• Forums
  • Best Betting Sites
  • Sportsbook Promos
  • Best Sports Betting Apps
  • NFL Betting Forum
  • NBA Betting Forum
  • MLB Betting Forum
  • NHL Betting Forum
  • NCAAF Betting Forum
  • NCAAB Betting Forum
  • Soccer Betting Forum
  • Tennis Betting Forum
  • General Discussion
  • Help Forum
  • Guidelines
  • FAQ
  • Forum Updates
    Covers Logo
    Covers App
    Faster picks. Smarter bets.
    All in the NEW Covers App
    Download on the App Store Download on the Google Play Store
    • Sports
      • NFL
        • Back
        • NFL
        • NFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NFL Picks
        • NFL Prediction Prices
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NCAAF
        • Back
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAF Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NCAAF Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NBA
        • Back
        • NBA
        • NBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • NCAAB
        • Back
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • NCAAB Picks
        • Injuries
      • MLB
        • Back
        • MLB
        • MLB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • MLB Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NHL
        • Back
        • NHL
        • NHL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NHL Picks
        • Injuries
      • Soccer
      • UFC
        • Back
        • UFC
        • Odds
        • Picks
        • News & Analysis
      • WNBA
        • Back
        • WNBA
        • WNBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • WNBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • CFL
        • Back
        • CFL
        • CFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • CFL Picks
      • Golf
        • Back
        • Golf
        • Golf Home
        • Golf Odds
        • Masters Odds
        • PGA Championship Odds
        • US Open Odds
        • British Open Odds
        • Ryder Cup Odds
        • Golf Picks
    • Odds
      • All Odds
      • NFL
      • NCAAF
      • NBA
      • NCAAB
      • MLB
      • NHL
      • Golf
      • Soccer Odds
        • Back
        • Soccer Odds
        • MLS Odds
        • Champions League Odds
        • Premier League Odds
      • UFC
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • Election Odds
      • Futures
        • Back
        • Futures
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • MLB
        • NHL
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAF
      • Sports Odds History
      • Politics
        • Back
        • Politics
        • Politics Home
        • Presidential Election Odds
        • Midterm Election Odds
        • House Midterm Odds
        • Senate Midterm Odds
        • Texas Midterm Odds
        • Michigan Midterm Odds
    • Picks
      • All Picks
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • NHL
      • MLB
      • NCAAF
      • NCAAB
      • UFC
      • Golf
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • User Picks
      • Team User Picks
      • Consensus Picks
        • Back
        • Consensus Picks
        • All Consensus Picks
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • NHL
        • MLB
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAB
        • CFL
        • WNBA
        • Consensus FAQ
        • Public Money
    • Prop Projections
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • MLB
      • NHL
    • Betting
      • US Betting Sites
      • Canada Betting Sites
      • Sportsbook Reviews
      • States
        • Back
        • States
        • US Legal Tracker
        • Revenue Tracker
        • Arizona
        • Arkansas
        • California
        • Colorado
        • Connecticut
        • DC
        • Florida
        • Georgia
        • Illinois
        • Indiana
        • Iowa
        • Kansas
        • Kentucky
        • Louisiana
        • Maine
        • Maryland
        • Massachusetts
        • Michigan
        • Mississippi
        • Missouri
        • Nevada
        • New Hampshire
        • New Jersey
        • New York
        • North Carolina
        • Ohio
        • Oregon
        • Pennsylvania
        • Tennessee
        • Texas
        • Vermont
        • Virginia
        • West Virginia
        • Wyoming
      • Provinces
        • Back
        • Provinces
        • Alberta
        • British Columbia
        • Manitoba
        • New Brunswick
        • Newfoundland and Labrador
        • Northwest Territories
        • Nova Scotia
        • Nunavut
        • Ontario
        • Prince Edward Island
        • Quebec (English)
        • Quebec (francais)
        • Saskatchewan
        • Yukon
      • By Sport
        • Back
        • By Sport
        • Baseball
        • Basketball
        • Boxing
        • College Football
        • F1
        • Football
        • Super Bowl
        • Golf
        • Hockey
        • Horse Racing
        • March Madness
        • Soccer
        • UFC
        • World Cup
      • Betting Apps
        • Back
        • Betting Apps
        • Best Sports Betting Apps USA
        • Ontario Sports Betting Apps
      • Rest of World
        • Back
        • Rest of World
        • UK Betting Offers
          • Back
          • UK Betting Offers
          • UK Betting Sites
          • bet365 Bonus Code UK
          • 888Sport Promo Code UK
