BEWARE. She is warning the public about protests and violence, concluding that it will not stop and it should continue and she says all this with a smile on her face while she is obviously encouraging the behavior. Google the clip and judge for yourself. Of course, she now claims she was speaking of only the "peaceful protests" that she was encouraging. Her back pedaling really doesn't compute logically. If she is only speaking of peaceful protests, then why is she warning the public and telling them to "beware"? Finding this sort of news does require being open to changing the channel from CNN. Typical bullshit answer. I asked for a source & you state all the channels. You sound just like the POS in the WH. And now you are the one doing the back pedaling. Fake News when you can't produce a source. A lot of what she has said can be taken that way even if not explicitly stated that way. If she does not understand that, you have to ask yourself should you be voting for someone that detached from what she is saying. Besides if you do not know some of what she has said or cannot find it yourself with a quick search -- does it matter to you? Would this 'NEW' information change your vote? https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/kamala-harris-wants-to-let-dangerous-rioters-back-onto-our-streets https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2020/09/01/fact-check-kamala-harris-said-protests-arent-going-stop/5678687002/ https://www.redstate.com/streiff/2020/08/28/kamala-harris-laughs-as-she-warns-that-violent-riots-will-continue/ https://www.redstate.com/streiff/2020/08/28/kamala-harris-laughs-as-she-warns-that-violent-riots-will-continue/
Not one of these sources ‘proves’ your point. You should actually read then before passing them off as fact.
djbrow...I heard the interview myself with my own ears and my own eyes. Harris promoted and facilitated violence and promised future violence while telling the people to beware. There is no disputing these facts. She also tweeted from her own personal account about encouraging BLM supporters to donate to the MFF. These are easily findable facts. No snoop proofing required.
I suppose the bright side of all this is that none of the Democrats here seem to support Harris encouraging and promoting the use of BLM and MFF funds to release dangerous criminals back on the streets.
Gamble for entertainment, invest for wealth!
1
djbrow...I heard the interview myself with my own ears and my own eyes. Harris promoted and facilitated violence and promised future violence while telling the people to beware. There is no disputing these facts. She also tweeted from her own personal account about encouraging BLM supporters to donate to the MFF. These are easily findable facts. No snoop proofing required.
I suppose the bright side of all this is that none of the Democrats here seem to support Harris encouraging and promoting the use of BLM and MFF funds to release dangerous criminals back on the streets.
djbrow...I heard the interview myself with my own ears and my own eyes. Harris promoted and facilitated violence and promised future violence while telling the people to beware. There is no disputing these facts. She also tweeted from her own personal account about encouraging BLM supporters to donate to the MFF. These are easily findable facts. No snoop proofing required. I suppose the bright side of all this is that none of the Democrats here seem to support Harris encouraging and promoting the use of BLM and MFF funds to release dangerous criminals back on the streets.
Please provide a link to an actual interview where she promotes violence. Just one. Asking you to provide factual backing to a statement should not be difficult.
Again, I’m not asking for an opinion piece like Raiders posted. Nor am I asking you to link an interview where she supports protestors. Your claim is she supports violence. Prove it.
You are in the big leagues now with people that are going to actually read or listen to what is posted.
2
Quote Originally Posted by gambleholic63:
djbrow...I heard the interview myself with my own ears and my own eyes. Harris promoted and facilitated violence and promised future violence while telling the people to beware. There is no disputing these facts. She also tweeted from her own personal account about encouraging BLM supporters to donate to the MFF. These are easily findable facts. No snoop proofing required. I suppose the bright side of all this is that none of the Democrats here seem to support Harris encouraging and promoting the use of BLM and MFF funds to release dangerous criminals back on the streets.
Please provide a link to an actual interview where she promotes violence. Just one. Asking you to provide factual backing to a statement should not be difficult.
Again, I’m not asking for an opinion piece like Raiders posted. Nor am I asking you to link an interview where she supports protestors. Your claim is she supports violence. Prove it.
You are in the big leagues now with people that are going to actually read or listen to what is posted.
Please provide a link to an actual interview where she promotes violence. Just one. Asking you to provide factual backing to a statement should not be difficult. Again, I’m not asking for an opinion piece like Raiders posted. Nor am I asking you to link an interview where she supports protestors. Your claim is she supports violence. Prove it. You are in the big leagues now with people that are going to actually read or listen to what is posted.
This tweet is a clear example of Kamala Harris supporting violent protestors.
0
Quote Originally Posted by djbrow:
Please provide a link to an actual interview where she promotes violence. Just one. Asking you to provide factual backing to a statement should not be difficult. Again, I’m not asking for an opinion piece like Raiders posted. Nor am I asking you to link an interview where she supports protestors. Your claim is she supports violence. Prove it. You are in the big leagues now with people that are going to actually read or listen to what is posted.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.