Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Is a racist, conspiracy-theorist, xenophobeGeorgia rep. Marjorie Taylor Greenethe new face of the GOP ?? Taylor Greene has also faced a backlash over recently resurfaced comments about the Parkland school massacre.Students who survived the Parkland, Florida, school shooting and families of the victims have called for Taylor Greene's resignation after comments surfaced that showed her agreeing with people who said the 2018 shooting was a "false flag" operation.(meaning, a staged event, with paid actors) And apparently, she questions whether the massacre in Las Vegas was also a false flag operation as well!
The regime executed Hans and Sophie Scholl and Christoph Probst on February 22, 1943. Officials also eventually arrested and executed philosophy professor Kurt Huber, who had guided the movement, and the rest of the “White Rose” members.
At his trial Huber remained loyal to the eighteenth century German philosopher Immanuel Kant’s ethical teaching, as he concluded his defense with the words of Kant’s disciple Johann Gottlieb Fichte:
0
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Is a racist, conspiracy-theorist, xenophobeGeorgia rep. Marjorie Taylor Greenethe new face of the GOP ?? Taylor Greene has also faced a backlash over recently resurfaced comments about the Parkland school massacre.Students who survived the Parkland, Florida, school shooting and families of the victims have called for Taylor Greene's resignation after comments surfaced that showed her agreeing with people who said the 2018 shooting was a "false flag" operation.(meaning, a staged event, with paid actors) And apparently, she questions whether the massacre in Las Vegas was also a false flag operation as well!
The regime executed Hans and Sophie Scholl and Christoph Probst on February 22, 1943. Officials also eventually arrested and executed philosophy professor Kurt Huber, who had guided the movement, and the rest of the “White Rose” members.
At his trial Huber remained loyal to the eighteenth century German philosopher Immanuel Kant’s ethical teaching, as he concluded his defense with the words of Kant’s disciple Johann Gottlieb Fichte:
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Is a racist, conspiracy-theorist, xenophobeGeorgia rep. Marjorie Taylor Greenethe new face of the GOP ?? Taylor Greene has also faced a backlash over recently resurfaced comments about the Parkland school massacre.Students who survived the Parkland, Florida, school shooting and families of the victims have called for Taylor Greene's resignation after comments surfaced that showed her agreeing with people who said the 2018 shooting was a "false flag" operation.(meaning, a staged event, with paid actors) And apparently, she questions whether the massacre in Las Vegas was also a false flag operation as well! The regime executed Hans and Sophie Scholl and Christoph Probst on February 22, 1943. Officials also eventually arrested and executed philosophy professor Kurt Huber, who had guided the movement, and the rest of the “White Rose” members. At his trial Huber remained loyal to the eighteenth century German philosopher Immanuel Kant’s ethical teaching, as he concluded his defense with the words of Kant’s disciple Johann Gottlieb Fichte:
"I'm the MOST HONEST HUMAN BEING that God has EVER created!!" - Donald Trump
2
Quote Originally Posted by nature1970:
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Is a racist, conspiracy-theorist, xenophobeGeorgia rep. Marjorie Taylor Greenethe new face of the GOP ?? Taylor Greene has also faced a backlash over recently resurfaced comments about the Parkland school massacre.Students who survived the Parkland, Florida, school shooting and families of the victims have called for Taylor Greene's resignation after comments surfaced that showed her agreeing with people who said the 2018 shooting was a "false flag" operation.(meaning, a staged event, with paid actors) And apparently, she questions whether the massacre in Las Vegas was also a false flag operation as well! The regime executed Hans and Sophie Scholl and Christoph Probst on February 22, 1943. Officials also eventually arrested and executed philosophy professor Kurt Huber, who had guided the movement, and the rest of the “White Rose” members. At his trial Huber remained loyal to the eighteenth century German philosopher Immanuel Kant’s ethical teaching, as he concluded his defense with the words of Kant’s disciple Johann Gottlieb Fichte:
lots of moves the repos have done the past 10 yrs which the dems r about to collect rent due also
greene is just another mosquito in the summer of life
