Slim, all courtesy and civil, respectful discourse in national politics died the day Trump announced for the nomination. He never did anything but bash his Republican, and then Democratic, opponents. He has never said a decent word about anyone else since. Trumpsters in this forum immediately aped their hero and jumped the bandwagon. While the economy was rolling Trumpsters were ready to name him the greatest president in U.S. history. Crisis management has brought out his weakest defects and exposed his cheap shot side like nothing else could have. His followers, here and elsewhere, better be ready to take what hey dished out. Intimidation and antagonism? Trumpsters can give the basic 101 course. Just sayin..............
Okay. If the Trumpsters ‘excuse’ is they aped him — what is the excuse for the anti-Trumper Republicans and the Democrats — especially on here? Because a lot of you on here of all groups are discourteous and uncivil — bashing and name calling.
Or is this another example of Trump uniting everyone?
0
Quote Originally Posted by KeyElement:
Slim, all courtesy and civil, respectful discourse in national politics died the day Trump announced for the nomination. He never did anything but bash his Republican, and then Democratic, opponents. He has never said a decent word about anyone else since. Trumpsters in this forum immediately aped their hero and jumped the bandwagon. While the economy was rolling Trumpsters were ready to name him the greatest president in U.S. history. Crisis management has brought out his weakest defects and exposed his cheap shot side like nothing else could have. His followers, here and elsewhere, better be ready to take what hey dished out. Intimidation and antagonism? Trumpsters can give the basic 101 course. Just sayin..............
Okay. If the Trumpsters ‘excuse’ is they aped him — what is the excuse for the anti-Trumper Republicans and the Democrats — especially on here? Because a lot of you on here of all groups are discourteous and uncivil — bashing and name calling.
Or is this another example of Trump uniting everyone?
Quote Originally Posted by mctrap: So your saying that Covers knowingly allows a disinformation troll farm to operate and then uses a double standard to enforce only the people who dare call them out? I have been attacked the same way by these same disinformation trolls in my threads. And where were you? What and who are you trying to protect? You say things that agitate folks. Things a lot of us think a little off. But I have never noticed you start the name calling or personal attacks. But, yes, you have to be aware that there is an obvious double standard here. Just learn to deal with it and act accordingly. Name calling and personal attacks have never been my thing. I always feel it weakens your points. But to each hi own.
I try to not engage with you because you never answer questions and only look to antagonize so lets just not stick your nose into something you have no business.
But if you are wise you will follow the thread from the first and see how the progression happened. The OP made a thread, he didnt make it to the other member referenced yet the other member replied in an unpleasant way...he was not provoked, not called out previously, not engaged. Are you following? So we have tried to say many times if someone enters a thread created by any member and especially without cause makes comments which are out of step with our guidelines, well we do not allow that. Read what I said initially, read this and then understand.
Now if your reply is going to be "well in OTHER threads blah blah blah" that is what I call diverting which you are pretty good at, it is not the issue at hand and if someone has any issues with regards to members breaking the rules, then you follow the proper channels and address it...let us know. It happens ALL the time, and that is the course of action.
Pretty simple...but please given how you are slighted in how you antagonize and do not reply, I'd prefer you not step in when there is no reason for you doing so.
Thanks!
0
Quote Originally Posted by Raiders22:
Quote Originally Posted by mctrap: So your saying that Covers knowingly allows a disinformation troll farm to operate and then uses a double standard to enforce only the people who dare call them out? I have been attacked the same way by these same disinformation trolls in my threads. And where were you? What and who are you trying to protect? You say things that agitate folks. Things a lot of us think a little off. But I have never noticed you start the name calling or personal attacks. But, yes, you have to be aware that there is an obvious double standard here. Just learn to deal with it and act accordingly. Name calling and personal attacks have never been my thing. I always feel it weakens your points. But to each hi own.
I try to not engage with you because you never answer questions and only look to antagonize so lets just not stick your nose into something you have no business.
But if you are wise you will follow the thread from the first and see how the progression happened. The OP made a thread, he didnt make it to the other member referenced yet the other member replied in an unpleasant way...he was not provoked, not called out previously, not engaged. Are you following? So we have tried to say many times if someone enters a thread created by any member and especially without cause makes comments which are out of step with our guidelines, well we do not allow that. Read what I said initially, read this and then understand.
Now if your reply is going to be "well in OTHER threads blah blah blah" that is what I call diverting which you are pretty good at, it is not the issue at hand and if someone has any issues with regards to members breaking the rules, then you follow the proper channels and address it...let us know. It happens ALL the time, and that is the course of action.
