All Forums | Politics

Kyle Rittenhouse declared not guilty on all counts

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 482
Posts: 123
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 7997
Posted: #26

Quote Originally Posted by kcblitzkrieg:

Obviously you have no idea and did not watch / follow any of the trial  The rifle was stored at a friends house in Wisconsin.  He did not cross state lines with a rifle.  If he had, then the gun charge would not have been dropped.   Everything else you stated DOES NOT MATTER as this trial was based on FACTS and a jury of peers, 12 of them, decided that he acted in SELF DEFENSE.   One of the people he shot was ARMED with a Glock.   One of the people he killed (yes killed in self defense, not murdered) was a CONVICTED CHILD RAPIST.  No tears lost for that one....

 

Sorry, forgot to make sure you are aware that the child rapist was also a RACIST...

You will not survive here. You are not a wolf, and this is the land of wolves now...
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2009
Posts: 16739
Posted: #27

Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:

 

Quote Originally Posted by KellyM_1964:

 

 

 

Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:

 

Quote Originally Posted by KellyM_1964:

Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:   Quote Originally Posted by KellyM_1964:     it is now ok for people to travel all across america with military assault weapons and place themselves in dangerous confrontations with people protesting crimes against black people -- and if u fee threatened in any way , it is ok to shoot and kill those protestors . precedent has now been set into law      

 

 

That's the truly scary part.

 

 

yep       but not much america can do now      the verdict is the verdict and the precedent is now the precedent

 

 

Still, as bad as that decision was, the good news is that not all states are governed by the law in exactly the same way as Wisconsin.

 

 

 

i suppose that is one way to look at an otherwise bad ruling but as i said i accept the decision too bcuz i believe in our democratic system

but i dont like the message this sends 

 

two more cases on trial this week ::

arbery murder by white nationalists    and  the charlottesville while nationalist civil case

 

 

Agreed. Bad message to Americans. 

But that's the law in WI and we have to go along with it if we believe in democracy. 

Much like accepting the result of elections.  Same deal.

i know floridas chump brown nosers have put a new anti-protesting law in place and i supposse they can shoot unarmed blacks down there now if they protest immoral police shootings   then use the wisconsin law to defend themselves

but unclear if all states will adopt the same measures like wisconsin or just chump luver states

 

"I'm the MOST HONEST human being that GOD EVER created!" - Donald "the felon" Trump
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2009
Posts: 16739
Posted: #28

Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:

 

Quote Originally Posted by KellyM_1964:

 

 

 

Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:

 

Quote Originally Posted by KellyM_1964:

Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:   Quote Originally Posted by KellyM_1964:     it is now ok for people to travel all across america with military assault weapons and place themselves in dangerous confrontations with people protesting crimes against black people -- and if u fee threatened in any way , it is ok to shoot and kill those protestors . precedent has now been set into law      

 

 

That's the truly scary part.

 

 

yep       but not much america can do now      the verdict is the verdict and the precedent is now the precedent

 

 

Still, as bad as that decision was, the good news is that not all states are governed by the law in exactly the same way as Wisconsin.

 

 

 

i suppose that is one way to look at an otherwise bad ruling but as i said i accept the decision too bcuz i believe in our democratic system

but i dont like the message this sends 

 

two more cases on trial this week ::

arbery murder by white nationalists    and  the charlottesville while nationalist civil case

 

 

Agreed. Bad message to Americans. 

But that's the law in WI and we have to go along with it if we believe in democracy. 

Much like accepting the result of elections.  Same deal.

i know floridas chump brown nosers have put a new anti-protesting law in place and i supposse they can shoot unarmed blacks down there now if they protest immoral police shootings   then use the wisconsin law to defend themselves

but unclear if all states will adopt the same measures like wisconsin or just chump luver states

 

"I'm the MOST HONEST human being that GOD EVER created!" - Donald "the felon" Trump
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2009
Posts: 16739
Posted: #29

Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:

 

Quote Originally Posted by KellyM_1964:

 

 

 

Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:

 

Quote Originally Posted by KellyM_1964:

Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:   Quote Originally Posted by KellyM_1964:     it is now ok for people to travel all across america with military assault weapons and place themselves in dangerous confrontations with people protesting crimes against black people -- and if u fee threatened in any way , it is ok to shoot and kill those protestors . precedent has now been set into law      

 

 

That's the truly scary part.