dems have a frickn collosal mess to clean up now and couldnt give a ratsass about greene or any other hypocrits who want to pout and stomp their feet boo hooo
i hope merrick garland the new ag makes their lives frickn miserable
payback is a beotch
"I'm the MOST HONEST HUMAN BEING that God has EVER created!!" - Donald Trump
3
lots of moves the repos have done the past 10 yrs which the dems r about to collect rent due also
greene is just another mosquito in the summer of life
dems have a frickn collosal mess to clean up now and couldnt give a ratsass about greene or any other hypocrits who want to pout and stomp their feet boo hooo
i hope merrick garland the new ag makes their lives frickn miserable
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Quote Originally Posted by djbrow: Ok. But haven’t members of the squad condemned Israel? Does that mean they are anti-Semitic? And thus, a good faith basis to be stripped as well? Judgement call. Just like it was for Steve King in 2019, AL Franken (Dmocrat) and like it was again today for MTG. I submit one lone comment does not make anyone anti-semitic, bigot, racist, sexist, etc. I would argue there needs to be a pattern of such behavior. If there is a definite PROVABLE pattern then I would say yes. Of course I would want to see the pattern of evidence. We have to put into perspective, and remember, that not only do the HOUSE lawspermit the action they took today after the Republicans refused to do so, ....BUT eleven republicans broke ranks to agree with them!Hell, a number of REPUBLICAN SENATORS agreed with the Dems on this, including Mitch!!! **And Democrat Al Francken and Republican Steve King are precedents! Further, this wasn't merely a spur of the moment WHIM of the Dems in the House.There was AND STILL IS considerable public backlash to MTG that the Dems listened tobecause those are their constituents - and including survivors/parents/colleagues ofvictims at SandyHook/Parkland/LasVegas/and the Pentagon that MTG disparaged with HER VIEWS -- regardless WHEN she said them!So the Dems sat back and waited for the GOP to "do the right thing" -- like Steve king --but because MTG got the endorsement of adolf trump, most of them REFUSED, and punted to the the Dems.So the Dems did what was called for -- not unlike what the GOP did to Steve King in 2019.
Ok, again, you are referring to her views. Tell me on what objective standard, moving forward, there is a measurement for the basis of the majority party to remove a member of the minority party from committees.
0
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Quote Originally Posted by djbrow: Ok. But haven’t members of the squad condemned Israel? Does that mean they are anti-Semitic? And thus, a good faith basis to be stripped as well? Judgement call. Just like it was for Steve King in 2019, AL Franken (Dmocrat) and like it was again today for MTG. I submit one lone comment does not make anyone anti-semitic, bigot, racist, sexist, etc. I would argue there needs to be a pattern of such behavior. If there is a definite PROVABLE pattern then I would say yes. Of course I would want to see the pattern of evidence. We have to put into perspective, and remember, that not only do the HOUSE lawspermit the action they took today after the Republicans refused to do so, ....BUT eleven republicans broke ranks to agree with them!Hell, a number of REPUBLICAN SENATORS agreed with the Dems on this, including Mitch!!! **And Democrat Al Francken and Republican Steve King are precedents! Further, this wasn't merely a spur of the moment WHIM of the Dems in the House.There was AND STILL IS considerable public backlash to MTG that the Dems listened tobecause those are their constituents - and including survivors/parents/colleagues ofvictims at SandyHook/Parkland/LasVegas/and the Pentagon that MTG disparaged with HER VIEWS -- regardless WHEN she said them!So the Dems sat back and waited for the GOP to "do the right thing" -- like Steve king --but because MTG got the endorsement of adolf trump, most of them REFUSED, and punted to the the Dems.So the Dems did what was called for -- not unlike what the GOP did to Steve King in 2019.
Ok, again, you are referring to her views. Tell me on what objective standard, moving forward, there is a measurement for the basis of the majority party to remove a member of the minority party from committees.
Rep. Yoho put his finger in my face,” she (Congressperson Cortez)recalled. “He called me disgusting. He called me crazy. He called me out of my mind. And he called me dangerous. And then he took a few more steps, and after I had recognized his comments as rude, he walked away and said, ‘I’m rude? You’re calling me rude?’”