          • William Hill Sign up Offer
          • Betway Sign up Offer
          • BetVictor Bonus Code UK
      • Betting Guides
        • Back
        • Betting Guides
        • All Guides
        • Glossary
        • Betting Calculators
          • Back
          • Betting Calculators
          • Odds Converter
          • Parlay Calculator
        • Futures Betting Guide
        • Moneyline Betting Guide
        • Over/Under Betting Guide
        • Parlay Betting Guide
        • Point Spread Betting Guide
        • Prop Betting Guide
        • Sports Betting Guides
          • Back
          • Sports Betting Guides
          • How To Bet On Sports Guide
          • NFL Betting Guide
          • NHL Betting Guide
          • NBA Betting Guide
          • MLB Betting Guide
          • NCAAB Betting Guide
          • NCAAF Betting Guide
          • Golf Betting Guide
          • Tennis Betting Guide
        • Teaser Betting Guide
      • Betting News
        • Back
        • Betting News
        • All News
        • Industry News
        • Podcasts
        • Covers Videos
        • Covers Writers
        • Offers & Boosts
    • Promos
      • Sportsbook Promos
      • Canada Sportsbook Promos
      • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • bet365 Bonus Code
        • BET99 Promo Code
        • BetMGM Bonus Code
        • BetRivers Bonus Code
        • Caesars Sportsbook Promo
        • DraftKings Promo Code
        • Fanatics Sportsbook Promo
        • FanDuel Promo Code
        • Hard Rock Bet Promo Code
        • Sports Interaction Promo
        • Stake Promo Code
        • theScore Bet Promo Code
        • TonyBet Promo Code
      • Bonuses By Region
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Region
        • Arkansas Promos
        • Arizona Promos
        • Colorado Promos
        • Connecticut Promos
        • DC Promos
        • Illinois Promos
        • Indiana Promos
        • Iowa Promos
        • Kansas Promos
        • Kentucky Promos
        • Louisiana Promos
        • Maine Promos
        • Maryland Promos
        • Massachusetts Promos
        • Michigan Promos
        • Missouri Promos
        • New Jersey Promos
        • New York Promos
        • North Carolina Promos
        • Ohio Promos
        • Pennsylvania Promos
        • Tennessee Promos
        • Vermont Promos
        • Virginia Promos
        • West Virginia Promos
        • Wyoming Promos
    • Forum & Contests
      • All Forums
      • NFL Betting Forum
      • MLB Betting Forum
      • NCAAB Betting Forum
      • NCAAF Betting Forum
      • NBA Betting Forum
      • NHL Betting Forum
      • Soccer Betting Forum
      • Contests
        • Back
        • Contests
        • Contests Home
        • Streak Survivor
        • King of Covers
        • My Contests
    • Casino
      • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Back
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes No-Deposit Bonuses
        • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Back
          • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Crown Coins Promo Code
          • FreeSpin Casino Promo Code
          • Jackpota Promo Code
          • LoneStar Promo Code
          • McLuck Promo Code
          • NoLimitCoins Promo Code
          • Rainbet.us Promo Code
          • RealPrize Promo Code
          • Splash Coins Promo Code
          • Stake.us Promo Code
      • US Casinos
        • Back
        • US Casinos
        • US Online Casinos
        • US Online Casino Bonuses
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • bet365 Casino Promo Code
          • BetMGM Casino Promo Code
          • BetRivers Casino Promo
          • Borgata Casino Bonus Code
          • Caesars Casino Bonus Code
          • DraftKings Casino Promo
          • Fanatics Casino Promo
          • FanDuel Casino Promo Code
          • Golden Nugget Casino Promo
          • Hard Rock Bet Casino Promo
          • Hollywood Casino Promo Code
      • Canada Casinos
        • Back
        • Canada Casinos
        • Canada Online Casinos
        • Provinces
          • Back
          • Provinces
          • Alberta Online Casino
          • BC Online Casino
          • Ontario Online Casinos
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • 7Bit Promo Code
          • BC.GAME Bonus Code
          • BitStarz Promo Code
          • Jack Casino Promo Code
          • JackpotCity Promo Code
          • Rainbet Promo Code
          • Roobet Promo Code
          • Shuffle Promo Code
          • Spin Casino Promo Code
          • TonyBet Casino Bonus Code
    • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Market Apps
      • Prediction Market Promos
      • Kalshi Promo Code
      • Kalshi Referral Code
      • Polymarket Promo Code
      • Polymarket Referral Code
      • FanDuel Predicts Promo Code
      • Gemini Predictions Promo Code
      • Novig Promo Code
      • Underdog Promo Code
      • ProphetX Promo Code
      • OG Promo Code
      • Plus500 Promo Code
      • Betr Promo Code
      • DraftKings Predictions Promo Code
      • Fanatics Markets Promo Code
    • NFL Week 10
      NFL Week 10
      • NFL Odds
      • NFL Picks
      • NFL Prediction Markets
      • NFL Betting Sites
    Covers Account
    Log in Create account
    Join free Log in
    All Forums | Politics