 

 

yep       but not much america can do now      the verdict is the verdict and the precedent is now the precedent

 

 

Still, as bad as that decision was, the good news is that not all states are governed by the law in exactly the same way as Wisconsin.

 

 

 

i suppose that is one way to look at an otherwise bad ruling but as i said i accept the decision too bcuz i believe in our democratic system

but i dont like the message this sends 

 

two more cases on trial this week ::

arbery murder by white nationalists    and  the charlottesville while nationalist civil case

 

 

Agreed. Bad message to Americans. 

But that's the law in WI and we have to go along with it if we believe in democracy. 

Much like accepting the result of elections.  Same deal.

i know floridas chump brown nosers have put a new anti-protesting law in place and i supposse they can shoot unarmed blacks down there now if they protest immoral police shootings   then use the wisconsin law to defend themselves

but unclear if all states will adopt the same measures like wisconsin or just chump luver states

 

"I'm the MOST HONEST human being that GOD EVER created!" - Donald "the felon" Trump
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2011
Posts: 27139
Posted: #30

Get off the drugs son 

 

peace_5

 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2012
Posts: 52994
Posted: #31

Quote Originally Posted by KellyM_1964:

Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:   Quote Originally Posted by KellyM_1964:       Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:   Quote Originally Posted by KellyM_1964: Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:   Quote Originally Posted by KellyM_1964:     it is now ok for people to travel all across america with military assault weapons and place themselves in dangerous confrontations with people protesting crimes against black people -- and if u fee threatened in any way , it is ok to shoot and kill those protestors . precedent has now been set into law           That's the truly scary part.     yep       but not much america can do now      the verdict is the verdict and the precedent is now the precedent     Still, as bad as that decision was, the good news is that not all states are governed by the law in exactly the same way as Wisconsin.       i suppose that is one way to look at an otherwise bad ruling but as i said i accept the decision too bcuz i believe in our democratic system but i dont like the message this sends    two more cases on trial this week :: arbery murder by white nationalists    and  the charlottesville while nationalist civil case     Agreed. Bad message to Americans.  But that's the law in WI and we have to go along with it if we believe in democracy.  Much like accepting the result of elections.  Same deal. i know floridas chump brown nosers have put a new anti-protesting law in place and i supposse they can shoot unarmed blacks down there now if they protest immoral police shootings   then use the wisconsin law to defend themselves but unclear if all states will adopt the same measures like wisconsin or just chump luver states

Tough to know at this point, though republicans do like to stick together so I would say it's likely

 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2012
Posts: 52994
Posted: #32

Quote Originally Posted by KellyM_1964:

Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:   Quote Originally Posted by KellyM_1964:       Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:   Quote Originally Posted by KellyM_1964: Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:   Quote Originally Posted by KellyM_1964:     it is now ok for people to travel all across america with military assault weapons and place themselves in dangerous confrontations with people protesting crimes against black people -- and if u fee threatened in any way , it is ok to shoot and kill those protestors . precedent has now been set into law           That's the truly scary part.     yep       but not much america can do now      the verdict is the verdict and the precedent is now the precedent     Still, as bad as that decision was, the good news is that not all states are governed by the law in exactly the same way as Wisconsin.       i suppose that is one way to look at an otherwise bad ruling but as i said i accept the decision too bcuz i believe in our democratic system but i dont like the message this sends    two more cases on trial this week :: arbery murder by white nationalists    and  the charlottesville while nationalist civil case     Agreed. Bad message to Americans.  But that's the law in WI and we have to go along with it if we believe in democracy.  Much like accepting the result of elections.  Same deal. i know floridas chump brown nosers have put a new anti-protesting law in place and i supposse they can shoot unarmed blacks down there now if they protest immoral police shootings   then use the wisconsin law to defend themselves but unclear if all states will adopt the same measures like wisconsin or just chump luver states

Tough to know at this point, though republicans do like to stick together so I would say it's likely

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2006
Posts: 5069
Posted: #33

Kelly, if you honestly believe the people that got shot are upstanding citizens trying to do well for society, you should take a real hard look at yourself and reconsider what you think it means to be a good citizen. I feel like you're off your rocker every time I read your posts.

