• Forums
  • Best Betting Sites
  • Sportsbook Promos
  • Best Sports Betting Apps
  • NFL Betting Forum
  • NBA Betting Forum
  • MLB Betting Forum
  • NHL Betting Forum
  • NCAAF Betting Forum
  • NCAAB Betting Forum
  • Soccer Betting Forum
  • Tennis Betting Forum
  • General Discussion
  • Help Forum
  • Guidelines
  • FAQ
  • Forum Updates
    Covers Logo
    Covers App
    Faster picks. Smarter bets.
    All in the NEW Covers App
    Download on the App Store Download on the Google Play Store
    • Sports
      • NFL
        • Back
        • NFL
        • NFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NFL Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NCAAF
        • Back
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAF Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NCAAF Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NBA
        • Back
        • NBA
        • NBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • NCAAB
        • Back
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • NCAAB Picks
        • Injuries
      • MLB
        • Back
        • MLB
        • MLB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • MLB Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NHL
        • Back
        • NHL
        • NHL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NHL Picks
        • Injuries
      • Soccer
      • UFC
      • WNBA
        • Back
        • WNBA
        • WNBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • WNBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • CFL
        • Back
        • CFL
        • CFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • CFL Picks
      • Golf
        • Back
        • Golf
        • Golf Home
        • Golf Odds
        • Masters Odds
        • PGA Championship Odds
        • US Open Odds
        • British Open Odds
        • Ryder Cup Odds
        • Golf Picks
    • Odds
      • All Odds
      • NFL
      • NCAAF
      • NBA
      • NCAAB
      • MLB
      • NHL
      • Golf
      • Soccer Odds
        • Back
        • Soccer Odds
        • MLS Odds
        • Champions League Odds
        • Premier League Odds
      • UFC
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • Election Odds
      • Futures
        • Back
        • Futures
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • MLB
        • NHL
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAF
      • Sports Odds History
    • Picks
      • All Picks
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • NHL
      • MLB
      • NCAAF
      • NCAAB
      • Golf
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • User Picks
      • Team User Picks
      • Consensus Picks
        • Back
        • Consensus Picks
        • All Consensus Picks
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • NHL
        • MLB
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAB
        • CFL
        • WNBA
        • Consensus FAQ
        • Public Money
    • Prop Projections
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • MLB
      • NHL
    • Betting
      • US Betting Sites
      • Canada Betting Sites
      • Sportsbook Reviews
      • States
        • Back
        • States
        • US Legal Tracker
        • Revenue Tracker
        • Arizona
        • Arkansas
        • California
        • Colorado
        • Connecticut
        • DC
        • Florida
        • Georgia
        • Illinois
        • Indiana
        • Iowa
        • Kansas
        • Kentucky
        • Louisiana
        • Maine
        • Maryland
        • Massachusetts
        • Michigan
        • Mississippi
        • Missouri
        • Nevada
        • New Hampshire
        • New Jersey
        • New York
        • North Carolina
        • Ohio
        • Oregon
        • Pennsylvania
        • Tennessee
        • Texas
        • Vermont
        • Virginia
        • West Virginia
        • Wyoming
      • Provinces
        • Back
        • Provinces
        • Alberta
        • British Columbia
        • Manitoba
        • New Brunswick
        • Newfoundland and Labrador
        • Northwest Territories
        • Nova Scotia
        • Nunavut
        • Ontario
        • Prince Edward Island
        • Quebec (English)
        • Quebec (francais)
        • Saskatchewan
        • Yukon
      • By Sport
        • Back
        • By Sport
        • Baseball
        • Basketball
        • Boxing
        • College Football
        • F1
        • Football
        • Super Bowl
        • Golf
        • Hockey
        • Horse Racing
        • March Madness
        • Soccer
        • UFC
        • World Cup
      • Betting Apps
        • Back
        • Betting Apps
        • Best Sports Betting Apps USA
        • Ontario Sports Betting Apps
      • Rest of World
        • Back
        • Rest of World
        • UK Betting Offers
          • Back
          • UK Betting Offers
          • UK Betting Sites
          • bet365 Bonus Code UK
          • 888Sport Promo Code UK
          • William Hill Sign up Offer
          • Betway Sign up Offer
          • BetVictor Bonus Code UK
      • Betting Guides
        • Back
        • Betting Guides
        • All Guides
        • Glossary
        • Betting Calculators
          • Back
          • Betting Calculators
          • Odds Converter
          • Parlay Calculator
        • Futures Betting Guide
        • Moneyline Betting Guide
        • Over/Under Betting Guide
        • Parlay Betting Guide
        • Point Spread Betting Guide
        • Prop Betting Guide
        • Sports Betting Guides
          • Back
          • Sports Betting Guides
          • How To Bet On Sports Guide
          • NFL Betting Guide
          • NHL Betting Guide
          • NBA Betting Guide
          • MLB Betting Guide
          • NCAAB Betting Guide
          • NCAAF Betting Guide
          • Golf Betting Guide
          • Tennis Betting Guide
        • Teaser Betting Guide
      • Betting News
        • Back
        • Betting News
        • All News
        • Industry News
        • Podcasts
        • Covers Videos
        • Covers Writers
        • Offers & Boosts
    • Promos
      • Sportsbook Promos
      • Canada Sportsbook Promos
      • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • bet365 Bonus Code
        • BET99 Promo Code
        • BetMGM Bonus Code
        • BetRivers Bonus Code
        • Caesars Sportsbook Promo
        • DraftKings Promo Code
        • Fanatics Sportsbook Promo
        • FanDuel Promo Code
        • Hard Rock Bet Promo Code
        • Sports Interaction Promo
        • Stake Promo Code
        • theScore Bet Promo Code
        • TonyBet Promo Code
      • Bonuses By Region
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Region
        • Arkansas Promos
        • Arizona Promos
        • Colorado Promos
        • Connecticut Promos
        • DC Promos
        • Illinois Promos
        • Indiana Promos
        • Iowa Promos
        • Kansas Promos
        • Kentucky Promos
        • Louisiana Promos
        • Maine Promos
        • Maryland Promos
        • Massachusetts Promos
        • Michigan Promos
        • Missouri Promos
        • New Jersey Promos
        • New York Promos
        • North Carolina Promos
        • Ohio Promos
        • Pennsylvania Promos
        • Tennessee Promos
        • Vermont Promos
        • Virginia Promos
        • West Virginia Promos
        • Wyoming Promos
    • Forum & Contests
      • All Forums
      • NFL Betting Forum
      • MLB Betting Forum
      • NCAAB Betting Forum
      • NCAAF Betting Forum
      • NBA Betting Forum
      • NHL Betting Forum
      • Soccer Betting Forum
      • Contests
        • Back
        • Contests
        • Contests Home
        • Streak Survivor
        • King of Covers
        • My Contests
    • Casino
      • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Back
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes No-Deposit Bonuses
        • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Back
          • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Card Crush
          • Casino.click
          • Chanced Casino
          • Crown Coins Casino
          • FreeSpin Casino
          • LoneStar
          • McLuck
          • Mega Bonanza Casino
          • PlayFame
          • Pulsz
          • Stake.us
      • US Casinos
        • Back
        • US Casinos
        • US Online Casinos
        • US Online Casino Bonuses
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • bet365 Casino Promo Code
          • BetRivers Casino Promo
          • Borgata Casino Bonus Code
          • Caesars Casino Bonus Code
          • DraftKings Casino Promo
          • Fanatics Casino Promo
          • FanDuel Casino Promo Code
          • Golden Nugget Casino Promo
          • Hard Rock Bet Casino Promo
          • Hollywood Casino Promo Code
      • Canada Casinos
        • Back
        • Canada Casinos
        • Canada Online Casinos
        • Provinces
          • Back
          • Provinces
          • Alberta Online Casino
          • BC Online Casino
          • Ontario Online Casinos
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • BC.GAME Bonus Code
          • Cloudbet Promo Code
          • RainBet Promo Code
          • Roobet Promo Code
          • Shuffle Promo Code
          • Thrill Promo Code
    • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Market Apps
      • Prediction Market Promos
      • Kalshi Promo Code
      • Polymarket Promo Code
      • DraftKings Predictions Promo Code
      • Novig Promo Code
      • ProphetX Promo Code
      • Underdog Promo Code
      • OG Promo Code
      • Fanatics Markets Promo Code
      • Plus500 Promo Code
    • NFL Week 1
      NFL Week 1
      • NFL Picks
      • NFL Odds
      • 49ers vs. Rams Prediction
      • 49ers vs. Rams TD Picks
      • 49ers vs. Rams Prop Picks
      • ATS Picks
      • NFL Betting Sites
    Covers Account
    Log in Create account
    Join free Log in
    All Forums | Politics