    our government is broken and it can not be fixed

    «First Previous 123 Next Last»
    cd329
    rick3117
    wallstreetcappers
    J_Galt
    SarasotaSlim
    ...
    Participants:
    Search
    Views: 1375
    Posts: 57
    «First Previous 123 Next Last»
     
    cd329
    cd329
    Hall of Fame
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Mar, 2004
    Posts: 23843
    Posted: Apr. 3, 2012 - 3:27 PM ET #26

    Sorry KOAJ, but even the most diehard extreme right wingers i know who hate govt, dont even remotely have the same thoughts as you.

    You have got to be a product of some whacked out internet blogs, because your ideas are not what a civilized society like ours is about.

    I dont understand, since you have no kids and you hate it here so bad, why havent you packed up and moved out of the country to one where you wont have to deal with or pay for the things you hate so much? You must realize America, does indeed benefit you or else you would be gone. If you havent realized by now, that in order for us to have the type of country we have, it takes money to run and that money isnt just gonna come out of the sky, the people living in the country have to for that.

    You need to forgot about how it was in 1776 with a population of 13 million. Our 300 million people dont want to live like that.

    Also you still havent addressed why are you paying for medical insurance, when you arent forced to take it?  And please dont use the tax benefit line, because that only helps you so much. You would do alot better just not paying for health insurance, so why are you sending that money in?  You complain about it, but you arent doing anything about it.

    Far as pensions go, you will never get it and understand it, until the day you get a job that gives you one. Its a benefit of the job. Instead of the employer paying the employee 20 bucks an hour, he pays them 15 bucks an hour and gives them the pension benefit instead.

    And like Wallstreet , said, pension systems have just been underfunded and they also got to stop letting workers pad their pensions. Fix those 2 things and pensions would be just fine.

    Everything isnt a ponzi scheme, thats just the talking heads telling you that bullshit

    Reply

    Sorry KOAJ, but even the most diehard extreme right wingers i know who hate govt, dont even remotely have the same thoughts as you.

    You have got to be a product of some whacked out internet blogs, because your ideas are not what a civilized society like ours is about.

    I dont understand, since you have no kids and you hate it here so bad, why havent you packed up and moved out of the country to one where you wont have to deal with or pay for the things you hate so much? You must realize America, does indeed benefit you or else you would be gone. If you havent realized by now, that in order for us to have the type of country we have, it takes money to run and that money isnt just gonna come out of the sky, the people living in the country have to for that.

    You need to forgot about how it was in 1776 with a population of 13 million. Our 300 million people dont want to live like that.

    Also you still havent addressed why are you paying for medical insurance, when you arent forced to take it?  And please dont use the tax benefit line, because that only helps you so much. You would do alot better just not paying for health insurance, so why are you sending that money in?  You complain about it, but you arent doing anything about it.

    Far as pensions go, you will never get it and understand it, until the day you get a job that gives you one. Its a benefit of the job. Instead of the employer paying the employee 20 bucks an hour, he pays them 15 bucks an hour and gives them the pension benefit instead.

    And like Wallstreet , said, pension systems have just been underfunded and they also got to stop letting workers pad their pensions. Fix those 2 things and pensions would be just fine.

    Everything isnt a ponzi scheme, thats just the talking heads telling you that bullshit

     
    rick3117
    rick3117
    All-Star
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Mar, 2006
    Posts: 14715
    Posted: Apr. 3, 2012 - 5:49 PM ET #27

    Ponzi scheme is paying old investors with new investor's money right?  Not investing the money to grow,  just using it and paying off old investors?  

    I thought that is what Madoff went to jail for.  
    You have to admit there are serious similarities. 

    Just because it is backed by the Govt. does not mean that it is not a Ponzi scheme. 

    I don't get it,  why all the fuss about it now,  Rachael Maddow's new promo is putting out the meme that it is ridiculous to call it a Ponzi scheme.  

    I think it is reasonable. 
    Reply
    Ponzi scheme is paying old investors with new investor's money right?  Not investing the money to grow,  just using it and paying off old investors?  

    I thought that is what Madoff went to jail for.  
    You have to admit there are serious similarities. 

    Just because it is backed by the Govt. does not mean that it is not a Ponzi scheme. 

    I don't get it,  why all the fuss about it now,  Rachael Maddow's new promo is putting out the meme that it is ridiculous to call it a Ponzi scheme.  

    I think it is reasonable. 
     
    rick3117
    rick3117
    All-Star
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Mar, 2006
    Posts: 14715
    Posted: Apr. 3, 2012 - 5:54 PM ET #28

    A Ponzi scheme is a fraudulent investment operation that pays returns to its investors from their own money or the money paid by subsequent investors, rather than from profit earned by the individual or organization running the operation. The Ponzi scheme usually entices new investors by offering higher returns than other investments, in the form of short-term returns that are either abnormally high or unusually consistent. Perpetuation of the high returns requires an ever-increasing flow of money from new investors to keep the scheme going.
    Reply
    A Ponzi scheme is a fraudulent investment operation that pays returns to its investors from their own money or the money paid by subsequent investors, rather than from profit earned by the individual or organization running the operation. The Ponzi scheme usually entices new investors by offering higher returns than other investments, in the form of short-term returns that are either abnormally high or unusually consistent. Perpetuation of the high returns requires an ever-increasing flow of money from new investors to keep the scheme going.
     
    rick3117
    rick3117
    All-Star
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Mar, 2006
    Posts: 14715
    Posted: Apr. 3, 2012 - 5:55 PM ET #29

    Is it just because it is widely accepted not to be a "Fraudulent investment"? 

