I honestly can't figure out why anyone would vote for Rick Santorum. I understand if you don't want to vote Obama. But Ron Paul makes far more sense than Rick Santorum.
I still don't put much value into these polls being conducted. Seems kind of fishy on how they conduct them according to what I read.
If the poll says obama will lose the liberal-wackjobs will argue that the numbers are fishy... if the poll says obama will win the conservative-wackjobs will say it is fishy...
If an independent thinker says all the polls and numbers are fishy... the wackjobs will blindly assume and ignorantly characterize the independent thinker as an extremist from other side...
0
Quote Originally Posted by Ktrain:
I honestly can't figure out why anyone would vote for Rick Santorum. I understand if you don't want to vote Obama. But Ron Paul makes far more sense than Rick Santorum.
I still don't put much value into these polls being conducted. Seems kind of fishy on how they conduct them according to what I read.
If the poll says obama will lose the liberal-wackjobs will argue that the numbers are fishy... if the poll says obama will win the conservative-wackjobs will say it is fishy...
If an independent thinker says all the polls and numbers are fishy... the wackjobs will blindly assume and ignorantly characterize the independent thinker as an extremist from other side...
I am seeing it around -160 right now. What are your current thoughts on this?
It means if u like Romney, bet it now to get the best odds. And if u want to throw away ur money on Obama, wait until October and it will be a PK line.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Gambleholic:
I am seeing it around -160 right now. What are your current thoughts on this?
It means if u like Romney, bet it now to get the best odds. And if u want to throw away ur money on Obama, wait until October and it will be a PK line.
Why do people quote non-market odds? At Intrade, Obama is 54% (-117) and Romney is 41.5 (+140). Yes, there is a gap because it's theoretically possible someone else could win.
0
Why do people quote non-market odds? At Intrade, Obama is 54% (-117) and Romney is 41.5 (+140). Yes, there is a gap because it's theoretically possible someone else could win.
It means if u like Romney, bet it now to get the best odds. And if u want to throw away ur money on Obama, wait until October and it will be a PK line.
Obama a pick in october
do you really think that? or do you just want to believe it so badly that you hope, pray and desperately try to do anything to think that it might happen
0
Quote Originally Posted by FrontRowCenter:
It means if u like Romney, bet it now to get the best odds. And if u want to throw away ur money on Obama, wait until October and it will be a PK line.
Obama a pick in october
do you really think that? or do you just want to believe it so badly that you hope, pray and desperately try to do anything to think that it might happen
Unfortunately, it appears that RuPaul has just as good of a shot as Ron Paul does at this point.
I actually wanted him to win...but when the false conservative GOPs are not going to vote for the most conservative candidate(s)... him running on sound conservative principle lost him the election...
oh the irony
0
Quote Originally Posted by wizardofroz:
Unfortunately, it appears that RuPaul has just as good of a shot as Ron Paul does at this point.
I actually wanted him to win...but when the false conservative GOPs are not going to vote for the most conservative candidate(s)... him running on sound conservative principle lost him the election...
I actually wanted him to win...but when the false conservative GOPs are not going to vote for the most conservative candidate(s)... him running on sound conservative principle lost him the election...
oh the irony
The Republican Party feeds off the middle class and is not going to share any of the riches that they acquired off their backs. And Ron Paul speaks for the common man and is a threat to their power, so the brilliant man is written off as nuts. When in reality, he basically stands for everything the Republican Party should be emulating.
And notice that the radio and TV personalities that denounce Paul are also hoarding their millions while duping the public with their warped beliefs.
0
Quote Originally Posted by dl36:
I actually wanted him to win...but when the false conservative GOPs are not going to vote for the most conservative candidate(s)... him running on sound conservative principle lost him the election...
oh the irony
The Republican Party feeds off the middle class and is not going to share any of the riches that they acquired off their backs. And Ron Paul speaks for the common man and is a threat to their power, so the brilliant man is written off as nuts. When in reality, he basically stands for everything the Republican Party should be emulating.
And notice that the radio and TV personalities that denounce Paul are also hoarding their millions while duping the public with their warped beliefs.
Why do people quote non-market odds? At Intrade, Obama is 54% (-117) and Romney is 41.5 (+140). Yes, there is a gap because it's theoretically possible someone else could win.
There are actual books that off the line, which is what people are quoting.
0
Quote Originally Posted by depeche2:
Why do people quote non-market odds? At Intrade, Obama is 54% (-117) and Romney is 41.5 (+140). Yes, there is a gap because it's theoretically possible someone else could win.
