Quote Originally Posted by Midnight1: @BigGame90 I don't spread MSM bullshit in here. I have my own brand of bullshit. With the interactions we've had in here, you should know that by now. I own what I share in here. Peaceful riots have a tendency to turn violent when opposing forces interact.
Kind of ironic that you re-posted. Should take his words and apply them to yourself.
2
Quote Originally Posted by KellyM_1964:
Quote Originally Posted by Midnight1: @BigGame90 I don't spread MSM bullshit in here. I have my own brand of bullshit. With the interactions we've had in here, you should know that by now. I own what I share in here. Peaceful riots have a tendency to turn violent when opposing forces interact.
Kind of ironic that you re-posted. Should take his words and apply them to yourself.
Can't say I'm shocked with the decision but am very sad with the precedent that has now been set. In future protest settings, we will see similar people with weapons expecting trouble to take place. In today's world, we have shootings in grocery stores & shopping malls. Does this now mean I can carry a weapon unconcealed when I go Christmas shopping?
Completely agree. Not surprised at the result at all, but was wishful I would be wrong.
This is a dangerous precedent.
Soon we will see 12 year olds toting assault rifles on playgrounds in Wisconsin because they aren't short barreled. Will also set up situations in which active shooters start claiming self defense if anyone tries to stop them. Prosecution botched this case within first week though, tried to recover late, but it was already too late. Judge Rittenhouse didn't help either.
Completely dangerous. It's simply a bad outcome. The prosecution over-charged which set up an acquittal, imo, but Rittenhouse is no innocent hero --- quite the opposite.
3
Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81:
Quote Originally Posted by Midnight1:
Can't say I'm shocked with the decision but am very sad with the precedent that has now been set. In future protest settings, we will see similar people with weapons expecting trouble to take place. In today's world, we have shootings in grocery stores & shopping malls. Does this now mean I can carry a weapon unconcealed when I go Christmas shopping?
Completely agree. Not surprised at the result at all, but was wishful I would be wrong.
This is a dangerous precedent.
Soon we will see 12 year olds toting assault rifles on playgrounds in Wisconsin because they aren't short barreled. Will also set up situations in which active shooters start claiming self defense if anyone tries to stop them. Prosecution botched this case within first week though, tried to recover late, but it was already too late. Judge Rittenhouse didn't help either.
Completely dangerous. It's simply a bad outcome. The prosecution over-charged which set up an acquittal, imo, but Rittenhouse is no innocent hero --- quite the opposite.
Can't say I'm shocked with the decision but am very sad with the precedent that has now been set. In future protest settings, we will see similar people with weapons expecting trouble to take place. In today's world, we have shootings in grocery stores & shopping malls. Does this now mean I can carry a weapon unconcealed when I go Christmas shopping?
Completely agree. Not surprised at the result at all, but was wishful I would be wrong.
This is a dangerous precedent.
Soon we will see 12 year olds toting assault rifles on playgrounds in Wisconsin because they aren't short barreled. Will also set up situations in which active shooters start claiming self defense if anyone tries to stop them. Prosecution botched this case within first week though, tried to recover late, but it was already too late. Judge Rittenhouse didn't help either.
Completely dangerous. It's simply a bad outcome. The prosecution over-charged which set up an acquittal, imo, but Rittenhouse is no innocent hero --- quite the opposite.
3
Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81:
Quote Originally Posted by Midnight1:
Can't say I'm shocked with the decision but am very sad with the precedent that has now been set. In future protest settings, we will see similar people with weapons expecting trouble to take place. In today's world, we have shootings in grocery stores & shopping malls. Does this now mean I can carry a weapon unconcealed when I go Christmas shopping?
Completely agree. Not surprised at the result at all, but was wishful I would be wrong.
This is a dangerous precedent.
Soon we will see 12 year olds toting assault rifles on playgrounds in Wisconsin because they aren't short barreled. Will also set up situations in which active shooters start claiming self defense if anyone tries to stop them. Prosecution botched this case within first week though, tried to recover late, but it was already too late. Judge Rittenhouse didn't help either.
