Isn't really confusing for NC should just have signs a picture of a penis.
Enter here a picture of a vaginas enter here this is so a high school is compliance with feds transgender rights. Seriously when did this crop become a focal issue. For elementary schools. ... the ultra left has pushed to far and as the political pendulum swings it cause and effect is the pendulum is coming back to a hard right line.
0
Isn't really confusing for NC should just have signs a picture of a penis.
Enter here a picture of a vaginas enter here this is so a high school is compliance with feds transgender rights. Seriously when did this crop become a focal issue. For elementary schools. ... the ultra left has pushed to far and as the political pendulum swings it cause and effect is the pendulum is coming back to a hard right line.
DL - You seem to know so much about the happy rights movement. You got something to tell us?
The wedding bs started in the late 90s in the U.S., that's what I was referring to. It's been defeated most of the time when put to a vote but the judges know better.
Sorry if I struck a nerve with you, please accept my sincere apologies, I didn't realize this was such a sensitive subject to you. I hope you can suck it up and forgive me...
Struck a nerve? You mean your uneducated point of view? It is what it is. Uneducated. NBD.
You said that happy rights started in the 90s and then went on this weird emotional rant. If anything you come across like this is a sensitive subject for you. I simply wanted to ascertain if you were talking about how you felt emotionally in your rant or if you were talking about historical facts and what really happened.
I think you pretty clearly showed us that once again you talking about how you feel things are emotionally rather than an informed perspective. But I guess I shouldn't expect much different when you get all emotional with your uneducated point of view.
Just checking, not offended in anyway.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Killer_B:
DL - You seem to know so much about the happy rights movement. You got something to tell us?
The wedding bs started in the late 90s in the U.S., that's what I was referring to. It's been defeated most of the time when put to a vote but the judges know better.
Sorry if I struck a nerve with you, please accept my sincere apologies, I didn't realize this was such a sensitive subject to you. I hope you can suck it up and forgive me...
Struck a nerve? You mean your uneducated point of view? It is what it is. Uneducated. NBD.
You said that happy rights started in the 90s and then went on this weird emotional rant. If anything you come across like this is a sensitive subject for you. I simply wanted to ascertain if you were talking about how you felt emotionally in your rant or if you were talking about historical facts and what really happened.
I think you pretty clearly showed us that once again you talking about how you feel things are emotionally rather than an informed perspective. But I guess I shouldn't expect much different when you get all emotional with your uneducated point of view.
my argument isn't that complicated. it's a matter of how much we want to look to big government to makes us feel comfortable, how much government we want in our lives and the ability of government to accomplish anything in this context anyway.
while i agree government has a role in protecting people, i don't think this particular law does that in any way. because again, if you are looking for government to protect you in a bathroom from being uncomfortable, you're going to be disappointed. also, this law does not address people who commit crimes in places where these crimes would be committed in any historically accurate manner. it would be like fighting religious extremist violence by going after the amish.
and finally, if you do the cost benefit analysis for a law like this, which government and the people who elect them should always do, this law with its added discriminatory elements is insane.
hugh understands the argument, we have some disagreements and we've discussed it. some others don't get it, want to characterize it in terms of their insecurity about happy people or transvestites and i have no interest in discussing those particular personal issues you guys have about them.
People don't/won't get it. Mainly because some one of principles would be able to see the government role issue but remember talking points are used only to attack those targeted, The lack of actual principles are just so lacking in certain groups right now.
It is also from a safety standpoint, people don't get it. It is used to create an emotional point of view to get all sensitive and upset over to be able stage a temper tantrum. But a rational point of view would be looking at numbers and ratios and look at reality. But this would also be having principles but it would be actually caring about safety and not using it to rile up an emotional argument.
The insecurity, bigotry, fear and emotion comes from a lack of understanding. And I'm not saying being understanding of lgbtq people. I'm saying having a clue about reality or history. Instead you see a low information uneducated point of view prescribed to them and packaged in the emotional manner that they can comprehend. The level of denial, vehement stubbornes and level of craziness makes you wonder what is fueling that. Probably a few logical conclusions for that
0
Quote Originally Posted by ClubDirt:
my argument isn't that complicated. it's a matter of how much we want to look to big government to makes us feel comfortable, how much government we want in our lives and the ability of government to accomplish anything in this context anyway.
while i agree government has a role in protecting people, i don't think this particular law does that in any way. because again, if you are looking for government to protect you in a bathroom from being uncomfortable, you're going to be disappointed. also, this law does not address people who commit crimes in places where these crimes would be committed in any historically accurate manner. it would be like fighting religious extremist violence by going after the amish.
and finally, if you do the cost benefit analysis for a law like this, which government and the people who elect them should always do, this law with its added discriminatory elements is insane.
hugh understands the argument, we have some disagreements and we've discussed it. some others don't get it, want to characterize it in terms of their insecurity about happy people or transvestites and i have no interest in discussing those particular personal issues you guys have about them.