    I thought that we were all in agreement that dipping into it and using it for budget voodoo was fraudulent. Thus making subsequent investment a fraudulent investment right?? 

    Terribly confused. 
    Reply
    Is it just because it is widely accepted not to be a "Fraudulent investment"? 

    I thought that we were all in agreement that dipping into it and using it for budget voodoo was fraudulent. Thus making subsequent investment a fraudulent investment right?? 

    Terribly confused. 
     
    wallstreetcappers
    wallstreetcappers
    Covers Linesmen
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2003
    Posts: 58466
    Posted: Apr. 3, 2012 - 6:04 PM ET #30

    rick,

    If the future obligation is funded while it is being created, how is that a ponzi?

    A ponzi occurs if the future/current obligation is funded with future contributions.

    That only happens if the funding is improperly collected. 

    The comments started with Koaj complaining about pensions from what I saw.


    Reply
    rick,

    If the future obligation is funded while it is being created, how is that a ponzi?

    A ponzi occurs if the future/current obligation is funded with future contributions.

    That only happens if the funding is improperly collected. 

    The comments started with Koaj complaining about pensions from what I saw.


     
    rick3117
    rick3117
    All-Star
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Mar, 2006
    Posts: 14715
    Posted: Apr. 3, 2012 - 6:09 PM ET #31

    I would say that the "fraudulent" use of the funds. 

    When SS was set up, it was never supposed to be touched. It is my understanding that this is not the case anymore?
    Reply
    I would say that the "fraudulent" use of the funds. 

    When SS was set up, it was never supposed to be touched. It is my understanding that this is not the case anymore?
     
    rick3117
    rick3117
    All-Star
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Mar, 2006
    Posts: 14715
    Posted: Apr. 3, 2012 - 6:10 PM ET #32

    Is it not still on track to be putting out more than it takes in?  or is that another "white man's" lie? 
    Reply
    Is it not still on track to be putting out more than it takes in?  or is that another "white man's" lie? 
     
    wallstreetcappers
    wallstreetcappers
    Covers Linesmen
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2003
    Posts: 58466
    Posted: Apr. 3, 2012 - 6:18 PM ET #33

    rick,

    I wasnt discussing SS, but the same thinking exists..if the future funding is not done with current contributions, then in reality it is a ponzi because we are not wanting to take responsibility with current actions.

    There is the concept of actuarial calculations which adds a wrinkle to the discussion.
    Reply
    rick,

    I wasnt discussing SS, but the same thinking exists..if the future funding is not done with current contributions, then in reality it is a ponzi because we are not wanting to take responsibility with current actions.

    There is the concept of actuarial calculations which adds a wrinkle to the discussion.
     
    J_Galt
    J_Galt
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2012
    Posts: 381
    Posted: Apr. 3, 2012 - 6:22 PM ET #34

    @#33

    If I am funding my future SS, should I not also have the choice how to do that?
    IE privatize social security
    Reply
    @#33

    If I am funding my future SS, should I not also have the choice how to do that?
    IE privatize social security
     
    J_Galt
    J_Galt
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2012
    Posts: 381
    Posted: Apr. 3, 2012 - 6:23 PM ET #35

    By doing that, wouldn't I only run the risk of defrauding only myself
    Reply
    By doing that, wouldn't I only run the risk of defrauding only myself
     
    cd329
    cd329
    Hall of Fame
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Mar, 2004
    Posts: 23843
    Posted: Apr. 3, 2012 - 6:55 PM ET #36

    Quote Originally Posted by rick3117:

    I would say that the "fraudulent" use of the funds. 

    When SS was set up, it was never supposed to be touched. It is my understanding that this is not the case anymore?


    Rick, if the politicians never took money out of SS for other things, there was enough money in SS to last another 100 years without changing anything. Pretty good for a ponzi scheme. Really so sick of hearing ponzi scheme and unsustainable from the talking goofballs on tv. They just beat some words to death, until they are entrenched in regular folks heads.
    Maybe they should start chanting overseas labor or no import tax for American companies making their products overseas.

    Also Rick, if employers didnt offer pensions to employees, they would have to pay more per hour for the jobs. Pensions are just a trade off and maybe when you finally get that cops job you said you were gonna go after, your tune will change.
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by rick3117:

    I would say that the "fraudulent" use of the funds. 

    When SS was set up, it was never supposed to be touched. It is my understanding that this is not the case anymore?


    Rick, if the politicians never took money out of SS for other things, there was enough money in SS to last another 100 years without changing anything. Pretty good for a ponzi scheme. Really so sick of hearing ponzi scheme and unsustainable from the talking goofballs on tv. They just beat some words to death, until they are entrenched in regular folks heads.
    Maybe they should start chanting overseas labor or no import tax for American companies making their products overseas.