    Pelosi

    «First Previous 123 Next Last»
    darkhorse12
    ilsp2003
    SarasotaSlim
    nature1970
    Crusher13
    ...
    Participants:
    Search model icon
    Views: 2030
    Posts: 54
    «First Previous 123 Next Last»
     
    darkhorse12
    darkhorse12
    All-Star
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2004
    Posts: 10739
    Posted: Jun. 23, 2017 - 7:52 PM ET #26

    Quote Originally Posted by Killer_B:

    July 31 — The New York Times reports on Trump Campaign Manager Paul Manafort’s “business dealings with prominent Ukrainian and Russian tycoons.”

    From you Facebook fact check. And that means exactly what? Clinton approved the sale of 20% of the planets Uranium while her foundations and Billy boy received 10's of $millions for what? And a Trump campaign manager having business dealings with Ukrainian & Russian tycoons makes it to your b.s. "fact" list? wtf? I thought you libs just loved worldwide business dealings? Except when it's related to Trump. He makes money all over the planet, that's no secret, he's a capitalist.

    Here's some advice: Stop crying about the Nov 2016 election and go find a candidate that can beat Trump because he ain't going anywhere.


    He's not a capitalist, he's a shyster! He's lied cheated and stolen to get where he is. He will resign in disgrace like nixon. As for the uranium deal just how many agencies were involved in it? What were the terms of the deal? hint: no uranium was allowed to leave the country. Do yourself a favor and educated yourself. If I was one of your teachers I'd shoot myself.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by Killer_B:

    July 31 — The New York Times reports on Trump Campaign Manager Paul Manafort’s “business dealings with prominent Ukrainian and Russian tycoons.”

