Quote Originally Posted by Midnight1: @I_Need_A_Detox This kid shouldn't walk. He killed 2 people. Believe it or not, there are still consequences for one's actions. When a mob is attacking you, you have the right to self-defense in America. If you don’t agree maybe this isn’t the right country for you.
This is a country of laws Mr. Law and Order. Your boy Kyle was open carrying a firearm he was not legally permitted to possess or carry in a state he is not from.
Bottom line he should not have been carrying or using that weapon as he was too young and broke the law.
If you don't like following laws, perhaps this country is not for you.
0
Quote Originally Posted by I_Need_A_Detox:
Quote Originally Posted by Midnight1: @I_Need_A_Detox This kid shouldn't walk. He killed 2 people. Believe it or not, there are still consequences for one's actions. When a mob is attacking you, you have the right to self-defense in America. If you don’t agree maybe this isn’t the right country for you.
This is a country of laws Mr. Law and Order. Your boy Kyle was open carrying a firearm he was not legally permitted to possess or carry in a state he is not from.
Bottom line he should not have been carrying or using that weapon as he was too young and broke the law.
If you don't like following laws, perhaps this country is not for you.
Quote Originally Posted by Midnight1: @I_Need_A_Detox This kid shouldn't walk. He killed 2 people. Believe it or not, there are still consequences for one's actions. When a mob is attacking you, you have the right to self-defense in America. If you don’t agree maybe this isn’t the right country for you.
Exactly! When you're in a crowd and someone is walking around with an automatic rifle with no reason other than looking for trouble you have the right to protect and defend yourself.
0
Quote Originally Posted by I_Need_A_Detox:
Quote Originally Posted by Midnight1: @I_Need_A_Detox This kid shouldn't walk. He killed 2 people. Believe it or not, there are still consequences for one's actions. When a mob is attacking you, you have the right to self-defense in America. If you don’t agree maybe this isn’t the right country for you.
Exactly! When you're in a crowd and someone is walking around with an automatic rifle with no reason other than looking for trouble you have the right to protect and defend yourself.
You don't even have an argument because you are full of $hit.
Just shows that you totally support the breaking of laws when it involves someone you feel carries the same ideological and political stance as you.
Illegally possessing, carrying, and using a military style rifle totally ok with you, as long as the shooter is a Republican.
But hey if a BLM protestor throws a brick through a window and causes property damage (misdemeanor), he should get the death penalty according to you (Law and Order).
Everyone can see right thru your hypocritical BS you spew in here daily.
Give it a rest.
0
Quote Originally Posted by I_Need_A_Detox:
Your only argument is the misdemeanor
You don't even have an argument because you are full of $hit.
Just shows that you totally support the breaking of laws when it involves someone you feel carries the same ideological and political stance as you.
Illegally possessing, carrying, and using a military style rifle totally ok with you, as long as the shooter is a Republican.
But hey if a BLM protestor throws a brick through a window and causes property damage (misdemeanor), he should get the death penalty according to you (Law and Order).
Everyone can see right thru your hypocritical BS you spew in here daily.
"These restrictions only apply to a person under age 18 who possesses or is armed with a rifle or a shotgun if the firearm is a short-barreled rifle or short-barreled shotgun, or if the person is not in compliance with the hunting regulations."
An AR-15 is classified as a rifle.
He’ll probably be found not guilty of the misdemeanor as well.
0
According to Wisconsin Statute 948.60(2)(a):
"These restrictions only apply to a person under age 18 who possesses or is armed with a rifle or a shotgun if the firearm is a short-barreled rifle or short-barreled shotgun, or if the person is not in compliance with the hunting regulations."
An AR-15 is classified as a rifle.
He’ll probably be found not guilty of the misdemeanor as well.
Exactly! When you're in a crowd and someone is walking around with an automatic rifle with no reason other than looking for trouble you have the right to protect and defend yourself.
With no reason?
0
Quote Originally Posted by BWS77:
Exactly! When you're in a crowd and someone is walking around with an automatic rifle with no reason other than looking for trouble you have the right to protect and defend yourself.