Pretty simple...but please given how you are slighted in how you antagonize and do not reply, I'd prefer you not step in when there is no reason for you doing so.
Quote Originally Posted by SarasotaSlim: Quote Originally Posted by BarneysDad: Quote Originally Posted by nature1970: Private media can censorntheir site .What ever happened to the saying "Sticks and Stones can break my bones but words will never hurt" Oh that's right Liberal Psycho babblers said otherwise.......... You know I never realized to now ..that AC/DC can sound a little like ZZ Top.. Nah 2 different styles but same Rock and Roll
I was only referring to the start of the AC/AD song you posted..not all songs . I know there's a difference.. a big difference..
0
Trumpsters ..I see.
Quote Originally Posted by BarneysDad:
Quote Originally Posted by SarasotaSlim: Quote Originally Posted by BarneysDad: Quote Originally Posted by nature1970: Private media can censorntheir site .What ever happened to the saying "Sticks and Stones can break my bones but words will never hurt" Oh that's right Liberal Psycho babblers said otherwise.......... You know I never realized to now ..that AC/DC can sound a little like ZZ Top.. Nah 2 different styles but same Rock and Roll
I was only referring to the start of the AC/AD song you posted..not all songs . I know there's a difference.. a big difference..
Quote Originally Posted by KeyElement: Slim, all courtesy and civil, respectful discourse in national politics died the day Trump announced for the nomination. He never did anything but bash his Republican, and then Democratic, opponents. He has never said a decent word about anyone else since. Trumpsters in this forum immediately aped their hero and jumped the bandwagon. While the economy was rolling Trumpsters were ready to name him the greatest president in U.S. history. Crisis management has brought out his weakest defects and exposed his cheap shot side like nothing else could have. His followers, here and elsewhere, better be ready to take what hey dished out. Intimidation and antagonism? Trumpsters can give the basic 101 course. Just sayin.............. Okay. If the Trumpsters ‘excuse’ is they aped him — what is the excuse for the anti-Trumper Republicans and the Democrats — especially on here? Because a lot of you on here of all groups are discourteous and uncivil — bashing and name calling. Or is this another example of Trump uniting everyone?
There may be a grain of truth there. By dividing the country so thoroughly and insisting on only two opposing camps existing he has united partisans of a similar feather together. I, you, we, must be A or B, there is no middle ground. That would seem to be unity, of a sort.
Now and then even a BLIND squirrel can find an acorn
0
Quote Originally Posted by Raiders22:
Quote Originally Posted by KeyElement: Slim, all courtesy and civil, respectful discourse in national politics died the day Trump announced for the nomination. He never did anything but bash his Republican, and then Democratic, opponents. He has never said a decent word about anyone else since. Trumpsters in this forum immediately aped their hero and jumped the bandwagon. While the economy was rolling Trumpsters were ready to name him the greatest president in U.S. history. Crisis management has brought out his weakest defects and exposed his cheap shot side like nothing else could have. His followers, here and elsewhere, better be ready to take what hey dished out. Intimidation and antagonism? Trumpsters can give the basic 101 course. Just sayin.............. Okay. If the Trumpsters ‘excuse’ is they aped him — what is the excuse for the anti-Trumper Republicans and the Democrats — especially on here? Because a lot of you on here of all groups are discourteous and uncivil — bashing and name calling. Or is this another example of Trump uniting everyone?
There may be a grain of truth there. By dividing the country so thoroughly and insisting on only two opposing camps existing he has united partisans of a similar feather together. I, you, we, must be A or B, there is no middle ground. That would seem to be unity, of a sort.
Trumpsters ..I see. Quote Originally Posted by BarneysDad: Quote Originally Posted by SarasotaSlim: Quote Originally Posted by BarneysDad: Quote Originally Posted by nature1970: Private media can censorntheir site .What ever happened to the saying "Sticks and Stones can break my bones but words will never hurt" Oh that's right Liberal Psycho babblers said otherwise.......... You know I never realized to now ..that AC/DC can sound a little like ZZ Top.. Nah 2 different styles but same Rock and Roll I was only referring to the start of the AC/AD song you posted..not all songs . I know there's a difference.. a big difference..