    From you Facebook fact check. And that means exactly what? Clinton approved the sale of 20% of the planets Uranium while her foundations and Billy boy received 10's of $millions for what? And a Trump campaign manager having business dealings with Ukrainian & Russian tycoons makes it to your b.s. "fact" list? wtf? I thought you libs just loved worldwide business dealings? Except when it's related to Trump. He makes money all over the planet, that's no secret, he's a capitalist.

    Here's some advice: Stop crying about the Nov 2016 election and go find a candidate that can beat Trump because he ain't going anywhere.


    He's not a capitalist, he's a shyster! He's lied cheated and stolen to get where he is. He will resign in disgrace like nixon. As for the uranium deal just how many agencies were involved in it? What were the terms of the deal? hint: no uranium was allowed to leave the country. Do yourself a favor and educated yourself. If I was one of your teachers I'd shoot myself.
     
    darkhorse12
    darkhorse12
    All-Star
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2004
    Posts: 10739
    Posted: Jun. 23, 2017 - 7:56 PM ET #27

    A key fact ignored in criticisms of Clinton’s supposed involvement in the deal is that the uranium was not — nor could it be — exported, and remained under the control of U.S.-based subsidiaries of Uranium One, according to a statementby the Nuclear Regulatory Commission:
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    A key fact ignored in criticisms of Clinton’s supposed involvement in the deal is that the uranium was not — nor could it be — exported, and remained under the control of U.S.-based subsidiaries of Uranium One, according to a statementby the Nuclear Regulatory Commission:
     
    ilsp2003
    ilsp2003
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Mar, 2004
    Posts: 4587
    Posted: Jun. 23, 2017 - 10:46 PM ET #28

    Quote Originally Posted by SarasotaSlim:




    Yes,, if he were alive ..however he is not ..he's dead so his current age is not 92.  You do have a history of googling up stuff and not fact checking what you cut&paste example  Sen Inouye being dead and another faux in your post  ....Sen Boxer..

    Barbara Boxer, D-Calif.
    Date of birth: November 11, 1940
    Took office: January 3, 1993
    Age at taking office: 52 years
    Current age: 76 years

    Here you are correct on her current age ,,,,except she retired from Congress on January 3, 2017 and was replaced by 52 year old Kamala Harris..and is no longer in office..



    And your point is . Can you prove this ?

    Send me all the posts 

    On January 8, 2015, Boxer announced that she would not seek re-election in 2016. Boxer was in office until 03-January-2017 ( 76 yeras old).

    Kamala Harris took over on 03-January-2017





    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by SarasotaSlim:




    Yes,, if he were alive ..however he is not ..he's dead so his current age is not 92.  You do have a history of googling up stuff and not fact checking what you cut&paste example  Sen Inouye being dead and another faux in your post  ....Sen Boxer..

    Barbara Boxer, D-Calif.
    Date of birth: November 11, 1940
    Took office: January 3, 1993
    Age at taking office: 52 years
    Current age: 76 years

    Here you are correct on her current age ,,,,except she retired from Congress on January 3, 2017 and was replaced by 52 year old Kamala Harris..and is no longer in office..



    And your point is . Can you prove this ?

    Send me all the posts 

    On January 8, 2015, Boxer announced that she would not seek re-election in 2016. Boxer was in office until 03-January-2017 ( 76 yeras old).

    Kamala Harris took over on 03-January-2017





     
    SarasotaSlim
    SarasotaSlim
    Covers Rehab
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2007
    Posts: 35487
    Posted: Jun. 23, 2017 - 11:02 PM ET #29

    My point is you posted that Pelosi is not the only one who needs to to be replaced.  Then you post the names and ages of people you are either dead or retired from Congress as ones who need to be replaced ..when they have already died or been replaced ...using old out dated and incorrect info..is my point..

    Having said that you make a fair observation just your facts are padded..
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    My point is you posted that Pelosi is not the only one who needs to to be replaced.  Then you post the names and ages of people you are either dead or retired from Congress as ones who need to be replaced ..when they have already died or been replaced ...using old out dated and incorrect info..is my point..

    Having said that you make a fair observation just your facts are padded..
     
    ilsp2003
    ilsp2003
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Mar, 2004
    Posts: 4587
    Posted: Jun. 23, 2017 - 11:21 PM ET #30

    Quote Originally Posted by SarasotaSlim:

    My point is you posted that Pelosi is not the only one who needs to to be replaced.  Then you post the names and ages of people you are either dead or retired from Congress as ones who need to be replaced ..when they have already died or been replaced ...using old out dated and incorrect info..is my point..

    Having said that you make a fair observation just your facts are padded..


    Both Inoue and Boxer were over 75 while thye were still members of congress

    You've accused me in a combative/antagonizing way of having  "a history of googling up stuff and not fact checking what I cut&paste".

    don't try to spin it  ..the onus is on you to back up your 
    outrageous accusation with facts.

    Both Inouye and Boxer were  75 years old while they were still members of congress


    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by SarasotaSlim:

    My point is you posted that Pelosi is not the only one who needs to to be replaced.  Then you post the names and ages of people you are either dead or retired from Congress as ones who need to be replaced ..when they have already died or been replaced ...using old out dated and incorrect info..is my point..

    Having said that you make a fair observation just your facts are padded..


    Both Inoue and Boxer were over 75 while thye were still members of congress

    You've accused me in a combative/antagonizing way of having  "a history of googling up stuff and not fact checking what I cut&paste".

    don't try to spin it  ..the onus is on you to back up your 
    outrageous accusation with facts.