Completely dangerous. It's simply a bad outcome. The prosecution over-charged which set up an acquittal, imo, but Rittenhouse is no innocent hero --- quite the opposite.
The Rittenhouse Privilege has set a precedent. There is now legal precedent which permits individuals to claim self-defense in the most outrageous of cases. Be forewarned – this precedent will only extend to individuals who can claim the Rittenhouse privilege.
NOTE:Stephanie Willis is an Attorney and Policy Strategist focusing on reforming the Criminal Legal System. Stephanie was an anchor on the Law and Crime Network and has provided legal analysis for Fox News.
4
YAHOO NEWS - Stephanie Willis
The Rittenhouse Privilege has set a precedent. There is now legal precedent which permits individuals to claim self-defense in the most outrageous of cases. Be forewarned – this precedent will only extend to individuals who can claim the Rittenhouse privilege.
NOTE:Stephanie Willis is an Attorney and Policy Strategist focusing on reforming the Criminal Legal System. Stephanie was an anchor on the Law and Crime Network and has provided legal analysis for Fox News.
Can't say I'm shocked with the decision but am very sad with the precedent that has now been set. In future protest settings, we will see similar people with weapons expecting trouble to take place. In today's world, we have shootings in grocery stores & shopping malls. Does this now mean I can carry a weapon unconcealed when I go Christmas shopping?
Completely agree. Not surprised at the result at all, but was wishful I would be wrong.
This is a dangerous precedent.
Soon we will see 12 year olds toting assault rifles on playgrounds in Wisconsin because they aren't short barreled. Will also set up situations in which active shooters start claiming self defense if anyone tries to stop them. Prosecution botched this case within first week though, tried to recover late, but it was already too late. Judge Rittenhouse didn't help either.
Completely dangerous. It's simply a bad outcome. The prosecution over-charged which set up an acquittal, imo, but Rittenhouse is no innocent hero --- quite the opposite.
i agree with u, baish ,deezy ,and midnight1 dangerous bad precedent that we have to live with
but i do accept the decision of the jury
"I'm the MOST HONEST HUMAN BEING that God has EVER created!!" - Donald Trump
2
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81:
Quote Originally Posted by Midnight1:
Can't say I'm shocked with the decision but am very sad with the precedent that has now been set. In future protest settings, we will see similar people with weapons expecting trouble to take place. In today's world, we have shootings in grocery stores & shopping malls. Does this now mean I can carry a weapon unconcealed when I go Christmas shopping?
Completely agree. Not surprised at the result at all, but was wishful I would be wrong.
This is a dangerous precedent.
Soon we will see 12 year olds toting assault rifles on playgrounds in Wisconsin because they aren't short barreled. Will also set up situations in which active shooters start claiming self defense if anyone tries to stop them. Prosecution botched this case within first week though, tried to recover late, but it was already too late. Judge Rittenhouse didn't help either.
Completely dangerous. It's simply a bad outcome. The prosecution over-charged which set up an acquittal, imo, but Rittenhouse is no innocent hero --- quite the opposite.
i agree with u, baish ,deezy ,and midnight1 dangerous bad precedent that we have to live with
Can't say I'm shocked with the decision but am very sad with the precedent that has now been set. In future protest settings, we will see similar people with weapons expecting trouble to take place. In today's world, we have shootings in grocery stores & shopping malls. Does this now mean I can carry a weapon unconcealed when I go Christmas shopping?
Completely agree. Not surprised at the result at all, but was wishful I would be wrong.
This is a dangerous precedent.
Soon we will see 12 year olds toting assault rifles on playgrounds in Wisconsin because they aren't short barreled. Will also set up situations in which active shooters start claiming self defense if anyone tries to stop them. Prosecution botched this case within first week though, tried to recover late, but it was already too late. Judge Rittenhouse didn't help either.