On a side note I think Wally woke up on the wrong side of the bed this morning or is getting frustrated with the Covert Quarantine and wearing a mask in public thing. Maybe he should consider switching to Decaf until this blows over
0
Quote Originally Posted by SarasotaSlim:
Trumpsters ..I see. Quote Originally Posted by BarneysDad: Quote Originally Posted by SarasotaSlim: Quote Originally Posted by BarneysDad: Quote Originally Posted by nature1970: Private media can censorntheir site .What ever happened to the saying "Sticks and Stones can break my bones but words will never hurt" Oh that's right Liberal Psycho babblers said otherwise.......... You know I never realized to now ..that AC/DC can sound a little like ZZ Top.. Nah 2 different styles but same Rock and Roll I was only referring to the start of the AC/AD song you posted..not all songs . I know there's a difference.. a big difference..
On a side note I think Wally woke up on the wrong side of the bed this morning or is getting frustrated with the Covert Quarantine and wearing a mask in public thing. Maybe he should consider switching to Decaf until this blows over
seriously Barne? Baiting wall does not work. This is his yard. As for Raiders he and wall can meet with some understanding raider22 isn't calling strike one with him yet.... I guess I digress but where raider is unreachable.... You mcrappp midnight are not above the fray of realms that you and mctrappe been singing of for the past 93days of corona ... Guess I like to say let's go horse around in another play ground follow me to why we protest if you care too... But here well. Good luck with this when you find yourself being a chew toy in a world of great Danes.... And those voices inside your head talk with me.... Come play in a reality that makes chasing a white rabbit in a matrix movie look like band camp to San quintet.
0
seriously Barne? Baiting wall does not work. This is his yard. As for Raiders he and wall can meet with some understanding raider22 isn't calling strike one with him yet.... I guess I digress but where raider is unreachable.... You mcrappp midnight are not above the fray of realms that you and mctrappe been singing of for the past 93days of corona ... Guess I like to say let's go horse around in another play ground follow me to why we protest if you care too... But here well. Good luck with this when you find yourself being a chew toy in a world of great Danes.... And those voices inside your head talk with me.... Come play in a reality that makes chasing a white rabbit in a matrix movie look like band camp to San quintet.
seriously Barne? Baiting wall does not work. This is his yard. As for Raiders he and wall can meet with some understanding raider22 isn't calling strike one with him yet.... I guess I digress but where raider is unreachable.... You mcrappp midnight are not above the fray of realms that you and mctrappe been singing of for the past 93days of corona ... Guess I like to say let's go horse around in another play ground follow me to why we protest if you care too... But here well. Good luck with this when you find yourself being a chew toy in a world of great Danes.... And those voices inside your head talk with me.... Come play in a reality that makes chasing a white rabbit in a matrix movie look like band camp to San quintet.
Why is everybody on edge and so uptight? Wally knows I don't have anything against him personally. I didn't mean to ruffle your feathers lil buddy I'm sure you have heard about Internet arguments and winning one,Right? It's like winning a Special Olympics race even if you win you're still WeToddIt
0
Quote Originally Posted by nature1970:
seriously Barne? Baiting wall does not work. This is his yard. As for Raiders he and wall can meet with some understanding raider22 isn't calling strike one with him yet.... I guess I digress but where raider is unreachable.... You mcrappp midnight are not above the fray of realms that you and mctrappe been singing of for the past 93days of corona ... Guess I like to say let's go horse around in another play ground follow me to why we protest if you care too... But here well. Good luck with this when you find yourself being a chew toy in a world of great Danes.... And those voices inside your head talk with me.... Come play in a reality that makes chasing a white rabbit in a matrix movie look like band camp to San quintet.
Why is everybody on edge and so uptight? Wally knows I don't have anything against him personally. I didn't mean to ruffle your feathers lil buddy I'm sure you have heard about Internet arguments and winning one,Right? It's like winning a Special Olympics race even if you win you're still WeToddIt
Quote Originally Posted by Raiders22: Quote Originally Posted by mctrap: So your saying that Covers knowingly allows a disinformation troll farm to operate and then uses a double standard to enforce only the people who dare call them out? I have been attacked the same way by these same disinformation trolls in my threads. And where were you? What and who are you trying to protect? You say things that agitate folks. Things a lot of us think a little off. But I have never noticed you start the name calling or personal attacks. But, yes, you have to be aware that there is an obvious double standard here. Just learn to deal with it and act accordingly. Name calling and personal attacks have never been my thing. I always feel it weakens your points. But to each hi own. I try to not engage with you because you never answer questions and only look to antagonize so lets just not stick your nose into something you have no business. But if you are wise you will follow the thread from the first and see how the progression happened. The OP made a thread, he didnt make it to the other member referenced yet the other member replied in an unpleasant way...he was not provoked, not called out previously, not engaged. Are you following? So we have tried to say many times if someone enters a thread created by any member and especially without cause makes comments which are out of step with our guidelines, well we do not allow that. Read what I said initially, read this and then understand. Now if your reply is going to be "well in OTHER threads blah blah blah" that is what I call diverting which you are pretty good at, it is not the issue at hand and if someone has any issues with regards to members breaking the rules, then you follow the proper channels and address it...let us know. It happens ALL the time, and that is the course of action. Pretty simple...but please given how you are slighted in how you antagonize and do not reply, I'd prefer you not step in when there is no reason for you doing so. Thanks!