    Also Rick, if employers didnt offer pensions to employees, they would have to pay more per hour for the jobs. Pensions are just a trade off and maybe when you finally get that cops job you said you were gonna go after, your tune will change.
     
    cd329
    cd329
    Hall of Fame
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Mar, 2004
    Posts: 23843
    Posted: Apr. 3, 2012 - 6:57 PM ET #37

    Quote Originally Posted by J_Galt:

    @#33

    If I am funding my future SS, should I not also have the choice how to do that?
    IE privatize social security


    If they ever privatized ss, the majority of people wouldnt save shit and when they got older, the govt  {us} would still have to take care of them, so in reality, its way better off to just keep it the way it is, that way, you know you will have a check when you get older. And yes they will fix the system, so dont get your panties in an uproar
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by J_Galt:

    @#33

    If I am funding my future SS, should I not also have the choice how to do that?
    IE privatize social security


    If they ever privatized ss, the majority of people wouldnt save shit and when they got older, the govt  {us} would still have to take care of them, so in reality, its way better off to just keep it the way it is, that way, you know you will have a check when you get older. And yes they will fix the system, so dont get your panties in an uproar
     
    wallstreetcappers
    wallstreetcappers
    Covers Linesmen
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2003
    Posts: 58466
    Posted: Apr. 3, 2012 - 7:04 PM ET #38

    Quote Originally Posted by cd329:



    If they ever privatized ss, the majority of people wouldnt save shit and when they got older, the govt  {us} would still have to take care of them, so in reality, its way better off to just keep it the way it is, that way, you know you will have a check when you get older. And yes they will fix the system, so dont get your panties in an uproar

    Minus the sarcasm the rest is quite true. 

    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by cd329:



    If they ever privatized ss, the majority of people wouldnt save shit and when they got older, the govt  {us} would still have to take care of them, so in reality, its way better off to just keep it the way it is, that way, you know you will have a check when you get older. And yes they will fix the system, so dont get your panties in an uproar

    Minus the sarcasm the rest is quite true. 

     
    SarasotaSlim
    SarasotaSlim
    Covers Rehab
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2007
    Posts: 35594
    Posted: Apr. 3, 2012 - 7:16 PM ET #39

    I don't see where privatized SS would leave the majority of the people flat out broke ...wasn't Bushs plan to only privatize a portion ...?
    Reply
    I don't see where privatized SS would leave the majority of the people flat out broke ...wasn't Bushs plan to only privatize a portion ...?
     
    J_Galt
    J_Galt
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2012
    Posts: 381
    Posted: Apr. 3, 2012 - 7:23 PM ET #40

    @#37

    I can see your point.
    When I set privatize, I probably did not use the right word.

    What I would like is still for a mandatory deduction, but I get to choose where it is invested.
    Apple?
    Gold?
    US treasury bills?
    Or even go the old fashion way, let Uncle sam hold it for me.

    Where I can see it being called a ponzi scheme is to the young people.

    Those that are ready to collect social security may have worked and contributed since they were 15 years old.

    Now 50 years later they are ready to collect....

    Todays 15 year old may have to work 60 or more years to collect
    Reply
    @#37

    I can see your point.
    When I set privatize, I probably did not use the right word.

    What I would like is still for a mandatory deduction, but I get to choose where it is invested.
    Apple?
    Gold?
    US treasury bills?
    Or even go the old fashion way, let Uncle sam hold it for me.

    Where I can see it being called a ponzi scheme is to the young people.

    Those that are ready to collect social security may have worked and contributed since they were 15 years old.

    Now 50 years later they are ready to collect....

    Todays 15 year old may have to work 60 or more years to collect
     
    rick3117
    rick3117
    All-Star
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Mar, 2006
    Posts: 14715
    Posted: Apr. 3, 2012 - 7:40 PM ET #41

    Quote Originally Posted by cd329:



    Rick, if the politicians never took money out of SS for other things, there was enough money in SS to last another 100 years without changing anything. Pretty good for a ponzi scheme. Really so sick of hearing ponzi scheme and unsustainable from the talking goofballs on tv. They just beat some words to death, until they are entrenched in regular folks heads.
    Maybe they should start chanting overseas labor or no import tax for American companies making their products overseas.

    Also Rick, if employers didnt offer pensions to employees, they would have to pay more per hour for the jobs. Pensions are just a trade off and maybe when you finally get that cops job you said you were gonna go after, your tune will change.

    You are agreeing with me. 

    I said that once the money in SS started being diverted, and used for the Voodoo budgets,  it became illegitimate. 

    I think that SS is a good idea,  I think that you should be able to opt out, and the money should never be touched, but govt. has shown time and time again it is incapable of not funneling large sums of money to benefit them and their political aspirations, and personal wealth.  
    the bastardization of the program has made it into a classic ponzi scheme, it is just the way it is.  If it makes you feel better to blame Republicans for that bastardization, then go right ahead, I am sure someone will pop up and remind you of Clinton's Ballanced (lol) budget that fucked with SS.   I am not concerned with who did it I am concerned with how we fix it, make it sustainable, and fair.  