    Both Inouye and Boxer were  75 years old while they were still members of congress


     
    nature1970
    nature1970
    Hall of Fame
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2015
    Posts: 21593
    Posted: Jun. 23, 2017 - 11:31 PM ET #31

    she is 'short circuting... unemployement lowest level since Reagan.

    she has literally no idea what she sounded like but had to dig deep for this.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    she is 'short circuting... unemployement lowest level since Reagan.

    she has literally no idea what she sounded like but had to dig deep for this.
     
    nature1970
    nature1970
    Hall of Fame
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2015
    Posts: 21593
    Posted: Jun. 23, 2017 - 11:35 PM ET #32

    early onset of Alzheimer.  for many in american press.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B9prHmcwGxk
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    early onset of Alzheimer.  for many in american press.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B9prHmcwGxk
     
    nature1970
    nature1970
    Hall of Fame
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2015
    Posts: 21593
    Posted: Jun. 23, 2017 - 11:44 PM ET #33

    Quote Originally Posted by darkhorse12:

    A key fact ignored in criticisms of Clinton’s supposed involvement in the deal is that the uranium was not — nor could it be — exported, and remained under the control of U.S.-based subsidiaries of Uranium One, according to a statementby the Nuclear Regulatory Commission:

    we understand democrats like being led by out of touch elderly women who suffer from memory loss. you all endorsed Killary as your nominee. she won that when she announced she was running.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by darkhorse12:

    A key fact ignored in criticisms of Clinton’s supposed involvement in the deal is that the uranium was not — nor could it be — exported, and remained under the control of U.S.-based subsidiaries of Uranium One, according to a statementby the Nuclear Regulatory Commission:

    we understand democrats like being led by out of touch elderly women who suffer from memory loss. you all endorsed Killary as your nominee. she won that when she announced she was running.
     
    Crusher13
    Crusher13
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2009
    Posts: 8038
    Posted: Jun. 23, 2017 - 11:56 PM ET #34

    What's so funny now are all the conservatives and DJT supporting her...can't let such a good thing go..

    But, time for a MAXIMUM age limit...it kills the ears to try and understand some of these incoherent old folks...McCain, Leahy, Pelosi, even Grassley..even Mitch...DJT will be senile soon too

    And these are the BEST our country offers as our leaders..
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    What's so funny now are all the conservatives and DJT supporting her...can't let such a good thing go..

    But, time for a MAXIMUM age limit...it kills the ears to try and understand some of these incoherent old folks...McCain, Leahy, Pelosi, even Grassley..even Mitch...DJT will be senile soon too

    And these are the BEST our country offers as our leaders..
     
    darkhorse12
    darkhorse12
    All-Star
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2004
    Posts: 10739
    Posted: Jun. 23, 2017 - 11:58 PM ET #35

    Quote Originally Posted by nature1970:


    we understand democrats like being led by out of touch elderly women who suffer from memory loss. you all endorsed Killary as your nominee. she won that when she announced she was running.

    Appears that using your logic then the equivalent for you righties would be that you prefer frauds phoneys and attention wh0res.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by nature1970:


    we understand democrats like being led by out of touch elderly women who suffer from memory loss. you all endorsed Killary as your nominee. she won that when she announced she was running.

    Appears that using your logic then the equivalent for you righties would be that you prefer frauds phoneys and attention wh0res.
     
    darkhorse12
    darkhorse12
    All-Star
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2004
    Posts: 10739
    Posted: Jun. 24, 2017 - 12:08 AM ET #36

    Quote Originally Posted by darkhorse12:


    Appears that using your logic then the equivalent for you righties would be that you prefer frauds phoneys and attention wh0res.
    192?
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by darkhorse12:


    Appears that using your logic then the equivalent for you righties would be that you prefer frauds phoneys and attention wh0res.
    192?
     
    SarasotaSlim
    SarasotaSlim
    Covers Rehab
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2007
    Posts: 35487
    Posted: Jun. 24, 2017 - 3:07 AM ET #37

    Quote Originally Posted by ilsp2003:



    don't try to spin it  ..the onus is on you to back up your 
    outrageous accusation with facts.

    Both Inouye and Boxer were  75 years old while they were still members of congress



    Look ilsp2003,, I'am sorry for getting you so upset ..I was just trying to point out the mistakes in your post so we are dealing with accurate fact.. nothing more.....
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by ilsp2003:



    don't try to spin it  ..the onus is on you to back up your 
    outrageous accusation with facts.

    Both Inouye and Boxer were  75 years old while they were still members of congress



    Look ilsp2003,, I'am sorry for getting you so upset ..I was just trying to point out the mistakes in your post so we are dealing with accurate fact.. nothing more.....
     
    Hugh_Jorgan
    Hugh_Jorgan
    Hall of Fame
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2002
    Posts: 22961
    Posted: Jun. 24, 2017 - 6:51 AM ET #38

    Quote Originally Posted by darkhorse12:

    This investigation will take a lot of time since the orange traitor that sits in the big chair keeps trying to stall it.

    As per the MSM, you are correct.

    As per reality, not so much 
    bigreds daddy
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by darkhorse12:

    This investigation will take a lot of time since the orange traitor that sits in the big chair keeps trying to stall it.