Completely dangerous. It's simply a bad outcome. The prosecution over-charged which set up an acquittal, imo, but Rittenhouse is no innocent hero --- quite the opposite.
i agree with u, baish ,deezy ,and midnight1 dangerous bad precedent that we have to live with
but i do accept the decision of the jury
"I'm the MOST HONEST HUMAN BEING that God has EVER created!!" - Donald Trump
3
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81:
Quote Originally Posted by Midnight1:
Can't say I'm shocked with the decision but am very sad with the precedent that has now been set. In future protest settings, we will see similar people with weapons expecting trouble to take place. In today's world, we have shootings in grocery stores & shopping malls. Does this now mean I can carry a weapon unconcealed when I go Christmas shopping?
Completely agree. Not surprised at the result at all, but was wishful I would be wrong.
This is a dangerous precedent.
Soon we will see 12 year olds toting assault rifles on playgrounds in Wisconsin because they aren't short barreled. Will also set up situations in which active shooters start claiming self defense if anyone tries to stop them. Prosecution botched this case within first week though, tried to recover late, but it was already too late. Judge Rittenhouse didn't help either.
Completely dangerous. It's simply a bad outcome. The prosecution over-charged which set up an acquittal, imo, but Rittenhouse is no innocent hero --- quite the opposite.
i agree with u, baish ,deezy ,and midnight1 dangerous bad precedent that we have to live with
YAHOO NEWS - Stephanie Willis The Rittenhouse Privilege has set a precedent. There is now legal precedent which permits individuals to claim self-defense in the most outrageous of cases. Be forewarned – this precedent will only extend to individuals who can claim the Rittenhouse privilege. NOTE: Stephanie Willis is an Attorney and Policy Strategist focusing on reforming the Criminal Legal System. Stephanie was an anchor on the Law and Crime Network and has provided legal analysis for Fox News.
shes right and i bet this emerges much more in red states than blue
"I'm the MOST HONEST HUMAN BEING that God has EVER created!!" - Donald Trump
3
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
YAHOO NEWS - Stephanie Willis The Rittenhouse Privilege has set a precedent. There is now legal precedent which permits individuals to claim self-defense in the most outrageous of cases. Be forewarned – this precedent will only extend to individuals who can claim the Rittenhouse privilege. NOTE: Stephanie Willis is an Attorney and Policy Strategist focusing on reforming the Criminal Legal System. Stephanie was an anchor on the Law and Crime Network and has provided legal analysis for Fox News.
shes right and i bet this emerges much more in red states than blue
Kelly and Fubah are either the same person or it’s just a coincidence that they’re the only people in covers history that can’t figure out how not to double post.
3
Kelly and Fubah are either the same person or it’s just a coincidence that they’re the only people in covers history that can’t figure out how not to double post.
Kelly and Fubah are either the same person or it’s just a coincidence that they’re the only people in covers history that can’t figure out how not to double post.
careful, people have been boxed for suggesting the same...
America First
0
Quote Originally Posted by I_Need_A_Detox:
Kelly and Fubah are either the same person or it’s just a coincidence that they’re the only people in covers history that can’t figure out how not to double post.
careful, people have been boxed for suggesting the same...
Quote Originally Posted by THEMUGG: Biden has embarrassed himself yet again. biden haters have embarrassed themselves yet again
Awwww......didn't get the verdict you wanted?
Had all the left-wing zealots bothered to hear the truth then maybe they wouldn't be so disappointed. But no, the truth doesn't fit their narrative here.
2
Quote Originally Posted by KellyM_1964:
Quote Originally Posted by THEMUGG: Biden has embarrassed himself yet again. biden haters have embarrassed themselves yet again
Awwww......didn't get the verdict you wanted?
Had all the left-wing zealots bothered to hear the truth then maybe they wouldn't be so disappointed. But no, the truth doesn't fit their narrative here.
YAHOO NEWS - Stephanie Willis The Rittenhouse Privilege has set a precedent. There is now legal precedent which permits individuals to claim self-defense in the most outrageous of cases. Be forewarned – this precedent will only extend to individuals who can claim the Rittenhouse privilege. NOTE: Stephanie Willis is an Attorney and Policy Strategist focusing on reforming the Criminal Legal System. Stephanie was an anchor on the Law and Crime Network and has provided legal analysis for Fox News.
shes right and i bet this emerges much more in red states than blue
A distinct possibility.