    I do not begrudge pensions, but they should be planned for and should stay solvent.  Larger contributions may be needed to make that happen. 

    Have been approached by the Union at my new job and am having a bit of a personal crises deciding if it is for me or not. 



    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by cd329:



    Rick, if the politicians never took money out of SS for other things, there was enough money in SS to last another 100 years without changing anything. Pretty good for a ponzi scheme. Really so sick of hearing ponzi scheme and unsustainable from the talking goofballs on tv. They just beat some words to death, until they are entrenched in regular folks heads.
    Maybe they should start chanting overseas labor or no import tax for American companies making their products overseas.

    Also Rick, if employers didnt offer pensions to employees, they would have to pay more per hour for the jobs. Pensions are just a trade off and maybe when you finally get that cops job you said you were gonna go after, your tune will change.

    You are agreeing with me. 

    I said that once the money in SS started being diverted, and used for the Voodoo budgets,  it became illegitimate. 

    I think that SS is a good idea,  I think that you should be able to opt out, and the money should never be touched, but govt. has shown time and time again it is incapable of not funneling large sums of money to benefit them and their political aspirations, and personal wealth.  
    the bastardization of the program has made it into a classic ponzi scheme, it is just the way it is.  If it makes you feel better to blame Republicans for that bastardization, then go right ahead, I am sure someone will pop up and remind you of Clinton's Ballanced (lol) budget that fucked with SS.   I am not concerned with who did it I am concerned with how we fix it, make it sustainable, and fair.  

    I do not begrudge pensions, but they should be planned for and should stay solvent.  Larger contributions may be needed to make that happen. 

    Have been approached by the Union at my new job and am having a bit of a personal crises deciding if it is for me or not. 



     
    cd329
    cd329
    Hall of Fame
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Mar, 2004
    Posts: 23843
    Posted: Apr. 3, 2012 - 9:01 PM ET #42

    Quote Originally Posted by rick3117:


    You are agreeing with me. 

    I said that once the money in SS started being diverted, and used for the Voodoo budgets,  it became illegitimate. 

    I think that SS is a good idea,  I think that you should be able to opt out, and the money should never be touched, but govt. has shown time and time again it is incapable of not funneling large sums of money to benefit them and their political aspirations, and personal wealth.  
    the bastardization of the program has made it into a classic ponzi scheme, it is just the way it is.  If it makes you feel better to blame Republicans for that bastardization, then go right ahead, I am sure someone will pop up and remind you of Clinton's Ballanced (lol) budget that fucked with SS.   I am not concerned with who did it I am concerned with how we fix it, make it sustainable, and fair.  

    I do not begrudge pensions, but they should be planned for and should stay solvent.  Larger contributions may be needed to make that happen. 

    Have been approached by the Union at my new job and am having a bit of a personal crises deciding if it is for me or not. 





    Trust me Rick, am blaming both parties for raiding SS for their own pet bullshit projects. SS should have never been able to be used for anything other then what it was designed to be used for.
    The structure of the system isnt a ponzi scheme, for the simple fact that there is always going to be people paying into the system, because its highly unlikely our population is going to go backwards.

    Another group that has contributed to ruining a pretty decent system besides the politicians robbing it like it was their own personal piggy bank, is the large corporations, who by moving the job overseas, has reduced the amount of people paying into the system.
    If these 2 factors alone were removed from the equation SS would be fine for every generation after generation.



    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by rick3117:


    You are agreeing with me. 

    I said that once the money in SS started being diverted, and used for the Voodoo budgets,  it became illegitimate. 

    I think that SS is a good idea,  I think that you should be able to opt out, and the money should never be touched, but govt. has shown time and time again it is incapable of not funneling large sums of money to benefit them and their political aspirations, and personal wealth.  
    the bastardization of the program has made it into a classic ponzi scheme, it is just the way it is.  If it makes you feel better to blame Republicans for that bastardization, then go right ahead, I am sure someone will pop up and remind you of Clinton's Ballanced (lol) budget that fucked with SS.   I am not concerned with who did it I am concerned with how we fix it, make it sustainable, and fair.  

    I do not begrudge pensions, but they should be planned for and should stay solvent.  Larger contributions may be needed to make that happen. 

    Have been approached by the Union at my new job and am having a bit of a personal crises deciding if it is for me or not. 





    Trust me Rick, am blaming both parties for raiding SS for their own pet bullshit projects. SS should have never been able to be used for anything other then what it was designed to be used for.
    The structure of the system isnt a ponzi scheme, for the simple fact that there is always going to be people paying into the system, because its highly unlikely our population is going to go backwards.