    As per the MSM, you are correct.

    As per reality, not so much 
     
    darkhorse12
    darkhorse12
    All-Star
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2004
    Posts: 10739
    Posted: Jun. 24, 2017 - 12:14 PM ET #39

    Quote Originally Posted by Hugh_Jorgan:


    As per the MSM, you are correct.

    As per reality, not so much 

    Time depends on who wants to throw who under the bus.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by Hugh_Jorgan:


    As per the MSM, you are correct.

    As per reality, not so much 

    Time depends on who wants to throw who under the bus.
     
    BWS77
    BWS77
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2010
    Posts: 35351
    Posted: Jun. 24, 2017 - 4:17 PM ET #40

    Quote Originally Posted by Killer_B:

    I'll post the line at -140 she doesn't make 4th of July as Speaker of the House. The Dems knives are coming out and there's nothing more malicious than liberals when they smell blood in the water. 

    I can only hope they leave her in place, especially since she's such and "masterful" legislator (just ask her). The human Coo Coo clock's time is up. 

    One thing about the lefties, when they lose it gets ugly whether is attacking the Electoral College process or a Russian Boogeyman, they lost and someone is responsible and will pay... I love hearing them claim that the 2018 mid-terms are where the Dems will win the House. I guess they don't pay much attention to the trends of the last 8 years. Lose, lose, & lose some more. Please don't change a thing, keep focusing on CO2, which bathroom people should use, and mass immigration from the third world...

    Someone else cried about the Electoral College back in 2012...   what was his name again?   
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by Killer_B:

    I'll post the line at -140 she doesn't make 4th of July as Speaker of the House. The Dems knives are coming out and there's nothing more malicious than liberals when they smell blood in the water. 

    I can only hope they leave her in place, especially since she's such and "masterful" legislator (just ask her). The human Coo Coo clock's time is up. 

    One thing about the lefties, when they lose it gets ugly whether is attacking the Electoral College process or a Russian Boogeyman, they lost and someone is responsible and will pay... I love hearing them claim that the 2018 mid-terms are where the Dems will win the House. I guess they don't pay much attention to the trends of the last 8 years. Lose, lose, & lose some more. Please don't change a thing, keep focusing on CO2, which bathroom people should use, and mass immigration from the third world...

    Someone else cried about the Electoral College back in 2012...   what was his name again?   
     
    ilsp2003
    ilsp2003
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Mar, 2004
    Posts: 4587
    Posted: Jun. 25, 2017 - 6:29 AM ET #41

    Quote Originally Posted by SarasotaSlim:



    Look ilsp2003,, I'am sorry for getting you so upset ..I was just trying to point out the mistakes in your post so we are dealing with accurate fact.. nothing more.....

    I am not upset  and I know you're not sorry  
    I am just tired of your personal attack BS , now you're sorry  

    You can't back up your statement with facts 

      
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by SarasotaSlim:



    Look ilsp2003,, I'am sorry for getting you so upset ..I was just trying to point out the mistakes in your post so we are dealing with accurate fact.. nothing more.....

    I am not upset  and I know you're not sorry  
    I am just tired of your personal attack BS , now you're sorry  

    You can't back up your statement with facts 

      
     
    MoneySRH
    MoneySRH
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2010
    Posts: 8480
    Posted: Jun. 25, 2017 - 8:39 AM ET #42

    Quote Originally Posted by darkhorse12:

    He's not a capitalist, he's a shyster! He's lied cheated and stolen to get where he is. He will resign in disgrace like nixon. As for the uranium deal just how many agencies were involved in it? What were the terms of the deal? hint: no uranium was allowed to leave the country. Do yourself a favor and educated yourself. If I was one of your teachers I'd shoot myself.
    1. The deal was signed with the premise that the Russian owned company would not be private. The company broke its promise. It is private.

    2. The company is not controlled by the US. The Hillary Russian Company is a privately controlled.

    3. Expect evidence that the Hillary Russian uranium has landed in the hands of the Obama pals, the Iranians is going to come out very soon.

    Here are the facts:

    Bill Clinton received a $500,000 speaking fee from a Russian bank tied to the Kremlin before Secretary of State Hillary Clinton helped decide whether to approve the sale to the Russian government of a company that held one-fifth of America’s uranium capacity.

    The Clintons received the $145 million in donations from uranium investors before Russia’s energy agency secured the purchase of Uranium One.

    The Russian government now owns 20 percent of U.S. uranium assets, thanks to Hillary.

    Some of the donations were kept secret, even though the Clintons promised to disclose all donations.

    The acquisition made Russia one of the world’s largest uranium producers and brought Putin closer to his goal of controlling much of the global uranium supply chain.

    The origin of the Clinton Russia deal goes back as far as 2005.

    It does not matter that most of the donations occurred before Hillary was named secretary of state. She was running for president at the time. Being president would’ve helped her Russian pals even more.

    And before you say the deal had to be approved other agencies. The idea that a bunch of liberals are going to deny the queen of the liberals anything is a joke.

    There’s simply too much proof of quid pro quo.

    Hillary is the ultimate traitor. She has taken bribes from Saudi Arabia, Iran, UAE, Oman, Qatar, and Russia. She’s broken well over 16 federal laws. It’s amazing she’s not in prison.