0
Quote Originally Posted by KellyM_1964:
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
YAHOO NEWS - Stephanie Willis The Rittenhouse Privilege has set a precedent. There is now legal precedent which permits individuals to claim self-defense in the most outrageous of cases. Be forewarned – this precedent will only extend to individuals who can claim the Rittenhouse privilege. NOTE: Stephanie Willis is an Attorney and Policy Strategist focusing on reforming the Criminal Legal System. Stephanie was an anchor on the Law and Crime Network and has provided legal analysis for Fox News.
shes right and i bet this emerges much more in red states than blue
Can't say I'm shocked with the decision but am very sad with the precedent that has now been set. In future protest settings, we will see similar people with weapons expecting trouble to take place. In today's world, we have shootings in grocery stores & shopping malls. Does this now mean I can carry a weapon unconcealed when I go Christmas shopping?
I mean, YES, depending on what state and county you may be living in....
America First
0
Quote Originally Posted by Midnight1:
Can't say I'm shocked with the decision but am very sad with the precedent that has now been set. In future protest settings, we will see similar people with weapons expecting trouble to take place. In today's world, we have shootings in grocery stores & shopping malls. Does this now mean I can carry a weapon unconcealed when I go Christmas shopping?
I mean, YES, depending on what state and county you may be living in....
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Quote Originally Posted by KellyM_1964: Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Quote Originally Posted by KellyM_1964: Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Quote Originally Posted by KellyM_1964: Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Quote Originally Posted by KellyM_1964: it is now ok for people to travel all across america with military assault weapons and place themselves in dangerous confrontations with people protesting crimes against black people -- and if u fee threatened in any way , it is ok to shoot and kill those protestors . precedent has now been set into law That's the truly scary part. yep but not much america can do now the verdict is the verdict and the precedent is now the precedent Still, as bad as that decision was, the good news is that not all states are governed by the law in exactly the same way as Wisconsin. i suppose that is one way to look at an otherwise bad ruling but as i said i accept the decision too bcuz i believe in our democratic system but i dont like the message this sends two more cases on trial this week :: arbery murder by white nationalists and the charlottesville while nationalist civil case Agreed. Bad message to Americans. But that's the law in WI and we have to go along with it if we believe in democracy. Much like accepting the result of elections. Same deal. i know floridas chump brown nosers have put a new anti-protesting law in place and i supposse they can shoot unarmed blacks down there now if they protest immoral police shootings then use the wisconsin law to defend themselves but unclear if all states will adopt the same measures like wisconsin or just chump luver states Tough to know at this point, though republicans do like to stick together so I would say it's likely true it will b intersting to see how the other two prominent court cases rule those r both racially motivated assaults so we will see
Please explain to us all in your all mighty wisdom how shooting 3 white people in self defense, as a white teenager, who were chasing you down is the same as 3 white grown ass men stalking a black man and executing him on the grounds of "citizens arrest" ???
I'll save you the time.... you can't explain it, just like any other question posed in response to one of your outrageous LIES.... YOU CAN'T
America First
1
Quote Originally Posted by KellyM_1964:
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Quote Originally Posted by KellyM_1964: Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Quote Originally Posted by KellyM_1964: Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Quote Originally Posted by KellyM_1964: Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Quote Originally Posted by KellyM_1964: it is now ok for people to travel all across america with military assault weapons and place themselves in dangerous confrontations with people protesting crimes against black people -- and if u fee threatened in any way , it is ok to shoot and kill those protestors . precedent has now been set into law That's the truly scary part. yep but not much america can do now the verdict is the verdict and the precedent is now the precedent Still, as bad as that decision was, the good news is that not all states are governed by the law in exactly the same way as Wisconsin. i suppose that is one way to look at an otherwise bad ruling but as i said i accept the decision too bcuz i believe in our democratic system but i dont like the message this sends two more cases on trial this week :: arbery murder by white nationalists and the charlottesville while nationalist civil case Agreed. Bad message to Americans. But that's the law in WI and we have to go along with it if we believe in democracy. Much like accepting the result of elections. Same deal. i know floridas chump brown nosers have put a new anti-protesting law in place and i supposse they can shoot unarmed blacks down there now if they protest immoral police shootings then use the wisconsin law to defend themselves but unclear if all states will adopt the same measures like wisconsin or just chump luver states Tough to know at this point, though republicans do like to stick together so I would say it's likely true it will b intersting to see how the other two prominent court cases rule those r both racially motivated assaults so we will see
Please explain to us all in your all mighty wisdom how shooting 3 white people in self defense, as a white teenager, who were chasing you down is the same as 3 white grown ass men stalking a black man and executing him on the grounds of "citizens arrest" ???