It this enough to remove a person from a committee?
0
Rep yoho next.
Rep. Yoho put his finger in my face,” she (Congressperson Cortez)recalled. “He called me disgusting. He called me crazy. He called me out of my mind. And he called me dangerous. And then he took a few more steps, and after I had recognized his comments as rude, he walked away and said, ‘I’m rude? You’re calling me rude?’”
It this enough to remove a person from a committee?
You can dictate to another fubah2 that her feelings are baseless? Yet we should respect another's feelings as real.
We keep circling back to what is good for one is privileged even if another suffers.
While one group feasts on the carnal lust of revenge the other must suffer by the feast.
And then have this passive nativity that it won't be played the same way against your chosen party when the deal is reversed.
Pelosi is dealing in feelings her entire case is based on sensationalized events that can not be proven in court.
She is not going to succeed to convict Trump.
Sooo ms Greene becomes a worthy opponent cause she is to weak to actually fight the leader?
You lost seats in the house. Barely by a perfect storm have a temporal.control of the senate.
Any venerable democrstic senator is a breath away from McConnell receiving his gavel back.
You are over playing the hand given
Your not holding a royal straight flush supermajority ... by the finest of margins your two pair bests their pair of aces. But if the river just that extra ace. You fail.
0
WHO dictates what is real and what is baseless.
You can dictate to another fubah2 that her feelings are baseless? Yet we should respect another's feelings as real.
We keep circling back to what is good for one is privileged even if another suffers.
While one group feasts on the carnal lust of revenge the other must suffer by the feast.
And then have this passive nativity that it won't be played the same way against your chosen party when the deal is reversed.
Pelosi is dealing in feelings her entire case is based on sensationalized events that can not be proven in court.
She is not going to succeed to convict Trump.
Sooo ms Greene becomes a worthy opponent cause she is to weak to actually fight the leader?
You lost seats in the house. Barely by a perfect storm have a temporal.control of the senate.
Any venerable democrstic senator is a breath away from McConnell receiving his gavel back.
You are over playing the hand given
Your not holding a royal straight flush supermajority ... by the finest of margins your two pair bests their pair of aces. But if the river just that extra ace. You fail.
I am picking on you for unlike the most of your party you have some semblance of an education.
You described Trump over a series of posts as Adolf like individual but your clueless as to how he damn near comwoured the world how he rose to power what he did to cement control of Germany not it's capitol but the people of Germany.
I am sure you heard of me in Kemp buy I doubt you ever read it. And hence the flaw in the campaign sun tzu stated this best another philosopher even more ancient than Immanuel kantz.
To know your Enemy, you must become your Enemy. ... If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the result of a hundred battles. If you know yourself but not the enemy, for every victory gained you will also suffer a defeat. If you know neither the enemy nor yourself, you will succumb in every battle.
0
I am picking on you for unlike the most of your party you have some semblance of an education.
You described Trump over a series of posts as Adolf like individual but your clueless as to how he damn near comwoured the world how he rose to power what he did to cement control of Germany not it's capitol but the people of Germany.
I am sure you heard of me in Kemp buy I doubt you ever read it. And hence the flaw in the campaign sun tzu stated this best another philosopher even more ancient than Immanuel kantz.
To know your Enemy, you must become your Enemy. ... If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the result of a hundred battles. If you know yourself but not the enemy, for every victory gained you will also suffer a defeat. If you know neither the enemy nor yourself, you will succumb in every battle.
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Is a racist, conspiracy-theorist, xenophobeGeorgia rep. Marjorie Taylor Greenethe new face of the GOP ?? Greene, who has embraced and spread the baseless conspiracy theory about a "deep state" working to usurp Trump's agenda, suggested in Facebook posts that FBI agents disloyal to Trump were traitors...Another Facebook post she liked said, "These traitors need to be put to death as an example of what will no longer be tolerated in our country!!!" In one Facebook post from April 2018, Greene wrote conspiratorially about the Iran Deal.A commenter asked Greene, "Now do we get to hang them ?? Meaning H & O ???,"referring to Obama and Hillary Clinton. Greene replied, "Stage is being set. Players are being put in place. We must be patient.This must be done perfectly or liberal judges would let them off."