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by darkhorse12:

    He's not a capitalist, he's a shyster! He's lied cheated and stolen to get where he is. He will resign in disgrace like nixon. As for the uranium deal just how many agencies were involved in it? What were the terms of the deal? hint: no uranium was allowed to leave the country. Do yourself a favor and educated yourself. If I was one of your teachers I'd shoot myself.
    1. The deal was signed with the premise that the Russian owned company would not be private. The company broke its promise. It is private.

    2. The company is not controlled by the US. The Hillary Russian Company is a privately controlled.

    3. Expect evidence that the Hillary Russian uranium has landed in the hands of the Obama pals, the Iranians is going to come out very soon.

    Here are the facts:

    Bill Clinton received a $500,000 speaking fee from a Russian bank tied to the Kremlin before Secretary of State Hillary Clinton helped decide whether to approve the sale to the Russian government of a company that held one-fifth of America’s uranium capacity.

    The Clintons received the $145 million in donations from uranium investors before Russia’s energy agency secured the purchase of Uranium One.

    The Russian government now owns 20 percent of U.S. uranium assets, thanks to Hillary.

    Some of the donations were kept secret, even though the Clintons promised to disclose all donations.

    The acquisition made Russia one of the world’s largest uranium producers and brought Putin closer to his goal of controlling much of the global uranium supply chain.

    The origin of the Clinton Russia deal goes back as far as 2005.

    It does not matter that most of the donations occurred before Hillary was named secretary of state. She was running for president at the time. Being president would’ve helped her Russian pals even more.

    And before you say the deal had to be approved other agencies. The idea that a bunch of liberals are going to deny the queen of the liberals anything is a joke.

    There’s simply too much proof of quid pro quo.

    Hillary is the ultimate traitor. She has taken bribes from Saudi Arabia, Iran, UAE, Oman, Qatar, and Russia. She’s broken well over 16 federal laws. It’s amazing she’s not in prison.

     
    sundance
    sundance
    MVP
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Mar, 2002
    Posts: 16783
    Posted: Jun. 25, 2017 - 9:08 AM ET #43

    Lock the white bit** up! Darnit.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Lock the white bit** up! Darnit.
     
    ClubDirt
    ClubDirt
    Hall of Fame
    Participation Meter
    Joined: May, 2003
    Posts: 28196
    Posted: Jun. 25, 2017 - 10:45 AM ET #44

    some of you guys aren't the best with logic but you should be able to see the obvious flaw in your argument about hillary.

    1. hillary lost because she's so hated by so many people.
    2. hillary's committed all of these crimes and it's so obvious from all this "evidence" you guys have
    3. any republican would be go down in history as an absolute hero if he/she successfully prosecuted hillary
    4. republicans control all of government, including the DOJ which actually prosecutes people who commit crimes (not to mention many state law enforcement agencies that have the power to prosecute hillary for state law violations, you know, if she committed all of these crimes)
    5. no one is arresting or prosecuting hillary.  not even close..

    i get that you guys don't understand very well how prosecution and our criminal justice system works.  there's no reason why you would if you don't work in this field.  but, you don't really need to to see the flaw in this idea that hillary is such a criminal.  now, it could be that republicans are so unbelievably incompetent that they have no ability to prosecute someone so obviously guilty to the average rightwinger.  and they are even too scared to try despite the historically awesome payoff.  i will entertain that possibility.  or, it could be that you are being fed a bunch of bullshit and you want to believe it because you know trump hates hates and is a shitshow and this is your psychological way to rationalize a vote for him by convincing yourself hillary is just as bad.


    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    some of you guys aren't the best with logic but you should be able to see the obvious flaw in your argument about hillary.

    1. hillary lost because she's so hated by so many people.
    2. hillary's committed all of these crimes and it's so obvious from all this "evidence" you guys have
    3. any republican would be go down in history as an absolute hero if he/she successfully prosecuted hillary
    4. republicans control all of government, including the DOJ which actually prosecutes people who commit crimes (not to mention many state law enforcement agencies that have the power to prosecute hillary for state law violations, you know, if she committed all of these crimes)
    5. no one is arresting or prosecuting hillary.  not even close..

    i get that you guys don't understand very well how prosecution and our criminal justice system works.  there's no reason why you would if you don't work in this field.  but, you don't really need to to see the flaw in this idea that hillary is such a criminal.  now, it could be that republicans are so unbelievably incompetent that they have no ability to prosecute someone so obviously guilty to the average rightwinger.  and they are even too scared to try despite the historically awesome payoff.  i will entertain that possibility.  or, it could be that you are being fed a bunch of bullshit and you want to believe it because you know trump hates hates and is a shitshow and this is your psychological way to rationalize a vote for him by convincing yourself hillary is just as bad.


     
    darkhorse12
    darkhorse12
    All-Star
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2004
    Posts: 10739
    Posted: Jun. 25, 2017 - 12:11 PM ET #45

    Quote Originally Posted by MoneySRH:

     1. The deal was signed with the premise that the Russian owned company would not be private. The company broke its promise. It is private.

    2. The company is not controlled by the US. The Hillary Russian Company is a privately controlled.

    3. Expect evidence that the Hillary Russian uranium has landed in the hands of the Obama pals, the Iranians is going to come out very soon.