 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2007
Posts: 25467
Posted: #34

Can't say I'm shocked with the decision but am very sad with the precedent that has now been set.

In future protest settings, we will see similar people with weapons expecting trouble to take place. In today's world, we have shootings in grocery stores & shopping malls. Does this now mean I can carry a weapon unconcealed when I go Christmas shopping?

 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2009
Posts: 16739
Posted: #35

Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:

Quote Originally Posted by KellyM_1964:

Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:   Quote Originally Posted by KellyM_1964:       Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:   Quote Originally Posted by KellyM_1964: Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:   Quote Originally Posted by KellyM_1964:     it is now ok for people to travel all across america with military assault weapons and place themselves in dangerous confrontations with people protesting crimes against black people -- and if u fee threatened in any way , it is ok to shoot and kill those protestors . precedent has now been set into law           That's the truly scary part.     yep       but not much america can do now      the verdict is the verdict and the precedent is now the precedent     Still, as bad as that decision was, the good news is that not all states are governed by the law in exactly the same way as Wisconsin.       i suppose that is one way to look at an otherwise bad ruling but as i said i accept the decision too bcuz i believe in our democratic system but i dont like the message this sends    two more cases on trial this week :: arbery murder by white nationalists    and  the charlottesville while nationalist civil case     Agreed. Bad message to Americans.  But that's the law in WI and we have to go along with it if we believe in democracy.  Much like accepting the result of elections.  Same deal. i know floridas chump brown nosers have put a new anti-protesting law in place and i supposse they can shoot unarmed blacks down there now if they protest immoral police shootings   then use the wisconsin law to defend themselves but unclear if all states will adopt the same measures like wisconsin or just chump luver states

 

Tough to know at this point, though republicans do like to stick together so I would say it's likely

 

true

it will b intersting to see how the other two prominent court cases rule

those r both racially motivated assaults so we will see

 

"I'm the MOST HONEST human being that GOD EVER created!" - Donald "the felon" Trump
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2009
Posts: 16739
Posted: #36

Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:

Quote Originally Posted by KellyM_1964:

Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:   Quote Originally Posted by KellyM_1964:       Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:   Quote Originally Posted by KellyM_1964: Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:   Quote Originally Posted by KellyM_1964:     it is now ok for people to travel all across america with military assault weapons and place themselves in dangerous confrontations with people protesting crimes against black people -- and if u fee threatened in any way , it is ok to shoot and kill those protestors . precedent has now been set into law           That's the truly scary part.     yep       but not much america can do now      the verdict is the verdict and the precedent is now the precedent     Still, as bad as that decision was, the good news is that not all states are governed by the law in exactly the same way as Wisconsin.       i suppose that is one way to look at an otherwise bad ruling but as i said i accept the decision too bcuz i believe in our democratic system but i dont like the message this sends    two more cases on trial this week :: arbery murder by white nationalists    and  the charlottesville while nationalist civil case     Agreed. Bad message to Americans.  But that's the law in WI and we have to go along with it if we believe in democracy.  Much like accepting the result of elections.  Same deal. i know floridas chump brown nosers have put a new anti-protesting law in place and i supposse they can shoot unarmed blacks down there now if they protest immoral police shootings   then use the wisconsin law to defend themselves but unclear if all states will adopt the same measures like wisconsin or just chump luver states

 

Tough to know at this point, though republicans do like to stick together so I would say it's likely

 

true

it will b intersting to see how the other two prominent court cases rule

those r both racially motivated assaults so we will see

 

"I'm the MOST HONEST human being that GOD EVER created!" - Donald "the felon" Trump
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2006
Posts: 5069
Posted: #37

@Midnight1

 That was not a site of a protest. Please call it what it was, a riot and destruction. People support protests which is why there's usually no trouble in a "protest" setting. There is trouble from every side in "riot" settings.