People don't/won't get it. Mainly because some one of principles would be able to see the government role issue but remember talking points are used only to attack those targeted, The lack of actual principles are just so lacking in certain groups right now.
It is also from a safety standpoint, people don't get it. It is used to create an emotional point of view to get all sensitive and upset over to be able stage a temper tantrum. But a rational point of view would be looking at numbers and ratios and look at reality. But this would also be having principles but it would be actually caring about safety and not using it to rile up an emotional argument.
The insecurity, bigotry, fear and emotion comes from a lack of understanding. And I'm not saying being understanding of lgbtq people. I'm saying having a clue about reality or history. Instead you see a low information uneducated point of view prescribed to them and packaged in the emotional manner that they can comprehend. The level of denial, vehement stubbornes and level of craziness makes you wonder what is fueling that. Probably a few logical conclusions for that
Seems like you are upset and have become out of touch.
My posts on this are are simply describing what is happening. Not sure why my perspective bothers you so much.
Can you explain to me what the Darryl comment is about?
I figure you are going to cut-and-run like you have been doing when asked to answer questions or go on a weird rant explaining why you are refusing to answer and run like a coward.
So who is Darryl? What does that even mean?
0
Who is Darryl?
Seems like you are upset and have become out of touch.
My posts on this are are simply describing what is happening. Not sure why my perspective bothers you so much.
Can you explain to me what the Darryl comment is about?
I figure you are going to cut-and-run like you have been doing when asked to answer questions or go on a weird rant explaining why you are refusing to answer and run like a coward.
Look at that, you finally left out your keywords (all 58 of them) from one of your posts and what remains is a post which does not put one to sleep before reaching the end (although I was still bored reading it).
Congrats, Daryl, this is progress!
I'm proud of you, little buddy
bigreds daddy
0
Look at that, you finally left out your keywords (all 58 of them) from one of your posts and what remains is a post which does not put one to sleep before reaching the end (although I was still bored reading it).
Oh my bad putting a picture of private parts is lewd obscene for minors as if we were peddling hustler magazine to a minor So a professed lesbian trapped in mans body is allowed in your little.girls locker room bit showing private parts on the bathroom door is a.sex.crime.against a.minor. for some reason its.confusing boys with a penis should use the.boys room.??
0
Oh my bad putting a picture of private parts is lewd obscene for minors as if we were peddling hustler magazine to a minor So a professed lesbian trapped in mans body is allowed in your little.girls locker room bit showing private parts on the bathroom door is a.sex.crime.against a.minor. for some reason its.confusing boys with a penis should use the.boys room.??
The boy ain't right first I thought he was batting for the wrong fence to my shock he is a lesbian trapped in a man's body.....knew he was swinging for the wrong fence. Now he needs a sex change to do it????
0
The boy ain't right first I thought he was batting for the wrong fence to my shock he is a lesbian trapped in a man's body.....knew he was swinging for the wrong fence. Now he needs a sex change to do it????
Look at that, you finally left out your keywords (all 58 of them) from one of your posts and what remains is a post which does not put one to sleep before reaching the end (although I was still bored reading it).
Congrats, Daryl, this is progress!
I'm proud of you, little buddy
Here we go again. I ask simple questions about your own statements and you run like a coward from the dialog.
So who is Darryl? And what does that even mean?
Is it just your way to engaging in jab and name calling while I have done none of that on my end.
Funny how that works
0
Quote Originally Posted by Hugh_Jorgan:
Look at that, you finally left out your keywords (all 58 of them) from one of your posts and what remains is a post which does not put one to sleep before reaching the end (although I was still bored reading it).
Congrats, Daryl, this is progress!
I'm proud of you, little buddy
Here we go again. I ask simple questions about your own statements and you run like a coward from the dialog.
So who is Darryl? And what does that even mean?
Is it just your way to engaging in jab and name calling while I have done none of that on my end.
Huh north Carolina thinks a lesbian trapped in a boys body shouldn't use my daughter's locker room. Here a little common sense .if you can use a urinal maybe you should. If you can't maybe the men's room is.a little over your league......
0
Huh north Carolina thinks a lesbian trapped in a boys body shouldn't use my daughter's locker room. Here a little common sense .if you can use a urinal maybe you should. If you can't maybe the men's room is.a little over your league......
Completely solves seat up seat down crisis in america the urinal.
Such a cold cruel world my little daughter born with a penis couldn't use the girls room the tradgidy the ugly Truth of opinion of a bunch of low educated deplorables.