I always will answer -- you may not like the answer. Not trying to antagonize you. I know any time you are questioned you take it that way. I apologize if I offended you.
I am just saying the names the fellow called him should be acknowledged as well. It doesn't matter the thread or past history, or even the reason. When someone starts doing that -- it should be reprimanded. Or it will get out of hand.
0
Quote Originally Posted by wallstreetcappers:
Quote Originally Posted by Raiders22: Quote Originally Posted by mctrap: So your saying that Covers knowingly allows a disinformation troll farm to operate and then uses a double standard to enforce only the people who dare call them out? I have been attacked the same way by these same disinformation trolls in my threads. And where were you? What and who are you trying to protect? You say things that agitate folks. Things a lot of us think a little off. But I have never noticed you start the name calling or personal attacks. But, yes, you have to be aware that there is an obvious double standard here. Just learn to deal with it and act accordingly. Name calling and personal attacks have never been my thing. I always feel it weakens your points. But to each hi own. I try to not engage with you because you never answer questions and only look to antagonize so lets just not stick your nose into something you have no business. But if you are wise you will follow the thread from the first and see how the progression happened. The OP made a thread, he didnt make it to the other member referenced yet the other member replied in an unpleasant way...he was not provoked, not called out previously, not engaged. Are you following? So we have tried to say many times if someone enters a thread created by any member and especially without cause makes comments which are out of step with our guidelines, well we do not allow that. Read what I said initially, read this and then understand. Now if your reply is going to be "well in OTHER threads blah blah blah" that is what I call diverting which you are pretty good at, it is not the issue at hand and if someone has any issues with regards to members breaking the rules, then you follow the proper channels and address it...let us know. It happens ALL the time, and that is the course of action. Pretty simple...but please given how you are slighted in how you antagonize and do not reply, I'd prefer you not step in when there is no reason for you doing so. Thanks!
I always will answer -- you may not like the answer. Not trying to antagonize you. I know any time you are questioned you take it that way. I apologize if I offended you.
I am just saying the names the fellow called him should be acknowledged as well. It doesn't matter the thread or past history, or even the reason. When someone starts doing that -- it should be reprimanded. Or it will get out of hand.
Quote Originally Posted by nature1970: seriously Barne? Baiting wall does not work. This is his yard. As for Raiders he and wall can meet with some understanding raider22 isn't calling strike one with him yet.... I guess I digress but where raider is unreachable.... You mcrappp midnight are not above the fray of realms that you and mctrappe been singing of for the past 93days of corona ... Guess I like to say let's go horse around in another play ground follow me to why we protest if you care too... But here well. Good luck with this when you find yourself being a chew toy in a world of great Danes.... And those voices inside your head talk with me.... Come play in a reality that makes chasing a white rabbit in a matrix movie look like band camp to San quintet.Why is everybody on edge and so uptight? Wally knows I don't have anything against him personally. I didn't mean to ruffle your feathers lil buddy
no problem but one of those moments bro wall and Tom are equally matched titans in this world of cyber space... I stay out of that fight...
0
Quote Originally Posted by BarneysDad:
Quote Originally Posted by nature1970: seriously Barne? Baiting wall does not work. This is his yard. As for Raiders he and wall can meet with some understanding raider22 isn't calling strike one with him yet.... I guess I digress but where raider is unreachable.... You mcrappp midnight are not above the fray of realms that you and mctrappe been singing of for the past 93days of corona ... Guess I like to say let's go horse around in another play ground follow me to why we protest if you care too... But here well. Good luck with this when you find yourself being a chew toy in a world of great Danes.... And those voices inside your head talk with me.... Come play in a reality that makes chasing a white rabbit in a matrix movie look like band camp to San quintet.Why is everybody on edge and so uptight? Wally knows I don't have anything against him personally. I didn't mean to ruffle your feathers lil buddy
no problem but one of those moments bro wall and Tom are equally matched titans in this world of cyber space... I stay out of that fight...
