Obama is a log.....

Oh gee, a Democrat is saying Obama is a "lock" and his bet has "value"!

*GIGGLE*

In the poll, Obama lags the two leading Republican rivals in the 12 states likely to determine the outcome of a close race in November:

•Former Pennsylvania senator Rick Santorum tops Obama 50%-45% in the swing states. Nationwide, Santorum's lead narrows to 49%-46%.

•Former Massachusetts governor Mitt Romney edges Obama 48%-46% in the swing states. Nationwide, they are tied at 47% each.

================

You're better off lighting $20 bills on fire than listening to this poster and betting Obama's "value."

If only leftys had credit cards and didn't beg and riot on the streets for other people's money....

Quote Originally Posted by FrontRowCenter:

Most Americans I know do not want this country turning into Greece.   

Actually, not quite half give lip service to not wanting Greece but have little objection to the things that got Greece in trouble such as:

Unreasonably high pensions.

Unreasonable entitlements and other costly government programs.

Ureasonably high union wages.

Oh gee, a Democrat is saying Obama is a "lock" and his bet has "value"!

*GIGGLE*

In the poll, Obama lags the two leading Republican rivals in the 12 states likely to determine the outcome of a close race in November:

•Former Pennsylvania senator Rick Santorum tops Obama 50%-45% in the swing states. Nationwide, Santorum's lead narrows to 49%-46%.

•Former Massachusetts governor Mitt Romney edges Obama 48%-46% in the swing states. Nationwide, they are tied at 47% each.

================

You're better off lighting $20 bills on fire than listening to this poster and betting Obama's "value."

Oh the absolute irony....

dl36,

I'm completely serious. What type of "non partisan" person believes Obama is a lock?

Obama trails Santorum in national polling. Ron Paul polls within 7% of Obama in national polling.

Only a partisan hack with leftist blinders thinks betting 200 to 100 is "value" in this scenario.

The same partisan people who post the opposite, despite the fact that it isn't true.  

Value is a subjective measure depending upon the style of the individual. Someone who looks for plus money sides obviously won't find value.

Someone who doesn't have an issue tying up money based on the perceived outcome and doesn't mind playing high money lines likely won't view it the same.

I disagreed with Van in that the best time to play Obama will be right after the Repub nomination (which will be the same time I 'sell' my Romney futures).

There is money to be made in politics if one can play it without partisanship. Stating that Obama is a lock at -200 from the perception of the poster is hardly indicative of partisanship.

Value is a subjective measure depending upon the style of the individual

========================

Um, ok. Of course this sentence: "You will not see a -200 again that has this much value" doesn't seem to be subjective in light of this one: "it is inconceivable to me that Newt or Mitt can beat him"

Which proves my point.

Both statements are subjective. It hardly means one has a predisposed mindset for one side.

Nightly, I think one team has great value or another and it doesn't mean that I inherently favor one side over the other.

Vanzack,

If you are a trend better here's one,that you probably won't like.. and it's a 90%'er ...

In the history of US Presidential elections ..10 United States Presidents have unseated an incumbent President.. .