According to Wisconsin Statute 948.60(2)(a): "These restrictions only apply to a person under age 18 who possesses or is armed with a rifle or a shotgun if the firearm is a short-barreled rifle or short-barreled shotgun, or if the person is not in compliance with the hunting regulations." An AR-15 is classified as a rifle. He’ll probably be found not guilty of the misdemeanor as well.
Then why is he being charged for the misdemeanor? Why did the judge refuse to drop the weapons charge? Your interpretation is dubious at best. Not surprising though because you are generally full of $hit in every post. You sound like one of Kyles attorneys. He is doing time for at least breaking the law for possessing the gun underage and bringing across state lines. Your boy isnt just walking free on everything although I know thats what your biased partisan a$$ wants.
0
Quote Originally Posted by I_Need_A_Detox:
According to Wisconsin Statute 948.60(2)(a): "These restrictions only apply to a person under age 18 who possesses or is armed with a rifle or a shotgun if the firearm is a short-barreled rifle or short-barreled shotgun, or if the person is not in compliance with the hunting regulations." An AR-15 is classified as a rifle. He’ll probably be found not guilty of the misdemeanor as well.
Then why is he being charged for the misdemeanor? Why did the judge refuse to drop the weapons charge? Your interpretation is dubious at best. Not surprising though because you are generally full of $hit in every post. You sound like one of Kyles attorneys. He is doing time for at least breaking the law for possessing the gun underage and bringing across state lines. Your boy isnt just walking free on everything although I know thats what your biased partisan a$$ wants.
According to Wisconsin Statute 948.60(2)(a): "These restrictions only apply to a person under age 18 who possesses or is armed with a rifle or a shotgun if the firearm is a short-barreled rifle or short-barreled shotgun, or if the person is not in compliance with the hunting regulations." An AR-15 is classified as a rifle. He’ll probably be found not guilty of the misdemeanor as well.
Then why is he being charged for the misdemeanor? Why did the judge refuse to drop the weapons charge? Your interpretation is dubious at best. Not surprising though because you are generally full of $hit in every post. You sound like one of Kyles attorneys. He is doing time for at least breaking the law for possessing the gun underage and bringing across state lines. Your boy isnt just walking free on everything although I know thats what your biased partisan a$$ wants.
0
Quote Originally Posted by I_Need_A_Detox:
According to Wisconsin Statute 948.60(2)(a): "These restrictions only apply to a person under age 18 who possesses or is armed with a rifle or a shotgun if the firearm is a short-barreled rifle or short-barreled shotgun, or if the person is not in compliance with the hunting regulations." An AR-15 is classified as a rifle. He’ll probably be found not guilty of the misdemeanor as well.
Then why is he being charged for the misdemeanor? Why did the judge refuse to drop the weapons charge? Your interpretation is dubious at best. Not surprising though because you are generally full of $hit in every post. You sound like one of Kyles attorneys. He is doing time for at least breaking the law for possessing the gun underage and bringing across state lines. Your boy isnt just walking free on everything although I know thats what your biased partisan a$$ wants.
My takeaway from this trial would be: Don’t attack a guy with a gun, unless you also have a gun or can leap over buildings in a single bound. Also worth noting that the three guys who got shot were not a bunch of pacifists drawn against their nature to come to the defense of the world against this “active shooter”. To the contrary, they were a collection of violent thugs, child abusers, and mentally ill people. So there’s reason to believe that these guys were particularly apt to jump the gun on the “active shooter” assumption, and not really much reason to assume based on this incident that a normal person has such a hard time figuring it out.
1
My takeaway from this trial would be: Don’t attack a guy with a gun, unless you also have a gun or can leap over buildings in a single bound. Also worth noting that the three guys who got shot were not a bunch of pacifists drawn against their nature to come to the defense of the world against this “active shooter”. To the contrary, they were a collection of violent thugs, child abusers, and mentally ill people. So there’s reason to believe that these guys were particularly apt to jump the gun on the “active shooter” assumption, and not really much reason to assume based on this incident that a normal person has such a hard time figuring it out.