Quote Originally Posted by wallstreetcappers: Quote Originally Posted by Raiders22: Quote Originally Posted by mctrap: So your saying that Covers knowingly allows a disinformation troll farm to operate and then uses a double standard to enforce only the people who dare call them out? I have been attacked the same way by these same disinformation trolls in my threads. And where were you? What and who are you trying to protect? You say things that agitate folks. Things a lot of us think a little off. But I have never noticed you start the name calling or personal attacks. But, yes, you have to be aware that there is an obvious double standard here. Just learn to deal with it and act accordingly. Name calling and personal attacks have never been my thing. I always feel it weakens your points. But to each hi own. I try to not engage with you because you never answer questions and only look to antagonize so lets just not stick your nose into something you have no business. But if you are wise you will follow the thread from the first and see how the progression happened. The OP made a thread, he didnt make it to the other member referenced yet the other member replied in an unpleasant way...he was not provoked, not called out previously, not engaged. Are you following? So we have tried to say many times if someone enters a thread created by any member and especially without cause makes comments which are out of step with our guidelines, well we do not allow that. Read what I said initially, read this and then understand. Now if your reply is going to be "well in OTHER threads blah blah blah" that is what I call diverting which you are pretty good at, it is not the issue at hand and if someone has any issues with regards to members breaking the rules, then you follow the proper channels and address it...let us know. It happens ALL the time, and that is the course of action. Pretty simple...but please given how you are slighted in how you antagonize and do not reply, I'd prefer you not step in when there is no reason for you doing so. Thanks! I always will answer -- you may not like the answer. Not trying to antagonize you. I know any time you are questioned you take it that way. I apologize if I offended you. I am just saying the names the fellow called him should be acknowledged as well. It doesn't matter the thread or past history, or even the reason. When someone starts doing that -- it should be reprimanded. Or it will get out of hand.
Follow the logic...original poster makes a thread, not directed to anyone and no words or comments made. That is post 1. What follows is due only to the poster who replies...what follows is in direct result of what that party chooses to say.
So while you try to divert as you do, the logic is not there. If someone chooses to enter a thread and make a comment we require certain rules to be followed. That really is all there is to it. Anything else means nothing no matter how you slice it. If the post were not made in response then the following messages would not have been created as they were. It is a snoozer watching people like you try to point fingers at something directly caused by the actions of the party you agree with. And if someone did something somewhere else or later in the thread, feel free to let us know and we will reply similarly to how I did.
Deflection and finger pointing while ignoring the original, initial and direct cause is infantile at best.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Raiders22:
Quote Originally Posted by wallstreetcappers: Quote Originally Posted by Raiders22: Quote Originally Posted by mctrap: So your saying that Covers knowingly allows a disinformation troll farm to operate and then uses a double standard to enforce only the people who dare call them out? I have been attacked the same way by these same disinformation trolls in my threads. And where were you? What and who are you trying to protect? You say things that agitate folks. Things a lot of us think a little off. But I have never noticed you start the name calling or personal attacks. But, yes, you have to be aware that there is an obvious double standard here. Just learn to deal with it and act accordingly. Name calling and personal attacks have never been my thing. I always feel it weakens your points. But to each hi own. I try to not engage with you because you never answer questions and only look to antagonize so lets just not stick your nose into something you have no business. But if you are wise you will follow the thread from the first and see how the progression happened. The OP made a thread, he didnt make it to the other member referenced yet the other member replied in an unpleasant way...he was not provoked, not called out previously, not engaged. Are you following? So we have tried to say many times if someone enters a thread created by any member and especially without cause makes comments which are out of step with our guidelines, well we do not allow that. Read what I said initially, read this and then understand. Now if your reply is going to be "well in OTHER threads blah blah blah" that is what I call diverting which you are pretty good at, it is not the issue at hand and if someone has any issues with regards to members breaking the rules, then you follow the proper channels and address it...let us know. It happens ALL the time, and that is the course of action. Pretty simple...but please given how you are slighted in how you antagonize and do not reply, I'd prefer you not step in when there is no reason for you doing so. Thanks! I always will answer -- you may not like the answer. Not trying to antagonize you. I know any time you are questioned you take it that way. I apologize if I offended you. I am just saying the names the fellow called him should be acknowledged as well. It doesn't matter the thread or past history, or even the reason. When someone starts doing that -- it should be reprimanded. Or it will get out of hand.
Follow the logic...original poster makes a thread, not directed to anyone and no words or comments made. That is post 1. What follows is due only to the poster who replies...what follows is in direct result of what that party chooses to say.
So while you try to divert as you do, the logic is not there. If someone chooses to enter a thread and make a comment we require certain rules to be followed. That really is all there is to it. Anything else means nothing no matter how you slice it. If the post were not made in response then the following messages would not have been created as they were. It is a snoozer watching people like you try to point fingers at something directly caused by the actions of the party you agree with. And if someone did something somewhere else or later in the thread, feel free to let us know and we will reply similarly to how I did.