0
Completely solves seat up seat down crisis in america the urinal.
Such a cold cruel world my little daughter born with a penis couldn't use the girls room the tradgidy the ugly Truth of opinion of a bunch of low educated deplorables.
Completely solves seat up seat down crisis in america the urinal.
Such a cold cruel world my little daughter born with a penis couldn't use the girls room the tradgidy the ugly Truth of opinion of a bunch of low educated deplorables.
Scarier than the poor girl being born with the male sex organ is that her intellect and educational capacity is predominantly based on heredity.
0
Quote Originally Posted by nature1970:
Completely solves seat up seat down crisis in america the urinal.
Such a cold cruel world my little daughter born with a penis couldn't use the girls room the tradgidy the ugly Truth of opinion of a bunch of low educated deplorables.
Scarier than the poor girl being born with the male sex organ is that her intellect and educational capacity is predominantly based on heredity.
Sarcasm is such a problem for educated people. Such a wasted use of student loan money but if your professional attitude is to be a student good lick man.....
0
Sarcasm is such a problem for educated people. Such a wasted use of student loan money but if your professional attitude is to be a student good lick man.....
Cheswick, you are doing a much better job of condensing your simple thoughts into abbreviated posts.
I'm proud of you, Ches. (can I call you Ches?)
This is progress.
Don't forget to line up at the window at 10:00am for meds
What are you even talking about?
Are having a meltdown and have been reduced to name calling, jabs and personal attacks?
Because at this point now that even you recognize you are running from my simple questions your post has become nothing more than a personal attack even tho I make no jabs or name calling on my side.
Funny how that works
I hope you are able to get it together and curb your meltdown. Maybe you are having a crisis in your personal life. But to be reduced to just launching this name calling and personal attacks when I am have done none of that is just sad
Wishing you the best friend
0
Quote Originally Posted by Hugh_Jorgan:
Cheswick, you are doing a much better job of condensing your simple thoughts into abbreviated posts.
I'm proud of you, Ches. (can I call you Ches?)
This is progress.
Don't forget to line up at the window at 10:00am for meds
What are you even talking about?
Are having a meltdown and have been reduced to name calling, jabs and personal attacks?
Because at this point now that even you recognize you are running from my simple questions your post has become nothing more than a personal attack even tho I make no jabs or name calling on my side.
Funny how that works
I hope you are able to get it together and curb your meltdown. Maybe you are having a crisis in your personal life. But to be reduced to just launching this name calling and personal attacks when I am have done none of that is just sad
I am not making any jabs or insults on my end yet here you are with yet another post of name calling and jabs. I never get why some posters become so upset they are reduced to what you are doing while I sit here patiently and take your senseless abuse.
Funny how that works
0
Huh?
You're really coming unglued.
I am not making any jabs or insults on my end yet here you are with yet another post of name calling and jabs. I never get why some posters become so upset they are reduced to what you are doing while I sit here patiently and take your senseless abuse.
I understand you are in denial when it comes to your mental condition, but I defy anyone to read that link and then state that it does not describe you to a tee.
Cheswick, just remember to take your meds and stay in group therapy.
There is help for people like yourself
bigreds daddy
0
Cheswick, playing the victim again? You seem to do this quite often.
You are a perfect example of Borderline Personality Disorder, or BPD.
People with BPD always see themselves as the victim when dealing with others.
BPD sufferers have many distinct personality characteristics as detailed in this article ...
I understand you are in denial when it comes to your mental condition, but I defy anyone to read that link and then state that it does not describe you to a tee.
Cheswick, just remember to take your meds and stay in group therapy.
I would like to know why all of a sudden this became a very important issue to the Left. Apparently all in the name of Progressivism. Basically jamming it down our throats at warp speed.
Funny I was thinking the exact opposite. That the mindless Obama opposition has been dictated every talking point by Obama himself has been prescribed to make transgendered bathrooms the most important issue to them in this area.
Seems like a masterful tactic by the marriage equality people to take the focus off of that and put it on a smaller population in transgendered people. So rather than having a solid anti-equal marriage movement with a clear position on policy similar to the pro-life/roe v wade movement that could play to their advantage both directly and indirectly, Obama and progressives have their opposition chasing their tails and jumping at the next shiny object. And then add the media and talking head bias to make this an issue of terror and fear and you get the emotional content that sways the oppositional masses.
If marriage equality was really an important issue than why not try to fight it or have it repealed and make that the corner stone of a movement built on principles. If not it looks like an emotional and obsessed mentality with no principles or sense that is being played like a puppet by what it is opposing. And emotional obsessions for people that cannot control them even when brought to their attention shows how far gone some people can become.
Funny how that works
0
Quote Originally Posted by sundance:
I would like to know why all of a sudden this became a very important issue to the Left. Apparently all in the name of Progressivism. Basically jamming it down our throats at warp speed.