There's a video out there in the twitterverse of this punk ass getting in the middle of a fight between 2 girls & throwing haymakers at one of the girls.
0
There's a video out there in the twitterverse of this punk ass getting in the middle of a fight between 2 girls & throwing haymakers at one of the girls.
The DA continues to embarrass himself. He's stalling....trying to buy time in hopes of a miracle. His hiring of a guy to break down, frame by frame, any video he can find in hopes of getting a "goal line view" of hand positions & such is a joke. The defense could rebut it just by moving the frames forward or back a couple. Maybe if he put this much energy into prosecuting all the rioters & looters the town would be safer. They certainly know where to find all the video evidence they need.
1
The DA continues to embarrass himself. He's stalling....trying to buy time in hopes of a miracle. His hiring of a guy to break down, frame by frame, any video he can find in hopes of getting a "goal line view" of hand positions & such is a joke. The defense could rebut it just by moving the frames forward or back a couple. Maybe if he put this much energy into prosecuting all the rioters & looters the town would be safer. They certainly know where to find all the video evidence they need.
Defense attorney in the McMichael/Bryan trial objects to Al Sharpton sitting with Ahmaud Arbery’s family: “We don’t want to have any more black pastors coming in here .. sitting with the victim’s family.”
Presumably, white pastors are ok.
0
@THEMUGG
Defense attorney in the McMichael/Bryan trial objects to Al Sharpton sitting with Ahmaud Arbery’s family: “We don’t want to have any more black pastors coming in here .. sitting with the victim’s family.”
There's a video out there in the twitterverse of this punk ass getting in the middle of a fight between 2 girls & throwing haymakers at one of the girls.
There's a video out there in the twitterverse of this punk ass getting in the middle of a fight between 2 girls & throwing haymakers at one of the girls.
Rosenbaum — sentenced to prison for sexually abusing five children — all boys between the ages of 9 and 11. Democrat Rosenbaum was temporarily living with the boys’ parents after his mother had kicked him out for disobeying her rules about one month earlier. Over the course of his weeks-long stay, Democrat Rosenbaum molested the boys, showed them porn, and performed oral sex on them, among other offenses.
2
Democrats involved in this case
Rosenbaum — sentenced to prison for sexually abusing five children — all boys between the ages of 9 and 11. Democrat Rosenbaum was temporarily living with the boys’ parents after his mother had kicked him out for disobeying her rules about one month earlier. Over the course of his weeks-long stay, Democrat Rosenbaum molested the boys, showed them porn, and performed oral sex on them, among other offenses.
Huber — threatened his brother and grandmother at their home with a knife, choked the brother, and demanded that they follow his orders. The complaint said the brother wanted to take Democrat Huber to a hospital, apparently for emergency mental health help, but Democrat Huber resisted. In the end, he was charged with strangulation and suffocation and false imprisonment, both of which are felony crimes.
Democrat Huber was also charged with disorderly conduct, a misdemeanor offense, after a fight with his sister at their house, per a criminal complaint by Kenosha prosecutors.
3
Huber — threatened his brother and grandmother at their home with a knife, choked the brother, and demanded that they follow his orders. The complaint said the brother wanted to take Democrat Huber to a hospital, apparently for emergency mental health help, but Democrat Huber resisted. In the end, he was charged with strangulation and suffocation and false imprisonment, both of which are felony crimes.
Democrat Huber was also charged with disorderly conduct, a misdemeanor offense, after a fight with his sister at their house, per a criminal complaint by Kenosha prosecutors.
Grosskreutz — Democrat Grosskreutz was charged with a felony until this year when his felony burglary conviction was expunged. Also his second felony dwi charge from a oct 6th 2020 traffic stop was mysteriously dropped 3 days before the rittenhouse trial began. So at the time of the protest he was facing felony charges and was not legally able to possess a firearm at all … I believe? Anyways Democrat Grosskreutz did reveal in the trial that he was carrying a gun despite having an expired concealed carry permit.