Deflection and finger pointing while ignoring the original, initial and direct cause is infantile at best.
Is about as Republican and loyal as a man can get. He is sickened by the current president. Disgusted. I suppose there is a completely acceptable answer for this but it totally escapes me. Let's hear it for Trump, again, as another respected, loyal American patriot goes over the hill. Or is he as treasonous as all the others that have bailed on Donnie?
Another Never Trumper... just like his old boss G W Bush.. the establishment on the right despises Trump just like the left wingers..
1
Quote Originally Posted by KeyElement:
Is about as Republican and loyal as a man can get. He is sickened by the current president. Disgusted. I suppose there is a completely acceptable answer for this but it totally escapes me. Let's hear it for Trump, again, as another respected, loyal American patriot goes over the hill. Or is he as treasonous as all the others that have bailed on Donnie?
Another Never Trumper... just like his old boss G W Bush.. the establishment on the right despises Trump just like the left wingers..
I did. I copied and pasted it and bolded it. But if you are isolating it to each thread like that -- no biggie. But even you have said and noticed different folks going back and forth on various threads. But...carry on per thread.
0
I did. I copied and pasted it and bolded it. But if you are isolating it to each thread like that -- no biggie. But even you have said and noticed different folks going back and forth on various threads. But...carry on per thread.
Quote Originally Posted by KeyElement: Is about as Republican and loyal as a man can get. He is sickened by the current president. Disgusted. I suppose there is a completely acceptable answer for this but it totally escapes me. Let's hear it for Trump, again, as another respected, loyal American patriot goes over the hill. Or is he as treasonous as all the others that have bailed on Donnie? Another Never Trumper... just like his old boss G W Bush.. the establishment on the right despises Trump just like the left wingers..
Will you concede that the right was 1,000% behind Trump for over three years? To get rid of them he had to chase them away, and has done an admirable job. They did not abandon him because they were liberals or RINO's all along. He single handedly destroyed their loyalty. Eventually even the deck officers and rats have to abandon a sinking ship. If the man can self congratulate himself time after time every day he should be able to shoulder the responsibility when times are tough. A lack of maturity, leadership skills and crisis management skills have doomed him, not disloyalty. jmho
Now and then even a BLIND squirrel can find an acorn
0
Quote Originally Posted by Rush51:
Quote Originally Posted by KeyElement: Is about as Republican and loyal as a man can get. He is sickened by the current president. Disgusted. I suppose there is a completely acceptable answer for this but it totally escapes me. Let's hear it for Trump, again, as another respected, loyal American patriot goes over the hill. Or is he as treasonous as all the others that have bailed on Donnie? Another Never Trumper... just like his old boss G W Bush.. the establishment on the right despises Trump just like the left wingers..
Will you concede that the right was 1,000% behind Trump for over three years? To get rid of them he had to chase them away, and has done an admirable job. They did not abandon him because they were liberals or RINO's all along. He single handedly destroyed their loyalty. Eventually even the deck officers and rats have to abandon a sinking ship. If the man can self congratulate himself time after time every day he should be able to shoulder the responsibility when times are tough. A lack of maturity, leadership skills and crisis management skills have doomed him, not disloyalty. jmho
I did. I copied and pasted it and bolded it. But if you are isolating it to each thread like that -- no biggie. But even you have said and noticed different folks going back and forth on various threads. But...carry on per thread.
I really am not interested in your approval of anything. You felt it necessary to stick your opinion in and it was wrong and unnecessary.
If you or anyone has issues with how members follow the rules we always suggest to contact CT or report a comment or contact any moderator. We try but we do not catch plenty of rules being broken, but the way to go about it isnt to attack someone in a neutral thread as that member did.
Then we waste several replies because you tried erroneously to antagonize and henpeck as you always do. In the future try to think a bit before you chime in where your comment isnt needed.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Raiders22:
I did. I copied and pasted it and bolded it. But if you are isolating it to each thread like that -- no biggie. But even you have said and noticed different folks going back and forth on various threads. But...carry on per thread.
I really am not interested in your approval of anything. You felt it necessary to stick your opinion in and it was wrong and unnecessary.
If you or anyone has issues with how members follow the rules we always suggest to contact CT or report a comment or contact any moderator. We try but we do not catch plenty of rules being broken, but the way to go about it isnt to attack someone in a neutral thread as that member did.