Who says they are treasonous..
.
0
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Is a racist, conspiracy-theorist, xenophobeGeorgia rep. Marjorie Taylor Greenethe new face of the GOP ?? Greene, who has embraced and spread the baseless conspiracy theory about a "deep state" working to usurp Trump's agenda, suggested in Facebook posts that FBI agents disloyal to Trump were traitors...Another Facebook post she liked said, "These traitors need to be put to death as an example of what will no longer be tolerated in our country!!!" In one Facebook post from April 2018, Greene wrote conspiratorially about the Iran Deal.A commenter asked Greene, "Now do we get to hang them ?? Meaning H & O ???,"referring to Obama and Hillary Clinton. Greene replied, "Stage is being set. Players are being put in place. We must be patient.This must be done perfectly or liberal judges would let them off."
Conjecture is not facts sensationalism is propaganda. And you succumb to the fact you can not believe you are like those humans.and have no understanding of what you enemy is...
You targeting the weakest images in the party hoping the grove doesn't send spiders weaving traps... you find yourself out of any position.
Take for instance telling McConnell you wont violate the rules of the senate. And need a 60 senator to end debate first out of the gate you suspend debate and move with a democrats only plan
How much pork did you have to slice to get the senator from w.v. to go along with this?
Liars. Look at your party ...
Your opening move in the Senate is based on script of denial. Denial of rights if a women who felt trumo win the election.
Denial of the rights republicans dictate who is apart of what comitteee...
By 2022 they will be crying for Trump minded colleagues by 2024 you lose the Senate and presidency.
0
Conjecture is not facts sensationalism is propaganda. And you succumb to the fact you can not believe you are like those humans.and have no understanding of what you enemy is...
You targeting the weakest images in the party hoping the grove doesn't send spiders weaving traps... you find yourself out of any position.
Take for instance telling McConnell you wont violate the rules of the senate. And need a 60 senator to end debate first out of the gate you suspend debate and move with a democrats only plan
How much pork did you have to slice to get the senator from w.v. to go along with this?
Liars. Look at your party ...
Your opening move in the Senate is based on script of denial. Denial of rights if a women who felt trumo win the election.
Denial of the rights republicans dictate who is apart of what comitteee...
By 2022 they will be crying for Trump minded colleagues by 2024 you lose the Senate and presidency.
Because your leadership is the virtue of saint hood... please.
Maybe it's time we as Americans abandoned those two parties and find candidates that reflect us women who under the leadership policies who have begged to feed their kids from agency then then took them and destroyed them.
Or fathers who begged for a job to be ridiculed.
Maybe the 99 percent of Americans that is fed up with Washington find citizens who actually been there done that and you your college professors and they educated media pigments just go and talk amongst your selves.
0
Because your leadership is the virtue of saint hood... please.
Maybe it's time we as Americans abandoned those two parties and find candidates that reflect us women who under the leadership policies who have begged to feed their kids from agency then then took them and destroyed them.
Or fathers who begged for a job to be ridiculed.
Maybe the 99 percent of Americans that is fed up with Washington find citizens who actually been there done that and you your college professors and they educated media pigments just go and talk amongst your selves.
@nature1970 It is a little misleading as her opponent withdrew. But the point is well taken
are you going to run a Cyprus tree against her? She wins that district Nancy is an aged wall flower near senile and not ever comprehensive. So an 80 year old drunk takes in a fresh face ... she is gone and that face is weathered.
What doesn't destroy you only builds stronger tougher and less sympathetic to her enemy.
She won't be so nieve white a champion in the making...
0
Quote Originally Posted by djbrow:
@nature1970 It is a little misleading as her opponent withdrew. But the point is well taken
are you going to run a Cyprus tree against her? She wins that district Nancy is an aged wall flower near senile and not ever comprehensive. So an 80 year old drunk takes in a fresh face ... she is gone and that face is weathered.