People don't burn cars and businesses and buildings during a protest. People do burn shit in a riot.

Stop acting like MSM in twisting words. Thanks, peace_5

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2012
Posts: 2055
Posted: #38

Quote Originally Posted by Midnight1:

Can't say I'm shocked with the decision but am very sad with the precedent that has now been set. In future protest settings, we will see similar people with weapons expecting trouble to take place. In today's world, we have shootings in grocery stores & shopping malls. Does this now mean I can carry a weapon unconcealed when I go Christmas shopping?

Valid point, Midnight1  peace_5  

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2006
Posts: 5069
Posted: #39

Quote Originally Posted by baish2012:

Quote Originally Posted by Midnight1: Can't say I'm shocked with the decision but am very sad with the precedent that has now been set. In future protest settings, we will see similar people with weapons expecting trouble to take place. In today's world, we have shootings in grocery stores & shopping malls. Does this now mean I can carry a weapon unconcealed when I go Christmas shopping? Valid point, Midnight1

 

Don't chase people that are running from you if they didn't touch you, don't attack someone with an AR that hasn't attacked you. Not much of a precedent set unless you're a complete moron and need to be told that shit. But I guess we gotta make rules for the dumbest of them all.

 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2009
Posts: 16739
Posted: #40

 

Quote Originally Posted by Midnight1:

Can't say I'm shocked with the decision but am very sad with the precedent that has now been set.

In future protest settings, we will see similar people with weapons expecting trouble to take place. In today's world, we have shootings in grocery stores & shopping malls. Does this now mean I can carry a weapon unconcealed when I go Christmas shopping?

very bad precedent            but in a functioning democracy we have to live with this ruling for now

"I'm the MOST HONEST human being that GOD EVER created!" - Donald "the felon" Trump
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2007
Posts: 25467
Posted: #41

@BigGame90

 I don't spread MSM bullshit in here. I have my own brand of bullshit. With the interactions we've had in here, you should know that by now. I own what I share in here.

Peaceful riots have a tendency to turn violent when opposing forces interact.

Now turn on the Clemson/St. Bonaventure game on ESPN2, relax & watch the Bonnies get the upset.

an_cheers  

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2005
Posts: 8713
Posted: #42

Quote Originally Posted by Midnight1:

Can't say I'm shocked with the decision but am very sad with the precedent that has now been set. In future protest settings, we will see similar people with weapons expecting trouble to take place. In today's world, we have shootings in grocery stores & shopping malls. Does this now mean I can carry a weapon unconcealed when I go Christmas shopping?

Completely agree. Not surprised at the result at all, but was wishful I would be wrong.

This is a dangerous precedent. Soon we will see 12 year olds toting assault rifles on playgrounds in Wisconsin because they aren't short barreled. Will also set up situations in which active shooters start claiming self defense if anyone tries to stop them. Prosecution botched this case within first week though, tried to recover late, but it was already too late. Judge Rittenhouse didn't help either. an_light

 

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2006
Posts: 5069
Posted: #43

@Midnight1

 Hopefully we don't see peaceful protests get turned upside down. That's not how you make change in this country. I hope all protests stay peaceful and the mass gets their voices heard without any violence. Violence doesn't solve anything. IMO I don't think this ruling is going to bring out ARs to future protests. Now if they turn for the worst, then it might get wild. Lets just hope moving forward people keep it civil.

Hope you got the hook peace_5  keep pickin winners!

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2006
Posts: 5069
Posted: #44

Why is MSM making this about race already? I turn on a certain web page and all the reactions are about race.  What is their motive in doing so? Why was MSNBC trying to expose the jury? What was their motive?