Then we waste several replies because you tried erroneously to antagonize and henpeck as you always do. In the future try to think a bit before you chime in where your comment isnt needed.
Quote Originally Posted by Rush51: Quote Originally Posted by KeyElement: Is about as Republican and loyal as a man can get. He is sickened by the current president. Disgusted. I suppose there is a completely acceptable answer for this but it totally escapes me. Let's hear it for Trump, again, as another respected, loyal American patriot goes over the hill. Or is he as treasonous as all the others that have bailed on Donnie? Another Never Trumper... just like his old boss G W Bush.. the establishment on the right despises Trump just like the left wingers..Will you concede that the right was 1,000% behind Trump for over three years? To get rid of them he had to chase them away, and has done an admirable job. They did not abandon him because they were liberals or RINO's all along. He single handedly destroyed their loyalty. Eventually even the deck officers and rats have to abandon a sinking ship. If the man can self congratulate himself time after time every day he should be able to shoulder the responsibility when times are tough. A lack of maturity, leadership skills and crisis management skills have doomed him, not disloyalty. jmho
"Just for entertainment you understand, I am going to go make enemies in the Politics Forum. The supply is endless. That should amuse me for a month or so"
It worked perfectly. I started a thread that drew every wank, crank and bored gambler that fancies himself a politico and late into the evening they are still going at it. 58 replies when I left and wallstreetcappers has had to inject discipline from the mod side of things. With no baseball, movies, pool halls or other entertainment venues to attend this may be the most fun I have all summer.
0
Quote Originally Posted by KeyElement:
Quote Originally Posted by Rush51: Quote Originally Posted by KeyElement: Is about as Republican and loyal as a man can get. He is sickened by the current president. Disgusted. I suppose there is a completely acceptable answer for this but it totally escapes me. Let's hear it for Trump, again, as another respected, loyal American patriot goes over the hill. Or is he as treasonous as all the others that have bailed on Donnie? Another Never Trumper... just like his old boss G W Bush.. the establishment on the right despises Trump just like the left wingers..Will you concede that the right was 1,000% behind Trump for over three years? To get rid of them he had to chase them away, and has done an admirable job. They did not abandon him because they were liberals or RINO's all along. He single handedly destroyed their loyalty. Eventually even the deck officers and rats have to abandon a sinking ship. If the man can self congratulate himself time after time every day he should be able to shoulder the responsibility when times are tough. A lack of maturity, leadership skills and crisis management skills have doomed him, not disloyalty. jmho
"Just for entertainment you understand, I am going to go make enemies in the Politics Forum. The supply is endless. That should amuse me for a month or so"
It worked perfectly. I started a thread that drew every wank, crank and bored gambler that fancies himself a politico and late into the evening they are still going at it. 58 replies when I left and wallstreetcappers has had to inject discipline from the mod side of things. With no baseball, movies, pool halls or other entertainment venues to attend this may be the most fun I have all summer.
Quote Originally Posted by Raiders22: I did. I copied and pasted it and bolded it. But if you are isolating it to each thread like that -- no biggie. But even you have said and noticed different folks going back and forth on various threads. But...carry on per thread. I really am not interested in your approval of anything. You felt it necessary to stick your opinion in and it was wrong and unnecessary. If you or anyone has issues with how members follow the rules we always suggest to contact CT or report a comment or contact any moderator. We try but we do not catch plenty of rules being broken, but the way to go about it isnt to attack someone in a neutral thread as that member did. Then we waste several replies because you tried erroneously to antagonize and henpeck as you always do. In the future try to think a bit before you chime in where your comment isnt needed.
Yep. Not looking for your approval.
Obviously, the other guy called him pretty vile names. I didn’t know that was excused if it was his thread. Not absolving the other guy either if you feel he started it.
It was well thought-out. But didn’t have to be, it was obvious to anyone reading the thread.
0
Quote Originally Posted by wallstreetcappers:
Quote Originally Posted by Raiders22: I did. I copied and pasted it and bolded it. But if you are isolating it to each thread like that -- no biggie. But even you have said and noticed different folks going back and forth on various threads. But...carry on per thread. I really am not interested in your approval of anything. You felt it necessary to stick your opinion in and it was wrong and unnecessary. If you or anyone has issues with how members follow the rules we always suggest to contact CT or report a comment or contact any moderator. We try but we do not catch plenty of rules being broken, but the way to go about it isnt to attack someone in a neutral thread as that member did. Then we waste several replies because you tried erroneously to antagonize and henpeck as you always do. In the future try to think a bit before you chime in where your comment isnt needed.
Yep. Not looking for your approval.