    Another group that has contributed to ruining a pretty decent system besides the politicians robbing it like it was their own personal piggy bank, is the large corporations, who by moving the job overseas, has reduced the amount of people paying into the system.
    If these 2 factors alone were removed from the equation SS would be fine for every generation after generation.



     
    rick3117
    rick3117
    All-Star
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Mar, 2006
    Posts: 14715
    Posted: Apr. 3, 2012 - 9:04 PM ET #43

    Can we agree that it has devolved into a ponzi scheme?
    Reply
    Can we agree that it has devolved into a ponzi scheme?
     
    cd329
    cd329
    Hall of Fame
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Mar, 2004
    Posts: 23843
    Posted: Apr. 3, 2012 - 9:04 PM ET #44

    Privatizing SS will never work, no matter how much some of you want to believe thats the answer. Apply a little common sense with some street smarts and you will be able to realize all the bad things that would happen.
    They just need to stop raiding the fund as a first step towards fixing it.
    Reply
    Privatizing SS will never work, no matter how much some of you want to believe thats the answer. Apply a little common sense with some street smarts and you will be able to realize all the bad things that would happen.
    They just need to stop raiding the fund as a first step towards fixing it.
     
    AcerRubrum
    AcerRubrum
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2010
    Posts: 2098
    Posted: Apr. 3, 2012 - 9:30 PM ET #45

    telling them to stop raiding the fund ... LOLOLOLOL  talk about addicts.... those pols on both sides spend spend spend always spend because they make more money and it costs them nothing and they get more votes.....

    never ending.....been going on for a long time and now it is coming to the tipping point. 

    this summer should see a lot of action....


    Reply
    telling them to stop raiding the fund ... LOLOLOLOL  talk about addicts.... those pols on both sides spend spend spend always spend because they make more money and it costs them nothing and they get more votes.....

    never ending.....been going on for a long time and now it is coming to the tipping point. 

    this summer should see a lot of action....


     
    be easy
    be easy
    MVP
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2006
    Posts: 15433
    Posted: Apr. 4, 2012 - 10:05 AM ET #46

    SS is a ponzi that has collapsed in part because the fund was plundered, and mostly because of demographics and inflation. SS pays out more money than they take in.  B

    blame the baby boomers, they are the ones that didn't want to have enough children to keep the scam going
    Reply
    SS is a ponzi that has collapsed in part because the fund was plundered, and mostly because of demographics and inflation. SS pays out more money than they take in.  B

    blame the baby boomers, they are the ones that didn't want to have enough children to keep the scam going
     
    cd329
    cd329
    Hall of Fame
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Mar, 2004
    Posts: 23843
    Posted: Apr. 4, 2012 - 12:31 PM ET #47

    Quote Originally Posted by be easy:

    SS is a ponzi that has collapsed in part because the fund was plundered, and mostly because of demographics and inflation. SS pays out more money than they take in.  B

    blame the baby boomers, they are the ones that didn't want to have enough children to keep the scam going

     

    Be, your post is pure bullshit and totally not true. you keep blaming the baby boomers, but the fact is, they didnt destroy the fund. The politicians are the ones who destroyed it, by constantly pulling money out of it, to use on other shit. If they didnt touch it, that fund would have lasted another 100 years easily, without changing one thing to it.

    Also wouldnt your parents be baby boomers? Dont you have any friends or other relatives who collect SS?  Do you bitch at them about it?

     

     

    One other thing, you still never addressed my health insurance question. Whya re you paying 6k a year for it, if you dont need it? Your not being forced to take it and dont use the tax thing, because you would make out alot better keeping your 6k in insurance payments and filing your taxes with 6k more income. There is no huge benefit, in using health insurance as a dedcution on your taxes.

    Reply

    Quote Originally Posted by be easy:

    SS is a ponzi that has collapsed in part because the fund was plundered, and mostly because of demographics and inflation. SS pays out more money than they take in.  B

    blame the baby boomers, they are the ones that didn't want to have enough children to keep the scam going

     

    Be, your post is pure bullshit and totally not true. you keep blaming the baby boomers, but the fact is, they didnt destroy the fund. The politicians are the ones who destroyed it, by constantly pulling money out of it, to use on other shit. If they didnt touch it, that fund would have lasted another 100 years easily, without changing one thing to it.

    Also wouldnt your parents be baby boomers? Dont you have any friends or other relatives who collect SS?  Do you bitch at them about it?

     

     

    One other thing, you still never addressed my health insurance question. Whya re you paying 6k a year for it, if you dont need it? Your not being forced to take it and dont use the tax thing, because you would make out alot better keeping your 6k in insurance payments and filing your taxes with 6k more income. There is no huge benefit, in using health insurance as a dedcution on your taxes.

     
    wallstreetcappers
    wallstreetcappers
    Covers Linesmen
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2003
    Posts: 58466
    Posted: Apr. 4, 2012 - 12:42 PM ET #48

    cd,

    He is PARTLY correct from how I see it..boomers are to blame, but not for the lack of having kids.

    Boomers got all the fun and none of the cost..SS was not properly funded to anticipate future costs and demand, so yes boomers are to blame..the government should have been upping SS at LEAST to the level of inflation if not higher..because the "costs" for people on SS and that inflation is higher than the overall "core" inflation.


    Reply
    cd,

    He is PARTLY correct from how I see it..boomers are to blame, but not for the lack of having kids.