What doesn't destroy you only builds stronger tougher and less sympathetic to her enemy.
She won't be so nieve white a champion in the making...
Rep yoho next. Rep. Yoho put his finger in my face,” she (Congressperson Cortez)recalled. “He called me disgusting. He called me crazy. He called me out of my mind. And he called me dangerous. And then he took a few more steps, and after I had recognized his comments as rude, he walked away and said, ‘I’m rude? You’re calling me rude?’” It this enough to remove a person from a committee?
now when ms greene states this to new speaker of the house ..when republicans regain control it happens
Wjat happens to those thst did this to their lady to those congress PEOPLE . Stop acting like republicans will be saint like. You clearly view the as rump lickers white suppremists make chavinists and may i term kellys remarks " rump lickers "...
0
Quote Originally Posted by nature1970:
Rep yoho next. Rep. Yoho put his finger in my face,” she (Congressperson Cortez)recalled. “He called me disgusting. He called me crazy. He called me out of my mind. And he called me dangerous. And then he took a few more steps, and after I had recognized his comments as rude, he walked away and said, ‘I’m rude? You’re calling me rude?’” It this enough to remove a person from a committee?
now when ms greene states this to new speaker of the house ..when republicans regain control it happens
Wjat happens to those thst did this to their lady to those congress PEOPLE . Stop acting like republicans will be saint like. You clearly view the as rump lickers white suppremists make chavinists and may i term kellys remarks " rump lickers "...
Marjorie Taylor Greene Says Committee Removal Silences Her Constituents, would've been a waste of time
WSJ, Feb 5
Mrs. Greene, speaking to reporters in a combative press conference, said lawmakers said lawmakers (including 11 republicans) who voted to remove her from the committees “actually stripped my district of their voice, they stripped my voters of having representation to work for them.”
(So then by HER logic, this means the other 400+ House reps who are similarly NOT on committees also have THEIR constituents "stripped of representation" too, or only her?!)
5
Marjorie Taylor Greene Says Committee Removal Silences Her Constituents, would've been a waste of time
WSJ, Feb 5
Mrs. Greene, speaking to reporters in a combative press conference, said lawmakers said lawmakers (including 11 republicans) who voted to remove her from the committees “actually stripped my district of their voice, they stripped my voters of having representation to work for them.”
(So then by HER logic, this means the other 400+ House reps who are similarly NOT on committees also have THEIR constituents "stripped of representation" too, or only her?!)
So then by HER logic, this means the other 400+ House reps
This is a false statement there are 435 members of the house of representatives most serve on committee or sub comittees. Of course how many is now obscured but 400 plus members have assignments at already weighted 2 minority to 3 majority.
Another example of how you have manipulated and falsely stated the information to fit your narrative.
0
So then by HER logic, this means the other 400+ House reps
This is a false statement there are 435 members of the house of representatives most serve on committee or sub comittees. Of course how many is now obscured but 400 plus members have assignments at already weighted 2 minority to 3 majority.
Another example of how you have manipulated and falsely stated the information to fit your narrative.
So then by HER logic, this means the other 400+ House reps This is a false statement there are 435 members of the house of representatives most serve on committee or sub comittees. Of course how many is now obscured but 400 plus members have assignments at already weighted 2 minority to 3 majority. Another example of how you have manipulated and falsely stated the information to fit your narrative.
Well, that was a typo.......should not read 400+, but rather 200+
However the tone and intent of your post is no typo.
You've lost my respect ...
1
Quote Originally Posted by nature1970:
So then by HER logic, this means the other 400+ House reps This is a false statement there are 435 members of the house of representatives most serve on committee or sub comittees. Of course how many is now obscured but 400 plus members have assignments at already weighted 2 minority to 3 majority. Another example of how you have manipulated and falsely stated the information to fit your narrative.
Well, that was a typo.......should not read 400+, but rather 200+
However the tone and intent of your post is no typo.