I'll save you the time.... you can't explain it, just like any other question posed in response to one of your outrageous LIES.... YOU CAN'T
am very sad with the precedent that has now been set.
In future protest settings, we will see similar people with weapons expecting trouble to take place. In today's world, we have shootings in grocery stores & shopping malls. Does this now mean I can carry a weapon unconcealed when I go Christmas shopping?
In Wisconsin, yes, as long as it is a full-length military assault weapon.
And if a teenage girl seems to threaten you with her skateboard you would be OK to empty your entire clip into her body
Precedent matters.
2
Quote Originally Posted by Midnight1:
am very sad with the precedent that has now been set.
In future protest settings, we will see similar people with weapons expecting trouble to take place. In today's world, we have shootings in grocery stores & shopping malls. Does this now mean I can carry a weapon unconcealed when I go Christmas shopping?
In Wisconsin, yes, as long as it is a full-length military assault weapon.
And if a teenage girl seems to threaten you with her skateboard you would be OK to empty your entire clip into her body
am very sad with the precedent that has now been set.
In future protest settings, we will see similar people with weapons expecting trouble to take place. In today's world, we have shootings in grocery stores & shopping malls. Does this now mean I can carry a weapon unconcealed when I go Christmas shopping?
In Wisconsin, yes, as long as it is a full-length military assault weapon.
And if a teenage girl seems to threaten you with her skateboard you would be OK to empty your entire clip into her body
Precedent matters.
yep in wisconsin killing is legal if u claim self-defense even if u were breaking the law in the first place
"I'm the MOST HONEST HUMAN BEING that God has EVER created!!" - Donald Trump
1
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
Quote Originally Posted by Midnight1:
am very sad with the precedent that has now been set.
In future protest settings, we will see similar people with weapons expecting trouble to take place. In today's world, we have shootings in grocery stores & shopping malls. Does this now mean I can carry a weapon unconcealed when I go Christmas shopping?
In Wisconsin, yes, as long as it is a full-length military assault weapon.
And if a teenage girl seems to threaten you with her skateboard you would be OK to empty your entire clip into her body
Precedent matters.
yep in wisconsin killing is legal if u claim self-defense even if u were breaking the law in the first place
am very sad with the precedent that has now been set.
In future protest settings, we will see similar people with weapons expecting trouble to take place. In today's world, we have shootings in grocery stores & shopping malls. Does this now mean I can carry a weapon unconcealed when I go Christmas shopping?
In Wisconsin, yes, as long as it is a full-length military assault weapon.
And if a teenage girl seems to threaten you with her skateboard you would be OK to empty your entire clip into her body
Precedent matters.
yep in wisconsin killing is legal if u claim self-defense even if u were breaking the law in the first place
"I'm the MOST HONEST HUMAN BEING that God has EVER created!!" - Donald Trump
1
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
Quote Originally Posted by Midnight1:
am very sad with the precedent that has now been set.
In future protest settings, we will see similar people with weapons expecting trouble to take place. In today's world, we have shootings in grocery stores & shopping malls. Does this now mean I can carry a weapon unconcealed when I go Christmas shopping?