    Here are the facts:

    Bill Clinton received a $500,000 speaking fee from a Russian bank tied to the Kremlin before Secretary of State Hillary Clinton helped decide whether to approve the sale to the Russian government of a company that held one-fifth of America’s uranium capacity.

    The Clintons received the $145 million in donations from uranium investors before Russia’s energy agency secured the purchase of Uranium One.

    The Russian government now owns 20 percent of U.S. uranium assets, thanks to Hillary.

    Some of the donations were kept secret, even though the Clintons promised to disclose all donations.

    The acquisition made Russia one of the world’s largest uranium producers and brought Putin closer to his goal of controlling much of the global uranium supply chain.

    The origin of the Clinton Russia deal goes back as far as 2005.

    It does not matter that most of the donations occurred before Hillary was named secretary of state. She was running for president at the time. Being president would’ve helped her Russian pals even more.

    And before you say the deal had to be approved other agencies. The idea that a bunch of liberals are going to deny the queen of the liberals anything is a joke.

    There’s simply too much proof of quid pro quo.

    Hillary is the ultimate traitor. She has taken bribes from Saudi Arabia, Iran, UAE, Oman, Qatar, and Russia. She’s broken well over 16 federal laws. It’s amazing she’s not in prison.


    https://web.archive.org/web/20170129043258/https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/news/2010/10-211.pdf

    https://www.snopes.com/hillary-clinton-uranium-russia-deal/

    https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2017/mar/28/fact-checking-donald-trumps-tweets-about-hillary-c/


    #3. It's been 7 + years.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by MoneySRH:

     1. The deal was signed with the premise that the Russian owned company would not be private. The company broke its promise. It is private.

    2. The company is not controlled by the US. The Hillary Russian Company is a privately controlled.

    3. Expect evidence that the Hillary Russian uranium has landed in the hands of the Obama pals, the Iranians is going to come out very soon.

    Here are the facts:

    Bill Clinton received a $500,000 speaking fee from a Russian bank tied to the Kremlin before Secretary of State Hillary Clinton helped decide whether to approve the sale to the Russian government of a company that held one-fifth of America’s uranium capacity.

    The Clintons received the $145 million in donations from uranium investors before Russia’s energy agency secured the purchase of Uranium One.

    The Russian government now owns 20 percent of U.S. uranium assets, thanks to Hillary.

    Some of the donations were kept secret, even though the Clintons promised to disclose all donations.

    The acquisition made Russia one of the world’s largest uranium producers and brought Putin closer to his goal of controlling much of the global uranium supply chain.

    The origin of the Clinton Russia deal goes back as far as 2005.

    It does not matter that most of the donations occurred before Hillary was named secretary of state. She was running for president at the time. Being president would’ve helped her Russian pals even more.

    And before you say the deal had to be approved other agencies. The idea that a bunch of liberals are going to deny the queen of the liberals anything is a joke.

    There’s simply too much proof of quid pro quo.

    Hillary is the ultimate traitor. She has taken bribes from Saudi Arabia, Iran, UAE, Oman, Qatar, and Russia. She’s broken well over 16 federal laws. It’s amazing she’s not in prison.


    https://web.archive.org/web/20170129043258/https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/news/2010/10-211.pdf

    https://www.snopes.com/hillary-clinton-uranium-russia-deal/

    https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2017/mar/28/fact-checking-donald-trumps-tweets-about-hillary-c/


    #3. It's been 7 + years.
     
    nature1970
    nature1970
    Hall of Fame
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2015
    Posts: 21593
    Posted: Jun. 25, 2017 - 10:15 PM ET #46

    hillary rodham clinton was a very bad choice. super delegates thought that against donald trump she was going to be president.

    The campaign made a vital mistake, She did not pick Bernie as her running mate. If she had she would of swept the election, but i guess that was comeys fault or the uneducated masses fault or Russian state hacking teams fault. Maybe it was comeys fault or the hundred other excuses . She could come up with but it was her fault for not uniting the party .... and thank god for her arrogance.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    hillary rodham clinton was a very bad choice. super delegates thought that against donald trump she was going to be president.

    The campaign made a vital mistake, She did not pick Bernie as her running mate. If she had she would of swept the election, but i guess that was comeys fault or the uneducated masses fault or Russian state hacking teams fault. Maybe it was comeys fault or the hundred other excuses . She could come up with but it was her fault for not uniting the party .... and thank god for her arrogance.
     
    Hawky
    Hawky
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Apr, 2014
    Posts: 3439
    Posted: Jun. 26, 2017 - 3:26 AM ET #47

    can anyone name one russian yet? besides the one comey tried to pay to take the fall. there arent any.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    can anyone name one russian yet? besides the one comey tried to pay to take the fall. there arent any.
     
    MoneySRH
    MoneySRH
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2010
    Posts: 8480
    Posted: Jun. 26, 2017 - 8:28 AM ET #48

    Quote Originally Posted by darkhorse12:


    https://web.archive.org/web/20170129043258/https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/news/2010/10-211.pdf

    https://www.snopes.com/hillary-clinton-uranium-russia-deal/

    https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2017/mar/28/fact-checking-donald-trumps-tweets-about-hillary-c/


    #3. It's been 7 + years.
    Politifact is fake fact checking liberal funded website. Don’t believe me?
    https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/blog/2011/oct/06/who-pays-for-politifact/                 
    PolitiFact doesn’t even hide it.