Funny I was thinking the exact opposite. That the mindless Obama opposition has been dictated every talking point by Obama himself has been prescribed to make transgendered bathrooms the most important issue to them in this area.
Seems like a masterful tactic by the marriage equality people to take the focus off of that and put it on a smaller population in transgendered people. So rather than having a solid anti-equal marriage movement with a clear position on policy similar to the pro-life/roe v wade movement that could play to their advantage both directly and indirectly, Obama and progressives have their opposition chasing their tails and jumping at the next shiny object. And then add the media and talking head bias to make this an issue of terror and fear and you get the emotional content that sways the oppositional masses.
If marriage equality was really an important issue than why not try to fight it or have it repealed and make that the corner stone of a movement built on principles. If not it looks like an emotional and obsessed mentality with no principles or sense that is being played like a puppet by what it is opposing. And emotional obsessions for people that cannot control them even when brought to their attention shows how far gone some people can become.
Funny I was thinking the exact opposite. That the mindless Obama opposition has been dictated every talking point by Obama himself has been prescribed to make transgendered bathrooms the most important issue to them in this area.
Seems like a masterful tactic by the marriage equality people to take the focus off of that and put it on a smaller population in transgendered people. So rather than having a solid anti-equal marriage movement with a clear position on policy similar to the pro-life/roe v wade movement that could play to their advantage both directly and indirectly, Obama and progressives have their opposition chasing their tails and jumping at the next shiny object. And then add the media and talking head bias to make this an issue of terror and fear and you get the emotional content that sways the oppositional masses.
If marriage equality was really an important issue than why not try to fight it or have it repealed and make that the corner stone of a movement built on principles. If not it looks like an emotional and obsessed mentality with no principles or sense that is being played like a puppet by what it is opposing. And emotional obsessions for people that cannot control them even when brought to their attention shows how far gone some people can become.
Funny how that works
You always bring up emotion. You have such disdain for emotion. Psychopaths have no conscience or moral compass, so they do not feel guilt. You come across as a psychopath. You’re anti-emotion rants present you as a very disturbed and psychopathic individual.
0
Quote Originally Posted by dl36:
Funny I was thinking the exact opposite. That the mindless Obama opposition has been dictated every talking point by Obama himself has been prescribed to make transgendered bathrooms the most important issue to them in this area.
Seems like a masterful tactic by the marriage equality people to take the focus off of that and put it on a smaller population in transgendered people. So rather than having a solid anti-equal marriage movement with a clear position on policy similar to the pro-life/roe v wade movement that could play to their advantage both directly and indirectly, Obama and progressives have their opposition chasing their tails and jumping at the next shiny object. And then add the media and talking head bias to make this an issue of terror and fear and you get the emotional content that sways the oppositional masses.
If marriage equality was really an important issue than why not try to fight it or have it repealed and make that the corner stone of a movement built on principles. If not it looks like an emotional and obsessed mentality with no principles or sense that is being played like a puppet by what it is opposing. And emotional obsessions for people that cannot control them even when brought to their attention shows how far gone some people can become.
Funny how that works
You always bring up emotion. You have such disdain for emotion. Psychopaths have no conscience or moral compass, so they do not feel guilt. You come across as a psychopath. You’re anti-emotion rants present you as a very disturbed and psychopathic individual.
I simply made a post commenting about the topic as well as feeding off of the point that sundance made looking at the bigger picture. Not sure what your issue is here beyond trying to bash.
Seems like insults, personal attacks and trying to make up lies about me is completely acceptable while I do none of that and patiently withstand the onslaught of venting this negativity.
funny how that works
0
I simply made a post commenting about the topic as well as feeding off of the point that sundance made looking at the bigger picture. Not sure what your issue is here beyond trying to bash.
Seems like insults, personal attacks and trying to make up lies about me is completely acceptable while I do none of that and patiently withstand the onslaught of venting this negativity.
You always bring up emotion. You have such disdain for emotion. Psychopaths have no conscience or moral compass, so they do not feel guilt. You come across as a psychopath. You’re anti-emotion rants present you as a very disturbed and psychopathic individual.
This kind of reply also will not be tolerated in the main forums, if you or anyone else makes personal digs and or negative off-topic replies like this we will obviously take action.
0
Quote Originally Posted by MoneySRH:
You always bring up emotion. You have such disdain for emotion. Psychopaths have no conscience or moral compass, so they do not feel guilt. You come across as a psychopath. You’re anti-emotion rants present you as a very disturbed and psychopathic individual.
This kind of reply also will not be tolerated in the main forums, if you or anyone else makes personal digs and or negative off-topic replies like this we will obviously take action.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