In Wisconsin, yes, as long as it is a full-length military assault weapon.
And if a teenage girl seems to threaten you with her skateboard you would be OK to empty your entire clip into her body
Precedent matters.
yep in wisconsin killing is legal if u claim self-defense even if u were breaking the law in the first place
Kelly and Fubah are either the same person or it’s just a coincidence that they’re the only people in covers history that can’t figure out how not to double post.
They're waiting for the infrastructure bill to allocate the money for broadband internet to the boonies. That'll fix it.
1
Quote Originally Posted by I_Need_A_Detox:
Kelly and Fubah are either the same person or it’s just a coincidence that they’re the only people in covers history that can’t figure out how not to double post.
They're waiting for the infrastructure bill to allocate the money for broadband internet to the boonies. That'll fix it.
Quote Originally Posted by Midnight1: am very sad with the precedent that has now been set. In future protest settings, we will see similar people with weapons expecting trouble to take place. In today's world, we have shootings in grocery stores & shopping malls. Does this now mean I can carry a weapon unconcealed when I go Christmas shopping? In Wisconsin, yes, as long as it is a full-length military assault weapon. And if a teenage girl seems to threaten you with her skateboard you would be OK to empty your entire clip into her body Precedent matters.
So you should probably stay out of Wisconsin and away from teenage girls with skateboards. Got it. Be afraid of everyone, especially if you're a civil citizen.
0
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
Quote Originally Posted by Midnight1: am very sad with the precedent that has now been set. In future protest settings, we will see similar people with weapons expecting trouble to take place. In today's world, we have shootings in grocery stores & shopping malls. Does this now mean I can carry a weapon unconcealed when I go Christmas shopping? In Wisconsin, yes, as long as it is a full-length military assault weapon. And if a teenage girl seems to threaten you with her skateboard you would be OK to empty your entire clip into her body Precedent matters.
So you should probably stay out of Wisconsin and away from teenage girls with skateboards. Got it. Be afraid of everyone, especially if you're a civil citizen.
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Quote Originally Posted by Midnight1: am very sad with the precedent that has now been set. In future protest settings, we will see similar people with weapons expecting trouble to take place. In today's world, we have shootings in grocery stores & shopping malls. Does this now mean I can carry a weapon unconcealed when I go Christmas shopping? In Wisconsin, yes, as long as it is a full-length military assault weapon.
And if a teenage girl seems to threaten you with her skateboard you would be OK to empty your entire clip into her body Precedent matters. yep in wisconsin killing is legal if u claim self-defense even if u were breaking the law in the first place
Its sad but unfortunately true
2
Quote Originally Posted by KellyM_1964:
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Quote Originally Posted by Midnight1: am very sad with the precedent that has now been set. In future protest settings, we will see similar people with weapons expecting trouble to take place. In today's world, we have shootings in grocery stores & shopping malls. Does this now mean I can carry a weapon unconcealed when I go Christmas shopping? In Wisconsin, yes, as long as it is a full-length military assault weapon.
And if a teenage girl seems to threaten you with her skateboard you would be OK to empty your entire clip into her body Precedent matters. yep in wisconsin killing is legal if u claim self-defense even if u were breaking the law in the first place
Looked like self defense to me. If someone has an AR pointed at the ground, I'm not trying to swing my skate board at them if they didn't do anything to me. If someone with an AR is running away from me, I'm not going to chase after them and tell them to shoot me.
Doesn't take a brainiac to understand common sense. Apparently some people just don't have common sense which is why they're pedos and have domestic abuse charges against them to their loved ones and who end up in mental hospitals. Clearly they have mental issues.
1
@fubah2
Looked like self defense to me. If someone has an AR pointed at the ground, I'm not trying to swing my skate board at them if they didn't do anything to me. If someone with an AR is running away from me, I'm not going to chase after them and tell them to shoot me.
Doesn't take a brainiac to understand common sense. Apparently some people just don't have common sense which is why they're pedos and have domestic abuse charges against them to their loved ones and who end up in mental hospitals. Clearly they have mental issues.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