There are actual books that off the line, which is what people are quoting.
The Republican Party feeds off the middle class and is not going to share any of the riches that they acquired off their backs. And Ron Paul speaks for the common man and is a threat to their power, so the brilliant man is written off as nuts. When in reality, he basically stands for everything the Republican Party should be emulating.
And notice that the radio and TV personalities that denounce Paul are also hoarding their millions while duping the public with their warped beliefs.
The irony is that more independents and democrats would lean towards paul... but they instead run romney because like you said about power it does not matter if it is romney or obama, they keep their hands on the money and the power (and get to indulge in whine/bitch every second if obama wins)....
I guess the fox "news", beck, rush group are in on it too... hannity has been against paul even before he ran for president 2012... check this out
0
Quote Originally Posted by wizardofroz:
The Republican Party feeds off the middle class and is not going to share any of the riches that they acquired off their backs. And Ron Paul speaks for the common man and is a threat to their power, so the brilliant man is written off as nuts. When in reality, he basically stands for everything the Republican Party should be emulating.
And notice that the radio and TV personalities that denounce Paul are also hoarding their millions while duping the public with their warped beliefs.
The irony is that more independents and democrats would lean towards paul... but they instead run romney because like you said about power it does not matter if it is romney or obama, they keep their hands on the money and the power (and get to indulge in whine/bitch every second if obama wins)....
I guess the fox "news", beck, rush group are in on it too... hannity has been against paul even before he ran for president 2012... check this out
Obviously a political line is gonna jump all over the place. It doesn't take shit to move this stuff.
you are thinking like a gambler
to respond to the alias/supporters, you need to think like someone that does not bet or know how to honor a bet... at least that is what history shows us about these bob alias/supporters...
the site seems to be aware of the pattern
0
Quote Originally Posted by gsprush:
Obviously a political line is gonna jump all over the place. It doesn't take shit to move this stuff.
you are thinking like a gambler
to respond to the alias/supporters, you need to think like someone that does not bet or know how to honor a bet... at least that is what history shows us about these bob alias/supporters...
Perhaps you missed this... perhaps you are running scared from the reality of an actual bet...
So... are you going to take the bet? or just be a blow hard talking crap and never put your money where your mouth is?
The site knows however that bob aliases/supporters are pathological liars and cant honor the bets they make... At least that is what we all have seen with with the woop alias...
typical cut/paste alias... blah blah blah...
but then disgrace yourself by not being able to follow basic gambling etiquette and honoring a bet on a site made up of gamblers that know
Perhaps you missed this... perhaps you are running scared from the reality of an actual bet...
So... are you going to take the bet? or just be a blow hard talking crap and never put your money where your mouth is?
The site knows however that bob aliases/supporters are pathological liars and cant honor the bets they make... At least that is what we all have seen with with the woop alias...
typical cut/paste alias... blah blah blah...
but then disgrace yourself by not being able to follow basic gambling etiquette and honoring a bet on a site made up of gamblers that know
1. perhaps getting better odds with one that appears to be blindly overconfident in obama losing...
2. To try to expose you for not being honorable... a key trait in aliases...
what I will say is that I agree with you that -200 does not seem like a good value... If we are talking simply about numbers knowing when to buy on lines makes sense...
So I will simply ask you... what odds would be odds that would be a good value to bet on obama?
0
I think it has to do with two things...
1. perhaps getting better odds with one that appears to be blindly overconfident in obama losing...
2. To try to expose you for not being honorable... a key trait in aliases...
what I will say is that I agree with you that -200 does not seem like a good value... If we are talking simply about numbers knowing when to buy on lines makes sense...
So I will simply ask you... what odds would be odds that would be a good value to bet on obama?
So I will simply ask you... what odds would be odds that would be a good value to bet on obama?
For you, pick.....nose pick.......covers nose
obama voters relying on blind faith and fraud at this point. How deluded would one have to be to think that his presidency has helped the country? So the basic attitude of the obama voter is, fuck all else, just send me my check.
0
Quote Originally Posted by dl36:
So I will simply ask you... what odds would be odds that would be a good value to bet on obama?
For you, pick.....nose pick.......covers nose
obama voters relying on blind faith and fraud at this point. How deluded would one have to be to think that his presidency has helped the country? So the basic attitude of the obama voter is, fuck all else, just send me my check.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.