    PolitiFact donors:

    Tampa Bay Times (Endorsed Hillary for President)
    The Democracy Fund (Donated to the Clinton Foundation)
    The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (Partners with the Clinton Foundation)
    The Knight Foundation (Donated to the Clinton Foundation and has ties to George Soros)
    The Ford Foundation (Donated to the Clinton Foundation)

    PolitiFact donors have also donated money to Obama, Harry Reid, Nancy Pelosi, the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee and the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee.

    Snoops is another fake fact checking liberal website.

    The so called “fact checkers” are a former husband and wife from loony left California, with no background or training or education in research investigation whatsoever. The other two so called “fact checkers” are a hooker/porn star and a sex blogger.

    PolitiFact and Snoops are both nothing but liberal fake fact checking websites.

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by darkhorse12:


    https://web.archive.org/web/20170129043258/https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/news/2010/10-211.pdf

    https://www.snopes.com/hillary-clinton-uranium-russia-deal/

    https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2017/mar/28/fact-checking-donald-trumps-tweets-about-hillary-c/


    #3. It's been 7 + years.
    Politifact is fake fact checking liberal funded website. Don’t believe me?
    https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/blog/2011/oct/06/who-pays-for-politifact/                 
    PolitiFact doesn’t even hide it.

    PolitiFact donors:

    Tampa Bay Times (Endorsed Hillary for President)
    The Democracy Fund (Donated to the Clinton Foundation)
    The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (Partners with the Clinton Foundation)
    The Knight Foundation (Donated to the Clinton Foundation and has ties to George Soros)
    The Ford Foundation (Donated to the Clinton Foundation)

    PolitiFact donors have also donated money to Obama, Harry Reid, Nancy Pelosi, the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee and the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee.

    Snoops is another fake fact checking liberal website.

    The so called “fact checkers” are a former husband and wife from loony left California, with no background or training or education in research investigation whatsoever. The other two so called “fact checkers” are a hooker/porn star and a sex blogger.

    PolitiFact and Snoops are both nothing but liberal fake fact checking websites.

     
    Killer_B
    Killer_B
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2007
    Posts: 6288
    Posted: Jun. 26, 2017 - 5:30 PM ET #49

    Average age of a Democratic house member: 76
    Average age of a Republican house member: 49

    (From today's USA today)

    The Dems need a youth movement in a big way....
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Average age of a Democratic house member: 76
    Average age of a Republican house member: 49

    (From today's USA today)

    The Dems need a youth movement in a big way....
     
     
    jdr016
    jdr016
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2006
    Posts: 6591
    Posted: Jun. 26, 2017 - 5:37 PM ET #50

    Just because someone endorsed or donated to a fund doesn't make up their political beliefs. 

    For example: Bill Gates donated to both Democratic and Republican causes.

    Patriots owner Robert Kraft donated an equal amount to Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump. 

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Just because someone endorsed or donated to a fund doesn't make up their political beliefs. 

    For example: Bill Gates donated to both Democratic and Republican causes.

    Patriots owner Robert Kraft donated an equal amount to Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump. 

    All Forums | Politics
    «First Previous 123 Next Last»

    Hot Forums IconHot Forum Topics

    • 🤢🥴💩_ Fubah's risky baseball bets _🥶😲🥵 445,973 Covers arrow
    • 🏈🏈🏈 “To BEt, or not to BEt, that is the question” ...Fubah2's risky bets 301,682 Covers arrow
    • PART DEUX 347 Covers arrow
    • 🏈🏈🏈 Fubah2's risky CFB bets 253,398 Covers arrow
    • Patriots vs Seahawks in-game live season kickoff 1,417 Covers arrow
    • Wednesday 09/09/2026 825 Covers arrow
    • PART TROIS 264 Covers arrow
    • 9/9 🫣🫣🔥🔥🔥 4,602 Covers arrow
    • Couple thoughts 4,033 Covers arrow
    • NFL LOCKED IN! 95,222 Covers arrow

    Warning - External Link

    Report User

    Thank you for reporting
    This content is abusive or harmful
    This post is spam
    An error has occurred
    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

    Delete Post

    Are you sure you would like to remove this post?

    Remove Thread

    Are you sure you would like to remove this thread?

    Scan Results

    Login/Register

    Happy to have you join the conversation. To do so, please login or create an account.
    Accounts are free and easy to create.

    Search


    Loading…

    Loading…

    About Us
    Contact Us
    Careers
    Our Team
    Brand
    Testimonials
    Betting Guides
    Sportsbook Reviews
    Betting News
    Podcasts
    Responsible Gambling
    Betting Sites
    US Betting Sites
    Canada Betting Sites
    Canada Casinos
    Best Betting Apps
    Contests
    Streak Survivor
    King of Covers
    Ultimate Race
    Office Pools
    The Covers community has
    810,221
    lifetime members worldwide
    Join our community today
    Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
    Covers is the world
    leader in sports
    betting information.
    21+
    Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER
    Help Privacy Terms of Service Cookies Sitemap Forum
    YouTube logo
    Facebook logo
    Twitter logo
    Instagram logo
    LinkedIn logo
    Google News logo
    Covers is verified safe by:
    Evalon Logo Logo GPWA Logo GDPR logo Logo GeoTrust logo Logo PCI DSS logo Logo
    Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Ltd. All Rights Reserved.
    If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.