 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2009
Posts: 16739
Posted: #45

Quote Originally Posted by Midnight1:

@BigGame90  I don't spread MSM bullshit in here. I have my own brand of bullshit. With the interactions we've had in here, you should know that by now.

I own what I share in here.

Peaceful riots have a tendency to turn violent when opposing forces interact.

peace      peace_5   

"I'm the MOST HONEST human being that GOD EVER created!" - Donald "the felon" Trump
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2009
Posts: 16739
Posted: #46

Quote Originally Posted by Midnight1:

@BigGame90  I don't spread MSM bullshit in here. I have my own brand of bullshit. With the interactions we've had in here, you should know that by now.

I own what I share in here.

Peaceful riots have a tendency to turn violent when opposing forces interact.

peace      peace_5   

"I'm the MOST HONEST human being that GOD EVER created!" - Donald "the felon" Trump
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2009
Posts: 16739
Posted: #47

Quote Originally Posted by Midnight1:

@BigGame90  I don't spread MSM bullshit in here. I have my own brand of bullshit. With the interactions we've had in here, you should know that by now.

I own what I share in here.

Peaceful riots have a tendency to turn violent when opposing forces interact.

peace      peace_5   

"I'm the MOST HONEST human being that GOD EVER created!" - Donald "the felon" Trump
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2014
Posts: 1605
Posted: #48

Quote Originally Posted by KellyM_1964:

the teen brandishing a military assault weapon ,who travelled from out of county to deliberately confront UNARMED people in kenosha protesting the immoral shooting of an UNARMED black man in the back by police , and knowingly immersing himself into a dangerous confrontation that he could easily have avoided altogether or walked away from at any point , then shooting 3 people and killing two   it is now ok for people to travel all across america with military assault weapons and place themselves in dangerous confrontations with people protesting crimes against black people -- and if u fee threatened in any way , it is ok to shoot and kill those protestors .  precedent has now been set into law
you are pissed because the system worked in favor of a white, male 2nd amendment supporter.

 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2009
Posts: 16739
Posted: #49

Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81:

 

Quote Originally Posted by Midnight1:

Can't say I'm shocked with the decision but am very sad with the precedent that has now been set. In future protest settings, we will see similar people with weapons expecting trouble to take place. In today's world, we have shootings in grocery stores & shopping malls. Does this now mean I can carry a weapon unconcealed when I go Christmas shopping?

 

Completely agree. Not surprised at the result at all, but was wishful I would be wrong.

This is a dangerous precedent. Soon we will see 12 year olds toting assault rifles on playgrounds in Wisconsin because they aren't short barreled. Will also set up situations in which active shooters start claiming self defense if anyone tries to stop them. Prosecution botched this case within first week though, tried to recover late, but it was already too late.

Judge Rittenhouse didn't help either. an_light

we have to accept the jury decision bcuz this is the way our democracy works

president biden wants us to peacefully accept any jury decision in america  but it doesnt mean we have to agree it is just

but jury decisions arent always correct as many falsely imprisoned people could tell us

u r correct    the prosecution failed

they failed in the o j   trial too

 

"I'm the MOST HONEST human being that GOD EVER created!" - Donald "the felon" Trump
 
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2012
Posts: 52994
Posted: #50

Quote Originally Posted by Midnight1:

@BigGame90

 I don't spread MSM bullshit in here. I have my own brand of bullshit. With the interactions we've had in here, you should know that by now. I own what I share in here.

Peaceful riots have a tendency to turn violent when opposing forces interact.

 

Midnight1  thumbs_up

All Forums | Politics
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gambling
Betting Sites
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
810,221
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
21+
Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER
Help Privacy Terms of Service Cookies Sitemap Forum
Covers is verified safe by:
Evalon Logo Logo GPWA Logo GDPR logo Logo GeoTrust logo Logo PCI DSS logo Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Ltd. All Rights Reserved.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.