3
Grosskreutz — Democrat Grosskreutz was charged with a felony until this year when his felony burglary conviction was expunged. Also his second felony dwi charge from a oct 6th 2020 traffic stop was mysteriously dropped 3 days before the rittenhouse trial began. So at the time of the protest he was facing felony charges and was not legally able to possess a firearm at all … I believe? Anyways Democrat Grosskreutz did reveal in the trial that he was carrying a gun despite having an expired concealed carry permit.
This whole ordeal is so freaking sad. I'm not watching any of the trial btw.
Let us start from the beginning. You have a black man with a knive fighting police, he ends up getting shot. There's going to be riots and businesses will burn. We know police will be standing down during these riots, no national guard, let them burn the city, it was that way across our nation in 2020. Law and order you say? HA! So a bunch of idiots decide to guard businesses they don't own, among them a 17 year old pasty face white boy. Police actually inferface with this kid holding a rifle and do nothing. Gave him bottled water if I remember right. Freaking sad where we are at as a country.
So 5 or 10 years ago the situation would be different. Police and national guard would have taken the streets, those with rifles would be told to get their ass off the streets and rioters actually arrested. That is called "Law and Order".
But not in 2020. The democratic party promoted lawlessness throughout the year as they had to beat the evil orange face man at all costs. So this pasty white boy is now in the middle of a riot. Those participating in the riot see this kid as "out of place" for sure, an easy mark for their aggressions. The kid is lucky to be alive today.
So here we are with the current president calling this kid a white supremist. Folks on here calling him a fucker, etc.
I find it sickening. None of this would have happened if there was actually law and order.
Now New York BLM is threatening the new mayor with violence if he attempts to reduce the huge amount of violence seen in that city.
Which way will we go?
2
This whole ordeal is so freaking sad. I'm not watching any of the trial btw.
Let us start from the beginning. You have a black man with a knive fighting police, he ends up getting shot. There's going to be riots and businesses will burn. We know police will be standing down during these riots, no national guard, let them burn the city, it was that way across our nation in 2020. Law and order you say? HA! So a bunch of idiots decide to guard businesses they don't own, among them a 17 year old pasty face white boy. Police actually inferface with this kid holding a rifle and do nothing. Gave him bottled water if I remember right. Freaking sad where we are at as a country.
So 5 or 10 years ago the situation would be different. Police and national guard would have taken the streets, those with rifles would be told to get their ass off the streets and rioters actually arrested. That is called "Law and Order".
But not in 2020. The democratic party promoted lawlessness throughout the year as they had to beat the evil orange face man at all costs. So this pasty white boy is now in the middle of a riot. Those participating in the riot see this kid as "out of place" for sure, an easy mark for their aggressions. The kid is lucky to be alive today.
So here we are with the current president calling this kid a white supremist. Folks on here calling him a fucker, etc.
I find it sickening. None of this would have happened if there was actually law and order.
Now New York BLM is threatening the new mayor with violence if he attempts to reduce the huge amount of violence seen in that city.
@THEMUGG Defense attorney in the McMichael/Bryan trial objects to Al Sharpton sitting with Ahmaud Arbery’s family: “We don’t want to have any more black pastors coming in here .. sitting with the victim’s family.” Presumably, white pastors are ok.
That's almost as bad as all the whack jobs crying racism & white supremacy in the KR case.
1
Quote Originally Posted by Midnight1:
@THEMUGG Defense attorney in the McMichael/Bryan trial objects to Al Sharpton sitting with Ahmaud Arbery’s family: “We don’t want to have any more black pastors coming in here .. sitting with the victim’s family.” Presumably, white pastors are ok.
That's almost as bad as all the whack jobs crying racism & white supremacy in the KR case.
Al Sharpton is a piece of shit who fuels the flames of racism and hatred, a person who only cares for himself and feeds, preys and profits on the people he claims to help...
2
Al Sharpton is a piece of shit who fuels the flames of racism and hatred, a person who only cares for himself and feeds, preys and profits on the people he claims to help...
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
shoes... real Patriot!
Hot Forum Topics