    Boomers got all the fun and none of the cost..SS was not properly funded to anticipate future costs and demand, so yes boomers are to blame..the government should have been upping SS at LEAST to the level of inflation if not higher..because the "costs" for people on SS and that inflation is higher than the overall "core" inflation.


     
    cd329
    cd329
    Hall of Fame
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Mar, 2004
    Posts: 23843
    Posted: Apr. 4, 2012 - 1:43 PM ET #49

    Quote Originally Posted by wallstreetcappers:

    cd,

    He is PARTLY correct from how I see it..boomers are to blame, but not for the lack of having kids.

    Boomers got all the fun and none of the cost..SS was not properly funded to anticipate future costs and demand, so yes boomers are to blame..the government should have been upping SS at LEAST to the level of inflation if not higher..because the "costs" for people on SS and that inflation is higher than the overall "core" inflation.


     

    They might be partly to blame, but they werent the ones controlling the fund. On top of that, if politicians didnt steal money from the fund and use it for other things, the fund would last well over a 100 more years. So if the fund could last that long, how can you blame the boomers, if the money would have been there. On top of that,the boomers during their working years, had many millions of people with good jobs paying into the system.

    I really dont blame the boomers for this mess, the politicians get this one on their backs.

    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by wallstreetcappers:

    cd,

    He is PARTLY correct from how I see it..boomers are to blame, but not for the lack of having kids.

    Boomers got all the fun and none of the cost..SS was not properly funded to anticipate future costs and demand, so yes boomers are to blame..the government should have been upping SS at LEAST to the level of inflation if not higher..because the "costs" for people on SS and that inflation is higher than the overall "core" inflation.


     

    They might be partly to blame, but they werent the ones controlling the fund. On top of that, if politicians didnt steal money from the fund and use it for other things, the fund would last well over a 100 more years. So if the fund could last that long, how can you blame the boomers, if the money would have been there. On top of that,the boomers during their working years, had many millions of people with good jobs paying into the system.

    I really dont blame the boomers for this mess, the politicians get this one on their backs.

     
     
    wallstreetcappers
    wallstreetcappers
    Covers Linesmen
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2003
    Posts: 58466
    Posted: Apr. 4, 2012 - 2:12 PM ET #50

    So do you think that the ammt paid in is lesser or greater than the benefits taken out?

    COLA's come from where exactly? From investing the money?

    I get a massive kick out of my inlaws and their views on SS, that COLAs were promised and should be given..even though there were not proper pay-in adjustments over the decades they contributed..nor the fact that Medicare IS an extension of SS in reality..and most definitely that has not been funded properly at all.

    SS should have been double what it was..maybe even higher.
    Reply
    So do you think that the ammt paid in is lesser or greater than the benefits taken out?

    COLA's come from where exactly? From investing the money?

    I get a massive kick out of my inlaws and their views on SS, that COLAs were promised and should be given..even though there were not proper pay-in adjustments over the decades they contributed..nor the fact that Medicare IS an extension of SS in reality..and most definitely that has not been funded properly at all.

    SS should have been double what it was..maybe even higher.
    All Forums | Politics
    «First Previous 123 Next Last»

    Hot Forums IconHot Forum Topics

    • Serious Streak Survivor Strategies 1,918,783
    • 🏈🏈🏈 Fubah2's risky CFB bets 301,577
    • PART DEUX 129
    • Thursday 11/12/2026 568
    • I'm embarrassed for Trump supporters 63,611
    • SKINS/GIANTS live in game comments welcome 609
    • Dallas Mavericks +6 2,473
    • Florida Man Thursday 3,847
    • Friday 11/13/2026 288
    • *** THURS. NCAAF *** 3,737

    Warning - External Link

    Report User

    Thank you for reporting
    This content is abusive or harmful
    This post is spam
    An error has occurred
    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

    Delete Post

    Are you sure you would like to remove this post?

    Remove Thread

    Are you sure you would like to remove this thread?

    Scan Results

    Login/Register

    Happy to have you join the conversation. To do so, please login or create an account.
    Accounts are free and easy to create.

    Search


    Loading…

    Loading…

    About Us
    Contact Us
    Careers
    Our Team
    Brand
    Testimonials
    Betting Guides
    Sportsbook Reviews
    Betting News
    Podcasts
    Responsible Gambling
    Betting Sites
    US Betting Sites
    Canada Betting Sites
    Canada Casinos
    Best Betting Apps
    Contests
    Streak Survivor
    King of Covers
    Office Pools
    The Covers community has
    810,221
    lifetime members worldwide
    Join our community today
    Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
    Covers is the world
    leader in sports
    betting information.
    21+
    Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER
    Help Privacy Privacy Choices Terms of Service Cookies Sitemap Forum
    YouTube logo
    Facebook logo
    Twitter logo
    Instagram logo
    LinkedIn logo
    Google News logo
    Covers is verified safe by:
    Evalon Logo Logo GPWA Logo GDPR logo Logo GeoTrust logo Logo
    Covers Logo
    Copyright © 1995 - 2026 Genius Sports. All Rights Reserved.
    If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.