Marjorie Taylor Greene Says Committee Removal Silences Her Constituents,would've been a waste of time WSJ, Feb 5 Mrs. Greene, speaking to reporters in a combative press conference, said lawmakers said lawmakers (including 11 republicans) who voted to remove her from the committees “actually stripped my district of their voice, they stripped my voters of having representation to work for them.” (So then by HER logic, this means the other 400+ House reps who are similarly NOT on committees also have THEIR constituents "stripped of representation" too, or only her?!)
Correcting my typo above from 400+ to 200+ ...
Marjorie Taylor Greene Says: Committee Removal "Silences Her Constituents," and "would've been a waste of time"
WSJ, Feb 5
Mrs. Greene, speaking to reporters in a combative press conference, said lawmakers said lawmakers (including 11 republicans) who voted to remove her from the committees “actually stripped my district of their voice, they stripped my voters of having representation to work for them.”
(So then by HER logic, this means the other 200+ House reps who are similarly NOT on committees also have THEIR constituents "stripped of representation" too, or only her?!)
1
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
Marjorie Taylor Greene Says Committee Removal Silences Her Constituents,would've been a waste of time WSJ, Feb 5 Mrs. Greene, speaking to reporters in a combative press conference, said lawmakers said lawmakers (including 11 republicans) who voted to remove her from the committees “actually stripped my district of their voice, they stripped my voters of having representation to work for them.” (So then by HER logic, this means the other 400+ House reps who are similarly NOT on committees also have THEIR constituents "stripped of representation" too, or only her?!)
Correcting my typo above from 400+ to 200+ ...
Marjorie Taylor Greene Says: Committee Removal "Silences Her Constituents," and "would've been a waste of time"
WSJ, Feb 5
Mrs. Greene, speaking to reporters in a combative press conference, said lawmakers said lawmakers (including 11 republicans) who voted to remove her from the committees “actually stripped my district of their voice, they stripped my voters of having representation to work for them.”
(So then by HER logic, this means the other 200+ House reps who are similarly NOT on committees also have THEIR constituents "stripped of representation" too, or only her?!)
Quote Originally Posted by nature1970: So then by HER logic, this means the other 400+ House reps This is a false statement there are 435 members of the house of representatives most serve on committee or sub comittees. Of course how many is now obscured but 400 plus members have assignments at already weighted 2 minority to 3 majority. Another example of how you have manipulated and falsely stated the information to fit your narrative.
Well, that was a typo.......should not read 400+, but rather 200+
However the tone and intent of your post is no typo. You've lost my respect ...
Correcting my typo above from 400+ to 200+ ...
Marjorie Taylor Greene Says: Committee Removal "Silences Her Constituents," and "would've been a waste of time"
WSJ, Feb 5
Mrs. Greene, speaking to reporters in a combative press conference, said lawmakers said lawmakers (including 11 republicans) who voted to remove her from the committees “actually stripped my district of their voice, they stripped my voters of having representation to work for them.”
(So then by HER logic, this means the other 200+ House reps who are similarly NOT on committees also have THEIR constituents "stripped of representation" too, or only her?!)
1
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
Quote Originally Posted by nature1970: So then by HER logic, this means the other 400+ House reps This is a false statement there are 435 members of the house of representatives most serve on committee or sub comittees. Of course how many is now obscured but 400 plus members have assignments at already weighted 2 minority to 3 majority. Another example of how you have manipulated and falsely stated the information to fit your narrative.
Well, that was a typo.......should not read 400+, but rather 200+
However the tone and intent of your post is no typo. You've lost my respect ...
Correcting my typo above from 400+ to 200+ ...
Marjorie Taylor Greene Says: Committee Removal "Silences Her Constituents," and "would've been a waste of time"
WSJ, Feb 5
Mrs. Greene, speaking to reporters in a combative press conference, said lawmakers said lawmakers (including 11 republicans) who voted to remove her from the committees “actually stripped my district of their voice, they stripped my voters of having representation to work for them.”
(So then by HER logic, this means the other 200+ House reps who are similarly NOT on committees also have THEIR constituents "stripped of representation" too, or only her?!)
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.