Obviously, the other guy called him pretty vile names. I didn’t know that was excused if it was his thread. Not absolving the other guy either if you feel he started it.
It was well thought-out. But didn’t have to be, it was obvious to anyone reading the thread.
Most believe 6 neither party truly represents their interests. They side with not what they actual like but what the loathe in the other platform the neg attacks by both sides of politics and even within this gambling forum spill out to the streets at time for neither specific interest represents anyone... The real goverent isnt judges or politicians it is the bureaucracy that welds true power. The Bureau of investigations the internal revenue and by large thw foreign service office of state department works independently of Congress or the courts.
These positi I ns are protected by one of the strongest unions known in this world The Government Workers Union who lobbies for its interests... Leverage is done the same way extortion and threats whethwr the government leverages prison for compliance or a union represntative leverages knowledge for benefit everything was done by publicists wielding secrets. What happened in Vegas gave vegas the monopoly on sport betting for over 50 years.... As an example. These laws special interests insist with an olive branch Money or sword exposure for a himan being a human flawed to fphuck....
0
Most believe 6 neither party truly represents their interests. They side with not what they actual like but what the loathe in the other platform the neg attacks by both sides of politics and even within this gambling forum spill out to the streets at time for neither specific interest represents anyone... The real goverent isnt judges or politicians it is the bureaucracy that welds true power. The Bureau of investigations the internal revenue and by large thw foreign service office of state department works independently of Congress or the courts.
These positi I ns are protected by one of the strongest unions known in this world The Government Workers Union who lobbies for its interests... Leverage is done the same way extortion and threats whethwr the government leverages prison for compliance or a union represntative leverages knowledge for benefit everything was done by publicists wielding secrets. What happened in Vegas gave vegas the monopoly on sport betting for over 50 years.... As an example. These laws special interests insist with an olive branch Money or sword exposure for a himan being a human flawed to fphuck....
Quote Originally Posted by wallstreetcappers: Quote Originally Posted by Raiders22: I did. I copied and pasted it and bolded it. But if you are isolating it to each thread like that -- no biggie. But even you have said and noticed different folks going back and forth on various threads. But...carry on per thread. I really am not interested in your approval of anything. You felt it necessary to stick your opinion in and it was wrong and unnecessary. If you or anyone has issues with how members follow the rules we always suggest to contact CT or report a comment or contact any moderator. We try but we do not catch plenty of rules being broken, but the way to go about it isnt to attack someone in a neutral thread as that member did. Then we waste several replies because you tried erroneously to antagonize and henpeck as you always do. In the future try to think a bit before you chime in where your comment isnt needed. Yep. Not looking for your approval. Obviously, the other guy called him pretty vile names. I didn’t know that was excused if it was his thread. Not absolving the other guy either if you feel he started it. It was well thought-out. But didn’t have to be, it was obvious to anyone reading the thread.
Now you all done bickering can midnight come out and play again????
0
Quote Originally Posted by Raiders22:
Quote Originally Posted by wallstreetcappers: Quote Originally Posted by Raiders22: I did. I copied and pasted it and bolded it. But if you are isolating it to each thread like that -- no biggie. But even you have said and noticed different folks going back and forth on various threads. But...carry on per thread. I really am not interested in your approval of anything. You felt it necessary to stick your opinion in and it was wrong and unnecessary. If you or anyone has issues with how members follow the rules we always suggest to contact CT or report a comment or contact any moderator. We try but we do not catch plenty of rules being broken, but the way to go about it isnt to attack someone in a neutral thread as that member did. Then we waste several replies because you tried erroneously to antagonize and henpeck as you always do. In the future try to think a bit before you chime in where your comment isnt needed. Yep. Not looking for your approval. Obviously, the other guy called him pretty vile names. I didn’t know that was excused if it was his thread. Not absolving the other guy either if you feel he started it. It was well thought-out. But didn’t have to be, it was obvious to anyone reading the thread.
Now you all done bickering can midnight come out and play again????
Powell was raised in the south he followed the party of Dr King. As did condelesa Rice. For him to vote for a southern Democrat speaks volumes of the caliber of man the Republicans have as a sitting president in global crisis. That general turned his back.
0
Powell was raised in the south he followed the party of Dr King. As did condelesa Rice. For him to vote for a southern Democrat speaks volumes of the caliber of man the Republicans have as a sitting president in global crisis. That general turned his back.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
I'm sure you have heard about Internet arguments and winning one,Right? It's like winning a Special Olympics race even if you win you're still WeToddIt
That sounds like something Rachel Jeantel would say..
Hot Forum Topics
